Raslan, Ahmed M

Abstract Objectives Pivotal trials have established the effectiveness of the Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS® System) in treating focal epilepsy. In clinical trials, depth leads were primarily used to treat mesial temporal seizure onsets while cortical strip leads were used to treat neocortical seizure onsets. Here, we systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG)‐guided depth leads to provide responsive stimulation to neocortical gray matter. Methods Patients were stratified as strong responders (>median cohort seizure reduction %), weak responders (>0% and ≤median cohort seizure reduction %), and anti‐responders (≤0%) based on percent seizure reduction at 1 year post‐implant (1‐Y). Pre‐operative T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging and post‐operative computed tomography images were merged, and the Euclidean distance between the sEEG epileptic focus (sEEG‐EF) and the nearest RNS System depth lead contacts was calculated. Results A total of 87 depth leads were implanted in 55 patients across neocortical brain regions. The median reduction in clinical seizures improved from 66.7% at 1‐Y to 77.5% at long‐term follow‐up (LTFU: 2.35 ± 0.95 years), with 10 patients (18.2%) achieving complete seizure freedom. Seven patients (12.7%) experienced six serious adverse events. At 1‐Y, shorter Euclidean distance between the sEEG‐EF and RNS System depth leads predicted improved seizure outcome in strong responders ( β = −0.84, p = 0.008) but not in weak responders ( β = 0.21, p = 0.9) or anti‐responders ( β = −20.34, p = 0.11). At LTFU, there was no significant relationship between Euclidean distance and seizure reduction in strong responders ( β = 0.77, p = 0.18), weak responders ( β = 2.05, p = 0.54), or anti‐responders ( β = 0.24, p = 0.99). Exploratory analyses at 1‐Y showed nominal associations between older age ( ρ = 0.32), longer epilepsy duration ( ρ = 0.27), and non‐mesial temporal sEEG‐EFs and greater seizure reduction; however, none survived Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0027; all post‐correction p > 0.0027), and no associations were observed at LTFU. Significance In this series, neocortical depth leads for RNS therapy had favorable safety and efficacy and proximity to the sEEG‐EF drove initial outcomes for strong responders to RNS therapy. Plain Language Summary In this multi‐center study, patients with difficult‐to‐treat seizures received brain‐responsive stimulation using a device called responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which delivers small electrical pulses to reduce seizures. We focused on patients treated with electrodes placed in the brain's outer regions (the neocortex) and guided by a mapping procedure called sEEG. On average, patients had their seizures cut by two‐thirds after one year and by more than three‐quarters with longer follow‐up, with about one in five becoming seizure‐free. The treatment was safe, and closer electrode placement to the seizure source helped explain early—but not long‐term—improvements.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children ≥2 years with NF1 who have symptomatic PN not amenable to complete resection. We report results from the phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543), including the LTFU. METHODS In ReNeu, mirdametinib was administered in 3-weeks-on/1-week-off 28-day cycles. Following the 24-cycle treatment phase, patients could continue mirdametinib in an optional LTFU. We report results through June 12, 2024, approximately 9 months from the previous data cutoff. RESULTS Fifty-eight adults and 56 children received mirdametinib. Median (range) duration of treatment was 21.8 (0.4, 54.4) months in adults and 25.4 (1.6, 48.5) months in children. Among LTFU-eligible patients, 26/31 (84%) adults and 32/37 (86%) children entered LTFU. Confirmed objective response rate (ORR, treatment+LTFU phases) was 47% (27/58; 95%CI, 33%, 60%) in adults and 55% (31/56; 95%CI, 42%, 69%) in children. Among confirmed responders, 18 adults and 19 children achieved a deep response (best target PN volume reduction from baseline of >50%). Median (range) best percentage change from baseline in target PN volume was –41% (–90%, 13%) in adults and –43% (–98%, 48%) in children. Median duration of response (DoR) was not reached for either age cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥25% of patients were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in adults; and diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia in children. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17% of adults and 25% of children. Dose interruptions, dose reductions, and discontinuations due to TRAEs occurred in 9%, 17%, and 22%, respectively, of adults, and 14%, 14%, and 9%, respectively, of children. CONCLUSIONS Improved confirmed ORR was observed with longer duration of mirdametinib, with additional deep responses achieved in both adults and children. Mirdametinib continued to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile and no new safety signals in the LTFU.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children (≥2 years) with NF1 who have symptomatic PN not amenable to complete resection. We report updated results from the LTFU phase of the pivotal, phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543) evaluating the efficacy and safety of mirdametinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS In ReNeu, mirdametinib capsules or tablets for oral suspension (2 mg/m2 BID, max 4 mg BID) are administered in 3-weeks-on/1-week-off 28-day cycles. Following the 24-cycle (~2 years) treatment phase, patients could continue mirdametinib in an optional LTFU phase. These analyses are inclusive of the treatment and LTFU phases (data cutoff: June 12, 2024; an additional 9 months of cumulative data following the primary analysis). Exploratory analyses reported here included confirmed objective response rate (ORR; proportion of patients with ≥20% reduction of target PN volume from baseline on consecutive MRI scans within 2 to 6 months, assessed by blinded independent central review), duration of response (DoR), change from baseline in target PN volume, and safety. RESULTS Fifty-eight adults and 56 children were dosed with mirdametinib. Median (range) duration of mirdametinib treatment was 21.8 (0.4, 54.4) months in adults and 25.4 (1.6, 48.5) months in children. Among LTFU-eligible patients, 26/31 (84%) adults and 32/37 (86%) children entered the LTFU. Confirmed ORR was 47% (27/58; 95% CI, 33%, 60%) in adults and 55% (31/56; 95% CI, 42%, 69%) in children. Of patients with a confirmed objective response, 18 adults and 19 children achieved a deep response (best target PN volume reduction from baseline of >50%). Median (range) best percentage change from baseline in target PN volume was -41% (-90%, 13%) in adults and -43% (-98%, 48%) in children. Median DoR was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥25% of patients were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting in adults, and diarrhoea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia in children. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17% of adults and 25% of children. Dose interruptions, dose reductions, and discontinuations due to TRAEs occurred in 9%, 17%, and 22%, respectively, of adults, and in 14%, 14%, and 9%, respectively, of children. CONCLUSIONS An increase in confirmed ORR was observed with longer duration of mirdametinib treatment, with additional deep responses achieved in both adults and children with NF1-PN. Mirdametinib continued to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile and no new safety signals identified in the LTFU phase. SUPPORTED BY SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.

Abstract Objective In patients with focal drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE), resective epilepsy surgery correlates with high rates of remission. However, in cases where the epileptic region is deemed surgically inaccessible, or when it involves a complex network, stereoelectroencephalography‐guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG‐RFTC) might be an alternative therapeutic strategy. However, most of the available evidence is limited to small observational studies. An updated meta‐analysis is warranted to provide a comprehensive assessment of SEEG‐RFTC in patients with DRE. Methods Databases were searched until September 9, 2023 to identify published studies reporting on the effectiveness of SEEG‐RFTC in patients with DRE. The primary outcomes of interest were the 1‐year seizure‐freedom rate and response rate (50% seizure frequency decrease from baseline). These outcomes were pooled using the inverse variance and a random‐effects model. Results We screened 182 articles and included 16 retrospective cohort studies. A total of 437 unique patients from 12 nonoverlapping cohorts were analyzed for seizure and complication outcomes. The pooled seizure‐free rate after 1 year was 37.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 24.7%–50.8%), whereas the seizure response rate after 1 year was 69.7% (95% CI = 52.7%–86.7%). There was high heterogeneity among the included studies. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with nodular heterotopia achieved higher rates of seizure freedom (57.1%, 95% CI = 38.8%–75.5%) compared to those with cortical dysplasia (CD) and magnetic resonance imaging‐negative conditions. Furthermore, hippocampal sclerosis patients exhibited higher seizure freedom rates (66.7%, 95% CI = 49.8%–83.5%) than those with CD (12.0%, 95% CI = .0%–24.7%). Significance SEEG‐RFTC might be an effective therapeutic option for seizure control in patients with DRE who undergo SEEG for DRE workup. The role of SEEG‐RFTC as a potential adjunct therapy to laser interstitial thermal therapy or surgical resection should be explored. This study highlights the need for well‐designed clinical trials to compare SEEG‐guided RFTC with other therapeutic modalities.