Back to Authors

Kottschade, Rebecca S.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

A Multiregional Decentralized Clinical Trial Program to Improve Access
Haddad, Tufia C. , Mercado, Lydia A., Enarson, David A., Sener, Ugur, Price, Katharine A., Juhn, Young J., Cartin‐Ceba, Rodrigo , Colón‐Otero, Gerardo , Kottschade, Rebecca S., Le‐Rademacher, Jennifer , Sener, Uğur , Kumar, Amanika , Juhn, Young J. , Willman, Cheryl L. , Garovic, Vesna D.

JAMA Network Open | June 5, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 6 | Pages: e2617204

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.17204 Get It

Importance Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) aim to increase trial access for underrepresented populations (URP) and ensure study outcomes, conclusions, and policy-related decisions are applicable to diverse populations. Objective To assess trends in the percentage of accrued participants from more than 120 miles from the research site upon DCT program implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants This descriptive quality improvement study was conducted from January 2024 to March 2025 at Mayo Clinic, a US multiregional, academic medical center (AMC) comprising 3 sites and an affiliated, community-based health care system. All individuals who consented and/or accrued to an institutional review board–approved clinical trial were included. Exposure DCTs are defined as trials with at least 1 decentralized capability beyond remote consent. DCT program development began July 2022. By January 2024, remote consent, video telehealth visits, remote phlebotomy, and device services were implemented across all sites and departments. Remote monitoring and oral medication delivery were available on a limited basis. Prospective automated program and DCT participant data collection and quarterly reporting began in January 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures Percentage of all DCT accrued participants with a residential zip code more than 120 miles from 1 of 3 AMC sites. Results There were 7469 participants (median [IQR] age, 62 [51-70] years; 3594 [48.1%] female; 241 [3.2%] Asian, 391 [5.2%] Black or African American, and 6347 [85.0%] White individuals) accrued to 765 DCTs. During the study period, the percentage of DCT participants residing more than 120 miles from an AMC site ranged from 18.9% in the first quarter (Q1) of 2024 (383 of 2032 participants) to 29.6% in Q1 of 2025 (346 of 1170 participants). Of those accrued, 1147 (15.4%) were of a racial or ethnic URP, ranging from 12.5% in Q1 of 2024 (253 participants) to 17.4% in Q1 of 2025 (204 participants). There were 1554 (20.8%) participants from a rural location, ranging from 16.6% in Q1 of 2024 (338 participants) to 24.9% in Q1 of 2025 (291 participants). Additionally, by geospatial distance from an AMC site, the male-to-female ratio was nearly 50:50, and the age distribution appeared similar. Conclusions and Relevance In this quality improvement study of a DCT program implementation, DCT accruals trended favorably among those residing more than 120 miles from an AMC site and those of rural or URP populations. While these findings cannot be directly attributed to program implementation, they are reassuring that this strategy may address some barriers to clinical trial access. Future studies should assess the sustained effectiveness and scalability of DCT models in improving equitable trial access.
564 Digital pill diaries in an electronic health record system: Enhancing chemotherapy adherence monitoring in decentralized clinical trials
Galloway, Taylor , Konzen, Karen A., Shanmugam, Chitra, Gutowski, Julie, Breutzman, Emily, Raske, Robert, Kottschade, Rebecca S., Haddad, Tufia C. , Sener, Uğur , Shanmugam, Chitra, Gutowski, Julie, Gundelach, Justin H.

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science | March 25, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: s1 | Pages: 165-166

10.1017/cts.2024.1135 Get It

Objectives/Goals: Mayo Clinic’s Clinical Trials Beyond Walls™ (CTBW) program collaborates with study teams to implement decentralized elements in clinical trials, enabling participation from home or local settings. In cancer treatment trials, traditional paper pill diaries are replaced with real-time digital tracking solutions to monitor chemotherapy adherence. Methods/Study Population: The CTBW team developed a solution to deliver electronic pill diaries to research participants using the electronic health record (EHR) system Epic and patient portal MyChart1. The solution includes a portal message to remind participants to take chemotherapy. Medication dose, date taken, and reasons for missed doses (e.g., “I forgot” or “side effects were bothersome”) are captured. An automated in-basket notification system alerts the study team when predefined conditions are met. Configurable medication schedules ensure diaries are sent according to the prescribed frequency. Reports were generated to allow study teams to monitor all participant diaries. Results/Anticipated Results: The CTBW team implemented this digital pill diary in neuro-oncology trial NCT066250472. We anticipate the pill diary in the patient portal will enhance chemotherapy adherence by capturing real-time data in a platform widely used by Mayo Clinic patients. This patient-reported data is stored in the EHR, where it is accessible to providers and study teams. This allows for continuous monitoring, which facilitates a streamlined review of potential adverse events, improved compliance visibility, and timely treatment adjustments compared to paper-based or external solutions. The system also streamlines data entry, reducing human error and eliminating manual transcription. The created language and workflow templates allow the CTBW to scale this approach to future cancer trials Discussion/Significance of Impact: Decentralized clinical trial participants may never visit Mayo Clinic, making digital recording essential. The EHR-based digital pill diary enables continuous monitoring within a familiar system for providers and patients, increasing study team visibility, and allowing for earlier intervention in cases of non-compliance or adverse events.
Transforming the Activation of Clinical Trials
Watters, Julie T., Pitzen, Jason H., Sanders, Linda J., Bruce, Virginia M., Cornell, Alissa R., Cseko, Gary C., Grace, Janice S., Kwon, Pamela S., Kukla, Andrea K., Lee, Michael S. , Monosmith, Michelle D., Myren, John D., Kottschade, Rebecca S., Shaft, Marc N., Weis, Jennifer A., Welter, Jane C., Bharucha, Adil E. , Bruce, Virginia Nickie M, Weis, Jennifer Jenny A, Bruce, Virginia M., Cseko, Gary C.

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics | November 6, 2017 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 43-46

10.1002/cpt.898 Get It

The Institute of Medicine and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognize that activating clinical trials in the United States is lengthy and inefficient. Downstream consequences include increased expense, suboptimal accrual, move of clinical trials overseas, and delayed availability of treatments for patients. An in‐tandem processing initiative is here highlighted that transformed the activation of clinical trials (TACT), reduced the activation time by 70%, and offers a paradigm for enhanced translational readiness.