Gorgulho, Alessandra

Background Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE). Objective To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries. Methods PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31–11.70%; vascular: 0.52–22.90%; oncology: 0.94–17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31–12%; vascular: 0.40–1.96% and oncology: 0.84–1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower. Conclusions Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.

Abstract Background There are limited data on the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pediatric patients. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize indications and outcomes specific to pediatric cranial SRS to inform consensus guidelines on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society. Methods A systematic review, using the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, analyzed English-language articles on SRS, published between 1989 and 2021, that included outcomes for at least 5 pediatric patients. MEDLINE database terms included tumor types and locations, and radiosurgical and age-specific terms. We excluded nonclinical reports, expert opinions, commentaries, and review articles. Meta-regressions for associations with local control were performed for medulloblastoma, craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, glioma, and arteriovenous malformation (AVM). Results Of the 113 articles identified for review, 68 met the inclusion criteria. These articles described approximately 400 pediatric patients with benign and malignant brain tumors and 5119 with AVMs who underwent cranial SRS. The rates of local control for benign tumors, malignant tumors, and AVMs were 89% (95% CI, 82%–95%), 71% (95% CI, 59%–82%), and 65% (95% CI, 60%–69%), respectively. No significant associations were identified for local control with the patient-, tumor-, or treatment-related variables. Conclusions This review is the first to summarize outcomes specific to SRS for pediatric brain tumors and AVMs. Although data reporting is limited for pediatric patients, SRS appears to provide acceptable rates of local control. We present ISRS consensus guidelines to inform the judicious use of cranial SRS for pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Consensus guidelines do not exist to guide the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of patients with Spetzler-Martin Grade III-V arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). We sought to establish SRS practice guidelines for Grade III-V AVMs based on a critical systematic review of the published literature. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant search of Medline, Embase, and Scopus, 1986 to 2023, for publications reporting post-SRS outcomes in ≥10 Grade III-V AVMs with the median follow-up ≥24 months was performed. Primary end points were AVM obliteration and post-SRS hemorrhage. Secondary end points included dosimetric variables, Spetzler-Martin parameters, and neurological outcome. RESULTS : In total, 2463 abstracts were screened, 196 manuscripts were reviewed, and 9 met the strict inclusion criteria. The overall sample of 1634 AVMs consisted of 1431 Grade III (88%), 186 Grade IV (11%), and 11 Grade V lesions (1%). Total median post-SRS follow-up was 53 months for Grade III and 43 months for Grade IV-V AVMs (ranges, 2-290; 12-262). For Grade III AVMs, the crude obliteration rate was 72%, and among Grade IV-V lesions, the crude obliteration rate was 46%. Post-SRS hemorrhage was observed in 7% of Grade III compared with 17% of Grade IV-V lesions. Major permanent deficits or death from hemorrhage or radiation-induced complications occurred in 86 Grade III (6%) and 22 Grade IV-V AVMs (12%). CONCLUSION: Most patients with Spetzler-Martin Grade III AVMs have favorable SRS treatment outcomes; however, the obliteration rate for Grade IV-V AVMs is less than 50%. The available studies are heterogenous and lack nuanced, long-term, grade-specific outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for residual arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can be considered as a salvage approach after failure of initial SRS. There are no published guidelines regarding patient selection, timing, or SRS parameters to guide clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to review outcomes and complications from the published literature to inform practice recommendations provided on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted. Fourteen studies with 925 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were treated between 1985 and 2022. All studies were retrospective, except for one prospective cohort. RESULTS: The median patient age at repeat SRS ranged from 32 to 60 years. Four studies (630 patients) reported detailed information on Spetzler–Martin grade at the time of repeat SRS; 12.54% of patients had Spetzler–Martin grade I AVMs (79/630 patients), 46.51% had grade II (293/630), 34.92% had grade III (220/630), 5.08% had grade IV (32/630), and 0.95% had grade V (6/630). The median prescription doses varied between 15 and 25 Gy (mean, 13.06-22.8 Gy). The pooled overall obliteration rate at the last follow-up after repeat SRS was 59% (95% CI 51%-67%) with a median follow-up between 21 and 50 months. The pooled hemorrhage incidence at the last follow-up was 5% (95% CI 4%-7%), and the pooled overall radiation-induced change incidence was 12% (95% CI 7%-20%). CONCLUSION: For an incompletely obliterated AVM, repeat radiosurgery after 3 to 5 years of follow-up from the first SRS provides a reasonable benefit to the risk profile. After repeat SRS, obliteration is achieved in the majority of patients. The risk of hemorrhage or radiation-induced change appears low, and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society recommendations are presented.

Abstract Background The choice of an appropriate strategy for intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma (ICVS) is still debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim to compare treatment outcomes amongst management strategies (conservative surveillance (CS), microsurgical resection (MR), or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)) aiming to inform guideline recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). Methods Using PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed manuscripts published between January 1990 and October 2021 referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical studies or case series reporting a cohort of ICVS managed with CS, MR, or SRS. Primary outcome measures included tumor control, the need for additional treatment, hearing outcomes, and posttreatment neurological deficits. These were pooled using meta-analytical techniques and compared using meta-regression with random effect. Results Forty studies were included (2371 patients). The weighted pooled estimates for tumor control were 96% and 65% in SRS and CS series, respectively (P < .001). Need for further treatment was reported in 1%, 2%, and 25% for SRS, MR, and CS, respectively (P = .001). Hearing preservation was reported in 67%, 68%, and 55% for SRS, MR, and CS, respectively (P = .21). Persistent facial nerve deficit was reported in 0.1% and 10% for SRS and MR series, respectively (P = .01). Conclusions SRS is a noninvasive treatment with at least equivalent rates of tumor control and hearing preservation as compared to MR, with the caveat of better facial nerve preservation. As compared to CS, upfront SRS is an effective treatment in achieving tumor control with similar rates of hearing preservation.