Back to Authors

Williams, Terence M

0000-0002-1020-0845

Mayo Clinic

Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.

Citations 3

Development of a MicroRNA Signature Predictive of Recurrence and Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Sebastian, Nikhil , Merrell, Kenneth W. , Zhang, Lizhi , Wilhite, T.J., Elganainy, Dalia , Cloyd, Jordan M. , Dillhoff, Mary , Tsung, Allan , Abushahin, Laith , Williams, Terence M. , Chen, Wei , Elganainy, Dalia , Abushahin, Laith , Williams, Terence M , Chen, Wei , Webb, Amy , Koay, Eugene J. , Wolfe, Adam R. , Robb, Ryan N. , Chen, Wei , Noonan, Anne M.

Cancers | October 15, 2021 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 5168

10.3390/cancers13205168 Get It

Background: Optimal patient selection for radiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unestablished. Molecular profiling may select patients at high risk for locoregional recurrence (LRR) who would benefit from radiation. Methods: We included resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PDAC) patients, divided into training and validation cohorts, treated among three institutions with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, and borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BR/LA-PDAC) patients treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation at the primary study institution. We isolated RNA from R-PDAC surgical specimens. Using NanoString, we identified miRNAs differentially expressed between normal and malignant pancreatic tissue. ElasticNet regression identified two miRNAs most predictive of LRR in the training cohort, miR-181b/d and miR-575, which were used to generate a risk score (RS). We evaluated the association of the median-dichotomized RS with recurrence and overall survival (OS). Results: We identified 183 R-PDAC and 77 BR/LA-PDAC patients with median follow up of 37 months treated between 2001 and 2014. On multivariable analysis of the R-PDAC training cohort (n = 90), RS was associated with worse LRR (HR = 1.34; 95%CI 1.27–11.38; p = 0.017) and OS (HR = 2.89; 95%CI 1.10–4.76; p = 0.027). In the R-PDAC validation cohort, RS was associated with worse LRR (HR = 2.39; 95%CI 1.03–5.54; p = 0.042), but not OS (p = 0.087). For BR/LA-PDAC, RS was associated with worse LRR (HR = 2.71; 95%CI 1.14–6.48; p = 0.025), DR (HR = 1.93; 95%CI 1.10–3.38; p = 0.022), and OS (HR = 1.97; 95%CI 1.17–3.34; p = 0.011). Additionally, after stratifying by RS and receipt of radiation in BR/LA-PDAC patients, high RS patients who did not receive radiation had worse LRR (p = 0.018), DR (p = 0.006), and OS (p < 0.001) compared to patients with either low RS or patients who received radiation, irrespective of RS. Conclusions: RS predicted worse LRR and OS in R-PDAC and worse LRR, DR, and OS in BR/LA-PDAC. This may select patients who would benefit from radiation and should be validated prospectively.
Oncogenic KRAS drives radioresistance through upregulation of NRF2-53BP1-mediated non-homologous end-joining repair
Yang, Linlin , Shen, Changxian , Estrada‐Bernal, Adriana , Sebastian, Nikhil , Chen, Wei , Williams, Terence M , Chen, Wei , Robb, Ryan N. , Chatterjee, Moumita , Webb, Amy , Mo, Xiaokui Molly , Chen, Wei , Krishnan, Sunil , Williams, Terence M.

Nucleic Acids Research | September 30, 2021 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 11067-11082

10.1093/nar/gkab871 Get It

Abstract KRAS-activating mutations are oncogenic drivers and are correlated with radioresistance of multiple cancers, including colorectal cancer, but the underlying precise molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Herein we model the radiosensitivity of isogenic HCT116 and SW48 colorectal cancer cell lines bearing wild-type or various mutant KRAS isoforms. We demonstrate that KRAS mutations indeed lead to radioresistance accompanied by reduced radiotherapy-induced mitotic catastrophe and an accelerated release from G2/M arrest. Moreover, KRAS mutations result in increased DNA damage response and upregulation of 53BP1 with associated increased non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair. Remarkably, KRAS mutations lead to activation of NRF2 antioxidant signaling to increase 53BP1 gene transcription. Furthermore, genetic silencing or pharmacological inhibition of KRAS, NRF2 or 53BP1 attenuates KRAS mutation-induced radioresistance, especially in G1 phase cells. These findings reveal an important role for a KRAS-induced NRF2-53BP1 axis in the DNA repair and survival of KRAS-mutant tumor cells after radiotherapy, and indicate that targeting NRF2, 53BP1 or NHEJ may represent novel strategies to selectively abrogate KRAS mutation-mediated radioresistance.
Potential Molecular Targets in the Setting of Chemoradiation for Esophageal Malignancies
Jabbour, Salma K. , Williams, Terence M. , Sayan, Mutlay , Ajani, Jaffer A. , Chang, Andrew C. , Coleman, Norman, El‐Rifai, Wael , Haddock, Michael G. , Ilson, David H. , Jamorabo, Daniel S. , Kunos, Charles A., Liu, Geoffrey , Prasanna, Pataje G.S. , Rustgi, Anil K. , Wong, Rosemary , Vikram, Bhadrasain , Ahmed, Mansoor M. , Ajani, Jaffer A , Chang, Andrew C , Haddock, Michael, Jamorabo, Daniel , Ahmed, Mansoor M , Liu, Geoffrey , Williams, Terence M , Jabbour, Salma K , Miller, Eric D. , Lin, Steven H.

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | December 1, 2020 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 665-679

10.1093/jnci/djaa195 Get It

AbstractAlthough the development of effective combined chemoradiation regimens for esophageal cancers has resulted in statistically significant survival benefits, the majority of patients treated with curative intent develop locoregional and/or distant relapse. Further improvements in disease control and survival will require the development of individualized therapy based on the knowledge of host and tumor genomics and potentially harnessing the host immune system. Although there are a number of gene targets that are amplified and proteins that are overexpressed in esophageal cancers, attempts to target several of these have not proven successful in unselected patients. Herein, we review our current state of knowledge regarding the molecular pathways implicated in esophageal carcinoma, and the available agents for targeting these pathways that may rationally be combined with standard chemoradiation, with the hope that this commentary will guide future efforts of novel combinations of therapy.