Hota, Piyush

Urinary urea is a key biomarker for tracking protein oxidation and nitrogen balance. A persistent analytical limitation is that conventional total-nitrogen assays do not deconvolute urinary urea from urinary ammonia, and direct measurement still requires capital-intensive clinical analyzers. Here, we implement and independently validate two cost-effective methods that resolve urinary urea by pairing the presence and absence of urease: Method 1 is a urease-coupled potentiometric assay using an ammonium ion-selective electrode (ISE method); Method 2 is a microplate Berthelot–salicylate colorimetric assay employing a repurposed consumer-grade aquarium ammonia test kit (API®) (API method). Each method was validated against the Roche Cobas C311 clinical analyzer (ISE for urinary ammonia and API for urinary urea) in healthy adult volunteers (n = 10 each), and API–ISE were then compared head-to-head for urinary urea. ISE vs. Cobas yielded R2 = 0.967, slope 95% CI [0.867, 1.173], and Bland–Altman bias of −1.02 mM (95% LoA [−7.40, +5.36] mM). API vs. Cobas yielded R2 = 0.973, slope 95% CI [0.790, 1.039], and bias of −1.55 mM (95% LoA [−11.56, +8.46] mM). API–ISE urinary urea comparison confirmed mutual agreement (R2 = 0.9976, slope 95% CI [0.946, 1.024]; bias of +3.47 mM; 95% LoA [−14.60, +21.53] mM), with mean recoveries near 100% (API: 100.7 ± 2.9%; ISE: 100.6 ± 5.4%; 20–350 mM). Both methods agreed with the clinical analyzer, supporting their potential for decentralized, resource-limited testing; clinical and point-of-care validations are needed.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects thousands of hospitalized patients annually, yet early detection remains challenging as serum creatinine elevation lags behind clinical deterioration. Decreased urine output (UO) represents a key diagnostic criterion of AKI, sometimes manifesting hours before biochemical changes; however, current manual monitoring methods are labor-intensive and prone to error. Here, we developed and validated a simple, cost-effective automated urine flow meter using non-contact optical sensors, a peristaltic pump, and microcontroller-based automation for precise, real-time monitoring of urine output in clinical settings, named P-meter. Three successive prototypes (V1, V2, V3) were validated against gold-standard gravimetric measurements over 285 h of testing during animal experiments that required bladder catheterization. Iterative refinement addressed miniaturization challenges, fluid dynamics optimization, and sensor positioning to achieve progressively improved accuracy. The optimized V3 prototype demonstrated further enhanced volumetric precision, stability, and flow accuracy with near-unity linearity vs. reference method (R2 = 0.9889), minimal bias (mean error −0.1 mL), and 94.18% agreement within confidence limits (n = 86), outperforming the initial V1 prototype (R2 = 0.9971, mean error −1.69 mL, n = 207) and intermediate V2 design (R2 = 0.9941, mean error 3.63 mL, n = 390), primarily in terms of reduced bias and improved agreement. The P-meter offers accurate urine output monitoring at a lower cost than commercial systems, facilitating its use in early AKI detection and thereby improving patient outcomes.

Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy of existing and new aerosol mitigation methods during nebulization (Neb) in combination with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen supplementation and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Methods: We recorded fugitive aerosol particle concentrations over time and assessed the peak (P) and area (A) efficacy of active and passive mitigation methods, comparing them to a no-mitigation condition. Peak efficacy was measured by the reduction in maximum aerosol concentration, while area efficacy was quantified by the reduction of the area under the aerosol concentration–time curve. Results: For HFNC with Neb, we found that active mitigation using a mask with a biofilter and a fan (referred to as the aerosol barrier mask) significantly outperformed passive mitigation with a face mask. The peak and area efficacy for aerosol reduction were 99.0% and 96.4% for active mitigation and 35.9% and 7.6% for passive mitigation, respectively. For NIV with Neb, the active mitigation method, using a box with a biofilter and fan, also outperformed passive mitigation using only the box. The peak and area efficacy for aerosol reduction were 92.1% and 85.5% for active mitigation and 53.7.0% and 25.4% for passive mitigation, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that active mitigation set up systems advantageous for effective reduction of airborne aerosols during aerosol generated procedures.

Colorimetric sensors are widely used because of their inherent advantages including accuracy, rapid response, ease-of-use, and low costs; however, they usually lack reusability, which precludes the continuous use of a single sensor. We have developed a threshold-responsive colorimetric system that enables repeated analyte measurements by a single colorimetric sensor. The threshold responsive algorithm automatically adjusts the sensor exposure time to the analyte and measurement frequency according to the sensor response. The system registers the colorimetric sensor signal change rate, prevents the colorimetric sensor from reaching saturation, and allows the sensor to fully regenerate before the next measurement is started. The system also addresses issues common to colorimetric sensors, including the response time and range of detection. We demonstrate the benefits and feasibility of this novel system, using colorimetric sensors for ammonia and carbon dioxide gases for continuous monitoring of up to (at least) 60 detection cycles without signs of analytical performance degradation of the sensors.