Back to Authors

Rayi, Appaji

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3231-4616

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Citations 3

Erratum to: Characterizing Benefit from Temozolomide in MGMT Promoter Unmethylated and Methylated Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Alnahhas, Iyad , Alsawas, Mouaz , Raval, Raju R. , Ong, Shirley, Giglio, Pierre , Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Alsawas, Mouaz , Rayi, Appaji , Palmer, Joshua D. , Murad, M. Hassan , Puduvalli, Vinay K.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | July 10, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdab095 Get It

Characterizing benefit from temozolomide in MGMT promoter unmethylated and methylated glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Alnahhas, Iyad , Alsawas, Mouaz , Palmer, Joshua D. , Raval, Raju R. , Ong, Shirley, Giglio, Pierre , Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Palmer, Joshua D , Alsawas, Mouaz , Rayi, Appaji , Murad, M. Hassan , Puduvalli, Vinay K.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | October 30, 2020 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdaa082 Get It

Abstract Background The current standard of care for the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). While it is well established that TMZ has better efficacy in patients with MGMT promoter methylation, it remains an area of debate whether TMZ should be omitted when treating GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide separate estimates of median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with methylated and unmethylated GBM treated with RT with or without TMZ. We searched multiple databases from inception to January 13, 2020. Results The median OS for patients with unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ pooled from 5 phase III studies (N = 655) was 14.11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.18–15.04) with a median PFS of 4.99 months (95% CI, 4.25–5.72). In contrast, the median OS for patients with methylated GBM pooled from 6 studies (N = 753) was 24.59 months (95% CI, 22.19–26.99) with a median PFS pooled from 7 studies (N = 805) of 9.51 months (95% CI, 7.41–11.61). There is a paucity of prospective data pertaining to OS/PFS in unmethylated patients treated with RT only and therefore a direct comparison was not possible. Conclusions This meta-analysis provides estimates of survival for patients with MGMT methylated or unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ. Further research is needed to delineate whether TMZ should be withheld for patients with unmethylated GBM outside of the setting of clinical trials.
Predictors of Nonconvulsive Seizure and Their Effect on Short-term Outcome
Singh, Jaysingh , Rayi, Appaji , Peng, Juan , Bell, W., Britton, Jeffrey, Thakur, Gaurav , Alexander, J. Steven , Bell, William, Britton, Jeffrey W.

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | March 6, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 221-225

10.1097/wnp.0000000000000687 Get It

Introduction: Nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) are common in critically ill adult patients with acute neurologic conditions. However, the effect of NCSs on patient outcome remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of NCSs on short-term outcome and to assess the clinical and EEG factors associated with NCSs. Methods: We retrospectively identified 219 adult patients from the EEG reporting system who underwent continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring between January 2018 and June 2018. Patients with anoxic brain injury were excluded from the study. Clinical, laboratory, and EEG data were reviewed to determine potentially predictive factors of NCSs. The impact of NCSs on in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and disability on discharge was measured; an modified Rankin scale of three or greater was considered disabled. Results: Of the 219 patients included in our study, a total of 14% (n = 31) had NCSs on continuous EEG, of which 42% (n = 13) had their first seizure discharge recorded during the first hour of continuous EEG monitoring. The presence of clinical seizures before continuous EEG (odds ratio = 1.787; 95% confidence interval = 1.197–2.667, P = 0.0045), history of epilepsy (odds ratio = 1.508; 95% confidence interval = 1.027–2.215, P = 0.035), and comatose state (29 vs. 16%; P = 0.0006) were associated with NCSs. Among EEG characteristics, the presence of interictal epileptiform discharges (P < 0.0001), lateralized rhythmic delta activity (P = 0.02), and lateralized periodic discharges (P < 0.0001) were associated with NCSs. Nonconvulsive seizures were significantly associated with longer in-hospital stay (23.68 ± 24.84 vs. 17.14 ± 20.52; P = 0.036) and disability on discharge (87% [n = 27] vs. 13% [n = 4], P = 0.02). However, there was no significant association between NCS and in-hospital mortality (9.6% [n = 3] vs. 10.6% [n = 20]; P = 0.1). Conclusions: Nonconvulsive seizures are associated with longer in-hospital stay and disability on discharge but not with in-hospital mortality in adult patients.