Steriade, Claude

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to examine acute and chronic electroencephalographic (EEG) and seizure characteristics in new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). Methods Multicenter inpatient and follow‐up clinical and EEG data were analyzed using International League Against Epilepsy definitions and American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) EEG terminology. Results Forty‐four patients were included from the Yale NORSE/FIRES Biorepository (median age = 29 years, 33 female, 38 cryptogenic). Nine hundred twenty inpatient EEG days were reviewed (median = 13.5 days/patient). Presenting status epilepticus (SE) types included 24 convulsive SE (CSE), five focal–motor (FMSE), and 15 nonconvulsive (NCSE). Of 39 patients with post discharge follow‐up (median = 14.7 months), 61.5% ( n = 24) had seizures and required more antiseizure medications than seizure‐free patients (median = 4 vs. 1, p < .001). Inpatient EEG captured epileptiform discharges in all and periodic discharges in 38 patients. Seizures were captured in 38 patients: 33 electrographic (11 only electrographic) and 27 electroclinical. Total seizure burden ranged 6.5–29 615.0 min (median = 50.7). Seizures fulfilling ACNS EEG criteria for SE were captured in 20 patients; two had CSE and the remainder NCSE with coma, nine of whom also had FMSE. Inpatient seizure days (median = 50.0 vs. 15.5%, p = .004) and seizure burden (median = 42.9 vs. 0 min, p = .009) were higher in the first half of monitored days. Interictal findings were equally present and did not predict postdischarge seizures, whereas electroclinical seizures (90.9% vs. 45.5%, p = .037), seizure burden (median = 116.8 vs. 32.5 min, p = .045), and proportion of seizure days (36.3% vs. 20.0%, p = .037) did. Among 12 patients with follow‐up EEGs (median = 19.6 months post onset), posterior‐dominant rhythm (PDR) returned in nine; five had periodic discharges, and three had seizure captured. Significance Seizures are most commonly convulsive upon presentation and nonconvulsive or clinically subtle throughout the inpatient course in NORSE. Inpatient seizures, but not interictal abnormalities, occur earlier in the inpatient course and presence of electroclinical seizures, seizure burden, and proportion of seizure days but not interictal findings are associated with postdischarge seizures. Although return of PDR reflects neurological recovery, seizure persistence and EEG abnormalities post‐NORSE are common.

Abstract Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subset of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) that involves a febrile infection prior to the onset of the refractory status epilepticus. It is unclear whether FIRES and non‐FIRES NORSE are distinct conditions. Here, we compare 34 patients with FIRES to 30 patients with non‐FIRES NORSE for demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, and outcomes. Because patients with FIRES were younger than patients with non‐FIRES NORSE (median = 28 vs. 48 years old, p = .048) and more likely cryptogenic (odds ratio = 6.89), we next ran a regression analysis using age or etiology as a covariate. Respiratory and gastrointestinal prodromes occurred more frequently in FIRES patients, but no difference was found for non‐infection‐related prodromes. Status epilepticus subtype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcomes were similar. However, FIRES cases were more frequently cryptogenic; had higher CSF interleukin 6, CSF macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP‐1a), and serum chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) levels; and received more antiseizure medications and immunotherapy. After controlling for age or etiology, no differences were observed in presenting symptoms and signs or inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that FIRES and non‐FIRES NORSE are very similar conditions.

Abstract Seizures are a well‐recognized and often prominent manifestation of autoimmune encephalitic syndromes. Progress in detection of pathogenic neural autoantibodies has led to increased awareness of autoimmune causes of seizures. Clinical studies of patients with these autoantibodies have improved our understanding of the seizure characteristics, treatments, and seizure prognosis in these disorders. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Autoimmunity and Inflammation Taskforce proposes conceptual definitions for two main diagnostic entities: (a) acute symptomatic seizures secondary to autoimmune encephalitis, and (b) autoimmune‐associated epilepsy, the latter of which suggests an enduring predisposition to seizures. Such a distinction is relevant when discussing the pathophysiology, treatment, prognosis, and social consequences of these disorders. We discuss the role of biomarkers in the application of these conceptual definitions and illustrate their use in patients cared for by members of the task force.