Citations

AbstractIntroductionThe various cutaneous manifestations have lately appeared in the setting of COVID‐19. Psoriasis flare‐ups have been reported during a COVID‐19 infection.Case presentationWe present a case of a 32‐year‐old woman with COVID‐19 who presented with generalized pustular psoriasis. She received oral prednisolone, hydroxyzine, and topical clobetasol. The patient received follow‐up two weeks later and found that her lesions were favorably desquamating.MethodsThe PubMed, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched for English studies reporting psoriasis flare‐ups following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Ten case reports/series were included after screening.ConclusionsOur case report brings awareness to clinicians for the possible cutaneous manifestation of COVID‐19, which should be considered part of the differential diagnoses.

Abstract KRAS-activating mutations are oncogenic drivers and are correlated with radioresistance of multiple cancers, including colorectal cancer, but the underlying precise molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Herein we model the radiosensitivity of isogenic HCT116 and SW48 colorectal cancer cell lines bearing wild-type or various mutant KRAS isoforms. We demonstrate that KRAS mutations indeed lead to radioresistance accompanied by reduced radiotherapy-induced mitotic catastrophe and an accelerated release from G2/M arrest. Moreover, KRAS mutations result in increased DNA damage response and upregulation of 53BP1 with associated increased non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair. Remarkably, KRAS mutations lead to activation of NRF2 antioxidant signaling to increase 53BP1 gene transcription. Furthermore, genetic silencing or pharmacological inhibition of KRAS, NRF2 or 53BP1 attenuates KRAS mutation-induced radioresistance, especially in G1 phase cells. These findings reveal an important role for a KRAS-induced NRF2-53BP1 axis in the DNA repair and survival of KRAS-mutant tumor cells after radiotherapy, and indicate that targeting NRF2, 53BP1 or NHEJ may represent novel strategies to selectively abrogate KRAS mutation-mediated radioresistance.

Abstract Aims The causes of distinct patterns of reduced cortical thickness in the common human epilepsies, detectable on neuroimaging and with important clinical consequences, are unknown. We investigated the underlying mechanisms of cortical thinning using a systems‐level analysis. Methods Imaging‐based cortical structural maps from a large‐scale epilepsy neuroimaging study were overlaid with highly spatially resolved human brain gene expression data from the Allen Human Brain Atlas. Cell‐type deconvolution, differential expression analysis and cell‐type enrichment analyses were used to identify differences in cell‐type distribution. These differences were followed up in post‐mortem brain tissue from humans with epilepsy using Iba1 immunolabelling. Furthermore, to investigate a causal effect in cortical thinning, cell‐type‐specific depletion was used in a murine model of acquired epilepsy. Results We identified elevated fractions of microglia and endothelial cells in regions of reduced cortical thickness. Differentially expressed genes showed enrichment for microglial markers and, in particular, activated microglial states. Analysis of post‐mortem brain tissue from humans with epilepsy confirmed excess activated microglia. In the murine model, transient depletion of activated microglia during the early phase of the disease development prevented cortical thinning and neuronal cell loss in the temporal cortex. Although the development of chronic seizures was unaffected, the epileptic mice with early depletion of activated microglia did not develop deficits in a non‐spatial memory test seen in epileptic mice not depleted of microglia. Conclusions These convergent data strongly implicate activated microglia in cortical thinning, representing a new dimension for concern and disease modification in the epilepsies, potentially distinct from seizure control.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Gland Tumors focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. NETs are generally subclassified by site of origin, stage, and histologic characteristics. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of NETs often involves collaboration between specialists in multiple disciplines, using specific biochemical, radiologic, and surgical methods. Specialists include pathologists, endocrinologists, radiologists (including nuclear medicine specialists), and medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists. These guidelines discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. This article is focused on the 2021 NCCN Guidelines principles of genetic risk assessment and counseling and recommendations for well-differentiated grade 3 NETs, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas.

Introduction: Thoracic external beam radiation therapy (XRT) for cancer is associated with a multitude of long-term cardiotoxic side effects. Previous studies have suggested worse outcomes in XRT-treated cancer survivors who undergo revascularization with CABG, but sample sizes have been small. In addition, XRT after CABG is thought to portend decreased patency and survival. We aimed to examine outcomes after CABG in patients with XRT compared with to those without XRT. Methods: We identified all patients who were treated with both CABG (between 1999 and 2013) and curative thoracic XRT for cancer (between 1971 and 2013) (>30 Gray). Baseline clinical characteristics and comorbidities at time of CABG, as well as long-term outcomes after CABG and XRT were compared with propensity matched control cohorts. Results: A total of 38 patients underwent CABG following XRT [Group 1] (mean age 67.9, 63% female) and 43 patients underwent XRT after CABG [Group 2] (mean age 69.3, 63% female). Compared with propensity-matched controls (Group 1: n=141; Group 2: n=167), baseline clinical and demographic characteristics between cases and controls were similar in both groups, except a lower incidence of triple vessel disease in XRT cases in Group 2 (64 vs 80%, p=0.02). For Group 1, there was no significant difference in all-cause survival in long-term follow-up after CABG (Fig. 1, p=0.72). Meanwhile, Group 2 cases had significantly higher all-cause mortality following XRT (Fig. 2, p<0.001). Conclusions: Patients previously treated with thoracic XRT who subsequently undergo CABG for coronary artery disease have a similar overall mortality rate compared to patients without prior XRT. This suggests that CABG is an effective method of revascularization in these patients. The higher mortality rates in CABG patients who subsequently develop disease requiring thoracic XRT is likely due to oncologic rather than cardiovascular causes, but more data are necessary to evaluate this finding.

Abstract Purpose The multiple energy extraction (MEE) delivery technique for synchrotron‐based proton delivery systems reduces beam delivery time by decelerating the beam multiple times during one accelerator spill, but this might cause additional plan quality degradation due to intrafractional motion. We seek to determine whether MEE causes significantly different plan quality degradation compared to single energy extraction (SEE) for lung cancer treatments due to the interplay effect. Methods Ten lung cancer patients treated with IMPT at our institution were nonrandomly sampled based on a representative range of tumor motion amplitudes, tumor volumes, and respiratory periods. Dose‐volume histogram (DVH) indices from single‐fraction SEE and MEE four‐dimensional (4D) dynamic dose distributions were compared using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Distributions of monitor units (MU) to breathing phases were investigated for features associated with plan quality degradation. SEE and MEE DVH indices were compared in fractionated deliveries of the worst‐case patient treatment scenario to evaluate the impact of fractionation. Results There were no clinically significant differences in target mean dose, target dose conformity, or dose to organs‐at‐risk between SEE and MEE in single‐fraction delivery. Three patients had significantly worse dose homogeneity with MEE compared to SEE (single‐fraction mean D 5% ‐D 95% increased by up to 9.6% of prescription dose), and plots of MU distribution to breathing phases showed synchronization patterns with MEE but not SEE. However, after 30 fractions the patient in the worst‐case scenario had clinically acceptable target dose homogeneity and coverage with MEE (mean D 5% –D 95% increased by 1% compared to SEE). Conclusions For some patients with breathing periods close to the mean spill duration, MEE resulted in significantly worse single‐fraction target dose homogeneity compared to SEE due to the interplay effect. However, this was mitigated by fractionation, and target dose homogeneity and coverage were clinically acceptable after 30 fractions with MEE.

8569 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (atezolizumab or durvalumab) combined with platinum-etoposide is the standard first-line therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The phase III clinical trials that led to the approval of chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC, excluded patients with an Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of Two or Greater. Therefore, data on efficacy of this combination in this subgroup of ES-SCLC patients whose performance status two or greater is limited. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy (atezolizumab or durvalumab) within the Mayo Clinic Health System between January 2016 and January 2021. Cases were identified from clinical databases at Mayo Clinic. Data on demographics, ECOG-PS, date of diagnosis, date of progression, whole brain radiation, CNS involvement, liver involvement, stereotactic body radiation, chest consolidation, platinum sensitivity, lines of therapy and last follow up date were extracted. Overall Survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for ECOG-PS 2-3 were compared to patients with an ECOG-PS 0-1. Results: A total of 84 patients were identified with a median age of 68.2 (48-88) years old. Of these, 54 patients were identified with an ECOG-PS 0-1 and 30 patients with an ECOG-PS 2-3. The median PFS for the ECOG PS 0-1 cohort was 5.2 months (95% CI 4.6-6.1) while the median PFS for the ECOG-PS 2-3 cohort was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.2-7.7; logrank p = 0.93). The median OS for the ECOG-PS 0-1 cohort was 10.8 months (95% CI 8.5-12.9) while the median OS for the ECOG-PS 2-3 cohort was 10.3 months (95% CI 6.0-14.1; logrank p = 0.39). Hazard ratios of ECOG-PS 0-1 versus 2-3 showed no tendency of increased PFS or OS for either group within cox proportional hazards models. Forty-three percent of ECOG-PS 0-1 achieved a partial response (PR) and 57% of patients who had ECOG-PS 2-3 also achieved a PR (Fisher’s exact p = 0.23). A complete response was found in 4% of ECOG-PS 0-1 compared to 3% in the ECOG-PS 2-3 cohort. For patients who responded to initial therapy, 46% of ECOG-PS 2-3 patients had a platinum sensitive relapse while only 33% of ECOG-PS 0-1 were still platinum sensitive at the time of relapse. Five ECOG-PS 2-3 patients were able to receive a second-line therapy. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate chemoimmunotherapy in the subgroup of ES-SCLC patients with an ECOG-PS 2 or greater. This retrospective study demonstrated no significant difference in PFS, OS, and ability to achieve a least a PR in ECOG-PS 2-3 cohort when compared to ECOG-PS 0-1. Therefore, chemoimmunotherapy should not be reserved for only an ECOG-PS of 0-1 but should be considered for all treatment eligible patients.

TPS4168 Background: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis, and improvements in therapy have been challenging. Alongside efforts in developing novel agents, there is a need to optimize and maximize the benefit of currently approved drugs. Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel is a frequently used regimen for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Nab-paclitaxel is albumin–bound chemotherapy; hence the role of albumin uptake is critical for its effect. Caveolae are small membrane invaginations essential for transendothelial albumin uptake. Cav-1 is the principal structural component of caveolae. Williams and colleagues have published a series of preclinical studies demonstrating that tumor cell-specific Cav-1 expression directly correlates with albumin and albumin-bound chemotherapy uptake and subsequent apoptotic response in tumor cells. In vitro studies showed that exposure of pancreatic cancer cells to Gemcitabine resulted in up-regulation of Cav-1 peaking 48 hours after gemcitabine exposure. This Cav-1 up-regulation correlated with increased temporal albumin cellular uptake. In addition, Williams and colleagues noted that exposure of pancreatic cancer cell lines to Gemcitabine resulted in a time–specific re-entry of cells into the G2/M phase (nab-paclitaxel cytotoxicity phase) between 48-60 hours after gemcitabine treatment. Collectively this data suggest that infusing nab-paclitaxel after 48 hours of gemcitabine infusion would be optimal for both increased uptake as well as increased susceptible tumor cells. We had previously shown this effect on multiple cell lines as well as mouse models. Methods: This is a phase II trial; patients will receive a standard of care chemotherapy regimen consisting of FDA-approved Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel with modification of the schedule to deliver nab-paclitaxel 48 hours (2 days) after gemcitabine infusions. The primary endpoint is ORR, with a null hypothesis of 20% vs. a target of 35%. Employing a 2-stage design (minimax) and assuming 80% power and a 0.05 significance level, a total of 53 patients will be required. In the first stage, if at least 7/31 patients respond to therapy, an additional 22 patients will be added for a total of 53 patients. The study will be terminated early if ≤ six patients respond in the first stage. Observation of response in at least 16/53 patients would be required to warrant further investigation of this infusion schedule of combination therapy. The secondary endpoints include the safety of the regimen schedule, Relative dose intensity, disease control rate, PFS, and OS. The trial opened to enrollment in June 2020 and is accepting patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04115163.

Purpose To compare the dosimetric performances of small‐spot three‐dimensional (3D) and four‐dimensional (4D) robustly optimized intensity‐modulated proton (IMPT) plans in the presence of uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously for distal esophageal carcinoma. Method and Materials Thirteen (13) patients were selected and re‐planned with small‐spot ( ~ 2–6 mm) 3D and 4D robust optimization in IMPT, respectively. The internal clinical target volumes (CTV high3d , CTV low3d ) were used in 3D robust optimization. Different CTVs (CTV high4d , CTV low4d ) were generated by subtracting an inner margin of the motion amplitudes in three cardinal directions from the internal CTVs and used in 4D robust optimization. All patients were prescribed the same dose to CTVs (50 Gy[RBE] for CTV high3d /CTV high4d and 45 Gy[RBE] for CTV low3d /CTV low4d ). Dose–volume histogram (DVH) indices were calculated to assess plan quality. Comprehensive plan robustness evaluations that consisted of 300 perturbed scenarios (10 different motion patterns to consider irregular motion (sampled from a Gaussian distribution) and 30 different uncertainties scenarios (sampled from a 4D uniform distribution) combined), were performed to quantify robustness to uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously. Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used for statistical analysis. Results Compared to 3D robustly optimized plans, 4D robustly optimized plans had statistically improved target coverage and better sparing of lungs and heart (heart D mean , P = 0.001; heart V 30Gy[RBE] , P = 0.001) in the nominal scenario. 4D robustly optimized plans had better robustness in target dose coverage (CTV high4d V 100% , P = 0.002) and the protection of lungs and heart (heart D mean , P = 0.001; heart V 30Gy[RBE] , P = 0.001) when uncertainties and interplay effect were considered simultaneously. Conclusions Even with small spots in IMPT, 4D robust optimization outperformed 3D robust optimization in terms of normal tissue protection and robustness to uncertainties and interplay effect simultaneously. Our findings support the use of 4D robust optimization to treat distal esophageal carcinoma with small spots in IMPT.