Back to Authors

Shah, Manisha H.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6453-2044

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute

Citations 18

Response to Letter to the Editor From Zhang et al: “Cabozantinib Plus Ipilimumab/Nivolumab in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Differentiated Thyroid Cancer”
Konda, Bhavana , Sherman, Eric J. , Ryder, Mabel , Agulnik, Mark , Handley, Demond , Moses, Catherine, Jacob, Rajani, Streicher, Howard , Shah, Manisha H. , Streicher, Howard , Ryder, Mabel , Massarelli, Erminia , Nieva, Jorgé , Muzaffar, Jameel, Morris, John C, Ho, Alan L. , Wei, Lai , Moses, Catherine, Jacob, Rajani, Wright, John, Carson, William E.

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | April 4, 2025 | Volume: 110 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e2425-e2426

10.1210/clinem/dgaf221 Get It

Cabozantinib Plus Ipilimumab/Nivolumab in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Konda, Bhavana , Sherman, Eric J. , Morris, John C, Ryder, Mabel , Agulnik, Mark , Handley, Demond , Moses, Catherine, Jacob, Rajani, Streicher, Howard , Shah, Manisha H. , Streicher, Howard , Ryder, Mabel , Massarelli, Erminia , Nieva, Jorgé , Muzaffar, Jameel, Morris, John C, Ho, Alan L. , Wei, Lai , Moses, Catherine, Jacob, Rajani, Wright, John, Carson, William E.

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | August 9, 2024 | Volume: 110 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 830-837

10.1210/clinem/dgae512 Get It

Abstract Background This investigator-initiated phase II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in previously treated patients with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Methods Eligible patients with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed on 1 prior line of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy received a 2-week run-in of cabozantinib monotherapy followed by CaboNivoIpi for 4 cycles (cycle length = 6 weeks), followed by cabozantinib plus nivolumab (cycle length = 4 weeks) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) within the first 6 months of treatment. A Simon optimal 2-stage design allowed for an interim analysis after accrual of 10 evaluable patients. At least 5 responses were needed to proceed to stage 2. Results Among 11 patients enrolled, the median age was 69 years. Prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapies included lenvatinib, pazopanib, and sorafenib plus everolimus. Median follow-up was 13.4 months. Among 10 evaluable patients, ORR within the first 6 months of treatment was 10% (1 partial response). Median progression-free survival was 9 months (95% CI, 3.0–not reached) and median overall survival was 19.2 months (95% CI, 4.6–not reached). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were noted in 55% (6/11) and grade 5 AEs in 18% (2/11) of patients. The most common treatment-related AE was hypertension. The study did not reach its prespecified efficacy threshold. Conclusion CaboNivoIpi had low ORRs and a high rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. Clinical Trial Registration NCT03914300
A phase II study of bevacizumab and temsirolimus in advanced extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Abuzakhm, Sonia, Sukrithan, Vineeth , Fruth, Briant, Qin, Rui , Strosberg, Jonathan , Hobday, Timothy J. , Reidy‐Lagunes, Diane , Kindler, Hedy L. , Kim, George P., Knox, Jennifer J. , Kaubisch, Andreas , Villalona‐Calero, Miguel A. , Erlichman, Charles , Shah, Manisha H. , Strosberg, Jonathan R , Knox, Jennifer J , Sukrithan, Vineeth , Semrad, Thomas John , Chen, Helen

Endocrine-Related Cancer | September 13, 2023 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 11 | Pages: No page available

10.1530/erc-22-0301 Get It

We assessed the efficacy and safety of combining bevacizumab with temsirolimus in patients with advanced extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This NCI-sponsored multicenter, open-label, phase II study (NCT01010126) enrolled patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. All patients were treated with temsirolimus and bevacizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Temsirolimus 25 mg was administered i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg i.v. on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. Discontinuation of temsirolimus or bevacizumab did not require discontinuation of the other agent. The primary endpoints were objective response rate and 6-month progression-free survival rate. Fifty-nine patients were enrolled in this study, and 54 were evaluated for efficacy and adverse events. While median progression-free survival was 7.1 months, the median duration of treatment with temsirolimus was 3.9 months and that with bevacizumab was 3.5 months. The objective response rate of combination therapy was 2%, and 6-month progression-free survival was 48%. The most frequently reported grade 3–4 adverse events included fatigue (13%), hypertension (13%), and bleeding (13%). Close to 54% of the patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, refusal of further treatment, or treatment delays. Three deaths occurred in the study, of which two were due to treatment-related bowel perforations. Given the minimal efficacy and increased toxicity seen with the combination of bevacizumab and temsirolimus, we do not recommend the use of this regimen in patients with advanced extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients Receiving B-Cell Targeted Therapy
Marty, Paige K. , Shah, Manisha H. , Keulen, Virginia Van, Erskine, Courtney L. , Theel, Elitza S. , Escalante, Patricio , Peikert, T., Keulen, Virginia P. Van , Zeng, Hu , Specks, Ulrich

C13. IMMUNE RESPONSES AND POTENTIAL INFLAMMATORY BIOMARKERS IN SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION | May 2, 2022 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A3687-A3687

10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2022.205.1_meetingabstracts.a3687 Get It

Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Shah, Manisha H. , Benson, Al B. , Bergsland, Emily K. , Blaszkowsky, Lawrence S. , Brock, Pamela , Chan, J.K.C., Das, Satya , Dickson, Paxton V. , Fanta, Paul T. , Giordano, Thomas J. , Halperin, Daniel M. , He, Jin , Heaney, Anthony P. , Heslin, Martin J. , Kandeel, Fouad , Kardan, Arash , Khan, Sajid , Kuvshinoff, Boris W. , Miller, Kimberly D. , Reidy‐Lagunes, Diane , Salgado, Sarimar Agosto , Shaheen, Shagufta , Sussman, Craig, Trikalinos, Nikolaos A. , Uboha, N., Vijayvergia, Namrata , Lynn, Beth, Hochstetler, Cindy, Trikalinos, Nikolaos A , Goldner, Whitney Sears , Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R. , Lieu, Christopher H. , Pillarisetty, Venu Gopal , Soares, Heloisa P. , Soulen, Michael C , Strosberg, Jonathan , Wong, Terence Z.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 2, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 839-868

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0032 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Gland Tumors focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. NETs are generally subclassified by site of origin, stage, and histologic characteristics. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of NETs often involves collaboration between specialists in multiple disciplines, using specific biochemical, radiologic, and surgical methods. Specialists include pathologists, endocrinologists, radiologists (including nuclear medicine specialists), and medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists. These guidelines discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. This article is focused on the 2021 NCCN Guidelines principles of genetic risk assessment and counseling and recommendations for well-differentiated grade 3 NETs, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas.
2021 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Management of Patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer
Bible, Keith C. , Kebebew, Electron , Brierley, James D. , Brito, Juan P. , Clark, Thomas J. , Foote, Robert L. , Giordano, Thomas J. , Kasperbauer, Jan L. , Newbold, Kate, Rosenthal, M. Sara, Sawka, Anna M. , Shah, Manisha H. , Shaha, Ashok R. , Smallridge, Robert C., Wong-Clark, Carol K., Kasperbauer, Jan , Smallridge, Robert, Brito, Juan P , Cabanillas, Maria E. , Cristofano, Antonio Di , Nikiforov, Yuri E. , Randolph, Gregory William

Thyroid® | March 17, 2021 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 337-386

10.1089/thy.2020.0944 Get It

Background: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare but highly lethal form of thyroid cancer. Since the guidelines for the management of ATC by the American Thyroid Association were first published in 2012, significant clinical and scientific advances have occurred in the field. The aim of these guidelines is to inform clinicians, patients, and researchers on published evidence relating to the diagnosis and management of ATC. Methods: The specific clinical questions and topics addressed in these guidelines were based on prior versions of the guidelines, stakeholder input, and input of the Task Force members (authors of the guideline). Relevant literature was reviewed, including serial PubMed searches supplemented with additional articles. The American College of Physicians Guideline Grading System was used for critical appraisal of evidence and grading strength of recommendations. Results: The guidelines include the diagnosis, initial evaluation, establishment of treatment goals, approaches to locoregional disease (surgery, radiotherapy, targeted/systemic therapy, supportive care during active therapy), approaches to advanced/metastatic disease, palliative care options, surveillance and long-term monitoring, and ethical issues, including end of life. The guidelines include 31 recommendations and 16 good practice statements. Conclusions: We have developed evidence-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the management of ATC. While all care must be individualized, such recommendations provide, in our opinion, optimal care paradigms for patients with ATC.
Selpercatinib (LOXO-292) in patients with RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer.
Shah, Manisha H. , Sherman, Eric J. , Lorch, Jochen H. , Brose, Marcia S. , Godbert, Yann , Meurer, Marie, Tan, Daniel Shao-Weng , Patel, Jyoti D. , Yang, Luxi , Kherani, Jennifer , Wirth, Lori J. , Robinson, Bruce , Solomon, Benjamin , Kang, Hyunseok , Worden, Francis P. , Leboulleux, Sophie , Morris, John C., Owonikoko, Taofeek Kunle , Gautschi, Oliver , Cabanillas, Maria E.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 3594-3594

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.3594 Get It

3594 Background: Selpercatinib (LOXO-292) is a highly selective and potent small molecule RET kinase inhibitor. Here we report an update on the efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Methods: Patients with RET-mutant MTC were enrolled to the Phase 1/2 LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128), a global, multicenter trial (16 countries, 89 sites). Following the Phase 1 dose escalation portion of the trial, patients received the recommended dose of 160 mg orally twice daily. Each cycle was 28 days. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR) and safety. Per health authority agreement, the primary analysis set was defined as the first 55 consecutively enrolled patients previously treated with multikinase inhibitors cabozantinib and/or vandetanib. Patients naïve to cabozantinib and vandetanib treatment were analyzed separately. All analyses were based on a 16-Dec-2019 data cutoff date. Results: In the primary analysis set of prior cabozantinib and/or vandetanib-treated patients with MTC (n = 55), the ORR by investigator assessment was 62% (95% CI 47.7–74.6, n = 34/55) and the median DoR was not reached (95% CI 18.4 months–not estimable) despite a median follow-up of 14.8 months. In cabozantinib/vandetanib treatment-naïve patients (n = 88), the ORR by investigator assessment was 69% (95% CI 58.6–78.7, n = 61/88, including 2 responses pending confirmation). Of the 59 confirmed responding patients, with a median follow-up of 8 months, responses were ongoing for 57 responders at the time of the analysis. In the safety analysis set consisting of all selpercatinib dosed patients (N = 702), the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) that occurred in ≥15% of patients were dry mouth (33.3%), increased AST (24.5%), increased ALT (23.8%), hypertension (23.2%), diarrhea (19.7%), and fatigue (16.8%). Only 2% (14 of 702) of patients discontinued selpercatinib for TRAEs. Conclusions: Selpercatinib use was associated with marked and durable antitumor activity in prior cabozantinib and/or vandetanib-treated patients and in cabozantinib/vandetanib-naïve patients with RET-mutant MTC, with the majority of responses ongoing in both cohorts. Selpercatinib was well tolerated. Efficacy data assessed by independent review committee based on the 16-Dec-2019 data cutoff date will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128 .
Multicenter phase II trial of temsirolimus (TEM) and bevacizumab (BEV) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET).
Hobday, Timothy J. , Qin, Rui , Moore, Malcolm J. , Reidy‐Lagunes, Diane , Kindler, Hedy L. , Shah, Manisha H. , Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Kaubisch, Andreas , Chen, Helen X., Erlichman, Charles , Strosberg, Jonathan

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 4032-4032

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4032 Get It

4032 Background: PNET has long had few effective therapies other than chemotherapy. Placebo-controlled phase III trials of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the VEGF/PDGF receptor inhibitor sunitinib noted improved progression-free survival (PFS). However, objective response rates (RR) with these agents are still <10%. Preclinical studies suggest enhanced anti-tumor effects with combined mTOR and VEGF targeted therapy. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor TEM (25 mg IV q week) and the VEGF-A monoclonal antibody BEV (10 mg/kg IV q 2 weeks) in patients (pts) with well or moderately differentiated PNET and progressive disease by RECIST within 7 months of study entry. Co primary endpoints were RR and 6-month PFS. Planned enrollment was 50 patients, with interim analysis for futility after the first 25 evaluable pts. Pts had no prior mTOR or VEGF targeted agents, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Continued octreotide was allowed, but not required. Prior interferon, embolization, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens were allowed. Results: 55 pts were eligible for response assessment. Confirmed PR was documented in 20 of 55 patients (37%). 44 of 55 (80%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. Of 49 pts evaluable for this endpoint, 12 month PFS is 49%. 15 patients remain on therapy. For evaluable patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to therapy were hypertension (18%), hyperglycemia (13%), fatigue (11%). leukopenia (9%), headache (9%), proteinuria (7%), and hypokalemia (7%). Conclusions: The combination of TEM/BEV has substantial activity in a multi-center phase II trial with RR of 37%, well in excess of single targeted agents in PNET. 6-month PFS was a notable 80% in a population of patients with RECIST criteria progression within 7 months of study entry. Phase III trials of combined VEGF/mTOR inhibition in PNET should be pursued. Clinical trial information: NCT01010126.
Multicenter phase II trial of temsirolimus (TEM) and bevacizumab (BEV) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET): Results of a planned interim efficacy analysis.
Hobday, Timothy J. , Qin, Rui , Reidy‐Lagunes, Diane , Moore, Malcolm J. , Kaubisch, Andreas , Shah, Manisha H. , Kindler, Hedy L. , Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Erlichman, Charles , Strosberg, Jonathan , Chen, Helen

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 4047-4047

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4047 Get It

4047 Background: PNET has long had few effective therapies other than chemotherapy. Recent placebo-controlled phase III trials of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the VEGF/ PDGF receptor inhibitor sunitinib noted improved progression-free survival (PFS). However, objective response rates (RR) with these agents are still <10%. Preclinical studies suggest enhanced anti-tumor effects with combined mTOR and VEGF targeted therapy. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor TEM (25 mg IV q week) and the VEGF-A monoclonal antibody BEV (10 mg/kg IV q 2 weeks) in patients (pts) with well or moderately differentiated PNET and progressive disease by RECIST within 7 months of study entry. Co-primary endpoints were RR and 6-month PFS. Planned enrollment is 50 patients, with interim analysis for futility after the first 25 evaluable pts. Pts had no prior mTOR or VEGF targeted agents, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Continued octreotide was allowed, but not required. Prior interferon, embolization, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens were allowed. Results: Confirmed PR was documented in 13 of the first 25 (52%) evaluable patients. 21 of 25 (84%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. Both endpoints exceeded the protocol-defined criteria to continue enrollment. For 36 evaluable patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to therapy were hypertension (14%), leukopenia (11%), lymphopenia (11%), hyperglycemia (11%), mucositis (8%), hypokalemia (8%), and fatigue (8%). Conclusions: The combination of TEM/BEV has substantial activity in a multi-center phase II trial with RR of 52%, well in excess of single targeted agents in PNET. 6-month PFS was a notable 84% in a population of patients with RECIST criteria progression within 7 months of study entry. Accrual is ongoing.
Effect of cabozantinib on bone turnover markers (BTM) and bone metastases (BM) in radioiodine refractory (RAIR)-differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).
Knopp, Michael V. , Martin, Peter R. , Geyer, Susan, Souza, Jonas A. de, Wirth, Lori J. , Menefee, Michael E., Shah, Manisha H. , Konda, Bhavana , Cabanillas, Maria E. , Liu, Stephen V.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e17580-e17580

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e17580 Get It

e17580 Background: Cabozantinib is a small molecule multiple-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that primarily targets MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2). We evaluated the effect of cabozantinib on BTM in RAIR DTC. We also assessed the response of BM to cabozantinib using 18F Sodium Fluoride (NaF) PET and radionuclide bone scans. Methods: This prospective analysis was performed as part of a multicenter International Thyroid Oncology Group phase II study of cabozantinibin patients with RAIR DTC who progressed on prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (NCT01811212). BTM [serum C-telopeptide (CTx), osteocalcin, N-telopeptide (NTx), procollagen type 1 (Pc1) and urinary NTx] and NaF PET or Tc-MDP scans were done at baseline and after 8 weeks of therapy. A paired t-test was used between baseline and week 8 BTM. Results: Primary study results were presented elsewhere (Shah, et al. 2015, International Thyroid Congress) showing a response rate of 36% with cabozantinib. Of 25 patients (pts) enrolled, 21 had BM, 10 of whom were on bone-modifying agents (BMA) prior to week 8. Only 2 pts had elevated BTM at baseline. In all pts who had paired BTM, there was a statistically significant decline in all BTM except NTx by week 8 (table). Pts not on BMA also had a significant decline in CTx (p 0.0003), urine NTx (p 0.0300), and Pc1 (p 0.0030) compared to baseline. 19 pts were evaluable for overall response and there was no correlation between BTM and response rate. 6/21 patients underwent paired NaF PET scans and 4/6 had minor reduction in lesion uptake at 8 weeks. Conclusions: Interestingly, most of our patients had normal baseline BTM despite BM. Cabozantinib was associated with a strikingly significant reduction in all BTM (even when BTM were within normal limits at baseline) except NTx by week 8. Minor decreases in bone lesion uptake was noted on NaF PET in 4/6 evaluable patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01811212. [Table: see text]