Robb, Ryan N.

Importance Outcomes for patients with unresectable stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) have improved with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors, with a reported 5-year overall survival benefit of approximately 10% for adjuvant durvalumab vs placebo after completion of CRT without progression and with preserved performance status. Starting atezolizumab prior to CRT may allow more patients to benefit from immunotherapy. Objective To evaluate clinical outcomes of patients treated with atezolizumab before and after CRT for unresectable stage III NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-cohort, phase II, nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted at 11 US sites. Patients with pathologically confirmed, unresectable stage III NSCLC who were treatment naive and had good performance status were enrolled between January 3, 2018, and July 24, 2019. Data were locked on March 21, 2023. Interventions Patients received four 21-day cycles of atezolizumab, 1200 mg intravenously, with therapy administered on day 1 of each cycle. Patients not experiencing tumor progression continued to CRT (60 Gy to involved fields) concurrent with weekly carboplatin area under the curve of 2 and paclitaxel, 50 mg/m 2 , followed by planned consolidation carboplatin area under the curve of 6 and paclitaxel, 200 mg/m 2 , for two 21-day cycles. Patients not experiencing progression continued atezolizumab, 1200 mg, every 21 days to complete 1 year of therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the disease control rate at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and translational science end points. Results A total of 62 patients (median [range] age, 63.9 [38.1-86.5] years; 32 female [51.6%]) were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of atezolizumab. The disease control rate at 12 weeks was 74.2% (80% CI, 65.7%-81.4%). Median progression-free survival was 30.0 months (95% CI, 15.8 to not evaluable), and the median overall survival was not reached. The overall survival rate at 24 months was 73.7% (95% CI, 63.4%-85.7%), and the overall response rate was 66.2%. Seventeen patients (27.4%) experienced grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events, including 1 with grade 5 pneumonitis and 1 with grade 4 Guillain-Barré syndrome. Thirty patients (48.4%) experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that neoadjuvant atezolizumab merits further study based on safety and encouraging outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102242

AbstractIntroductionIncreasingly, early‐stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although treatment is generally effective, a small subset of tumors will recur because of radioresistance. Preclinical studies suggested PI3K‐AKT‐mTOR activation mediates radioresistance. This study sought to validate this finding in tumor samples from patients who underwent SBRT for NSCLC.MethodsPatients with T1‐3N0 NSCLC treated with SBRT at our institution were included. Total RNA of formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tumor biopsy specimens (pretherapy) was isolated and analyzed using the Clariom D assay. Risk scores from a PI3K activity signature and four published NSCLC signatures were generated and dichotomized by the median. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regressions were used to analyze their association with recurrence and overall survival (OS). The PI3K signature was also tested in a data set of resected NSCLC for additional validation.ResultsA total of 92 patients were included, with a median follow‐up of 18.3 months for living patients. There was no association of any of the four published gene expression signatures with recurrence or OS. However, high PI3K risk score was associated with higher local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 11.72; 95% CI, 1.40–98.0; p = .023) and worse disease‐free survival (DFS) (HR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.57–10.09; p = .0035), but not OS (p = .49), regional recurrence (p = .15), or distant recurrence (p = .85). In the resected NSCLC data set (n = 361), high PI3K risk score was associated with decreased OS (log‐rank p = .013) but not DFS (p = 0.54).ConclusionsThis study validates that higher PI3K activity, measured by gene expression, is associated with local recurrence and worse DFS in early‐stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT. This may be useful in prognostication and/or tailoring treatment, and merits further validation.

Background: Optimal patient selection for radiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unestablished. Molecular profiling may select patients at high risk for locoregional recurrence (LRR) who would benefit from radiation. Methods: We included resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PDAC) patients, divided into training and validation cohorts, treated among three institutions with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, and borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BR/LA-PDAC) patients treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation at the primary study institution. We isolated RNA from R-PDAC surgical specimens. Using NanoString, we identified miRNAs differentially expressed between normal and malignant pancreatic tissue. ElasticNet regression identified two miRNAs most predictive of LRR in the training cohort, miR-181b/d and miR-575, which were used to generate a risk score (RS). We evaluated the association of the median-dichotomized RS with recurrence and overall survival (OS). Results: We identified 183 R-PDAC and 77 BR/LA-PDAC patients with median follow up of 37 months treated between 2001 and 2014. On multivariable analysis of the R-PDAC training cohort (n = 90), RS was associated with worse LRR (HR = 1.34; 95%CI 1.27–11.38; p = 0.017) and OS (HR = 2.89; 95%CI 1.10–4.76; p = 0.027). In the R-PDAC validation cohort, RS was associated with worse LRR (HR = 2.39; 95%CI 1.03–5.54; p = 0.042), but not OS (p = 0.087). For BR/LA-PDAC, RS was associated with worse LRR (HR = 2.71; 95%CI 1.14–6.48; p = 0.025), DR (HR = 1.93; 95%CI 1.10–3.38; p = 0.022), and OS (HR = 1.97; 95%CI 1.17–3.34; p = 0.011). Additionally, after stratifying by RS and receipt of radiation in BR/LA-PDAC patients, high RS patients who did not receive radiation had worse LRR (p = 0.018), DR (p = 0.006), and OS (p < 0.001) compared to patients with either low RS or patients who received radiation, irrespective of RS. Conclusions: RS predicted worse LRR and OS in R-PDAC and worse LRR, DR, and OS in BR/LA-PDAC. This may select patients who would benefit from radiation and should be validated prospectively.

Abstract KRAS-activating mutations are oncogenic drivers and are correlated with radioresistance of multiple cancers, including colorectal cancer, but the underlying precise molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Herein we model the radiosensitivity of isogenic HCT116 and SW48 colorectal cancer cell lines bearing wild-type or various mutant KRAS isoforms. We demonstrate that KRAS mutations indeed lead to radioresistance accompanied by reduced radiotherapy-induced mitotic catastrophe and an accelerated release from G2/M arrest. Moreover, KRAS mutations result in increased DNA damage response and upregulation of 53BP1 with associated increased non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair. Remarkably, KRAS mutations lead to activation of NRF2 antioxidant signaling to increase 53BP1 gene transcription. Furthermore, genetic silencing or pharmacological inhibition of KRAS, NRF2 or 53BP1 attenuates KRAS mutation-induced radioresistance, especially in G1 phase cells. These findings reveal an important role for a KRAS-induced NRF2-53BP1 axis in the DNA repair and survival of KRAS-mutant tumor cells after radiotherapy, and indicate that targeting NRF2, 53BP1 or NHEJ may represent novel strategies to selectively abrogate KRAS mutation-mediated radioresistance.

Abstract Purpose: The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway is critical to the development of colorectal cancers, and KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations foster resistance to radiation. We performed a phase I trial to determine the safety of trametinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor, with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Patients and Methods: Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were enrolled on a phase I study with 3+3 study design, with an expansion cohort of 9 patients at the MTD. Following a 5-day trametinib lead-in, with pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies, patients received trametinib and CRT, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Trametinib was given orally daily at 3 dose levels: 0.5 mg, 1 mg, and 2 mg. CRT consisted of infusional 5-FU 225 mg/m2/day and radiation dose of 28 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy (total 50.4 Gy). The primary endpoint was to identify the MTD and recommended phase II dose. IHC staining for phosphorylated ERK (pERK) and genomic profiling was performed on the tumor samples. Results: Patients were enrolled to all dose levels, and 18 patients were evaluable for toxicities and responses. Treatment was well tolerated, and there was one dose-limiting toxicity of diarrhea, which was attributed to CRT rather than trametinib. At the 2 mg dose level, 25% had pathologic complete response. IHC staining confirmed dose-dependent decrease in pERK with increasing trametinib doses. Conclusions: The combination of trametinib with 5-FU CRT is safe and well tolerated, and may warrant additional study in a phase II trial, perhaps in a RAS/RAF-mutant selected population.

Abstract Introduction: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiation (CRT) is a standard neoadjuvant treatment strategy for the treatment of locally-advanced rectal adenocarcinomas (LARC). MEK-1/2 inhibition has been shown to radiosensitize Ras mutant tumors in preclinical models, including colorectal cancer. In this phase 1 trial, we are testing MEK-1/2 inhibition in combination with neoadjuvant CRT for LARC. Methods: This trial is a standard 3+3 design testing 3 dose levels of the MEK-1/2 inhibitor trametinib in combination with CRT: 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, and 2.0 mg daily, followed by an expansion cohort. All patients first receive a one week lead-in dosing of trametinib monotherapy, and undergo a tumor biopsy at the end of that week to assess pharmacodynamic inhibition by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Then, patients receive standard CRT (5-FU 225 mg/m2 per day by continuous infusion during radiotherapy, and 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 5 days/ week) in combination with trametinib (5 days/week). Patients have total mesorectal excision (TME) 6-10 weeks after completion of CRT. Results: 17 patients have been enrolled to date, with current enrollment occurring on the trametinib 2 mg expansion cohort (total 18 patients planned). Of these, 15 patients (10 males, 5 females) have toxicity and surgical response data available. Median age is 53 years (range 35-74 years), and 6 patients have Stage II disease, while 9 patients with Stage III disease. There have been no grade 4-5 toxicities. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of diarrhea occurred in the 2mg dose cohort, attributed mainly to 5FU CRT, but led to trametinib discontinuation. Generalized skin rash led to trametinib discontinuation after 2 weeks of therapy for 1 patient and was held for 3 days for 2 patients. All patients completed TME, and 3 patients had wound infection at 2 weeks after TME, while 2 patients had perineal wound infection at 4 weeks after TME. Three out of 9 (33%) patients at the 2mg dose cohort had a pathologic complete response (pCR), and 2/9 (22%) patients had a near pCR. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 10 patients, 4 patients did not receive (3 refused), and 1 patient is pending. Correlative research studies have been performed in the first 12 patients enrolled. Examination of phospho-ERK levels using Vectra quantitative immunohistochemistry in pre-treatment versus post-lead-in trametinib tumor tissue reveals dose-dependent decreases in p-ERK expression in both tumor and stromal tissue as trametinib is increased from 0.5 to 2.0 mg (range 18-46% absolute reduction), with maximal reduction observed in the 2 mg cohort. Additionally, we have performed whole exome sequencing of a custom panel of 279 cancer associated genes (IGNITE platform) in tumor and normal tissue, and have identified high frequency mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and TP53, as well as additional lower frequency mutations in every tumor. One patient was noted to have microsatellite instability. Finally, we will present data correlating degree of change in p-ERK staining, mutational analysis, and mismatch repair status with pathologic response. Conclusions: The combination of trametinib with 5-FU-based CRT for LARC is feasible with promising signs of clinical activity and tolerability. Initial analysis of tumor tissue confirms dose-dependent pharmacodynamic inhibition of ERK-1/2 within 5 days of starting trametinib. Citation Format: Terence M. Williams, Christina Wu, Lai Wei, Emily Chan, Ryan Robb, Sameek Roychowdhury, Amy Webb, Cynthia Timmers, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Evan Wuthrick. A phase I trial combining MEK-1/2 inhibition in combination with 5-fluorouracil and radiation for locally-advanced rectal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT088. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT088