Karam, Karam Abi

Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy of existing and new aerosol mitigation methods during nebulization (Neb) in combination with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen supplementation and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Methods: We recorded fugitive aerosol particle concentrations over time and assessed the peak (P) and area (A) efficacy of active and passive mitigation methods, comparing them to a no-mitigation condition. Peak efficacy was measured by the reduction in maximum aerosol concentration, while area efficacy was quantified by the reduction of the area under the aerosol concentration–time curve. Results: For HFNC with Neb, we found that active mitigation using a mask with a biofilter and a fan (referred to as the aerosol barrier mask) significantly outperformed passive mitigation with a face mask. The peak and area efficacy for aerosol reduction were 99.0% and 96.4% for active mitigation and 35.9% and 7.6% for passive mitigation, respectively. For NIV with Neb, the active mitigation method, using a box with a biofilter and fan, also outperformed passive mitigation using only the box. The peak and area efficacy for aerosol reduction were 92.1% and 85.5% for active mitigation and 53.7.0% and 25.4% for passive mitigation, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that active mitigation set up systems advantageous for effective reduction of airborne aerosols during aerosol generated procedures.

Abstract In the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, it became evident that singing carried a substantial risk of virus transmission. Consequently, new regulations were implemented to safeguard the population, and the adoption of singing masks emerged as a pivotal measure to curb the spread of COVID-19 during vocal performances. However, the discomfort and impediment to sensory expression caused by these masks posed significant challenges, particularly for individuals whose passions or professions revolved around singing. This study shows a novel solution to address these issues: the Aerosol Barrier System for Singing. The system features a transparent screen with an Impactor-Fan-Filter. The Impactor-Fan-Filter (IFF) is integrated into the transparent screen and strategically positioned within 1.5 feet of the singer's face. We demonstrated that the system effectively reduces the dispersion of aerosols generated during singing by over 99%. In addition, comparative sound analysis indicated that the system minimizes interference with sound waves, ensuring the preservation of sound quality. Furthermore, the transparent screen offers an unobstructed view of the singer, enhancing the overall performance experience. Our system adheres to several crucial criteria for an effective solution tailored to the needs of singers: it prioritizes safety and comfort, upholds sound quality, and facilitates an unrestricted view of the singer's entire face for the benefit of the audience, conductors, and ensemble members.

Abstract Contaminated aerosols and micro droplets are easily generated by infected hosts through sneezing, coughing, speaking and breathing1-3 and harm humans’ health and the global economy. While most of the efforts are usually targeted towards protecting individuals from getting infected,4 eliminating transmissions from infection sources is also important to prevent disease transmission. Supportive therapies for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) pneumonia such as oxygen supplementation, nebulizers and non-invasive mechanical ventilation all carry an increased risk for viral transmission via aerosol to healthcare workers.5-9 In this work, we study the efficacy of five methods for self-containing aerosols emitted from infected subjects undergoing nebulization therapies with a diverse spectrum on oxygen delivery therapies. The work includes five study cases: Case I: Use of a Full-Face Mask with biofilter in bilevel positive airway pressure device (BPAP) therapy, Case II: Use of surgical mask in High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy, Case III: Use of a modified silicone disposable mask in a HFNC therapy, Case IV: Use of a modified silicone disposable mask with a regular nebulizer and normal breathing, Case V: Use of a mitigation box with biofilter in a Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilator (NIPPV). We demonstrate that while cases I, III and IV showed efficacies of 98-100%; cases II and V, which are the most commonly used, resulted with significantly lower efficacies of 10-24% to mitigate the dispersion of nebulization aerosols. Therefore, implementing cases I, III and IV in health care facilities may help battle the contaminations and infections via aerosol transmission during a pandemic.