Crudele, Angela

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of responsive thalamic stimulation as adjunctive therapy for drug‐resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) with generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCSs). Methods NAUTILUS is a prospective, multicenter, single‐blind, randomized sham‐controlled pivotal trial. Patients were ≥12 years of age with drug‐resistant IGE and ≥2 GTCSs over a 3‐month baseline. Bilateral depth leads were targeted to the centromedian thalamus. One month later, patients were randomized to Active (responsive stimulation, n = 44) or Sham (no stimulation, n = 43). The effectiveness evaluation period (EEP) began 3 months postimplant through 1 year. After a second GTCS in the EEP, patients transitioned to open‐label active stimulation. The primary safety endpoint was the serious adverse device‐related event (SADE) rate at 84 days postimplant. The primary effectiveness endpoint was time‐to‐second‐GTCS during the EEP. Additional endpoints included median percent change in days with any generalized seizure, GTCS frequency, and responder rate (RR). Results Eighty‐seven patients were implanted across 23 US centers. The SADE rate was significantly below the performance goal (6.9%, p < .0001), with no adverse effects on cognition, mood, or sleep. The prespecified primary effectiveness endpoint was not significant. However, a post hoc mixed‐effects model considering all EEP days demonstrated greater GTCS reduction in the originally randomized Active group (61%) compared to patients originally randomized to Sham (49%, p = .030). Eighteen‐month outcomes included 76.8% median GTCS reduction, 62.5% RR, 40% GTCS‐free at that timepoint, and 77.8% median reduction in days with any generalized seizure. More than 90% of patients and 86% of physicians reported improvement on Global Impression of Change scales. Significance NAUTILUS is the first randomized controlled neuromodulation trial in IGE. Responsive thalamic stimulation provided a clinically meaningful and durable reduction in seizures with an acceptable safety profile, offering a much‐needed option for drug‐resistant IGE.

BACKGROUND In patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are not candidates for resective surgery, thalamic neuromodulation targeting structures such as the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT), centromedian nucleus (CM), and pulvinar (PUL) has emerged as a promising therapy. The clinical investigation of these targets’ efficacy and side effect profiles is ongoing, complicating discussions between neurosurgeons, neurologists, and patients. The implementation of single-pulse and continuous stimulation protocols to conduct patient-specific side effect screens and generate prognostic biomarkers could offer guidance for target selection. OBSERVATIONS A 32-year-old male with extensive polymicrogyria and DRE underwent stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) with multisite thalamic sampling to inform neuromodulation target selection. Single-pulse stimulation was conducted to screen for acute sensorimotor effects, followed by continuous (12- to 24-hour) stimulation using clinically relevant parameters. Intolerable paresthesia occurred during CM single-pulse stimulation, leading to its exclusion as a target. Single-pulse and continuous stimulation of the ANT and PUL were well tolerated. PUL stimulation offered superior suppression of epileptiform discharges during sleep. LESSONS These findings meaningfully informed the selection of the PUL as a neuromodulation target. This case illustrates the safety, feasibility, and utility of patient-specific single-pulse and continuous stimulation assessments during SEEG monitoring to evaluate efficacy and tolerability prior to chronic neuromodulation, particularly for novel thalamic targets. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25947

Abstract How do brain networks limit seizure activity? In the interictal suppression hypothesis, we recently postulated that high inward connectivity to seizure onset zones (SOZs) from non-involved zones (NIZs) is a sign of broader network suppression. If broad networks appear to be responsible for interictal SOZ suppression, what changes during seizure initiation, spread and termination? For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, intracranial monitoring offers a view into the electrographic networks that organize around and in response to the SOZ. In this manuscript, we investigate network dynamics in the peri-ictal periods to assess possible mechanisms of seizure suppression and the consequences of this suppression being overwhelmed. Peri-ictal network dynamics were derived from stereo electroencephalography recordings from 75 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing presurgical evaluation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. We computed directed connectivity from 5 s windows in the periods between, immediately before, during and after 668 seizures. We aligned connectivity matrices across seizures and patients, then calculated net connectivity changes from the SOZ, propagative zone and NIZ. Across all seizure types, we observed two phases: a rapid increase in directed communication towards the SOZ, followed by a collapse in network connectivity. During the first phase, SOZs could be distinguished from all other regions (one-way ANOVA, P = 8.32 × 10−19–2.22 × 10−7). In the second phase and post-ictal period, SOZ inward connectivity decreased yet remained distinct (one-way ANOVA, P = 2.58 × 10−10–1.66 × 10−2). NIZs appeared to drive increased SOZ connectivity while intra-NIZ connectivity decreased concordantly. Stratifying by seizure subtype, we found that consciousness-impairing seizures decrease inward connectivity from the NIZ earlier than consciousness-sparing seizures (one-way ANOVA, P &lt; 0.01 after false discovery correction). Tracking network reorganization against a surrogate for seizure involvement highlighted a possible antagonism between seizure propagation and the ability of the NIZ to maintain high connectivity to the SOZ. Finally, we found that inclusion of peri-ictal connectivity improved the accuracy of SOZ classification from previous models to a combined area under the curve of 93%. Overall, NIZs appear actively to increase inhibitory signaling towards the SOZ during seizure onset, possibly to thwart seizure activity. Although inhibition appears insufficient to prevent seizure onset, the inability to restrict seizure propagation might contribute to loss of consciousness during larger seizures. Dynamic connectivity patterns uncovered in this work might: (i) facilitate accurate delineation of surgical targets in focal epilepsy; (ii) reveal why interictal suppression of SOZs might be insufficient to prevent all seizures; and (iii) provide insight into mechanisms of loss of consciousness during certain seizures.