Citations

Abstract Background Point-of-care testing (POCT) has expanded rapidly across healthcare systems, increasing both program scale and operational complexity. However, quantitative benchmarking data describing how POCT programs are structured and supported across institutions remain limited. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey to characterize POCT program support, including program scope, staffing, operational practices, governance, and challenges. The survey was distributed electronically through professional networks, and 93 institutional responses were analyzed. Descriptive analyses were performed, and derived metrics, including sites per point-of-care testing coordinator (POCC), were used to evaluate the relationship between program scale and staffing. Results POCT programs demonstrated substantial variability in scale, with wide ranges in the number of testing sites and operator populations. Adoption spanned multiple test categories, and many institutions reported use of multiple platforms for the same assays. Training, competency assessment, and quality management activities were primarily supported by laboratory staff and POCCs, with documentation frequently partially electronic. Median POCC staffing increased with program size; however, sites per POCC also increased significantly across program scale tiers (Kruskal–Wallis P < 0.001). Governance structures and operational responsibilities varied across institutions, and common challenges included staffing limitations, training and compliance burden, multisite coordination, and IT/connectivity constraints. Conclusions POCT programs are expanding in scale and complexity, but workforce capacity and governance structures have not scaled proportionally. This mismatch creates a cumulative and multiplicative operational burden. These findings provide benchmarking data to inform scalable staffing models, governance strategies, and infrastructure development for sustainable POCT program management.

BACKGROUND: Although the prognostic utility of positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is well established, emerging data suggest that reduced subendocardial flows also predict adverse outcomes. However, the incremental value of subendocardial MFR (MFR SE ) beyond transmural MFR (MFR TM ) remains unclear. METHODS: We studied patients in a multicenter PET registry with normal perfusion on stress/rest Rb-82 PET, excluding those with a previous history of coronary artery bypass surgery, heart transplantation, or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. The optimal MFR SE cutoff for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; death, myocardial infarction [MI], revascularization, or heart failure [HF] hospitalization) was determined using Youden’s index. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: concordant-normal (MFR TM ≥2.0; MFR SE ≥2.1), discordant (low-MFR SE , normal MFR TM ), and abnormal MFR TM . Clinical outcomes were compared by MFR groups. RESULTS: Among 6603 patients (normal N=4103; discordant N=885; abnormal N=1615) the mean age was 66.3±12.4 years, and 54% were women. Compared with the concordant-normal group, patients with discordant low-MFR SE were older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, peripheral artery disease, and previous percutaneous coronary intervention. The median MFR TM for normal, discordant, and abnormal groups were 2.86, 2.15, and 1.72, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 1661 MACE events occurred. Discordant low-MFR SE patients had a higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.22–1.64) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14–1.61) compared with concordant-normal patients. The discordant group had an intermediate absolute risk of MACE, with an adjusted annualized event rate of 5.79% (95% CI, 5.10–6.49) compared with 3.99% (95% CI, 3.67–4.30; P <0.001) in the concordant-normal group and 8.35% (95% CI, 7.71–9.00; P <0.001) in the abnormal MFR TM group. CONCLUSIONS: Subendocardial MFR reveals clinically meaningful risk heterogeneity among patients with preserved transmural flow reserve, helping refine risk stratification beyond traditional PET metrics.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of responsive thalamic stimulation as adjunctive therapy for drug‐resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) with generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCSs). Methods NAUTILUS is a prospective, multicenter, single‐blind, randomized sham‐controlled pivotal trial. Patients were ≥12 years of age with drug‐resistant IGE and ≥2 GTCSs over a 3‐month baseline. Bilateral depth leads were targeted to the centromedian thalamus. One month later, patients were randomized to Active (responsive stimulation, n = 44) or Sham (no stimulation, n = 43). The effectiveness evaluation period (EEP) began 3 months postimplant through 1 year. After a second GTCS in the EEP, patients transitioned to open‐label active stimulation. The primary safety endpoint was the serious adverse device‐related event (SADE) rate at 84 days postimplant. The primary effectiveness endpoint was time‐to‐second‐GTCS during the EEP. Additional endpoints included median percent change in days with any generalized seizure, GTCS frequency, and responder rate (RR). Results Eighty‐seven patients were implanted across 23 US centers. The SADE rate was significantly below the performance goal (6.9%, p < .0001), with no adverse effects on cognition, mood, or sleep. The prespecified primary effectiveness endpoint was not significant. However, a post hoc mixed‐effects model considering all EEP days demonstrated greater GTCS reduction in the originally randomized Active group (61%) compared to patients originally randomized to Sham (49%, p = .030). Eighteen‐month outcomes included 76.8% median GTCS reduction, 62.5% RR, 40% GTCS‐free at that timepoint, and 77.8% median reduction in days with any generalized seizure. More than 90% of patients and 86% of physicians reported improvement on Global Impression of Change scales. Significance NAUTILUS is the first randomized controlled neuromodulation trial in IGE. Responsive thalamic stimulation provided a clinically meaningful and durable reduction in seizures with an acceptable safety profile, offering a much‐needed option for drug‐resistant IGE.

LBA5012 Background: There is a critical evidence gap on the relative benefits and harms of proton therapy (PT) compared with photon-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. Herein we report early results from COMPPARE, a non-randomized comparative study of outcomes with PT and IMRT in prostate cancer. Methods: Between 2018-2022, 2524 patients from 51 facilities (28 PT and 23 IMRT) enrolled in COMPPARE, including 1501 treated with PT and 1023 treated with IMRT, and were followed prospectively. Treatment naïve patients with localized prostate cancer except those with very high-risk disease were eligible. Treatment was pragmatic with daily standard fractionation (1.8-2.1 Gy) and moderate hypofractionation (2.4-3.1 Gy) permitted. Use of rectal spacers and androgen deprivation were at physician discretion. Patient-reported quality of life data and treatment team-reported toxicity and disease control outcomes were collected at baseline and pre-specified time intervals via VisionTreeOptimalCare; treatment planning and delivery data were collected via the Advanced Treatment Consortium. We analyzed 1404 PT patients and 939 IMRT patients. We report the early primary endpoint of the study, a comparison of patient reported bowel urgency and bowel frequency at 2-years using the EPIC tool, and the secondary endpoints of 2-year CTCAE v5 ≥ grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity outcomes and 3-year freedom from biochemical progression (FFBP) results reported by the study teams. Results: Study sample size was targeted at 1,500 PT patients and 1,000 IMRT patients, and median follow-up time was 4.0 years. The primary endpoint and secondary toxicity 2-year endpoints focused on the alternative hypothesis of PT superiority. All results include inverse probability of treatment weighting. Using generalized linear mixed effects models, we found there to be no significant difference in EPIC bowel urgency scores (p = 0.324) or bowel frequency scores (p = 0.514) between PT and IMRT cohorts over time up to the 2-year endpoint. For grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity, the 2-year cumulative incidence was 5.2% for PT and 5.6% for IMRT. Gray’s Test for competing risks showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.28, p = 0.6] for PT versus IMRT. The exploratory non-inferiority endpoint of 3-year FFBP was 98.0% for PT and 97.9% for IMRT, and Gray’s Test showed a HR of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.52-1.71, p = 0.90). Conclusions: Analysis of early results of COMPPARE show no significant differences between PT and IMRT in patient reported bowel frequency and urgency, grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity, or FFBP. Assessment of long-term disease control, late toxicity and secondary malignancy will require longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT03561220 .

Stroke is the second leading cause of death globally and a major contributor to lower-limb disability, affecting gait, balance, and functional independence in elderly populations. While robot-assisted rehabilitation has demonstrated effectiveness in motor recovery, access remains limited due to high costs and geographic barriers, particularly in Latin America. This study presents ExoKnee, a low-cost knee exoskeleton designed through biomimetic principles and 3D-printed fabrication as a proof-of-concept device targeting gait rehabilitation in elderly adults. The system integrates a single-degree-of-freedom pneumatic actuator controlled by electromyography (EMG) signals from the quadriceps muscle, enabling knee flexion and extension (90° to 180°). The design was evaluated through finite element analysis and dynamic simulations in MATLAB/Simulink R2024a under constant, stepwise, and sinusoidal reference inputs in a digital-twin environment. Expert validation using the Content Validity Coefficient yielded a mean score of 0.8747, reflecting preliminary expert agreement on the conceptual design’s coherence and relevance. The prototype demonstrated controlled movements through a 6-bar pneumatic system with EMG-triggered relay activation, validated at the proof-of-concept level through simulation and single-subject threshold calibration. ExoKnee addresses critical gaps by offering an anthropometrically informed, biosignal-driven, and locally manufacturable rehabilitation platform for low- and middle-income countries, pending clinical validation. Future work will focus on clinical trials and adaptive EMG control strategies.

Abstract Background Distal (ileal) metabolic bariatric surgeries (DMBS) have gained increasing adoption due to their enhanced metabolic effects. However, the absence of standardized definitions, classification, and clinical indications limits their consistent application. This consensus aimed to establish an international consensus on the definition, classification, indications, and postoperative management of DMBS. Methods A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted including international expert surgeons from 16 countries. A total of 98 statements were developed across three domains: procedural characteristics, patient selection, and postoperative follow-up. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. Statements not reaching consensus were revised and resubmitted. Results Consensus was achieved on 81 statements. DMBS were defined as procedures involving gastro-ileal or duodeno-ileal bypass, emphasizing ileal stimulation as a key metabolic mechanism. Procedures with a common channel ≤350 cm, including single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal with SG (SADI-S), single anastomosis sleeve-ileal transit bipartition (SASI), sleeve gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y transit bipartition (SG+TB), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), as well as one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with biliopancreatic limb > 50% of total small bowel length were classified as DMBS. Routine measurement of total small bowel length was strongly recommended. DMBS were considered appropriate as primary procedures in patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m² with comorbidities, a BMI ≥50–60 kg/m², irrespective of the presence of comorbidities, and as revisional options for suboptimal clinical response (SoCR), recurrent weight gain (RWG), or persistent metabolic disease. Comprehensive preoperative and multidisciplinary evaluation was deemed mandatory, and liver cirrhosis, heart failure, end-stage kidney disease, and inflammatory bowel disease were considered contraindications. Postoperative care requires lifelong multidisciplinary follow-up, with increased attention to nutritional deficiencies and supplementation. Conclusions This consensus provides a standardized framework for DMBS, supporting harmonization of practice and improved patient safety.

Background: The current guidelines recommend that women at elevated risk for breast cancer (BC), defined as lifetime BC risk ≥ 20%, undergo annual screening with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammogram. However, limited evidence exists in the literature to guide the optimal timing of the MRI relative to the mammogram. Our study evaluated women undergoing high-risk BC screenings to determine the impact of timing for supplemental MRI on BC detection. Methods: Patients who completed high-risk screening MRI at a single institution from January 2019 through June 2022 were included. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected through retrospective chart review. MRI exams were divided into two groups based on timing of MRI: concurrent (<90 days from mammogram) and staggered (≥90 days from mammogram). Results: Of 1115 patients initially identified, 770 met inclusion criteria, with a total of 3707 screening exams performed (2073 mammograms and 1634 MRIs). The final analysis included 1355 MRI exams for 712 patients, where a prior mammogram and MRI were available. Of the MRIs included, 784 (57.9%) were concurrent and 571 (42.1%) were staggered. Additional imaging was performed for 12.5% (98/784) of concurrent MRIs and 9.6% (55/571) of staggered MRIs. Biopsy rates were 9.8% (77/784) for concurrent and 7.0% (40/571) for staggered MRIs. In this high-risk population, there were surprisingly low BC detection rates, with a BC incremental detection rate of 0.5% in both the concurrent and staggered groups (p = 1.0), with the median size of detected invasive BCs equaling 5 mm in the concurrent group and 4 mm in the staggered group (p = 0.72). Conclusions: When comparing concurrent and staggered MRI regimens, there were no significant differences in incremental cancer detection rate, tumor size, rates of additional imaging, or negative biopsies. Further investigation with prospective analysis is needed to validate these findings.