Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

4083 citation(s) found for "Uy, Jonathan J".

Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Benefit From Automated Insulin Delivery Irrespective of C-Peptide Level
Hirsch, Irl B., Kudva, Yogish C. , Blevins, Thomas , Raghinaru, Dan, Lum, John W. , Kollman, Craig, Pinsker, Jordan E. , Beck, Roy W. , Group*, 2IQP Study, Desjardins, Donna, Kurek, Corey, Kaur, Ravinder Jeet , Livingood, Daine, Rizvi, Shafaq , Graham, Timothy E., Terry, Adrienne, Luker, Ryan, Mellenthin, Melanie, Rezac, Stephanie, Liljenquist, David R., Rogers, Justin, Williams, Jonathan, Christensen, Rochelle, Lee, In‐Kyoung, Malone, Joann, Spanakis, Elias K. , Singh, Lakshmi G., Churchill, Jade, Comen, Kathleen, Scott, William H., Davis, Georgia M. , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Oladejo, Omolade , Usman, Sabeena, Ahmann, Andrew , Schmid, Caleb, Dean, Ariel, Branigan, Deborah , Caswell, Brittany, Heyerman, Tess, Tessman, Brian, Vanderheide, Jnh, Dennis, Brittany , Hendricks, Lisa, Reyes-Rodriguez, Clemente, Wolf, Valerie, Coyne, Kasey, Kravarusic, Jelena, Fronczyk, Evelyn, Herrmann, Stefanie, Penn, Samsam C., Casaubon, Luis, Espinosa, Valerie, Pandit, Keta, Perez, Jennifer, Stewart, Ana, Assir, Courtney, Fields, Cory, Kruger, Davida , Estrada, Kathleen, Jones, J. Kimberly, Mukhashen, Shereen, Corker, Natalie, Hunter, Heather, Layton, Paula, Brown, Sue A. , Afreen, Samina , Dhillon, Jasmeen, Emory, Emma, Fulkerson, David, Fuller, Morgan, Holmes, Viola, Kollar, Laura, Toole, Elyse, Levister, Camilla, O’Malley, Grenye , Ipek, Aslihan, Alabi, Denise, Ellis, Emily, Hassan, Shaziah, Ogyaadu, Selassie, Tamarez, Denisa, Weinstock, Ruth S. , Stone, Sheri , Bzdick, Suzan, Agostini, Lynn, Bulger, Jane , Wolpert, Howard , Atakov-Castillo, Astrid , Sullivan, Asya, Aia, Corinne, Brouillard, Elizabeth, Driscoll, Marsha, Lapier, Heather, Payra, Sherryl, Vancer, Louise, Averkiou, Xenia, Baran, Jesica, Holod, Rosanna, Litvicov, Patrisia, Mandava, Patali, Swinton, Sydney, Khakpour, Dori , Broyles, Frances E. , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Hairston, Babette, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Rickels, Michael R., Kamimoto, Jorge Jo, Peleckis, Amy J. , Sultan, Rahaf , Dalton-Bakes, Cornelia, Bourne, Patricia, Haidar, Ahmad, Pasqua, Melissa, Tardio, Vanessa , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Raskin, Philip, Jordan, L.F., Shao, Baomei, DoNguyen, Trang, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael , Lesniak, Amanda, Becerra, Mario, Denallo, Erica, Lewis, Claudia , Tribout, Jerry, Tribout, Megan, DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Phillips, Kylie, Lum, John W., Campos, Tiffany, Morrell, Beth, Oduah, Vanessa, Cardenas-Villamil, Gabriela, Morales, Amanda, Murphy, Carlos, Strayer, Heidi, Spanbauer, Charles , Kollman, Craig, Sasson-Katchalski, Ravid, Piquette, Nicole, Wheatcroft, Alex, WHITE, KIRSTIN N., Carmelo, KC, Janicek, Robert, Gabrielson, Deanna, Mercado, Kevin, Hirsch, Irl B. , Pinsker, Jordan E , Beck, Roy W , Hirsch, Irl B , Ahn, David , Rickels, Michael R. , Group*, 2IQP Study, Smith, Joshua W. , Christensen, Rochelle, Malone, Joann, Pasquel, Francisco J. , Tajrishi, Farbod Zahedi , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Dean, Ariel, Howard, Matthew, Vander-Heide, Jesse, Aleppo, Grazia , Fields, Cory, Layton, Paula, Oliveri, Mary Clancy , Levy, Carol J. , Agostini, Lynn, Steenkamp, Devin W , Spaic, Tamara , Liu, Selina , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Rickels, Michael R., Bourne, Patricia, Tsoukas, Michael A. , Pasqua, Melissa-Rosina , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael, Hatipoğlu, Betül , Lesniak, Amanda, Bellini, Natalie J. , Howard, Quiana , Lewis, Claudia, DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Lum, John W., Morrell, Beth, Morales, Amanda, Kanapka, Lauren , Kollman, Craig, Le, Hung V.

Diabetes Care | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2061-2066

10.2337/dc25-1125 | PMID 40953318 Get It

OBJECTIVE The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires a low C-peptide level for insulin pump coverage unless the individual is β-cell autoantibody positive, which precludes coverage of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems for many people with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In the Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Control-IQ+ Technology in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy study evaluating the t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ+ technology, adults with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes were categorized into high C-peptide (n = 195) and low C-peptide (n = 59) groups based on CMS criteria. RESULTS In the AID group, mean HbA1c decreased from baseline by 0.8%, which was significantly greater than in the control group with both high (P < 0.001) and low (P = 0.02) C-peptide levels. Results were similar in participants ≥65 years old. CONCLUSIONS The benefit of AID is present with high and low C-peptide levels. Thus, requiring a low C-peptide level as a prerequisite for AID therapy is not warranted.
Five-Year Outcomes from Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus for Parkinson Disease
Starr, Philip A. , Shivacharan, Rajat S. , Goldberg, E. Matilda, Tröster, Alexander I. , House, P.A. , Giroux, Monique, Hebb, Adam O. , Whiting, Donald, Leichliter, Timothy, Ostrem, Jill L. , Metman, Leo Verhagen , Karl, Jessica , Siddiqui, Mustafa , Haq, Ihtsham , Moguel‐Cobos, Guillermo , Ponce, Francisco A. , Pahwa, Rajesh, Lyons, Kelly , Buetefisch, Cathrin M. , Luca, Corneliu , Jagid, Jonathan , Revuelta, Gonzalo J. , Takács, István , Pourfar, Michael , Mandybur, George, Zadikoff, Cindy , Khandhar, Suketu M., Sedrak, Mark , Phibbs, Fenna T., Neimat, Joseph S. , Durphy, Jennifer, Ramirez‐Zamora, Adolfo , Pilitsis, Julie G. , Uitti, Ryan J. , Wharen, Robert E. , Park, Michael C. , Vitek, Jerrold L. , Group, INTREPID Study, Galifianakis, Nicholas B. , Schrock, Lauren E. , Farris, Sierra, Nazzarro, Jules M., Haq, Ihtsham , Ramirez-Zamora, Adolfo , Goldberg, Edward, Sani, Sepehr , Tatter, Stephen B. , Machado, André G. , Gostkowski, Michał , Tagliati, Michele , Mamelak, Adam N. , Okun, Michael S. , Foote, Kelly D. , Pahwa, Rajesh , Gross, Robert E. , Takacs, Istvan, Mogilner, Alon Y. , Duker, Andrew , Rosenow, Joshua M. , Group, INTREPID Study, Luciano, Marta San , Cooper, Scott E.

JAMA Neurology | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1181

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3373 | PMID 40952750 Get It

Importance The Implantable Neurostimulator for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease (INTREPID) trial was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). Objective To evaluate the long-term (5-year) outcomes and safety of STN-DBS for PD. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective, randomized (3:1), 12-week double-blind sham-controlled study at 23 movement disorder centers across the US with an open-label 5-year follow-up. Patients were implanted and followed up with the Vercise DBS system from May 2013 to December 2022. Eligibility required diagnosis of bilateral idiopathic PD with more than 5 years of motor symptoms, more than 6 hours per day of poor motor function, modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale scores higher than 2, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) score of 30 or higher (medication-off state), and 33% or higher improvement in UPDRS-III medication-on score. Intervention Bilateral STN-DBS for moderate to advanced PD. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included changes in UPDRS and dyskinesia scores, quality-of-life measures, and safety assessments. Exploratory analyses included medication reduction and DBS association with motor signs. Results A total of 313 patients were enrolled with 191 receiving the DBS system, and 137 participants (72%) completed the study. The study population had a mean (SD) age of 60 (7.9) years, with 139 (73%) male participants. Motor function without medication as measured by UPDRS-III improved from a mean (SD) of 42.8 (9.4) to 21.1 (10.6) at year 1 (51%; 95% CI, 49%-53%; P < .001) and 27.6 (11.6) at year 5 (36%; 95% CI, 33%-38%; P < .001). Activities of daily living without medication as measured by UPDRS-II improved from a mean (SD) of 20.6 (6.0) to 12.4 (6.1) at year 1 (41%; 95% CI, 38%-42%; P < .001) and 16.4 (6.5) at year 5 (22%; 95% CI, 18%-23%; P < .001). Dyskinesia scores decreased from 4.0 (5.1) to 1.0 (2.1) at year 1 (75%; 95% CI, 73%-75%; P < .001) and to 1.2 (2.1) at year 5 (70%; 95% CI, 63%-75%; P < .001). The levodopa equivalent dose was reduced by 28% at year 1, remaining stable at year 5 (28%; 95% CI, 26%-31%; P < .001). The most common serious adverse event was infection (9 participants). Ten deaths were reported, none related to the study. Conclusions and Relevance Although STN-DBS outcomes declined slightly, possibly due to the progressive nature of the disease, patients with PD sustained significant improvement in motor and activities of daily living scores, along with a stable reduction in anti-parkinsonian medication over the 5-year follow-up period.
Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 to Identify Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
Janelidze, Shorena, Bali, Divya , Dolado, Anna Orduña , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Blennow, Kaj, Doré, Vincent , Feizpour, Azadeh , Rowe, Christopher C., Villeneuve, Sylvia , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Groups, ADNI, ALFA, and PREVENT-AD Study, Adegoke, Olusegun, Hussen, Kedir Adem, Aisen, Paul, Ajayi, Adeyinka, Amaza, Hannatu, Apostolova, Liana G. , Ashford, Miriam T. , Ayo, Omobolanle, Bernard, Marie , Bernhardt, Haley, Boatwright, Virginia, Borowski, Bret, Brylska, Magdalena, Buckholtz, Neil, Cabrera, Yuliana, Cairns, Nigel J. , Carrillo, Maria, Choe, Mark, Clanton, Taylor, Conti, Cat, Craft, Hannah, Crawford, Karen , DeCarli, Charles , Benedetto, Joseph Di, Diaz, Adam , Drake, Erin, Faber, Kelley, Felmlee, Joel P. , Fidell, Andrea, Flenniken, Derek , Fockler, Juliet , Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Frank, R.T., Franklin, Erin , Glittenberg, Matt, Gunter, Jeff, Guzmán, Vanessa , Harvey, Danielle, Hedberg, Caitie, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Hoang, Isabella, Jackson, Jonathan , Jagust, William, Jahanshad, Neda , Jenkins, Cecily, Jiménez, Gustavo , Jin, Chengshi , Kachaturian, Zaven, Kaddurah-Daouk, Rima, Kantarci, Kejal, Karlawish, Jason , Khachaturian, Zaven S., Knaack, Alexander , Korecka, Magdalena , Kormos, Adrienne, Germano, Kaori Kubo, Kwang, Winnie, Lacy, Kaci, Landau, Susan, Lopresti, Brian J. , Magana, Fabiola, Mahboubi, Payam, Malone, Ian G., Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Matoush, Leonard, Miller, Melanie J. , Molchan, Susan, Montine, Tom, Moore-Weiss, John, Neu, Scott, Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ogwang, Sheila, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Parkins, Shaniya, Perrin, Richard J. , Petersen, Ronald, Pizzola, Jeremy, Potter, Zoë, Potter, William Z., Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Reyes, Calvin, Reyes, Denise , Robison, Justin , Chen, Stephanie Rossi, Ryan, Laurie, Sachdev, Pallavi, Saito, Naomi , Salazar, Jennifer, Thao, Mai Seng, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Shaw, Leslie M. , Silverberg, Nina, Strong, Joe, Talavera, Sandra , Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Thal, Leon J., Thomas, Lisa , Thompson, Paul , Tosun, Duygu , Trojanowki, John Q., Sacrey, Diana Truran, Villemagne, Victor L. , Walter, Sarah , Wan, Yang , Ward, Chad, Webb, Caitlin, Weiner, Michael W. , Weisensel, Trinity, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Poirier, Judes, Breitner, John C.S. , Badawy, Mohamed , Baril, Andrée‐Ann, Aguilar, Ricardo A, Gorriti, Annabella B, Gispert, Lidia C, Martinez, Alba C, Iglesias, Ruth D, Julian, Sherezade F, Serra, P, González‐Escalante, Armand , Penas, Laura H, Rodriguez, Gema H, Ninou, Jordi H, Gamaz, Laura Iglesias, Knezevic, Iva, Alvarez, Paula M, Diaz, Tania M, Palacios, Eva , Ballester, A, Mendez, Sandra P, Freixedes, Laura Ros, Vila, Aleix S, Harster, Lluis S, Prat, Anna S, Jaramillo, Marc V, Jack, Clifford R , Feizpour, Azadeh , Doré, Vincent , Pichet Binette, Alexa , Salvadó, Gemma , Janelidze, Shorena , Therriault, Joseph , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Stomrud, Erik , Mattsson, Niklas , Palmqvist, Sebastian , Coomans, Emma M. , Teunissen, Charlotte E. , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Gispert, Juan Domingo , Blennow, Kaj , Alcolea, Daniel , Fortea, Juan , Johnson, Sterling C. , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Schindler, Suzanne E. , Suárez‐Calvet, Marc , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Hansson, Oskar , Groups, ADNI, ALFA, and PREVENT-AD Study, Aisen, Paul , Barnes, Lisa L. , Beckett, Laurel , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Donohue, Michael , Drake, Erin, Erickson, Claire M. , Fletcher, Evan M. , Arani, Arvin , Foroud, Tatiana , Fox, Nick C. , Frank, Richard, González, Hector, Green, Robert C. , Grill, Joshua D. , Harkins, Kristin , Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jo, Taeho, Kaddurah‐Daouk, Rima , Kantarci, Kejal , Koeppe, Robert A. , Largent, Emily A. , Lee, Edward B. , Lee, Virginia M.‐Y. , Morris, John C. , Nho, Kwangsik T. , Nir, Talia M. , Nudelman, Kelly , Okonkwo, Ozioma, Petersen, Ronald, Rabinovici, Gil D. , Rafii, Michael S. , Reid, Robert, Reyes, Denise, Risacher, Shannon L. , Mindt, Mónica Rivera , Sachdev, Pallavi, Saykin, Andrew J. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Li, Shen , Smith, Stephanie R. , Snyder, Peter J. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Yushkevich, Paul A. , Badawy, Mohamed, Baillet, Sylvain , Minguillón, Carolina , Brugulat‐Serrat, Anna , Cacciaglia, Raffaele , Campo, Marta del , Pascual, Maria, Rodríguez‐Fernández, Blanca , Vilor‐Tejedor, Natàlia

JAMA Neurology | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1122

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217 | PMID 40952756 Get It

Importance Advances in Alzheimer disease (AD) have shifted research focus to earlier disease stages, necessitating more scalable approaches to identify cognitively unimpaired individuals with amyloid β (Aβ) pathology. Objective To assess the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) for classifying Aβ status in cognitively unimpaired individuals, both as a stand-alone test and in a 2-step approach where positive plasma results were confirmed using a second modality (Aβ positron emission tomography [PET] or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional cohort study used data collected between June 2009 and March 2024. We included 2916 cognitively unimpaired participants from 12 international independent observational cohorts in the US, Europe, Australia, and Canada with available plasma p-tau217 levels and CSF or PET Aβ biomarkers. Performance comparisons between mass spectrometry and immunoassay-based p-tau217 measurements were also performed (n = 964). Exposures Plasma p-tau217 levels measured by immunoassay. Main Outcome and Measures Aβ status, determined by CSF or Aβ PET biomarkers. Results Participants had a mean (SD) age of 66.9 (9.9) years; 971 (33.3%) were Aβ positive by either CSF or PET, 1667 (57.2%) were women, and 1108 (38.1%) carried at least 1 APOE ε4 allele. As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124. Immunoassays demonstrated comparable PPVs to mass spectrometry (80% [95% CI, 74-86] vs 85% [95% CI, 81-90]; P = .12) but significantly lower overall accuracy (82% [95% CI, 79-84]% vs 88 [95% CI, 86-90]; P < .001) and true Aβ-positive detection rate (49% [95% CI, 43-55] vs 69% [95% CI, 64-75]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance The findings highlight the potential of plasma p-tau217 as a stand-alone test—or when used in a sequential 2-step approach alongside PET or CSF testing—as a cost-effective, scalable, and minimally burdensome strategy for identifying preclinical AD. Tailored screening workflows that incorporate p-tau217 can improve efficiency in participant selection for preclinical AD trials and, in the future, help guide access to disease-modifying treatments.
Exploring Myths of Perioperative Autologous Red Blood Cell Salvage
Warner, Matthew A. , Klompas, Allan M. , Warner, Matthew A , Kaufman, Margit, Jahr, Jonathan S. , Perelman, Seth , Raphael, Jacob , Tan, Gee Mei , Frank, Steven M. , Waters, Jonathan H.

Anesthesiology | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1357-1370

10.1097/aln.0000000000005586 | PMID 40951985 Get It

Does back pain catastrophizing influence 60-month surgical outcomes for patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis? A Quality Outcomes Database study
Schonfeld, Elan, Boyett, Deborah , Mummaneni, Praveen V., Chou, Dean , Bydon, Mohamad , Bisson, Erica F. , Shaffrey, Christopher I. , Glassman, Steven D. , Foley, Kevin T. , Potts, Eric A. , Yen, Chun Po, Coric, Domagoj , Knightly, John J. , Wang, Michael Y. , Fu, Kai-Ming, Slotkin, Jonathan R., Asher, Anthony L. , Virk, Michael S., Haid, Regis W., Chan, Andrew K. , Yang, Eunice, Schonfeld, Elan , Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Park, Paul , Virk, Michael S.

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | September 12, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 529-539

10.3171/2025.5.spine25310 | PMID 40779803 Get It

OBJECTIVE Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common cause of back and leg pain influenced by factors like instability, disc degeneration, facet arthropathy, and psychosocial phenotype. Patients’ experience of high-severity pain is complex, with significant implications for surgical planning. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of back pain catastrophizing on long-term outcomes following lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery. METHODS This study uses the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) lumbar spondylolisthesis dataset and includes prospectively collected data from the 12 highest-enrolling clinical sites participating in the QOD lumbar module. The authors reviewed patients undergoing single-segment surgery for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Severe baseline numeric rating scale for back pain (NRS-BP) scores (≥ 8) were classified as "catastrophizing," and mild to moderate pain scores (< 8) were classified as "non-catastrophizing." Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared for catastrophizing versus non-catastrophizing patients at 60 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the impact of catastrophizing on PROs, with multivariate analysis controlling for variables initially reaching a p value < 0.10. RESULTS Of the 608 patients in this analysis, 260 (42.8%) experienced catastrophizing while 348 (57.2%) did not. Catastrophizing patients were significantly younger (59.9 ± 12.2 years vs 63.9 ± 11.7 years, p < 0.001), less often had ≥ 4 years of college education (31.2% vs 42.5%, p = 0.004), and more often used private insurance (58.8% vs 47.7%, p = 0.01). The catastrophizing cohort also had higher rates of depression (24.6% vs 17.0%, p = 0.02) and back pain predominance (45.4% vs 32.2%, p < 0.001). Surgical and perioperative characteristics did not significantly differ between cohorts. Although catastrophizing patients typically reported worse PRO scores at both baseline and 60 months, they demonstrated significantly greater improvement and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement across almost all PROs at 60 months (p < 0.05). However, North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction scores at 60 months did not differ significantly between cohorts. Multivariate analysis found that catastrophizing significantly predicted 60-month NRS-BP change (β −1.45, 95% CI −1.81 to −1.09; p < 0.001) and MCID achievement (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.52–2.58; p < 0.001) but not mean NRS-BP score or other metrics, including NASS satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Despite presenting with worse baseline symptoms, patients with pain catastrophizing experienced substantial and clinically meaningful improvement following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Patient satisfaction was comparable between cohorts, reflecting a nuanced balance between greater absolute improvement and persistence of residual symptoms. These findings underscore that catastrophizing should not be viewed as a barrier to surgical success, while pointing to the need for proactive expectation setting and shared decision-making.
Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Ng, Alexander , Asif, Aqua , Gómez‐Gómez, Enrique , Budäus, Lars, Barrett, Tristan , Radtke, Jan Philipp , Kesch, Claudia, Pham, Tho, Tewari, Ash , Cabello, M.A. Rodríguez , Mynderse, Lance A. , Borghi, Marcelo, Boesen, Lars , Singh, Paras B. , Renard‐Penna, Raphaële , Leow, Jeffrey J. , Pecoraro, Martina , Giannarini, Gianluca , Perlis, Nathan , López-Ruiz, Daniel, Rossiter, Marimo , Khetrapal, Pramit , Chan, Vinson Wai‐Shun , Haider, Aiman , Clarke, Caroline S. , Dickinson, Louise , Mitra, Anita, Margolis, Daniel J. A., Takwoingi, Yemisi , Emberton, Mark , Allen, Clare, Moore, Caroline M. , Kasivisvanathan, Veeru , Collaborators, PRIME Study Group, Briganti, Alberto , Evangelista, Alex, Freeman, Alex , Kirkham, Alex, Zlotta, Alexandre R. , Grey, Alistair, Ryan, Andrew, Borrelli, Antonella , Andrews, Antonette, Finelli, Antonio , Sancho, Arturo Platas, Baring, Ashley, Roy, Ashoke, Issa, Balqiisa, Israël, Bas , González, Carolina Aulló, English, Caroline, Zuiani, Chiara , Amate, Cristina, Yong, Daniel , Rozze, Davide, Lomas, Derek J. , Cannoletta, Donato , Chang, Eileen Wang, Chun, Felix, Zussino, Gaia , Antoch, Gerald , Gandaglia, Giorgio, Sauter, Guido , Thevarajah, Harini, Sorrell, Harriet, McBain, Hazel, Reis, Henning , Pita, Hernando Ríos , Potyka, Ingrid , Collavino, Jeanlou, Koshy, Jincy, Weng, Jing Yi , Withington, John, Egmond, Joke van, Piper, Jon, O’Brien, Jonathan , Rosa, José Valero, Sanz, Juan Luis , Quesada, Juan Mesa, Jannusch, Kai , Corr, Kateri , Haines, Kenneth, Umutlu, Lale , Quarta, Leonardo, Casarotto, Letizia, Gimeno, Linda , Moretti, Lucas, Laschena, Ludovica , Drewes, Lukas, Ostos, Manuel Sanchez, Peris, M., Volpacchio, Mariano , Prentice, Mark, Graefen, Markus , Soligo, Matteo, Boschheidgen, Matthias , Singhera, M., Wenzel, Mike, Fatterpekar, Monali, Al‐Nader, Mulham , Kachanov, Mykyta , Shaida, Nadeem , Muirhead, Nicola , Vasdev, Nikhil , Sanmugalingam, Nimalan , Nørgaard, Nis , Vicente, Pete, Incze, Peter , Ryan, Philip, Rouvier, Philippe , Mead, Phoebe, Mozer, Pierre, Viana, Públio César Cavalcante , Jiménez, Rafael E. , Novotta, Réka, Huang, Richard, O’Sullivan, Richard, Jepsen, Rikke Karlin , Frese, Robert, Clow, Rosemary, Al‐Monajjed, Rouvier , Lewis, Sara , Cashman, Sophia, Pizzolitto, Stefano, Lelie, S., Lindner, Sydney, Al‐Hammouri, Tarek , Sánchez, Teresa González, Reid, Thomas, McClure, Timothy, Maurer, Tobias , Peruzzi, Valeria, Tan, Wei Phin, Nahas, William Carlos, Chong, Yew Lam, Agarwal, Ridhi , Panebianco, Valeria , Girometti, Rossano , Ghai, Sangeet , COBELLI, Francesco DE , Pham, Tho, Taneja, Samir S. , Hu, Jim C. , Dias, Adriano Basso , Falkenbach, Fabian , Kastner, Christof , Schimmöller, Lars , Nathan, Arjun , Punwani, Shonit , Brew‐Graves, Chris , Brembilla, Giorgio , Margolis, Daniel , Giganti, Francesco , Collaborators, PRIME Study Group, Crestani, Alessandro , Sciarra, Alessandro , Evangelista, Alex, Kirkham, Alex P. S. , Grey, Alistair, Blanca, Ana , Bjartell, Anders , Tong, Angela , Warren, Anne Y. , Ciardi, Antonio , Rannikko, Antti , Stabile, Armando , Villers, Arnauld A. , Issa, Balqiisa, Hadaschik, Boris Alexander , English, Caroline L, Lee, Chau Hung , Caris, Christien T.M. , Stempel, Conrad von , Rozze, Davide, Messina, Emanuele , Chun, Felix, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Robert, G. , Caglič, Iztok , Theysohn, Jens Matthias , Grummet, Jeremy , Koshy, Jincy, Wilkinson, John, Withington, John, Egmond, Joke van, Deeks, Jonathan J , O'Brien, Jonathan, Quesada, Juan Mesa, Quarta, Leonardo , Orecchia, Luca , Moretti, Lucas, Rooij, Maarten de , Bicchetti, Marco , Gatti, Marco , Peris, María de los Desamparados Esteban, Roethke, Matthias Claudius , Monte, Maurizio Del, Wenzel, Mike, Takahashi, Naoki , Fleshner, Neil , Albers, Peter , Mead, Phoebe, Visschere, Pieter De , Huang, Richard, Shah, Syed Ahmar , Sanchez, Teresa González, Bathala, Tharakeswara K , Kwast, Theodorus van der , Reid, Thomas, Løgager, Vibeke , Prabhu, Vinay , Wagaskar, Vinayak Gorakhnath , Tan, Wei Phin, Nahas, William Carlos, Witjes, Wim P.J. , Chong, Yew Lam

JAMA | September 10, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1170

10.1001/jama.2025.13722 | PMID 40928788 Get It

Importance Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without prostate biopsy, has become the standard of care for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer. Resource capacity limits widespread adoption. Biparametric MRI, which omits the gadolinium contrast sequence, is a shorter and cheaper alternative offering time-saving capacity gains for health systems globally. Objective To assess whether biparametric MRI is noninferior to multiparametric MRI for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, multicenter, within-patient, noninferiority trial of biopsy-naive men from 22 centers (12 countries) with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings) from April 2022 to September 2023, with the last follow-up conducted on December 3, 2024. Interventions Participants underwent multiparametric MRI, comprising T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast–enhanced (DCE) sequences. Radiologists reported abbreviated biparametric MRI first (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted), blinded to the DCE sequence. After unblinding, radiologists reported the full multiparametric MRI. Patients underwent a targeted biopsy with or without systematic biopsy if either biparametric MRI or multiparametric MRI was suggestive of clinically significant prostate cancer. Main outcomes and measures The primary outcome was the proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer. The noninferiority margin was 5%. Results Of 555 men recruited, 490 were included for primary outcome analysis. Median age was 65 (IQR, 59-70) years and median PSA level was 5.6 (IQR, 4.4-8.0) ng/mL. The proportion of patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings was 12.7%. Biparametric MRI was noninferior to multiparametric MRI, detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in 143 of 490 men (29.2%), compared with 145 of 490 men (29.6%) (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points; P = .50). Biparametric MRI detected clinically insignificant cancer in 45 of 490 men (9.2%), compared with 47 of 490 men (9.6%) with the use of multiparametric MRI (difference, −0.4 [95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4] percentage points). Central quality control demonstrated that 99% of scans were of adequate diagnostic quality. Conclusion and relevance In men with suspected prostate cancer, provided image quality is adequate, an abbreviated biparametric MRI scan, with or without targeted biopsy, could become the new standard of care for prostate cancer diagnosis. With approximately 4 million prostate MRIs performed globally annually, adopting biparametric MRI could substantially increase scanner throughput and reduce costs worldwide. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04571840
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 7.2025
Riely, Gregory J. , Wood, Douglas E. , Aisner, Dara L. , Bauman, Jessica R. , Desai, Aakash , Dilling, Thomas J. , Durm, Gregory A. , Gettinger, Scott , Gubens, Matthew A. , Lackner, Rudy P., Levy, Benjamin, Maldonado, Fabien , Morgensztern, Daniel , Mullikin, Trey C. , Ng, Thomas, Owen, Dawn , Patel, Sandip Pravin , Riess, Jonathan W. , Mendez, Ana Lucia Ruano, Shapiro, Theresa A. , Singh, Aditi P. , Stevenson, James, Tam, Alda L. , Yau, Edwin , Gregory, Kristina M., Hang, Lisa, Desai, Aakash P , Loo, Billy W. , Axtell, Andrea L. , Bharat, Ankit , Chang, Joe Y. , Dowell, Jonathan E. , Grotz, Travis E. , Juloori, Aditya , Lanuti, Michael D. , Lin, Jules , Lovly, Christine Marie , Owen, Dwight H , Patil, Tejas , Polanco, Patricio Marcelo , Tanvetyanon, Tawee , Yanagawa, Jane

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | September 10, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 354-362

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0043 | PMID 40930154 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines, with a focus on systemic therapy options for the treatment of patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC and the corresponding molecular testing considerations.
Predictive Value of Plasma Biomarkers in Tau‐ PET Transitions
Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Lowe, Val J. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Wiste, Heather J. , Kremers, Walter K. , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Stomrud, Erik , Petersen, Ronald C. , Algeciras-Schimnich, Alicia , Pichet Binette, Alexa , Knopman, David S. , Petersen, Ronald C , Hansson, Oskar , Schwarz, Christopher G , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Stomrud, Erik , Kremers, Walter K , Algeciras‐Schimnich, Alicia , Smith, Ruben , Mattsson, Niklas , Palmqvist, Sebastian , Knopman, David S. , Cogswell, Petrice M. , Hansson, Oskar , Jack, Clifford R.

Annals of Neurology | September 10, 2025 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1249-1260

10.1002/ana.78003 | PMID 40927954 Get It

Objective The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of amyloid‐positron emission tomography (PET) versus the plasma ratio of phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p‐tau217) to non‐phosphorylated tau217 (%p‐tau217) for tau‐PET transitions (T− to T+). The added value of combining plasma amyloid‐β 42 and amyloid‐β 40 (Aβ42/40) and %p‐tau217 into an amyloid probability score (APS2) was also assessed. Methods Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) participants had plasma markers measured at via mass spectrometry (MS), an amyloid‐PET scan, and a tau‐PET (meta‐temporal region of interest [ROI]) negative scan (standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] <1.29) at the index (baseline) date, along with one or more follow‐up tau‐PET scans. The BioFINDER‐2 cohort was used for validation. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and apolipoprotein ( APOE ) ε4 were used to assess predictors, with scaling to the interquartile range (IQR) for comparability of hazard ratios (HR). Results Among 255 tau‐PET negative MCSA participants (median age: 71.9 years), 37 converted to tau‐PET positive (median follow‐up time: 3.81 years). Higher %p‐tau217 (HR: 1.52 [95% CI: 1.28–1.80]), amyloid‐PET centiloid (HR: 1.47 [95% CI: 1.20–1.79]), and APS2 (HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.22–2.16]) predicted tau‐PET conversion. However, Aβ42/40 (HR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.54–1.66]) was not associated with tau‐PET conversion. In the BioFINDER‐2 cohort (605 tau‐negative, median age: 70.2), 33 converted to tau‐positive (median follow‐up time: 2 years), with higher %p‐tau217 (HR: 1.80 [95% CI: 1.50–2.17]), amyloid‐PET centiloid (HR: 2.29 [95% CI: 1.77–2.97]), and lower Aβ42/40 (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.17–4.83]) predicting conversion. Interpretation In two cohorts, %p‐tau217 was associated with tau‐PET conversion, comparable to amyloid‐PET. APS2 also predicted conversion in the MCSA cohort, whereas Aβ42/40 predicted conversion in the BioFINDER‐2 cohort, which had more individuals with cognitive impairment. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:1249–1260
Ablative Techniques for the Management of Osseous Spine Metastases: A Narrative Review
Pennington, Zach , Morris, Jonathan M. , Elsamadicy, Aladine A. , Lo, Sheng-Fu Larry , Schwab, Joseph H. , Sciubba, Daniel M. , Pennington, Zach , Sciubba, Daniel

Journal of Clinical Medicine | September 10, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 6358

10.3390/jcm14186358 | PMID 41010564 Get It

With continued improvements in systemic cancer therapies, there has been an increase in the survivorship of patients with spinal metastases. However, many patients with spinal metastases are frail and may not be able to tolerate the morbidity of open surgery. For these patients, percutaneous ablation techniques offer a minimally invasive approach that can facilitate local tumor control and pain relief. Here we describe the currently employed modalities—radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT)—summarize the clinical support for their use, and overview the relative risks and benefits for each. All these technologies offer to help improve local tumor control and improve oncologic pain associated with vertebral metastases, and they have become a staple of multidisciplinary spine metastasis care at many centers. As clinical experience with these technologies continues to grow, their use will likely become more widely adopted, and so understanding of their indications, risks, and benefits will become increasingly important to the practicing spine oncologist.