Back to Authors

Walker, Harrison C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-3486

Mayo Clinic

Neurology,

Citations 5

Connectomic-guided stereotactic radiosurgery thalamotomy for tremor: a patient-specific approach to enhance outcomes
Middlebrooks, Erik H. , Patel, Vishal , Walker, Harrison C. , Thomas, Evan , Anderson, Ashley R. , Deshpande, Hrishikesh , McCullough, Benjamin, Stover, Natividad , Nicholas, Anthony P., Standaert, David G. , Dean, Marissa , Bentley, J. Nicole , Guthrie, Barton L. , Bredel, Markus , Middlebrooks, Erik H , Patel, Vishal, Popple, Richard A. , Brinkerhoff, Sarah A. , Sung, Victor , Yacoubian, Talene A. , Roper, Jaimie A. , Grewal, Sanjeet S. , Holland, Marshall T.

Journal of Neurosurgery | February 14, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 53-62

10.3171/2024.10.jns24753 Get It

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment for refractory tremor. However, the lack of reliable patient-specific targeting biomarkers leads to varying outcomes. Although connectomic-based targeting is commonly used in deep brain stimulation, its application in SRS is limited. This study aimed to develop a new targeting approach by using patient-specific structural connectivity to improve outcomes after SRS. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective study of patients in a prospective trial for frameless virtual-cone SRS on a linear accelerator for essential tremor or tremor-dominant Parkinson disease. The primary endpoint was percentage improvement in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores contralateral to the treatment side. Probabilistic tractography assessed connectivity from each thalamic voxel to the primary motor cortex (M1), primary sensory cortex (S1), and supplemental motor area/premotor cortex (SMA/PMC). Group-level comparisons were conducted to evaluate the relationship between the sweet spot for maximum contralateral tremor improvement and areas maximally connected to M1, S1, and SMA/PMC. Multiple regression analysis assessed the relationship between the lesion centerpoint coordinates and the maximally connected voxel to M1, S1, and SMA/PMC at the individual level. RESULTS The analysis included 27 patients with a mean follow-up of 17.9 ± 11.1 months. The sweet spot for maximal contralateral tremor improvement at the group level was in the region most connected to M1 cortex. Smaller y-distances (anterior-posterior) from the lesion center to the M1 maximally connected voxel significantly correlated with tremor improvement at the single-subject level (p < 0.001). However, the authors found no significant correlation between the lesion y-coordinate and the maximally connected voxel to SMA/PMC and S1, nor between the x-distances from the lesions to the SMA/PMC, M1, and S1 voxels (p > 0.07). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that patient-specific connectivity between the treatment target and M1 correlates with treatment outcomes. The authors’ approach provides a practical targeting method for SRS thalamotomy for tremor.
Frameless, Virtual Cone Linac-based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Essential & Parkinsonian Tremor: A Phase I/II Prospective Clinical Trial (S35.001)
Thomas, Evan , Walker, Harrison C. , Middlebrooks, Erik H. , McCullough, Benjamin, Stover, Natividad , Guthrie, Barton L. , Popple, Richard A. , Fiveash, John B. , Bredel, Markus , Middlebrooks, Erik H , Sung, Victor , Standaert, David G. , Bentley, J. Nicole , Holland, Marshall T.

Neurology | April 9, 2024 | Volume: 102 | Issue: 7_supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000208138 Get It

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Ventral Intermediate Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Axial Essential Tremor Symptoms (S18.003)
Peichel, DeLea, Wharen, Robert E. , Guthrie, Barton L. , Uitti, Ryan J. , Larson, Paul , Ford, Blair, Simpson, Richard K. , Phibbs, Fenna T., Neimat, Joseph S. , Stewart, R. Malcolm, Marshall, Frederick J., Ostrem, Jill L. , Mitchell, Kyle T. , Okun, Michael S. , Walker, Harrison C. , Pahwa, Rajesh , Dashtipour, Khashayar , Jankovic, Joseph J. , Foote, Kelly D. , Schwalb, Jason M.

Neurology | December 7, 2023 | Volume: 90 | Issue: 15_supplement | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.90.15_supplement.s18.003 Get It

Tourette syndrome deep brain stimulation: A review and updated recommendations
Schrock, Lauren E. , Woods, Douglas W. , Porta, Mauro, Servello, Domenico , Silburn, Peter A., Walker, Harrison C. , Shahed‐Jimenez, Joohi, Savica, Rodolfo , Klassen, Bryan T. , Foote, Kelly D. , Ackermans, Linda , Temel, Yasin , Changizi, Barbara Kelly , Lozano, Andrés M. , Auyeung, M., Kaido, Takanobu, Agid, Yves, Welter, Marie Laure, Khandhar, Suketu M., Pourfar, Michael , Walter, Benjamin L. , Juncos, Jorge L., Leckman, James F. , Neimat, Joseph A, Okun, Michael S. , Jimenez‐Shahed, Joohi , Mink, Jonathan W. , Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle E. R. M. , Foltynie, Thomas , Machado, André G. , Zhang, Jianguo , Hu, Wei , Mari, Zoltan K. , Auyeung, Man , Mogilner, Alon Y. , Gross, Robert E. , Kuhn, Jens , Okun, Michael S , Leckman, James F , Walter, Benjamin L , Jimenez-Shahed, Joohi , Welter, Marie‐Laure

Movement Disorders | December 8, 2014 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 448-471

10.1002/mds.26094 Get It

Abstract Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may improve disabling tics in severely affected medication and behaviorally resistant Tourette syndrome (TS). Here we review all reported cases of TS DBS and provide updated recommendations for selection, assessment, and management of potential TS DBS cases based on the literature and implantation experience. Candidates should have a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Fifth Edition (DSM V) diagnosis of TS with severe motor and vocal tics, which despite exhaustive medical and behavioral treatment trials result in significant impairment. Deep brain stimulation should be offered to patients only by experienced DBS centers after evaluation by a multidisciplinary team. Rigorous preoperative and postoperative outcome measures of tics and associated comorbidities should be used. Tics and comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions should be optimally treated per current expert standards, and tics should be the major cause of disability. Psychogenic tics, embellishment, and malingering should be recognized and addressed. We have removed the previously suggested 25‐year‐old age limit, with the specification that a multidisciplinary team approach for screening is employed. A local ethics committee or institutional review board should be consulted for consideration of cases involving persons younger than 18 years of age, as well as in cases with urgent indications. Tourette syndrome patients represent a unique and complex population, and studies reveal a higher risk for post‐DBS complications. Successes and failures have been reported for multiple brain targets; however, the optimal surgical approach remains unknown. Tourette syndrome DBS, though still evolving, is a promising approach for a subset of medication refractory and severely affected patients. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society