Abstract Objective To report the clinical presentations and outcomes of patients with seizure and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated disease (MOGAD). Methods We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records for clinical and paraclinical features among patients with seizures and MOG‐IgG (immunoglobulin G) seropositivity. Results We identified 213 patients with MOG‐IgG seropositivity who fulfilled criteria for MOGAD. Seizures attributed to central nervous system (CNS) autoimmunity were observed in 10% of patients ( n = 23: 19 children, 4 adults). The majority ( n = 19, 83%) had pediatric disease onset. Focal motor seizures were the most common seizure semiology (16/23; 70%). Focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures were present in 12 patients (53%), and 3 patients (13%) developed status epilepticus. All patients had features of encephalitis at onset of seizures. Cerebral cortical encephalitis (CCE) was the most common radiological finding (10 unilateral and 5 bilateral cases). Eight of 23 patients (35%) had only CCE, six of 23 patients (26%) had only acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and seven of 23 patients (30%) had features of both. Fifteen patients (65%) had leptomeningeal enhancement. Three patients (13%) had coexistence of N ‐methyl‐ d ‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR) IgG. Only 3 of 23 patients (13%) developed drug‐ resistant epilepsy. Although the majority had MOGAD relapses (14/23, 60%) had only 5 of 23 patients had recurrence of episodes of encephalitis with associated seizures. Twenty‐one of 23 patients (91%) had seizure freedom at last follow‐up. Significance MOG‐IgG evaluation should be considered in patients who present with encephalitis and focal motor and/or focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures, especially pediatric patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain findings consistent with CCE, ADEM, or other MOGAD presentations. The majority of these seizures are self‐limited and do not require maintenance/chronic antiseizure medications. Although seizure recurrence is uncommon, many patients have MOGAD relapses in the form of encephalitis and optic neuritis.
AbstractObjectiveThis study was undertaken to report clinical presentations and outcomes of CASPR2‐IgG‐associated seizures.MethodsMayo Clinic Neuroimmunology database was queried to identify CASPR2‐IgG‐seropositive (CASPR2‐IgG+) patients evaluated at our institution (2009–2019).ResultsOf the 53 CASPR2‐IgG+ patients (titer ≥ 1:10), 20 had seizures (38%). All seizure patients were male, with median onset age of 68 years. Eighteen (90%) had seizures at initial presentation. One patient was found to have malignancy (colon adenocarcinoma). Two patients had coexisting LGI1‐IgG. Twelve patients had archived sera, which on titration had CASPR2‐IgG titers ≥ 1:100. Fifteen patients (75%) met criteria for autoimmune encephalitis. Patients most commonly presented with focal onset, nonmotor seizures with impaired awareness (n = 14, 70%). Eleven patients also had focal motor and/or sensory seizures as one of the seizure semiologies. The majority of patients (n = 11, 55%) developed generalized tonic–clonic seizures during their disease course. Seizure clusters occurred in 12 patients. In addition to seizures, patients developed cognitive disturbance (n = 16, 80%), episodic emotional lability (n = 13, 65%), paroxysmal dizziness (n = 9, 45%), episodic ataxia (n = 6, 30%), and chronic ataxia (n = 9, 45%). Only three patients (15%) had coexisting peripheral nervous system involvement. Frontotemporal or temporal ictal and/or interictal electroencephalographic abnormalities were present among nine patients, and three had multifocal epileptiform abnormalities. Eight patients (40%) had medial temporal T2/fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensity on brain magnetic resonance imaging. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein and/or lymphocytic pleocytosis was present in most cases (13/14, 93%). Thirteen patients reached seizure freedom following initiation of antiseizure medication (ASM; n = 4) or a combination of immunotherapy and ASM (n = 9). Median duration of follow‐up was 25 months (range = 2–136 months).SignificanceCASPR2‐IgG evaluation should be considered among older male patients with new onset focal seizures and impaired awareness often occurring in clusters with/without features of encephalitis. Coexisting neurological manifestations, including episodic emotional lability, ataxia, and paroxysmal dizziness, also aid in the diagnosis.
Discerning the Role of Autoimmunity and Autoantibodies in Epilepsy
Abstract Seizures are a well‐recognized and often prominent manifestation of autoimmune encephalitic syndromes. Progress in detection of pathogenic neural autoantibodies has led to increased awareness of autoimmune causes of seizures. Clinical studies of patients with these autoantibodies have improved our understanding of the seizure characteristics, treatments, and seizure prognosis in these disorders. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Autoimmunity and Inflammation Taskforce proposes conceptual definitions for two main diagnostic entities: (a) acute symptomatic seizures secondary to autoimmune encephalitis, and (b) autoimmune‐associated epilepsy, the latter of which suggests an enduring predisposition to seizures. Such a distinction is relevant when discussing the pathophysiology, treatment, prognosis, and social consequences of these disorders. We discuss the role of biomarkers in the application of these conceptual definitions and illustrate their use in patients cared for by members of the task force.
Predictors of Nonconvulsive Seizure and Their Effect on Short-term Outcome
Introduction: Nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) are common in critically ill adult patients with acute neurologic conditions. However, the effect of NCSs on patient outcome remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of NCSs on short-term outcome and to assess the clinical and EEG factors associated with NCSs. Methods: We retrospectively identified 219 adult patients from the EEG reporting system who underwent continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring between January 2018 and June 2018. Patients with anoxic brain injury were excluded from the study. Clinical, laboratory, and EEG data were reviewed to determine potentially predictive factors of NCSs. The impact of NCSs on in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and disability on discharge was measured; an modified Rankin scale of three or greater was considered disabled. Results: Of the 219 patients included in our study, a total of 14% (n = 31) had NCSs on continuous EEG, of which 42% (n = 13) had their first seizure discharge recorded during the first hour of continuous EEG monitoring. The presence of clinical seizures before continuous EEG (odds ratio = 1.787; 95% confidence interval = 1.197–2.667, P = 0.0045), history of epilepsy (odds ratio = 1.508; 95% confidence interval = 1.027–2.215, P = 0.035), and comatose state (29 vs. 16%; P = 0.0006) were associated with NCSs. Among EEG characteristics, the presence of interictal epileptiform discharges (P < 0.0001), lateralized rhythmic delta activity (P = 0.02), and lateralized periodic discharges (P < 0.0001) were associated with NCSs. Nonconvulsive seizures were significantly associated with longer in-hospital stay (23.68 ± 24.84 vs. 17.14 ± 20.52; P = 0.036) and disability on discharge (87% [n = 27] vs. 13% [n = 4], P = 0.02). However, there was no significant association between NCS and in-hospital mortality (9.6% [n = 3] vs. 10.6% [n = 20]; P = 0.1). Conclusions: Nonconvulsive seizures are associated with longer in-hospital stay and disability on discharge but not with in-hospital mortality in adult patients.
Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trial of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Autoimmune LGI1/CASPR2 Epilepsy
ObjectiveDrug‐resistant seizures are common in patients with leucine‐rich, glioma‐inactivated 1 (LGI1)‐IgG associated and contactin‐associated protein‐like 2 (CASPR2)‐IgG associated encephalitis. We performed the first randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial to evaluate efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in reducing seizure frequency.MethodsOur enrollment goal was 30 LGI1/CASPR2‐IgG–seropositive adult patients with ≥2 seizures per week. Patients were randomized to receive IVIG (0.5g/kg day 1, 1g/kg day 2, 0.6g/kg weeks 3 and 5) or volume‐matched intravenous normal saline. Following the blinded phase, the nonresponders in the placebo group received IVIG. The primary clinical outcome was 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline to 5 weeks.ResultsAfter enrollment of 17 patients (LGI1‐IgG, 14; CASPR2‐IgG, 3) over 34 months, the study was terminated due to slow enrollment. Six of 8 patients in the IVIG group were responders, compared to 2 of 9 in the placebo group (p = 0.044, odds ratio = 10.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.1–98.9). For the LGI1‐IgG seropositive subgroup, 6 of 8 patients in the IVIG group were responders, compared to zero of 6 in the placebo group. Two LGI1‐IgG–seropositive patients receiving IVIG, but none receiving placebo, were seizure‐free at the end of the blinded phase. Four of the 6 patients entering the open‐label IVIG arm reported ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. There were no correlations with LGI1/CASPR2‐IgG1–4 subclasses.InterpretationSuperiority of IVIG to placebo reached statistical significance for the primary endpoint for all patients and the subset with LGI1‐IgG. These results have to be interpreted with the caveat that the study did not reach its originally selected sample size. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:313–323
After-Hours EEG: Relative Value of Emergent Routine Versus Prolonged EEG Recordings
Objective: After-hours EEG is increasingly used in hospital patients. Although the detection of seizures and interictal epileptiform discharges has been shown to be higher with prolonged EEG (pEEG) than routine-duration EEG, the relative value for particular indications can inform utilization. Method: The Mayo EEG Report System was queried for after-hours emergent routine EEG (ErEEG) and pEEG performed between January 2015 and June 2015. Total 296 after-hours ErEEG were identified, of which 140 converted into pEEG were included in the study for direct comparison of two modalities. Indications were categorized as: mental status changes, recent seizures rule out continued nonconvulsive seizures, spells, and prognosis after anoxic brain injury. Categorical data were analyzed using the McNemar and Fisher exact tests; a P value of 0.05 was considered significant. Result: Prolonged EEG was superior to ErEEG for detection of interictal epileptiform discharges (61 vs. 48/140, P = 0.004) and seizures (29 vs. 17/140, P = 0.012). Seizure detection was greater for pEEG than ErEEG for the indication of evaluating for subclinical seizures after recent observed clinical seizures (14/41 [34.1%] versus 4/41 [9.8%], P = 0.002). There was no significant difference between modalities for seizure detection in patients undergoing evaluation of spells or mental status changes without previous observed seizures. Detection of seizures on pEEG was higher for recordings greater than 24 hours (8/46, 17%, P = 0.014) and 48 hours (19/26, 73%, P < 0.001) than recordings less than 24 hours (2/68, 3%). Seizure detection was higher with pEEG in comatose patients than ErEEG (17/51, 33% vs. 12/89, 13%; P = 0.009). Conclusions: Increased value was demonstrated for pEEG over ErEEG in patients undergoing evaluation after observed recent clinical seizures and for coma. No significant difference was found between ErEEG and pEEG for seizure detection in the relatively small subgroups of patients with mental status changes other than coma and without preceding seizure or spells.
Parenteral phenobarbital in status epilepticus revisited: Mayo Clinic experience
SummaryDespite phenobarbital (PB) being a key component in status epilepticus (SE) treatment algorithms for decades, it has fallen out of favor compared to newer nonsedating medications due to potential for respiratory suppression and prolonged sedation. We retrospectively analyzed all nonintubated patients with refractory SE treated with parenteral PB. Forty patients were identified as having received PB in the neurologic intensive care unit at Mayo Clinic over a 7‐year period through our pharmacy dispensing database. Patients who received PB for maintenance therapy, those replenishing subtherapeutic levels, those who were already intubated, and those receiving PB for a non‐SE indication were excluded. Clinical data, prior treatments, therapeutic response, and outcome were reviewed. Eight patients were identified. Ages ranged from 24 to 77 years (median = 64 years); all had focal SE, and none was comatose. Seizure activity improved acutely following PB administration in seven and stopped in six. Dosages ranged from 5 to 19.8 mg/kg (median = 10.1 mg/kg); none required intubation, and one received supplemental oxygen. Patients received a median of four antiepileptic drugs prior to PB. Median interval between first drug and PB was 23.5 hours. Glasgow Coma Scale score did not change following PB administration. One patient required intervention for hypotension. Moderate‐dose parenteral PB was effective in attaining seizure control in a significant proportion of noncomatose refractory SE patients. None required ventilatory support. PB dosages below those in recent guidelines may be sufficient to stop SE without clinically significant cardiopulmonary complications.
Spatial variation in high-frequency oscillation rates and amplitudes in intracranial EEG