Gulati, Martha

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally for both men and women, yet women remain historically underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials (CV trials), despite facing a disproportionately high burden of morbidity and mortality in many forms of CVD. Purpose We aim to determine the representation of women across a broad range of CV trials. Methods The participation of women in CV trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2017 to 2023 was systematically determined through the extraction of publicly available information. Data was extracted to identify the country of study, disease type, trial size, clinical intervention and age of the participants. We calculated the proportion of women and the ratio of number of females to male participants (F:M ratio) for each trial. The female participation to prevalence ratio (PPR) was estimated for each trial based on the relative prevalence of the disease by sex in the specified region. Results We identified 1,079 registered CV trials, which included 1,396,104 participants, of whom 571,641 (41.0%) were women. The median F:M ratio was significantly lower for studies on arrhythmia (0.5), coronary heart disease (CHD) (0.39), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (0.32) and heart failure (HF) (0.51), but was higher for obesity (1.44) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (2.86) CV trials. F:M ratio was higher for trials on lifestyle intervention (1.51) than for drug trials. PPRs were low for clinical trials on CHD (0.66), ACS (0.79), and stroke (0.74). There was a trend to increasing PPR from 2017 to 2023, p=0.056. Conclusion Representation of women in CV trials varies by disease state, region, intervention, and sponsor type. Better understanding of reasons for these differences may enable more tailored interventions to improve representation of women globally and across therapeutic areas.Figure 1 Figure 2

Importance Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death globally for both men and women, yet women remain historically underrepresented in CV clinical trials, despite facing a disproportionately high burden of morbidity and mortality in many forms of CV disease. Objective To determine the representation of women across a broad range of CV trials. Evidence Review The participation of women in CV trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2017 to 2023 was systematically determined through the extraction of publicly available information. Data were extracted to identify the country of study, disease type, trial size, clinical intervention, and age of the participants. The proportion of women and the ratio of number of female to male participants (F:M ratio) were calculated for each trial. The women’s participation:prevalence ratio (PPR) was estimated for each trial based on the relative prevalence of the disease by sex in the specified region. Findings A total of 1079 registered CV trials were identified, including 1 396 104 participants, of whom 571 641 (41.0%) were women. The F:M ratio was significantly lower for studies on arrhythmia (median [IQR], 0.5), coronary heart disease (median [IQR], 0.39 [0.33-0.70]), acute coronary syndrome (median [IQR], 0.32 [0.24-0.51]), and heart failure (median [IQR], 0.51 [0.32-0.87]) but higher for obesity (median [IQR], 1.44 [1.08-4.50]) and pulmonary hypertension (median [IQR], 2.86 [1.50-3.97]) trials. The F:M ratio was higher for trials on lifestyle interventions (median [IQR], 1.51 [0.77-3.24]) than for drug trials. PPRs were low for clinical trials on coronary heart disease (median [IQR], 0.66 [0.50-0.86]), acute coronary syndrome (median [IQR], 0.79 [0.51-0.87]), and stroke (median [IQR], 0.74 [0.61-0.95]). Representation of women in CV trials varied by disease state, region, intervention, and sponsor type. Conclusions and Relevance These findings highlight both progress and persistent challenges in representation of women within CV trials. These gaps not only limit the generalizability of trial outcomes but also perpetuate inequities in evidence-based care for women with CV conditions.

Abstract Aim The cardiovascular benefits provided by glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) extend beyond weight reduction and glycaemic control. One possible mechanism may relate to blood pressure (BP) reduction. We aim to quantify the BP‐lowering effects of GLP1‐RAs. Methods A comprehensive database search for placebo‐controlled randomized controlled trials on GLP‐1RA treatment was conducted until December 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, employing a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to determine outcomes with a mean difference (MD) in mmHg and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was the mean difference in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP. Subgroup analyses and meta‐regressions were done to account for covariates. Results Compared with placebo, GLP‐1RAs modestly reduced SBP [semaglutide: MD −3.40 (95% CI −4.22 to −2.59, p < .001); liraglutide: MD −2.61 (95% CI −3.48 to −1.74, p < .001); dulaglutide: MD −1.46 (95% CI −2.20 to −0.72, p < .001); and exenatide: MD −3.36 (95% CI −3.63 to −3.10, p < .001)]. This benefit consistently increased with longer treatment durations. Diastolic BP reduction was only significant in the exenatide group [MD −0.94 (95% CI −1.78 to −0.1), p = .03]. Among semaglutide cohorts, mean changes in glycated haemoglobin and mean changes in body mass index were directly associated with SBP reduction. Conclusion Patients on GLP‐1RA experienced modest SBP lowering compared with placebo. This observed effect was associated with weight/body mass index reduction and better glycaemic control, which suggests that BP‐lowering is an indirect effect of GLP‐1RA and unlikely to be responsible for the benefits.

Abstract Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women and men globally, with most due to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite progress during the last 30 years, ASCVD mortality is now increasing, with the fastest relative increase in middle-aged women. Missed or delayed diagnosis and undertreatment do not fully explain this burden of disease. Sex-specific factors, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, premature menopause (especially primary ovarian insufficiency), and polycystic ovary syndrome are also relevant, with good evidence that these are associated with greater cardiovascular risk. This position statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society focuses on these factors, as well as sex-specific effects on lipids, including lipoprotein(a), over the life course in women which impact ASCVD risk. Women are also disproportionately impacted (in relative terms) by diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and auto-immune inflammatory disease. All these effects are compounded by sociocultural components related to gender. This panel stresses the need to identify and treat modifiable cardiovascular risk factors earlier in women, especially for those at risk due to sex-specific conditions, to reduce the unacceptably high burden of ASCVD in women.

Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in women globally, cardiovascular care for women remains suboptimal, with poorer outcomes than for men. During the past two decades, there has been an incremental increase in research and publications on CVD in women, addressing sex-specific risk factors, symptoms, pathophysiology, treatment, prevention and identification of inequities in care. Nonetheless, once women have manifested CVD, they continue to have increasingly worse outcomes than men. An approach to addressing these global disparities has been the worldwide establishment of specialised centres providing cardiovascular care for women. These women’s heart centres (WHCs) allow a comprehensive approach to the cardiovascular care of women across the lifespan. The purpose of this article is to define the need for and role of these specialised centres by outlining sex-specific gaps in CVD care, and to provide guidance on components within WHCs that may be considered when establishing such programmes.

Nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in women is associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes; however, information regarding genetic variants that predispose women to nonobstructive CAD is lacking. Women from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study and the St. James Women Take Heart (WTH) Study were genotyped with the Cardio-MetaboChip. WISE enrolled women with symptoms and signs of ischemia referred for coronary angiography; WTH enrolled asymptomatic, community-based women without heart disease. Analyses were conducted with a case (WISE) - control (WTH) design and multivariate logistic regression models to investigate genetic variation associated with likelihood of nonobstructive CAD. One genetic marker, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2301753 on chromosome 6 in RNF39, achieved chip-wide significance for nonobstructive CAD ( P < 9.5 × 10−7). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, we found no variants achieved chip-wide significance. However, SNP rs2301753 on chromosome 6 in RNF39 was associated with reduced likelihood of nonobstructive CAD [odds ratio (OR) 0.42 and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.29 to 0.68], at a nominal level of P = 5.6 × 10−6, while SNP rs12818945 in the ATP2B1 locus on chromosome 12 was associated with increased odds for nonobstructive CAD (OR 2.38 and 95% CI of 1.63 to 3.45) and nominal P = 5.8 × 10−6. The functions of RNF39 and ATP2B1 raise the possibility that genes involved in cardio-dysfunction may contribute to nonobstructive CAD in Caucasian women and may provide insights into novel approaches for therapy and prevention. If replicated, incorporation of these genetic variants into diagnostic evaluation may identify women at high risk for nonobstructive CAD.

Background: A women-based formula for calculation of age-predicted maximum heart rate [age-predicted maximum heart rate=206−(0.88×age)] was established in asymptomatic volunteer women undergoing treadmill exercise tolerance testing (ETT). We sought to perform a comparison of the performance of this women-based formula for prediction of peak heart rate to the traditional formula [220−age] and our own database-generated prediction formula in a large database of women undergoing ETT. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive women who underwent symptom-limited Bruce protocol ETT at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2010. Women with known cardiovascular disease or those using beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or digitalis were excluded. Separate analyses were performed according to symptomatic status. Results: The study included 11,029 women (89.4% Caucasian) with a mean age 52±12 years; 3,632 (33%) were referred specifically for evaluation of symptoms. Age-predicted maximum heart rate calculated by the traditional formula was achieved by 49.7% of women versus 69.9% by the women-based formula with most of the underestimation observed in older women. Average absolute deviation between achieved and predicted peak heart rate (HR) was 10.85±9.18 bpm for traditional versus 11.98±9.00 for women-based formulas (dependent t =−16.64, p <0.0001). The linear regression line calculated from our population [HR=201−(0.67×age)] was closer to the women-based formula, both in terms of intercept and slope than the traditional formula. Peak HR was shown to be slightly affected (−2.5 bpm) by symptom status at referral, whereas smoking and diabetes more significantly reduced achieved peak HR. Conclusions: The women-based formula underestimated peak HR, especially in older women, but was observed to be closer in both intercept and slope to the regression line determined from our study in this large population of female patients. These sex-unique observations should be taken into account when determining adequacy and targets for ETT in women.