Patel, Vishal

Abstract Background aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is neurological emergency associated with substantial mortality and disability. Current grading systems such as the modified Fisher Scale (mFS) and World Federation of Neurological Societies (WFNS) score, rely on semiquantitative and examination based assessments. Hence, they demonstrate limited predictive precision. The enhanced subarachnoid hemorrhage (eSAH) score is a simplified quantitative model integrating age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and cisternal subarachnoid hemorrhage volume (SAHV) to predict clinical outcomes after aSAH. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included 1088 patients across three tertiary-care centers the United States. Predictive performance for unfavorable functional outcome, in-hospital mortality and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC). Comparative analyses were performed and compared to the WFNS and mFS grading systems. Results the eSAH score demonstrated excellent discrimination for unfavorable functional outcome at discharge ( AUC 0.89 ) and in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.87). The DCI subscore demonstrated good discriminatory performance for predicting DCI (AUC 0.77). Compared with conventional grading systems, this was superior to both the WFNS (AUC 0.75) and the mFS ( AUC 0.70). increasing eSAH scores were additionally associated with progressively higher rates of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes. Conclusion the eSAH score demonstrates strong external validity, reproducibility and superior predictive performance compared with conventional grading systems in a large multicenter cohort. These findings support the clinical utility of quantitative hemorrhage burden integration for early risk stratification in patients with aSAH.

Abstract Objective Shunt-dependent hydrocephalus is a common and costly complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), affecting up to 28% of survivors. Existing prediction tools, including the Chronic Hydrocephalus Ensuing from SAH Score (CHESS), have limited discriminative accuracy. We developed the CHECKMATE score, a clinically practical tool to improve prediction of ventriculoperitoneal shunt dependency after aSAH. Methods In this multicenter retrospective cohort of 486 patients with aSAH from Mayo Clinic (January 1, 2006-December 31, 2021), we used multivariable logistic regression and machine learning to identify independent predictors of ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. The CHECKMATE score was derived from 5 weighted variables: symptomatic hydrocephalus (10 points), intraventricular hemorrhage (5 points), SAH volume greater than 10 mL (3 points), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 12 (2 points), and 10-year incremental age thresholds starting at older than 60 years (1 point each). Results Of 486 patients (mean age, 56.3 years; 64.6% female), 137 (28.2%) required ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. The CHECKMATE score achieved an area under the curve of 0.808 (compared to 0.737 for CHESS), with a sensitivity of 0.85, specificity of 0.67, and negative predictive value of 0.92 at the optimal cutoff of 14 points. Conclusions The CHECKMATE score outperforms CHESS for predicting ventriculoperitoneal shunt dependency after aSAH and is easily used at the bedside. Its high negative predictive value helps identify low-risk patients who may benefit from earlier external ventricular drain weaning and shorter hospital stays.

Ultrahigh-field 7-T MRI offers superior resolution and contrast, which enable improved detection of subtle neuroanatomic abnormalities and disease-specific imaging biomarkers, with established clinical applications across a broad range of neurologic disorders.

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment for refractory tremor. However, the lack of reliable patient-specific targeting biomarkers leads to varying outcomes. Although connectomic-based targeting is commonly used in deep brain stimulation, its application in SRS is limited. This study aimed to develop a new targeting approach by using patient-specific structural connectivity to improve outcomes after SRS. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective study of patients in a prospective trial for frameless virtual-cone SRS on a linear accelerator for essential tremor or tremor-dominant Parkinson disease. The primary endpoint was percentage improvement in Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale scores contralateral to the treatment side. Probabilistic tractography assessed connectivity from each thalamic voxel to the primary motor cortex (M1), primary sensory cortex (S1), and supplemental motor area/premotor cortex (SMA/PMC). Group-level comparisons were conducted to evaluate the relationship between the sweet spot for maximum contralateral tremor improvement and areas maximally connected to M1, S1, and SMA/PMC. Multiple regression analysis assessed the relationship between the lesion centerpoint coordinates and the maximally connected voxel to M1, S1, and SMA/PMC at the individual level. RESULTS The analysis included 27 patients with a mean follow-up of 17.9 ± 11.1 months. The sweet spot for maximal contralateral tremor improvement at the group level was in the region most connected to M1 cortex. Smaller y-distances (anterior-posterior) from the lesion center to the M1 maximally connected voxel significantly correlated with tremor improvement at the single-subject level (p < 0.001). However, the authors found no significant correlation between the lesion y-coordinate and the maximally connected voxel to SMA/PMC and S1, nor between the x-distances from the lesions to the SMA/PMC, M1, and S1 voxels (p > 0.07). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that patient-specific connectivity between the treatment target and M1 correlates with treatment outcomes. The authors’ approach provides a practical targeting method for SRS thalamotomy for tremor.