Neimat, Joseph S.

Since its US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2016, magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy has grown into one of the procedures of choice among patients with essential tremor (ET). Approved applications for the procedure have expanded over time from unilateral thalamotomy to treat ET and Parkinson disease tremor to bilateral staged thalamotomy for ET. As the procedure expands to healthcare environments beyond large academic centers, guidance is required to ensure that the responsible clinicians are appropriately trained to undertake this operative procedure. Although multidisciplinary movement disorder teams are important for the optimal management of patients, MRgFUS lesions are inherently surgical interventions. Neurosurgeons are trained to evaluate these patients, consider surgical alternatives and conduct these operations, particularly after completing a fellowship in the subspecialty of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. At present, all high-level evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of MRgFUS lesions to treat movement disorders derives from procedures performed by neurosurgeons, so those results may not be generalizable to other physicians. Based on these considerations and potential liability issues, the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, which acts as the joint section representing the field of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery on behalf of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, puts forth this position statement that only neurosurgeons appropriately trained to conduct functional neurosurgery procedures should conduct MRgFUS surgical lesions.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of responsive thalamic stimulation as adjunctive therapy for drug‐resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) with generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCSs). Methods NAUTILUS is a prospective, multicenter, single‐blind, randomized sham‐controlled pivotal trial. Patients were ≥12 years of age with drug‐resistant IGE and ≥2 GTCSs over a 3‐month baseline. Bilateral depth leads were targeted to the centromedian thalamus. One month later, patients were randomized to Active (responsive stimulation, n = 44) or Sham (no stimulation, n = 43). The effectiveness evaluation period (EEP) began 3 months postimplant through 1 year. After a second GTCS in the EEP, patients transitioned to open‐label active stimulation. The primary safety endpoint was the serious adverse device‐related event (SADE) rate at 84 days postimplant. The primary effectiveness endpoint was time‐to‐second‐GTCS during the EEP. Additional endpoints included median percent change in days with any generalized seizure, GTCS frequency, and responder rate (RR). Results Eighty‐seven patients were implanted across 23 US centers. The SADE rate was significantly below the performance goal (6.9%, p < .0001), with no adverse effects on cognition, mood, or sleep. The prespecified primary effectiveness endpoint was not significant. However, a post hoc mixed‐effects model considering all EEP days demonstrated greater GTCS reduction in the originally randomized Active group (61%) compared to patients originally randomized to Sham (49%, p = .030). Eighteen‐month outcomes included 76.8% median GTCS reduction, 62.5% RR, 40% GTCS‐free at that timepoint, and 77.8% median reduction in days with any generalized seizure. More than 90% of patients and 86% of physicians reported improvement on Global Impression of Change scales. Significance NAUTILUS is the first randomized controlled neuromodulation trial in IGE. Responsive thalamic stimulation provided a clinically meaningful and durable reduction in seizures with an acceptable safety profile, offering a much‐needed option for drug‐resistant IGE.

Background Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE). Objective To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries. Methods PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31–11.70%; vascular: 0.52–22.90%; oncology: 0.94–17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31–12%; vascular: 0.40–1.96% and oncology: 0.84–1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower. Conclusions Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.

OBJECTIVE Magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy has become a popular tool in the neurosurgical armamentarium for managing tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). METHODS Given the recent exponential growth in the use of this technology, the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, which acts as the joint section representing the field of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery on behalf of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, provides an update on treatment indications and the efficacy and safety of MRgFUS for the treatment of tremor. RESULTS In ET, the efficacy of MRgFUS thalamotomy is supported by several open-label and 1 prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) that showed a 47% improvement in hand tremor in the short term. Follow-up studies demonstrated that the benefits of MRgFUS for ET are sustained in the long term. Studies investigating the effects of bilateral staged MRgFUS thalamotomy in patients with ET have shown that tremor improvement on the second side was as significant as that observed after the first procedure. The efficacy of MRgFUS thalamotomy for PD tremor is supported by a systematic meta-analysis that consisted predominantly of smaller, nonrandomized studies; 1 RCT; and 1 prospective cohort study. Despite a significant short-term improvement in PD tremor, the long-term effects of this therapy remain unknown. Common early adverse effects of MRgFUS thalamotomy include gait disturbance and paresthesias. These, however, tend to subside over time. Other reported side effects are dysarthria, ataxia, taste disturbance, motor deficits, and speech difficulty. CONCLUSIONS MRgFUS thalamotomy is a safe, effective, and durable intervention for refractory ET in appropriately selected patients. The procedure appears to be safe and effective for PD tremor, although the long-term durability of the technique remains a concern. Early experience with bilateral staged lesions for ET suggests the procedure to be safe and effective.

Importance The Implantable Neurostimulator for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease (INTREPID) trial was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). Objective To evaluate the long-term (5-year) outcomes and safety of STN-DBS for PD. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, randomized (3:1), 12-week double-blind sham-controlled study at 23 movement disorder centers across the US with an open-label 5-year follow-up. Patients were implanted and followed up with the Vercise DBS system from May 2013 to December 2022. Eligibility required diagnosis of bilateral idiopathic PD with more than 5 years of motor symptoms, more than 6 hours per day of poor motor function, modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale scores higher than 2, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) score of 30 or higher (medication-off state), and 33% or higher improvement in UPDRS-III medication-on score. Intervention Bilateral STN-DBS for moderate to advanced PD. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included changes in UPDRS and dyskinesia scores, quality-of-life measures, and safety assessments. Exploratory analyses included medication reduction and DBS association with motor signs. Results A total of 313 patients were enrolled with 191 receiving the DBS system, and 137 participants (72%) completed the study. The study population had a mean (SD) age of 60 (7.9) years, with 139 (73%) male participants. Motor function without medication as measured by UPDRS-III improved from a mean (SD) of 42.8 (9.4) to 21.1 (10.6) at year 1 (51%; 95% CI, 49%-53%; P &amp;lt; .001) and 27.6 (11.6) at year 5 (36%; 95% CI, 33%-38%; P &amp;lt; .001). Activities of daily living without medication as measured by UPDRS-II improved from a mean (SD) of 20.6 (6.0) to 12.4 (6.1) at year 1 (41%; 95% CI, 38%-42%; P &amp;lt; .001) and 16.4 (6.5) at year 5 (22%; 95% CI, 18%-23%; P &amp;lt; .001). Dyskinesia scores decreased from 4.0 (5.1) to 1.0 (2.1) at year 1 (75%; 95% CI, 73%-75%; P &amp;lt; .001) and to 1.2 (2.1) at year 5 (70%; 95% CI, 63%-75%; P &amp;lt; .001). The levodopa equivalent dose was reduced by 28% at year 1, remaining stable at year 5 (28%; 95% CI, 26%-31%; P &amp;lt; .001). The most common serious adverse event was infection (9 participants). Ten deaths were reported, none related to the study. Conclusions and Relevance Although STN-DBS outcomes declined slightly, possibly due to the progressive nature of the disease, patients with PD sustained significant improvement in motor and activities of daily living scores, along with a stable reduction in anti-parkinsonian medication over the 5-year follow-up period.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic procedures are used to manage a diverse set of patients across a variety of clinical contexts. The stereotactic devices and software used in these procedures vary between surgeons, but the fundamental principles that constitute safe and accurate execution do not. The aim of this work is to describe these principles to equip readers with a generalizable knowledge base to execute and understand stereotactic procedures. METHODS: A combination of a review of the literature and empirical experience from several experienced surgeons led to the creation of this work. Thus, this work is descriptive and qualitative by nature, and the literature is used to support instead of generate the ideas of this framework. RESULTS: The principles detailed in this work are categorized based on 5 clinical domains: imaging, registration, mechanical accuracy, target planning and adjustment, and trajectory planning and adjustment. Illustrations and tables are used throughout to convey the concepts in an efficient manner. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic procedures are complex, requiring a thorough understanding of each step of the workflow. The concepts described in this work enable functional neurosurgeons with the fundamental knowledge necessary to provide optimal patient care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Identifying and characterizing sources of targeting error in stereotactic procedures is essential to maximizing accuracy, potentially improving surgical outcomes. We aim to describe a generic framework which characterizes sources of stereotactic inaccuracy. METHODS: We assembled a list of stereotactic systems: ROSA, Neuromate, Mazor Renaissance, ExcelsiusGPS, Cirq, STarFix (FHC), Nexframe, ClearPoint, CRW, and Leksell. We searched the literature for qualitative and quantitative work identifying and quantifying potential sources of inaccuracy and describing each system's implementation using Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Our literature search spanned 1969 to 2024, and various studies were included, with formats ranging from phantom studies to systematic reviews. Keyword searches were conducted, and the details about each system were used to create a framework for identifying and describing the unique targeting error profile of each system. RESULTS: We describe and illustrate the details of various sources of stereotactic inaccuracies and generate a framework to unify these sources into a single framework. This framework entails 5 domains: imaging, registration, mechanical accuracy, target planning and adjustment, and trajectory planning and adjustment. This framework was applied to 10 stereotactic systems. CONCLUSION: This framework provides a rubric to analyze the sources of error for any stereotactic system. Illustrations allow the reader to understand sources of error conceptually so that they may apply them to their practice.