Citations

Genetic testing in nephrology is becoming increasingly important to diagnose patients and to provide appropriate care. This is especially true for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) because this is a common cause of kidney failure and genetically complex. In addition to the major genes, PKD1 and PKD2 , there are at least six minor loci, and phenotypic, and in some cases, genetic overlap with other cystic disorders. Targeted next-generation sequencing, a low-cost, high-throughput technique, has made routine genetic testing viable in nephrology clinics. Appropriate pre- and post-testing genetic counseling is essential to the testing process. Carefully assessing variants is also critical, with the genetic report classifying variants in accordance with American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. However, variant of uncertain significance (VUSs) may pose a significant challenge for the ordering clinician. In ADPKD, and particularly within PKD1 , there is high allelic heterogeneity; no single variant is present in more than 2% of families. The Mayo/Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation variant database, a research tool, is the best current database of PKD1 and PKD2 variants containing over 2300 variants identified in individuals with polycystic kidney disease, but novel variants are often identified. In patients with a high pretest probability of ADPKD on the basis of clinical criteria, but no finding of a pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variant in a cystic kidney gene, additional evaluation of cystic gene VUS can be helpful. In this case-based review, we propose an algorithm for the assessment of such variants in a clinical setting and show how some can be reassigned to a diagnostic grouping. When assessing the relevance of a VUS, we consider both patient/family-specific and allele-related factors using population and variant databases and available prediction tools, as well as genetic expertise. This analysis plus further family studies can aid in making a genetic diagnosis.

Abstract Background There are no robust data addressing the United States (US) experience with the 0/2 hours (h) European Society of Cardiology (ESC) algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the 0/2h ESC-recommended absolute deltas in a US population. Methods Observational US cohort study of ED patients undergoing 0 and 2 h hs-cTnT measurements. The 99th percentiles upper reference limits (URL) used were 10 ng/L for women and 15 ng/L for men. Diagnostic outcomes were the adjudicated diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction (MI, type 1 or 2). Results A total of 1084 patients met inclusion criteria, amongst which 49% were women. Chest discomfort was reported in 521 (48%) patients. Among patients with a baseline hs-cTnT≤99th URL (n=434), 4 MIs occurred. To rule-out MI, an absolute 0-2h delta change <4 ng/L resulted in a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 39.8, 100) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (95% CI: 99.1, 100). To rule-in MI, an absolute 0-2h delta ≥10 ng/L had a specificity of 99.8 % (95% CI: 98.7, 99.9) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 75% (95% CI: 19.4, 99.4). Among patients with a baseline hs-cTnT >99th URL (n=650), 110 MIs occurred. In these patients, both rule-out (sensitivity 65%, NPV 91%) and rule-in (specificity 7.2%, PPV 11%) were poor using the ESC-recommended absolute deltas. Among patients with modest hs-cTnT increases (99th URL to 100 ng/L) neither the ESC-recommended absolute nor the Fourth Universal Definition of MI (UDMI)-recommended relative deltas provided acceptable performance. Among patients with marked hs-cTnT increases at presentation (>100 ng/L), a relative delta change >20% as recommended by the UDMI resulted in a superior rule-in performance, with a specificity of 92.0% (95% CI 74.0, 99.0) and PPV of 84.6% (57.4, 95.7). Conclusions In our unselected US-cohort of patients undergoing hs-cTnT, the 0/2h ESC algorithm had a good diagnostic performance in patients without myocardial injury at presentation. Conversely, in patients with myocardial injury at baseline, the ESC-recommended absolute deltas performed poorly to determine who had MI. In patients with marked hs-cTnT increases >100 ng/L at presentation, the UDMI recommended 20% relative change showed good rule-in performance.

Rare familial spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) kindreds implicate genetic disease predisposition and provide a unique opportunity for candidate gene discovery. Whole-genome sequencing was performed in fifteen probands with non-syndromic SCAD who had a relative with SCAD, eight of whom had a second relative with extra-coronary arteriopathy. Co-segregating variants and associated genes were prioritized by quantitative variant, gene, and disease-level metrics. Curated public databases were queried for functional relationships among encoded proteins. Fifty-four heterozygous coding variants in thirteen families co-segregated with disease and fulfilled primary filters of rarity, gene variation constraint, and predicted-deleterious protein effect. Secondary filters yielded 11 prioritized candidate genes in 12 families, with high arterial tissue expression (n = 7), high-confidence protein-level interactions with genes associated with SCAD previously (n = 10), and/or previous associations with connective tissue disorders and aortopathies (n = 3) or other vascular phenotypes in mice or humans (n = 11). High-confidence associations were identified among 10 familial SCAD candidate-gene-encoded proteins. A collagen-encoding gene was identified in five families, two with distinct variants in COL4A2. Familial SCAD is genetically heterogeneous, yet perturbations of extracellular matrix, cytoskeletal, and cell–cell adhesion proteins implicate common disease-susceptibility pathways. Incomplete penetrance and variable expression suggest genetic or environmental modifiers.

ImportanceSystematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.ExposureTreatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.ResultsOf 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19–related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Abstract Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women and men globally, with most due to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite progress during the last 30 years, ASCVD mortality is now increasing, with the fastest relative increase in middle-aged women. Missed or delayed diagnosis and undertreatment do not fully explain this burden of disease. Sex-specific factors, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, premature menopause (especially primary ovarian insufficiency), and polycystic ovary syndrome are also relevant, with good evidence that these are associated with greater cardiovascular risk. This position statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society focuses on these factors, as well as sex-specific effects on lipids, including lipoprotein(a), over the life course in women which impact ASCVD risk. Women are also disproportionately impacted (in relative terms) by diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and auto-immune inflammatory disease. All these effects are compounded by sociocultural components related to gender. This panel stresses the need to identify and treat modifiable cardiovascular risk factors earlier in women, especially for those at risk due to sex-specific conditions, to reduce the unacceptably high burden of ASCVD in women.

BACKGROUND: The financial burden linked to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chest pain on the health care system is considerable. Angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is common, associated with adverse cardiovascular events, and may lead to repeat testing or hospitalizations. Diagnostic certainty can be achieved in patients with ANOCA using coronary reactivity testing (CRT); however, its financial effect on the patient has not been studied. Our goal was to assess the effect of CRT on health care–related cost in patients with ANOCA. METHODS: Patients with ANOCA who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) and CRT (CRT group) were matched to controls who had similar presentation but only underwent a CAG without CRT (CAG group). Standardized inflation-adjusted costs were collected and compared between the 2 groups on an annual basis for 2 years post the index date (CRT or CAG). RESULTS: Two hundred seven CRT and 207 CAG patients were included in the study with an average age of 52.3±11.5 years and 76% females. The total cost was significantly higher in the CAG group as compared with the CRT group ($37 804 [$26 933–$48 674] versus $13 679 [$9447–$17 910]; P <0.001). When costs are itemized and divided based on the Berenson-Eggers Type of Service categorization, the largest cost difference occurred in imaging (any type, including CAG; P <0.001), procedures (eg, percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting/thrombectomy) ( P =0.001), and test (eg, blood tests, EKG; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective observational study, assessment of CRT in patients with ANOCA was associated with significantly reduced annual total costs and health care utilization. Therefore, the study may support the integration of CRT into clinical practice.

Introduction: Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a recognized cause of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. It was found to be associated with accelerated bioprosthetic degeneration and higher rates of valve re-replacement. Hypothesis: Warfarin for 3 months after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) protects against accelerated valve degeneration and is therefore associated with better outcomes compared to dual antiplatelet (DAPT) and single antiplatelet therapies (SAPT). Methods: Adult patients who underwent TAVR (2012-2019) were identified retrospectively (n=1,501). Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded (n=657). Patients were classified into warfarin, DAPT, and SAPT groups based on antithrombotic regimen. Structural valve degeneration (SVD) was considered when patients developed new ≥ moderate trans-prosthetic regurgitation, increase in mean gradients ≥10 mmHg from baseline, or when gradients exceeded 20 mmHg. Discharge date was considered time zero. Results: Overall, 844 patients [mean age 80 (±9), 43% females, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score 6.7 (±5.0)] were included. Warfarin was used in 633 (75%) patients, DAPT in 164 (19%), and SAPT in 47 (6%). Median follow-up time was 2.5 (IQR 1.2-3.9) years. There was no difference in outcomes of ischemic stroke, death, valve re-intervention, SVD, their composite endpoint, or hemorrhagic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke/RBC transfusion events (Figures 1 & 2), even after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion: Warfarin after TAVR was not associated with better clinical or hemodynamic outcomes or with worse adverse events compared to DAPT and SAPT.

Background: High-sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponin (cTn) assays quantifies cTn in most healthy men and women. Whether quantifiable cTn concentrations below the 99 th percentile upper-reference limit have short term prognostic implications in emergency department (ED) patients remains uncertain. Methods: Multicenter (n=22) United States (US) cohort of ED patients undergoing at least one hs-cTnT measurement (CV Data Mart Biomarker cohort). For this assay, the lowest reportable concentration is <6 ng/L. Sex-specific 99 th percentiles of 10 ng/L for women and 15 ng/L for men were used. The primary outcome was index hospitalization mortality. Results: A total of 85610 patients were examined, including 43043 women and 42567 men. A total of 775 index hospitalization deaths (0.91%) occurred, including 361 (0.84%) in women and 414 (0.97%) in men. Among women, baseline hs-cTnT concentrations were non-quantifiable (<LoQ) in 37.5%, quantifiable (LoQ-99 th ) in 21.6%, and increased >99 th percentile in 40.9%. Among men, baseline hs-cTnT concentrations were non-quantifiable (<LoQ) in 20.0%, quantifiable (LoQ-99 th ) in 37.4%, and increased >99 th percentile in 42.6%. Patients with higher concentrations were more likely to be older and had more comorbidities. Continuous baseline hs-cTnT (log) were associated with a higher odds of index hospitalization mortality (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.24-1.28). Following multivariable analyses, quantifiable hs-cTnT (LoQ-99 th ) also were associated with index hospitalization mortality in all patients (OR 2.07, 95% 1.22-3.53), and in both women (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.51-6.50) and men (OR 2.17, 95% 1.28-3.69) (Figure). Conclusions: Hs-cTnT concentrations within the reference range are more common in men than in women. Quantifiable hs-cTnT concentrations within the sex-specific reference range are associated with a higher risk of index hospitalization mortality, with a larger prognostic effect in women than in men.

Background: The 2021 ACC/AHA chest pain guidelines recommend risk scores such as HEAR (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk Factors) for short term risk-stratification yet limited data exists integrating them with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). Methods: Retrospective, multicenter (n=2), observational, U.S. cohort study of consecutive ED patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) who had at least one hs-cTnT (limit of quantitation, LoQ, <6 ng/L, and sex-specific 99 th percentiles of 10 ng/L for women and 15 ng/L for men) measurement on clinical indication in whom HEAR scores (0-8) were calculated. The composite major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) outcome was 30-day MI and death. Results: Among 1,979 ED patients undergoing hs-cTnT measurement, 1045 (53%) were classified as low-risk (0-3), 914 (46%) as intermediate-risk (4-6), and 20 (1%) as high-risk (7-8) based on HEAR scores. HEAR scores were not associated with an increased risk of 30-day MACE after adjusted analyses. Outcomes according to risk-strata based on HEAR scores and baseline hs-cTnT are shown in Table 1. Patients with quantifiable hs-cTnT (LoQ-99 th ) had an increased risk for 30-day MACE (3.4%) despite being estimated to be low-risk (0-3) per HEAR scores. Conversely, those with serial hs-cTnT<99 th percentile remained at low-risk (range 0% to 1.2%) for 30-day MACE across HEAR score strata. Conclusions: HEAR scores are of limited value in those with baseline hs-cTnT<LoQ or hs-cTnT>99 th percentile where hs-cTnT identifies very low and high-risk patients irrespective of HEAR scores. In those with baseline quantifiable hs-cTnT within the reference range (<99 th percentile), a higher risk (>1%) for 30-day MACE exists even in those with low HEAR scores. With serial hs-cTnT measurements, HEAR scores overestimate risk when hs-cTnT remains <99 th percentile.