Background and Purpose— To address the increasing need to counsel patients about treatment indications for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA), we endeavored to develop a consensus on assessment of UIAs among a group of specialists from diverse fields involved in research and treatment of UIAs. Methods— After composition of the research group, a Delphi consensus was initiated to identify and rate all features, which may be relevant to assess UIAs and their treatment by using ranking scales and analysis of inter-rater agreement (IRA) for each factor. IRA was categorized as very high, high, moderate, or low. Results— Ultimately, 39 specialists from 4 specialties agreed (high or very high IRAs) on the following key factors for or against UIA treatment decisions: (1) patient age, life expectancy, and comorbid diseases; (2) previous subarachnoid hemorrhage from a different aneurysm, family history for UIA or subarachnoid hemorrhage, nicotine use; (3) UIA size, location, and lobulation; (4) UIA growth or de novo formation on serial imaging; (5) clinical symptoms (cranial nerve deficit, mass effect, and thromboembolic events from UIAs); and (6) risk factors for UIA treatment (patient age and life expectancy, UIA size, and estimated risk of treatment). However, IRAs for features rated with low relevance were also generally low, which underlined the existing controversy about the natural history of UIAs. Conclusions— Our results highlight that neurovascular specialists currently consider many features as important when evaluating UIAs but also highlight that the appreciation of natural history of UIAs remains uncertain, even within a group of highly informed individuals.
Management of Intracranial Infectious Aneurysms: A Series of 16 Cases
Abstract OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to better define the management of intracranial infectious aneurysms. METHODS We present a retrospective review of the management of 16 patients with intracranial infectious aneurysms. The mean follow-up period was 86 months. RESULTS None of the patients had a rehemorrhage during antibiotic treatment. The mortality and long-term outcome from ruptured intracranial infectious aneurysms may be better than previously thought. There was no significant difference in long-term outcome between patients with single or multiple infectious aneurysms or between patients who underwent surgical resection and those who were treated only with antibiotics. CONCLUSION Operative treatment should be pursued for patients with ruptured infectious aneurysms. Patients with unruptured intracranial infectious aneurysms should be observed during antibiotic therapy and followed up with cerebral angiography. Surgical resection should be considered if the aneurysm enlarges and the patient's general medical condition allows general anesthesia to be tolerated.