Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1908 citation(s) found for "Wu, Henry".

Neuropsychiatric symptoms cluster and fluctuate over time in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Morrow, Christopher B. , Eldaief, Mark C. , Rezaii, Neguine, Wong, Bonnie , McGinnis, Scott, Darby, Ryan, Staffaroni, Adam M. , Pascual, Belén , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Tsapkini, Kyrana , Huey, Edward D. , Fisher, Daniel , Balaji, Akshata, Sah, Eric , Rascovsky, Katya, Ghoshal, Nupur , Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Kornak, John , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Huang, Eric J. , Yokoyama, Jennifer S. , Paulson, Henry L. , Wong, Bonnie , Damme, Philip Van , Barmada, Sami J. , Rezaii, Neguine , Sah, Eric , Paulson, Henry L , Van Damme, Philip , Pascual, Belen , Yokoyama, Jennifer , Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko , Barmada, Sami , Morrow, Christopher , Kamath, Vidyulata , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Lapid, Maria I. , Rojas, Julio C., Masdeu, Joseph C , Pantelyat, Alexander , Balaji, Akshata, Litvan, Irene

Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences | March 13, 2025 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 327-335

10.1111/pcn.13810 | PMID 40079430 Get It

Aim Cognitive and behavioral phenomena define behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), but neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) outside the core criteria are common throughout the illness. Identifying how NPS cluster in bvFTD may guide development of future therapies. Methods Participants ( n = 354) with sporadic and genetic bvFTD were enrolled in the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium. Dementia stage was defined as early (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≤1) or advanced (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≥1). Baseline and annual follow‐up visit data were analyzed to compare NPS across stages of bvFTD. Psychiatric states were captured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory‐Questionnaire and Clinician Judgment of Symptoms. Polychoric cluster analysis was used to describe NPS clusters. Results NPS were highly prevalent (≥90%) in early and late bvFTD. Four NPS clusters were identified based on magnitude of factor loadings: affective, disinhibited, compulsive, and psychosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms fluctuated across visits. In the affective cluster, depression showed the least visit‐to‐visit stability. In the disinhibited cluster, elation showed the least stability. Symptoms in the psychosis and compulsive clusters (hallucinations, delusions, obsessions/compulsions, and hyperorality) were largely stable, persisting from visit‐to‐visit in more than 50% of cases. Symptoms in the affective and disinhibited cluster were associated with the highest caregiver burden, while symptoms in the obsessive cluster were associated with the most functional impairment. Conclusion NPS in bvFTD are frequent and cluster into four discrete groups. The fluctuating nature of some NPS in bvFTD suggests that they may not be reliable markers of disease progression or stage.
Impact of Constipation Therapies on Severity of Gastroparesis and Constipation Symptoms in Relation to Gastric and Colonic Transit
Surjanhata, Brian , Moshiree, Baharak , Lee, Allen , McCallum, Richard W. , Sarosiek, Irene , Nguyen, Linda Anh B. , Schulman, Michael I., Wo, John M. , Parkman, Henry P. , Surjanhata, Brian C , Nguyen, Linda A , Hasler, William L. , Rao, Satish , Parkman, H P , Lee, Allen A , Kuo, Braden , Rao, Satish S.C.

Neurogastroenterology & Motility | March 11, 2025 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/nmo.70013 | PMID 40033166 Get It

ABSTRACTIntroductionStudies demonstrate an overlap of constipation with gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia, but the impact of treatments that target constipation on improving upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms is unexplored. We quantified the effects of constipation medication therapies on UGI and constipation symptom severity in subjects presenting with symptoms of gastroparesis.MethodsFifty‐six subjects with symptoms of gastroparesis underwent concurrent wireless motility capsule and gastric emptying scintigraphy and were recommended to receive either a new medication therapy for constipation or a change in constipation therapy based on investigator interpretation of test results. Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), upper abdominal pain, and constipation scores were compared between baseline and 6 months. Data were compared between delayed or non‐delayed gastric emptying and the presence or absence of slow colonic transit.Key ResultsSubjects with slow colonic transit had improvements in GCSI (p = 0.007) and constipation scores (p = 0.004) after treatment with a new or changed constipation medication, with the delayed emptying subgroup driving GCSI improvements (p = 0.004). Reductions in nausea/vomiting (p = 0.02) and early satiety/fullness subscores (p = 0.002) with trends to improved bloating/distention subscores (p = 0.06) were observed in this subgroup, but upper abdominal pain was unchanged. Subjects with normal colonic transit showed no improvement in GCSI scores regardless of gastric emptying status (p > 0.05).Conclusions and InferencesIdentifying and treating delayed colonic transit in gastroparetic (delayed gastric emptying) subjects improves global UGI symptoms as well as selected individual symptoms. Evaluation of whole gut motility as well as recognizing and managing extragastric delay may promote improved outcomes in these patients.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02022826
Clinical Outcomes With Normothermic Pulsatile Organ Perfusion in Heart Transplantation: A Report From the OCS Heart Perfusion Registry
Stehlik, Josef , Farr, Maryjane , Mehra, Mandeep R. , Schroder, Jacob N. , D’Alessandro, David A. , Pal, Jay D. , Villavicencio, Mauricio A. , Gruber, Peter J. , Couper, Gregory S., Shudo, Yasuhiro , Patel, Parag C. , Daneshmand, Mani A. , Klein, Liviu , Shah, Ashish S. , Skipper, Eric, Esmailian, F., Goldstein, Daniel J. , Ohira, Suguru , Kaczorowski, David, Takeda, Koji , Malyala, R., Haft, Jonathan W., Sun, Benjamin , Kilic, Arman , Anyanwu, Anelechi, Williams, Celeste T. , Kai, Masashi , Sulemanjee, Nasir , Funamoto, Masaki , Salerno, Christopher T. , Durham, Lucian A. , Shaffer, Andrew , Zhou, Xiang , Milano, Carmelo A. , Farr, Maryjane A , Goldstein, Daniel , Lozonschi, Lucian , Takeda, Koji , Meyer, Dan M , Sun, Benjamin C , Pretorius, Victor , Pham, Duc T , Kai, Masashi , Sulemanjee, Nasir Z , Funamoto, Masaki , Durham, Lucian A , Shaffer, Andrew , Zafar, Farhan , Pinney, Sean P , Milano, Carmelo A , Mehra, Mandeep R , Lozonschi, Lucian , Pretorius, Victor , Itoh, Akinobu , Ikonomidis, John S.

Circulation | March 7, 2025 | Volume: 151 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 896-909

10.1161/circulationaha.124.071743 | PMID 40052272 Get It

BACKGROUND: A preservation system, the Organ Care System (OCS; TransMedics) uses normothermic pulsatile perfusion during organ transport for heart transplantation. This system has demonstrated favorable outcomes in hearts recovered from extended-criteria donors after brain death (DBD) and donors after circulatory death (DCD). METHODS: The OCS Heart Perfusion Registry collects data on US heart transplantations using the OCS, static cold storage (SCS), or thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and donor hearts recovered from DBD or DCD donors. We analyzed donor and recipient characteristics and posttransplantation outcomes in patients transplanted with OCS donor hearts (either DBD or DCD) compared with SCS hearts, and with OCS hearts from DCD donors compared with those recovered with NRP followed by SCS. Propensity score matching was used in survival analyses to adjust for differences among recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Between 2021 and 2023, 3225 consecutive heart transplantations enrolled from 56 centers were analyzed in the Heart Perfusion Registry. The OCS was used in 854 of 3225 heart transplantations (26.4%), among which 340 (39.8%) were DBD and 514 (60.2%) were DCD donors, whereas 2174 DBD donors were recovered with SCS and another 197 DCD donors with NRP techniques. The OCS-DBD group experienced a greater number of organ offer refusals before final acceptance (13 versus 6; Wilcoxon rank sum, P <0.001) and a longer transport distance (667 miles versus 232 miles; Wilcoxon rank sum, P <0.001) compared with SCS-DBD. Survival at 12 months was similar between the 2 groups (89.9% for OCS-DBD versus 90.6% for SCS-DBD; marginal Cox model, P =0.54). Among the OCS-DCD and SCS-DBD groups, survival at 12 months was also similar (91.0% versus 92.5%, respectively; marginal Cox model, P =0.32). The OCS-DCD and NRP-DCD groups demonstrated similar survival (91.0% versus 91.7%, respectively; log rank, P =0.63), although the transport distance was longer in OCS-DCD compared with DCD with NRP followed by SCS (400 miles versus 223 miles; Wilcoxon rank sum, P <0.001). By 2023, 90% of all OCS donor management and recovery was performed with dedicated organ recovery teams. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that real-world implementation of the OCS for DBD donors (using predominantly a dedicated recovery team) is associated with expanded donor criteria, longer transport distance, and excellent posttransplantation outcomes. In OCS-DCD donors, outcomes parallel those of donors recovered with NRP-DCD and compare favorably with DBD donor organs.
Low-Dose Valacyclovir in Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus
Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Liu, Mengling , Baratz, Keith H. , Mian, Shahzad I., Choulakian, Mazen Y., Warner, David B., Lu, Ying , Twi-Yeboah, Alberta , Kim, Jiyu , Lopez-Jimenez, Carlos, Laury, Sarah, Jeng, Bennie H., Weissbart, Sarah B. , Abazari, Azin, Chou, Timothy , Chang, Eileen , Amescua, Guillermo , Koo, Ellen, Galor, Anat , Berestka, John S., Nanji, Afshan, Stutzman, Richard D., Clements, John, Davies, Emma , Saeed, Hajirah N. , Ciralsky, Jessica, Fernández, A. Gómez-Bastero , Sippel, Kimberly C. , Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Daluvoy, Melissa B. , Liu, Katy C., Ewald, M., Groos, Erich B, Chang, Bernard, Shivitz, Ira A., Hill, Jordan , Fowler, Priscilla G., Read, Russell W. , Geggel, Harry S. , Rony, Sayegh, Rapuano, Christopher J. , Meghpara, Beeran, Holland, Gary N. , Irvine, John, Aldave, Anthony J. , Edmund, Tsui, Chen, Judy , Honig, Marc A, Snyder, Lee A, Lubniewski, Anthony J., Katz, Douglas, Capoor, Seema, Gonzales, John, Keenan, Jeremy, Morkin, Melina I., Kenyon, Kenneth R., Lee, William B., Christenbury, Joseph, LaMattina, Kara C. , Negahban, Kambiz, Rao, Ronihi, Ament, Christine S, Lopatynsky, Marta O., Barbato, John D, Sarkar, Jayati S, Macsai, Marian S., Herz, Joshua B, Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina , Matoba, Alice Y., Cooney, Theresa, Sugar, Alan , Shtein, Roni M., Nehls, Sarah, Warner, Evan J. , Nettune, Greg, Bowman, Brad, Gelender, Henry, Alexander, Jamie K. , McCall, Tyrone, Zaffos, Joshua, Beebe, Walter E., Potts, Luke B. , Lustbader, Jay M., Oboh-Weilke, Aruoriwo, Hammersmith, K.M., Orlin, Stephen E., Nagra, Parveen K., Sulewski, Michael E., Bunya, Vatinee Y. , Shafer, Brian M. , Viriya, Elizabeth T., Qureshi, Anam, Lazzaro, Douglas R., Palazzolo, Laura , Goyal, Himani , Schrack, Katie E, Raber, Irving M. , Ayres, Brandon D. , Finklea, Brenton, Reeves, Sherman W., Awad, Omar E, Hardten, David R., Reilly, Charles, Flynn, William J., Rashid, Edward D, Wen, Angie E, Harris, David J. , Shaik, Neha, Seedor, John A., Rosenfeld, Steven I., Winnick, Marc , Amir, Ahmad Fitri , Sherman, Mark D., Chaon, Benjamin, Soukiasian, Sarkis H., Rao, Naveen K. , Steiner, Anne, Winokur, Jules , Udell, Ira J., Shih, Carolyn, Gorski, Matthew , Schrier, Amilia, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Sugar, Joel, Munir, Wuqaas W, Sunshine, Sarah B. , Miller, Donald M. , Gensheimer, William G. , Zegans, Michael E. , Weiss, Jayne S. , Bernal, María José , Barron, Bruce J., Hindman, Holly B. , Wise, R., Gelston, Christopher D. , Taravella, Michael J. , Davidson, Richard S. , Tran, Uyen, Bartley, Jeremy, McCulley, James P., Verity, Steven M., Bowman, Wayne, Blomquist, Preston H. , Mootha, V. Vinod , Thorne, George, Renucci, Ann M, Verdier, David D. , Sivaraman, K. R., Nordlund, Michael L., Hwang, Frank S. , Affeldt, John E., Ingraham, Herbert J., Guibord, Nathalie M., Dobbins, Kendall, Thareja, Tarika , Zaugg, Brian , Mifflin, Mark D., FORSTOT, S. LANCE, Fish, Robert A, Repine, Karen, Wildes, Michael, Estopinal, Christopher B., Brown, Donna, Koreishi, Aaleya, Ple-plakon, Patricia, Clemons, Carol S., Ashe, S, Bonaffini, Sarah G. , Houser, Kourtney, Wallace, M. Christopher , Wesberry, Jesse M, Yeung, Sonia N. , Noordeh, Nima, Faucher, Anne, Robert, Marie‐Claude , Rullo, Jacob, Johnson, Davin , Mah, Dean, Chew, Hall F., Hassonlou, Mojgan, Liu, Shaohui , Eikenberry, Jennifer , Yung, Chi-Wah, Shen, Joanne F , Yu, Charles, Ta, Christopher N. , Goins, Kenneth M., Sutphin, John E., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Rostov, Audrey Talley, Vyas, Neil , Hsu, Kimberly , Goodman, Gerri, McHam, Lisa, Oates, Dale, Rizkalla, Ramy, Shukla, Anita N. , Veena, Mathew , See, Craig W. , Feder, Robert S., Baqai, Jeanine, Basti, Surendra, Haddadin, Ramez I., You, Jae Young , Dixit, Lena, Patel, Ravi H, Golde, Kimberly T, Zaidman, Gerald W., Mahesh, Sankara, Wesolosky, Jason D., Jeffrey, Helen, Mannis, Mark J., Meyer, Jay J. , Niederer, Rachael L. , Colby, Kathryn , McLeod, Stephen D. , Melia, Michele , Sugar, Elizabeth A. , Taylor, Carol R., Nagel, Maria A. , Lass, Jonathan H. , Lu, Ying , Jeng, Bennie H. , Troxel, Andrea B. , Hochman, Judith S. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Warner, David B., Lu, Ying, Lee, Ting‐Fang , Tonk, Rahul Singh , Martinez, Jaime D. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Chamberlain, Winston , Chodosh, James , Fernandez, Ana G Alzaga, Hill, Jordan, Omar, Ahmed F. , Syed, Zeba A. , Lee, Olivia, Irvine, John, Deng, Sophie X. , Huang, Andrew , Margolis, Todd P. , Seitzman, Gerami D. , Hamrah, Pedram , Lee, Hyunjoo, Weikert, Mitchell P. , Hood, Christopher T. , Woodward, Maria A. , Shtein, Roni Mintz , Zaffos, Joshua, Prescott, Christina R. , Haberman, Ilyse D. , Ritterband, David C. , Harris, David J, Ahmad, Sumayya , Amir, Ahmad, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Akpek, Esen K. , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Miller, Donald M, Bernal, Maria, Barron, Bruce, Wise, Ronald, Shieh, Christine , Thorne, George, Renucci, A., Sivaraman, Kavitha, Affeldt, John, Guibord, Nathalie M, Lin, Amy , Patel, Ravi, Asbell, Penny A. , Wallace, Michael, Iovieno, Alfonso , Teichman, Joshua C. , Robert, Marie-Claude , Harissi‐Dagher, Mona , Baxter, Stephanie A. , Benson, Matthew, Tone, Stephan Ong , Yung, C.–W., Lin, Charles C. , Vyas, Neil M, Oates, Dale, Veena, Mathew, Goshe, Jeffrey M. , Sharma, Vikas , Miller, Darby D. , Ma, Jeffrey H, Dupps, William Joseph

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 269

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6114 | PMID 40048183 Get It

Importance High-quality evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is necessary to guide care. Objective To determine whether suppressive valacyclovir compared with placebo delays the occurrence of new or worsening stromal keratitis (SK), endothelial keratitis (EK), iritis, or dendriform epithelial keratitis (DEK) during 12 months of treatment and if treatment benefit persisted at 18 months (secondary end point). Design, Setting, and Participants The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 95 sites from November 2017 to June 2024. Immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with a history of an HZO rash, documented active keratitis or iritis within 1 year, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater were eligible. After determined to be eligible, participants were randomized in 4 strata: age at onset (&amp;lt;60 years vs ≥60 years) and disease duration (&amp;lt;6 months vs ≥6 months). Interventions A total of 12 months of double-masked daily valacyclovir, 1000 mg, or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to first occurrence within 12 months of new or worsening SK, EK, iritis, or DEK. Results A total of 527 participants (median [IQR] age, 60 [50-68] years; 266 female [50.5%]; 266 in the valacyclovir group; 261 in the placebo group) were randomized in 4 strata; 481 completed 12 months, and 460 completed 18 months. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. At 12 months, primary end points occurred in 86 participants (33%) assigned to placebo and 74 (28%) assigned to valacyclovir, and at 18 months in 104 participants (40%) assigned to placebo and 86 (32%) assigned to valacyclovir. The hazard ratio (HR) of the primary end point at 12 months was 0.77 for participants taking valacyclovir vs placebo (HR, 0.77; adjusted 95% CI, 0.56-1.05; P = .09) and 0.73 at the secondary end point at 18 months (HR, 0.73; adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = .03). There was a reduction of multiple other secondary end points at 12 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02) and 18 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary outcome did not show a benefit of suppressive valacyclovir treatment, secondary study outcomes showed treatment superiority at the 18-month end point and reduced number of multiple episodes of keratitis or iritis at both 12 and 18 months. These results support consideration of 1 year of suppressive valacyclovir treatment for HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196
Low-Dose Valacyclovir for Postherpetic Neuralgia in the Zoster Eye Disease Study
Warner, David, Jeng, Bennie H., Kim, Jiyu , Liu, Mengling , Baratz, Keith H. , Mian, Shahzad I., Choulakian, Mazen Y., Meyer, Jay J. , Lu, Ying , Twi-Yeboah, Alberta , Lopez-Jimenez, Carlos, Laury, Sarah, Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Weissbart, Sarah B. , Abazari, Azin, Chou, Timothy , Chang, Eileen , Amescua, Guillermo , Koo, Ellen, Galor, Anat , Berestka, John S., Nanji, Afshan, Stutzman, Richard D., Clements, John, Davies, Emma , Saeed, Hajirah N. , Ciralsky, Jessica, Fernández, A. Gómez-Bastero , Sippel, Kimberly C. , Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Daluvoy, Melissa B. , Liu, Katy C., Ewald, M., Groos, Erich B, Chang, Bernard, Shivitz, Ira A., Hill, Jordan , Fowler, Priscilla G., Read, Russell W. , Geggel, Harry S. , Rony, Sayegh, Rapuano, Christopher J. , Meghpara, Beeran, Holland, Gary N. , Irvine, John, Aldave, Anthony J. , Edmund, Tsui, Chen, Judy , Honig, Marc A, Snyder, Lee A, Lubniewski, Anthony J., Katz, Douglas, Capoor, Seema, Gonzales, John, Morkin, Melina I., Kenyon, Kenneth R., Lee, William B., Christenbury, Joseph, LaMattina, Kara C. , Negahban, Kambiz, Rao, Ronihi, Ament, Christine S, Lopatynsky, Marta O., Barbato, John D, Sarkar, Jayati S, Macsai, Marian S., Herz, Joshua B, Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina , Matoba, Alice Y., Cooney, Theresa, Hood, Christopher , Sugar, Alan M., Shtein, Roni M., Nehls, Sarah, Warner, Evan J. , Nettune, Greg, Bowman, Brad, Gelender, Henry, Alexander, Jamie K. , McCall, Tyrone, Zaffos, Joshua, Beebe, Walter E., Potts, Luke B. , Lustbader, Jay M., Oboh-Weilke, Aruoriwo, Hammersmith, K.M., Orlin, Stephen E., Nagra, Parveen K., Sulewski, Michael E., Bunya, Vatinee Y. , Shafer, Brian M. , Viriya, Elizabeth T., Qureshi, Anam, Lazzaro, Douglas R., Palazzolo, Laura , Goyal, Himani , Schrack, Katie E, Raber, Irving M. , Ayres, Brandon D. , Finklea, Brenton, Reeves, Sherman W., Awad, Omar E, Hardten, David R., Reilly, Charles, Flynn, William J., Rashid, Edward D, Wen, Angie E, Shaik, Neha, Seedor, John A., Rosenfeld, Steven I., Winnick, Marc , Amir, Ahmad, Sherman, Mark D., Chaon, Benjamin, Soukiasian, Sarkis H., Rao, Naveen K. , Steiner, Anne, Winokur, Jules , Udell, Ira J., Shih, Carolyn, Gorski, Matthew , Schrier, Amilia, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Sugar, Joel, Munir, Wuqaas W, Sunshine, Sarah B. , Miller, Donald M. , Gensheimer, William G. , Zegans, Michael E. , Weiss, Jayne S. , Bernal, M.L. , Barron, Bruce, Hindman, Holly B. , Wise, Ronald E. , Gelston, Christopher D. , Taravella, Michael J. , Davidson, Richard S. , Tran, Uyen, Bartley, Jeremy, McCulley, James P., Verity, Steven M., Bowman, Wayne, Blomquist, Preston H. , Mootha, V. Vinod , Thorne, George, Renucci, A., Verdier, David D. , Sivaraman, K. R., Nordlund, Michael L., Hwang, Frank S. , Affeldt, John, Ingraham, Herbert J., Guibord, Nathalie M, Dobbins, Kendall, Thareja, Tarika , Zaugg, Brian , Mifflin, Mark D., Forstot, S. Lance, Fish, Robert A, Repine, Karen, Wildes, Michael, Estopinal, Christopher B., Brown, Donna, Koreishi, Aaleya, Ple-plakon, Patricia, Clemons, Carol S., Patel, Ravi , Ashe, Sanda, Bonaffini, Sarah G. , Houser, Kourtney, Wallace, Michael A., Wesberry, Jesse M, Yeung, Sonia N. , Noordeh, Nima, Faucher, Anne, Rullo, Jacob, Johnson, Davin , Mah, Dean, Benson, Matthew , Chew, Hall F., Hassonlou, Mojgan, Liu, Shaohui , Eikenberry, Jennifer , Yung, Chi-Wah, Shen, Joanne F , Lin, Charles C. , Yu, Charles, Ta, Christopher N. , Goins, Kenneth M., Sutphin, John E., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Rostov, Audrey Talley, Vyas, Neil , Hsu, Kimberly, Goodman, Gerri, McHam, Lisa, Oates, Dale, Rizkalla, Ramy, Shukla, Anita N. , Veena, Mathew , See, Craig W. , Feder, Robert S., Baqai, Jeanine, Basti, Surendra, Haddadin, Ramez I., You, Jae Young , Dixit, Lena, Patel, Ravi H, Golde, Kimberly T, Zaidman, Gerald W., Mahesh, Sankara, Sharma, Vikas, Wesolosky, Jason D., Jeffrey, Helen, Mannis, Mark J., Niederer, Rachael L. , Lu, Ying , Jeng, Bennie H. , Troxel, Andrea B. , Hochman, Judith S. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Lee, Ting‐Fang , Tonk, Rahul Singh , Martinez, Jaime D. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Chamberlain, Winston , Chodosh, James , Fernandez, Ana G Alzaga, Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Hill, Jordan, Omar, Ahmed F. , Syed, Zeba A. , Lee, Olivia, Irvine, John, Deng, Sophie X. , Edmund, Tsui, Huang, Andrew , Margolis, Todd P. , Seitzman, Gerami D. , Keenan, Jeremy David , Hamrah, Pedram , Lee, Hyunjoo, Barbato, John D, Weikert, Mitchell P. , Hood, Christopher, Woodward, Maria A. , Sugar, Alan, Shtein, Roni Mintz , Prescott, Christina R. , Haberman, Ilyse D. , Schrack, Katie E, Ritterband, David C. , Harris, David J, Ahmad, Sumayya , Srikumaran, Divya S. , Akpek, Esen K. , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Miller, Donald M, Bernal, Maria, Shieh, Christine , Thorne, George, Sivaraman, Kavitha, Lin, Amy , Repine, Karen, Asbell, Penny A. , Ashe, S, Wallace, Michael, Iovieno, Alfonso , Teichman, Joshua C. , Robert, Marie-Claude , Harissi‐Dagher, Mona , Baxter, Stephanie A. , Benson, Matthew, Tone, Stephan Ong , Hassonlou, Mojgan, Yung, C.–W., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Vyas, Neil M, McHam, Lisa, Veena, Mathew, Goshe, Jeffrey M. , Miller, Darby D. , Ma, Jeffrey H

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 277

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6113 | PMID 40048191 Get It

Importance Evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment on postherpetic neuralgia is necessary to guide care. Objective To test the hypothesis that suppressive treatment with 1000 mg/d of oral valacyclovir for 12 months reduces the prevalence, severity, and duration of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at 12 and 18 months in participants with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 527 immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with history of HZO rash, documented keratitis, or iritis within 1 year and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater. The study was conducted at 95 participating sites (in Canada, New Zealand, and the US) from November 2017 to June 2024 and participant visits occurred every 3 months. Intervention Treatment with 1000 mg/d of valacyclovir or placebo for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia, severity as determined by pain score (a score of ≥3 on a scale of 1-10), pain duration (≥3 months after HZO onset), and total daily dose of pain medication. Results Of the 527 participants (490 completed 12 months of treatment and 460 completed 18 months), 73 (14%) had postherpetic neuralgia and were analyzed by age at HZO onset (&amp;lt;60 years or ≥60 years) and disease duration (recent [&amp;lt;6 months] or chronic [≥6 months]). Of the 73 participants with postherpetic neuralgia (34 in the valacyclovir group and 39 in the placebo group), the mean age was 62.4 years (SD, 13.6 years), 59% were female, 5% were Black or African American, and 10% were Hispanic. The prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at 12 months was not reduced by valacyclovir (12/32 [38%]) compared with placebo (14/35 [40%]) (between-group difference, 2.5% [95% CI, −20.8% to 25.8%]; P &amp;gt;.99). The participants who were younger than 60 years at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration had lower pain scores in the valacyclovir group (mean score, 0.3 [SD, 0.9]) vs the placebo group (mean score, 0.8 [SD, 1.9]) at 12 months ( P = .045) and at 18 months (mean score, 0.2 [SD, 0.9] vs 1.0 [SD, 2.3], respectively; P = .02). There was a decrease in pain duration in the valacyclovir group at 18 months (mean, 13.6 [SD, 11.4] months) vs the placebo group (mean, 18.7 [SD, 29.5] months) (linear mixed-effects model between-group difference, −3.39 months [95% CI, −6.73 to −0.04 months]; P = .046). The total daily dose of neuropathic pain medication was lower in the valacyclovir group (mean, 271.4 [SD, 593.8] mg/d) vs the placebo group (mean, 363.4 [SD, 592.2] mg/d) at 12 months (linear mixed-effects model P = .006) and at 18 months (mean, 209.0 [SD, 412.8] mg/d vs 286.2 [SD, 577.9] mg/d, respectively; linear mixed-effects model P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance One year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir was associated with a lower dosage of neuropathic pain medication. Participants in the valacyclovir group, who were younger at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration, had lower pain scores. These secondary outcomes support consideration of 1 year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir to reduce dosage of pain medications and pain due to HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196
Sex Differences in Longitudinal Tau-PET in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
Coughlan, Gillian , Klinger, Hannah M , Boyle, Rory , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Christenson, Luke R., Chadwick, Trevor, Healy, Brian C. , Jonaitis, Erin M. , Jack, Clifford R. , Johnson, Keith A. , Langhough, Rebecca E., Properzi, Michael J , Seto, Mabel , Johnson, Sterling C., Shirzadi, Zahra , Yau, Wai‐Ying Wendy , Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Hurko, Orest, Black, Sanra E, Doody, Rachelle S., Doraiswamy, Murali, Gamst, Anthony, Scharre, Doug, Sperling, Reisa, Weiner, Michael W. , Green, Robert C, Christenson, Luke, Jack, Clifford R , Pichet Binette, Alexa , Betthauser, Tobey J. , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Jacobs, Heidi I.L. , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Rentz, Dorene M. , Schultz, Aaron P. , Smith, Ruben , Johnson, Sterling C. , Mielke, Michelle M. , Manson, JoAnn E. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Buckley, Rachel F. , Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Black, Sanra E, Kaye, Jeffrey , Obisesan, Thomas O. , Rusinek, Henry

JAMA Neurology | March 3, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 364

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0013 | PMID 40029638 Get It

Importance Alzheimer disease (AD) predominates in females at almost twice the rate relative to males. Mounting evidence in adults without AD indicates that females exhibit higher tau deposition than age-matched males, particularly in the setting of elevated β-amyloid (Aβ), but the evidence for sex differences in tau accumulation rates is inconclusive. Objective To examine whether female sex is associated with faster tau accumulation in the setting of high Aβ (as measured with positron emission tomography [PET]) and the moderating influence of sex on the association between APOE ε4 carrier status and tau accumulation. Data Sources This meta-analysis used data from 6 longitudinal aging and AD studies, including the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Berkeley Aging Cohort Study, BioFINDER 1, Harvard Aging Brain Study, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, and Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer Prevention. Longitudinal data were collected between November 2004 and May 2022. Study Selection Included studies required available longitudinal [ 18 F]flortaucipir or [ 18 F]-MK-6240 tau-PET scans, as well as baseline [ 11 C] Pittsburgh Compound B, [ 18 F]flutemetamol or [ 18 F]florbetapir Aβ-PET scans. Recruitment criteria varied across studies. Analyses began on August 7, 2023, and were completed on February 5, 2024. Data Extraction and Synthesis In each study, primary analyses extracted estimates for the sex (female or male) and the sex by baseline Aβ-PET status (high or low) association with longitudinal tau-PET using a series of mixed-effects models. Secondary mixed-effects models extracted the interaction estimate for the association of sex by APOE ε4 carrier status with longitudinal tau-PET. Study-specific estimates for each mixed-effects model were then pooled in a meta-analysis, and the global fixed effect (β) and total heterogeneity ( I 2 ) across studies were estimated. This study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures Seven tau-PET outcomes that showed cross-sectional sex differences were examined across temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes. Results Among 6 studies assessed, there were 1376 participants (761 [55%] female; mean [range] age at first tau scan, 71.9 [46-93] years; 401 participants [29%] with high baseline Aβ; 412 APOE ε4 carriers [30%]). Among individuals with high baseline Aβ, female sex was associated with faster tau accumulation localized to inferior temporal (β = −0.14; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.06; P = .009) temporal fusiform (β = −0.13; 95% CI, −0.23 to −0.04; P = .02), and lateral occipital regions (β = −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.06; P = .009) compared with male sex. Among APOE ε4 carriers, female sex was associated with faster inferior-temporal tau accumulation (β = −0.10; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.03; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that sex differences in the pathological progression of AD call for sex-specific timing considerations when administrating anti-Aβ and anti-tau treatments.
Left Ventricular Entry to Reduce Brain Lesions During Catheter Ablation: A Randomized Trial
Marcus, Gregory M. , Tung, Roderick , Gerstenfeld, Edward P. , Hue, Trisha F. , Lin, Feng , Cheng, Jing , Weiss, J. Peter , Tzou, Wendy S. , Hsia, Henry H. , Ehdaie, Ashkan , Cooper, Daniel H. , Bunch, T. Jared , Arkles, Jeffrey , Lee, Adam , Hadjis, Alexios , Nguyen, Duy T. , Chelu, Mihail G. , Valderrábano, Miguel , Bhave, Prashant D. , Beaser, Andrew D. , Kanagasundram, Arvindh N. , Wazni, Oussama M. , Bradfield, Jason S. , Wall, Grace, Chang, Kathleen , Yang, Michelle, Montenegro, Gabrielle, Jarrott, Sabrina, Kramer, Joel H. , Kim, Anthony , Morris, Yonca, Dillon, W.P. , Hsia, Henry , Nazer, Babak , Lee, Adam , Hadjis, Alexios , Chelu, Mihail G , Hsu, Jonathan C , Valderrábano, Miguel , Bhave, Prashant D , Beaser, Andrew D , Kanagasundram, Arvindh , Wazni, Oussama , Chang, Kathleen , Jarrott, Sabrina , Kim, Anthony S , Dillon, William P , Tzou, Wendy , Weiss, Peter J , Marcus, Gregory M , Moss, Joshua D. , Hsu, Jonathan C. , Montenegro, Gabrielle C , Morris, Yvonne M.

Circulation | February 24, 2025 | Volume: 151 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 1051-1059

10.1161/circulationaha.124.071352 | PMID 39989365 Get It

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, one of the most rapidly growing procedures in cardiac electrophysiology, is associated with magnetic resonance imaging–detected brain lesions in more than half of cases. Although a retrograde aortic approach is conventional, modern tools enable entry through a transseptal approach that may avoid embolization of debris from the arterial system. We sought to test the hypothesis that a transseptal puncture would mitigate brain injury compared with a retrograde aortic approach. METHODS: The TRAVERSE trial (Transseptal Versus Retrograde Aortic Ventricular Entry to Reduce Systemic Emboli) was a multicenter randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Patients with left ventricular arrhythmias undergoing catheter ablation procedures were randomly assigned to a transseptal puncture approach compared (1:1) with a retrograde aortic approach. The primary outcome was the presence of an acute brain lesion detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary outcomes included clinically manifest complications, procedural efficacy, and 6-month neurocognitive assessments. RESULTS: Among the 62 patients randomly assigned to a retrograde aortic approach with postoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging, 28 (45%) exhibited an acute brain lesion compared with 19 of the 69 (28%) of those randomized to a transseptal puncture ( P =0.036). No differences in clinically manifest complications or procedural efficacy were observed. More patients in the retrograde aortic arm were categorized as having a high likelihood of cognitive impairment at 6 months (33% compared with 19% of those in the transseptal arm), but substantial loss to follow-up was present. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing left ventricular catheter ablation procedures, a transseptal approach reduced the risk of acute brain lesions by nearly half compared with a retrograde aortic approach without sacrificing safety or efficacy. Given a likely embolic pathogenesis, the brain magnetic resonance imaging findings may reflect a propensity to other organ damage; these findings may extend to other procedures requiring left ventricular entry. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03946072.
Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Krittanawong, Chayakrit , Wang, Zhen , Qadeer, Yusuf Kamran , Moras, Errol , Jneid, Hani , Sharma, Samin K. , Ahuja, Tania , Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan , Alam, Mahboob

Critical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine | February 21, 2025 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e0372

10.1097/hpc.0000000000000372 | PMID 39133562 Get It

Introduction: Data on outcomes between unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes remain inconclusive. We aimed to systematically analyze PCI outcomes by comparing unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin. Methods: We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception in 1966 through January 2024 for studies evaluating PCI outcomes comparing unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin. Two investigators independently reviewed the data. Conflicts were resolved through consensus. Random-effects meta-analyses were used. Results: A total of 10 prospective trials were identified that enrolled 42,253 individuals who presented with an acute coronary syndrome. Our analysis found that heparin when compared to bivalirudin was associated with an increased risk of trial-based definition of major bleeding [relative risk (RR): 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29–2.20], nonaccess site complications (RR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.75–12.09), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.20–2.41), major bleeding risks (RR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.49–2.36), cardiovascular disease death (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02–1.57), and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.07–2.62). There were no statistically significant differences between heparin and bivalirudin for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular event, stroke, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and acute or stent thrombosis. Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrates bivalirudin reduces major bleeding when used for anticoagulation during PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes and is not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiovascular event.
Comparing the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic genotyping and next generation sequencing in a military health system adult medicine clinic
Saunders, David , Hellwig, Lydia D. , Pagani, Austin, Castro, Mauricio De , Poon, Lucas, Ehat, Nate, Heroy, Andrew , Libbus, Joya, Fox, Keiko , Kalra, Sachi, Black, John L. , Scherer, Steven E. , Moyer, Ann M. , Black, John Logan, Haigney, Mark C. , Kalra, Sachi, Arnold, Thomas B. , Turner, Clesson

Pharmacogenomics | February 21, 2025 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 16-18 | Pages: 637-645

10.1080/14622416.2025.2466413 | PMID 39981562 Get It

Broadening the definition of patient-safety events: lessons from a multicentre learning health system collaborative
Whitford, Daniel , Yaszemski, Alexandra K, Schrieber, Matthew P, Pollak, Edward, Whitford, Daniel , Yaszemski, Alexandra K , Huddleston, Jeanne M. , Pollak, Edward

BMJ Open Quality | February 19, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e002988

10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002988 | PMID 39971591 Get It

Background Improving safety in healthcare has been paramount for decades, yet despite major attention and investment, improvement has remained incremental. Patient safety is a major concern in US healthcare, leading to significant harm and economic losses annually. Accurately identifying safety events remains difficult due to methodological discrepancies and lack of standardisation. This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing a standardised case-review methodology and safety-event taxonomy across diverse hospital settings to assess opportunities for improvement (OFIs) and compare findings with traditional definitions. Methods This multicentre retrospective cohort study reports data from 103 hospitals across the USA and Canada between 2016 and 2023. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to test case reviews for differences in the presence of one or more OFIs across several hospital types (bed size, academic status, urban setting, trauma level and Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services overall star rating) and patient characteristics (age, gender, length of stay, admission and discharge code status and mortality). Results 19 181 cases were reviewed across the Learning Health System Collaborative, with a median of 107 reviews per hospital. Mortality was the most common cohort selection, studied by 91 hospitals (88%). At least one OFI was identified in 12 714 cases (66.3%). The logistic regression analysis found that all hospital characteristics and patient age, length of stay, code status and discharge disposition were significantly associated with at least one OFI. Of the 46 444 OFIs identified, 41 439 (89%) were from categories focused on omissions of care. The categories of end-of-life, documentation and treatment/care alone accounted for 25 980 OFIs (56%). Conclusion The highest volumes of safety-related OFIs were associated with omissions of care, as opposed to the traditional definition of patient safety, which primarily includes outcomes from acts of commission.