Mason, Warren

PURPOSE STELLAR (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02796261 ) was a phase III, randomized, open-label trial of eflornithine + lomustine versus lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent grade 3 astrocytoma. METHODS At trial initiation, eligibility criteria included: age ≥18 years, anaplastic astrocytoma (2016 WHO CNS Tumor classification [WHO CNS4]), first recurrence ≥6 months after radiation and temozolomide (TMZ), Karnofsky performance status ≥70, and no imaging findings consistent with grade 4 glioblastoma. Random assignment (1:1) was stratified by isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH ) mutation, age, resection extent, and geography. Patients received eflornithine (2.8 g/m 2 orally, every 8 hours [2 weeks on, 1 week off]) + lomustine (90 mg/m 2 orally, once every 6 weeks), or lomustine monotherapy (110 mg/m 2 once every 6 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 343 patients randomly assigned across 74 sites in eight countries, there was no difference in survival between eflornithine + lomustine and lomustine monotherapy (median OS 23.4 v 20.3 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.94). Following changes in classification and grading in the 2021 WHO CNS5, a subset analysis of patients with IDH- mutant, grade 3 astrocytoma (n = 196), defined in 2024, before unblinding, showed clinically meaningful improvements in median OS with eflornithine + lomustine versus lomustine monotherapy (34.9 v 23.5 months, HR, 0.64) and median progression-free survival (PFS, 15.8 v 7.2 months, HR, 0.57). No differences were observed among patients with CNS grade 4 disease. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events of relevance were related to reversible myelosuppression (eflornithine + lomustine 42% v lomustine monotherapy 29% of patients) and hearing impairment (24% v 0%). No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION Clinically meaningful improvements were observed; eflornithine + lomustine doubled PFS and improved OS in patients with recurrent IDH -mutant, grade 3 astrocytoma, but not grade 4 tumors, after prior radiotherapy and TMZ, consistent with its cytostatic mechanism of action.

Abstract Recurrent or refractory IDH-mutant (mt) gliomas represent a population with significant unmet clinical need. The Notch ligand delta-like 3 (DLL3) is a tumor-associated antigen that is highly and homogeneously expressed in IDH-mt gliomas but absent in normal brain tissue, making it an attractive therapeutic target. Tarlatamab is a half-life extended bispecific T-cell engager that targets DLL3 and CD3 to redirect cytotoxic T cells toward DLL3-expressing tumor cells. Given the specific expression of DLL3 in IDH-mt gliomas and promising activity of tarlatamab in other DLL3-positive tumors, this study investigates the safety, efficacy, and intracranial activity of tarlatamab in this patient population. TARGID is an open-label, phase II trial enrolling adult patients with histologically confirmed IDH1 or IDH2-mt astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma following up to two prior lines of systemic therapies. The study comprises two cohorts. Cohort 1 (n=10) includes patients with resectable disease who will receive up to three cycles of tarlatamab prior to surgery; postoperative continuation is permitted. The primary endpoint for this cohort is the change in CD8+ T-cell infiltration in tumor tissue and blood. Cohort 2 (n=34) includes patients with unresectable disease and uses a Simon’s optimal two-stage design (H0: P ≤ 0.1 versus H1: P ≥ 0.25). In the 1st stage, 13 patients will be accrued. If 2 or more responses are observed, 21 additional patients will be enrolled. Tarlatamab is administered intravenously at 10 mg every two weeks, following a 1 mg priming dose on Cycle 1 Day 1. The primary endpoint is objective response rate by RANO 2.0. Exploratory endpoints include DLL3 expression, circulating biomarkers, and immune correlatives. The trial is currently in activation, with first patient enrollment anticipated in Q3 2025. The study is supported by the provision of study drug from Amgen as an investigator-initiated trial.

Abstract BACKGROUND Post-operative prognostication in glioma patients remains a clinical challenge, particularly given the heterogeneity in tumor biology and patient outcomes. We evaluated whether image-derived features from post-operative imaging improve survival modeling beyond established clinicopathologic factors. METHODS We analyzed a cohort of 71 post-surgical glioma patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre with known clinicopathologic features including age, histological classification, IDH mutation status, MGMT methylation status, extent of resection, and performance status. A baseline Cox proportional hazards model was fit to clinical variables. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics from post-operative CT and MRI across three regions of interest: whole brain, tumor bed, and peritumoral ring. Features underwent stepwise unsupervised reduction (variance filtering, exclusion of volume-correlated features, and removal of remaining collinear features), followed by dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis. Combined clinical and imaging models were evaluated in the overall cohort and stratified by IDH mutation status. RESULTS In the overall cohort, the clinical model was highly prognostic (C-index 0.74, p ~ 3.2×10⁻⁶). Adding imaging features improved performance (C-index 0.79) but was not significant (p ~ 0.31). Subset analysis revealed differential effects by IDH status. In IDH-mutant gliomas (n=24), neither clinical nor combined models were significant. In IDH wild-type glioblastoma (n=47), the clinical model achieved C-index 0.75 (p=0.04). The addition of imaging features significantly improved model performance (C-index 0.83, p=0.03), with selected imaging components contributing independent prognostic value after adjustment for clinical variables. Post-hoc analysis of radiomic feature importance (random forest ranking) revealed that top contributing features were drawn from both CT and MRI modalities, with most sourced from the whole brain region. CONCLUSIONS In post-surgical patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma, image-derived features from post-operative imaging can significantly enhance prognostic modeling beyond known clinicopathologic factors. These preliminary findings support the potential role of radiomic biomarkers in refining risk stratification for this patient subgroup.

Abstract Purpose: In a post hoc analysis of the CATNON trial (NCT00626990), we explored whether adding temozolomide to radiotherapy improves outcome in patients with IDH1/2 wildtype (wt) anaplastic astrocytomas with molecular features of glioblastoma [redesignated as glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase–wildtype (IDH-wt) in the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors]. Patients and Methods: From the randomized phase III CATNON study examining the addition of adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide to radiotherapy in anaplastic astrocytomas, we selected a subgroup of IDH1/2wt and H3F3Awt tumors with presence of TERT promoter mutations and/or EGFR amplifications and/or combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of chromosome 10. Molecular abnormalities including MGMT promoter methylation status were determined by next-generation sequencing, DNA methylation profiling, and SNaPshot analysis. Results: Of the 751 patients entered in the CATNON study, 670 had fully molecularly characterized tumors. A total of 159 of these tumors met the WHO 2021 molecular criteria for glioblastoma, IDH-wt. Of these patients, 47 received radiotherapy only and 112 received a combination of radiotherapy and temozolomide. There was no added effect of temozolomide on either overall survival [HR, 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–1.71] or progression-free survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.61–1.24). MGMT promoter methylation was prognostic for overall survival, but was not predictive for outcome to temozolomide treatment either with respect to overall survival or progression-free survival. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wt temozolomide treatment did not add benefit beyond that observed from radiotherapy, regardless of MGMT promoter status. These findings require a new well-powered prospective clinical study to explore the efficacy of temozolomide treatment in this patient population.