Streicher, Howard

Abstract Background: In the treatment of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC), randomized phase II/III trials testing selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs) and selective ER modulators (SERMs) (mostly compared to fulvestrant) have demonstrated modest (1-2 months) improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), mainly limited to patients with ESR1-mutated MBC. In these studies, the median PFS (mPFS) ranges from 3 to 6 months, with shorter mPFS in patients with prior progression on CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Here we report the final results of a randomized phase II study that compared Z-endoxifen (Endx) 80 mg/day with tamoxifen (Tam) 20 mg/day in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)- positive/ HER2-negative MBC, and report outcomes according to ESR1, PIK3CA, PTEN and AKT alterations (Alliance A011203; NCT02311933). Methods: Postmenopausal women with unlimited prior endocrine regimens (including CDK 4/6i) and up to two chemotherapy regimens for MBC, with tumor biopsy confirmation of ER+ (>10% nuclear staining) and negative for HER2 amplification/overexpression were eligible. Prior adjuvant Tam was allowed if relapse was > 1 year following Tam completion. Patients randomized to Tam could cross over to Endx at progression. The primary end point was PFS analyzed by the interval censored data analytic approach. ctDNA was analyzed for ESR1 and PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT alterations using Guardant360 CDx 74-gene next-generation sequencing-based assay (Guardant Health). Results: Among 108 women who preregistered, 76 (Endx: 40; Tam: 36) were randomized and eligible. Patients were heavily pretreated; all patients had prior exposure to an aromatase inhibitor (AI), 50% had ≥ 2 AI based regimens in the metastatic setting and 50% in each arm had received fulvestrant. Approximately half on each arm received at least one chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting. Prior CDK 4/6i therapy was imbalanced (48% on Endx and 28% on Tam). Endx did not significantly prolong PFS compared to Tam (median PFS [mPFS] 4.3 vs 1.7 months; HR 0.72, p=0.168). Because arms were imbalanced according to prior CDK 4/6i exposure, we performed an unplanned analysis demonstrating that Endx improved PFS relative to Tam in CDK 4/6i-naïve patients (mPFS 8.3 vs 2.1 months; HR 0.39, p=0.0097) but not in patients treated with prior CDK 4/6i (mPFS 3.0 vs 1.5 months). In the subset of patients who consented for ctDNA testing (n=28), the mPFS for those with either an activating alteration in the PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT pathway or with an ESR1 mutation was similar as the overall trial. For the 24 patients who progressed on Tam and crossed-over to Endx, the median PFS was 3.5 months (range 1.5-15.0 months) with a 6-month clinical benefit rate of 33.3% (8/24; 90% CI: 17.8-52.1%). Conclusions: Endx did not meet the prespecified threshold for concluding that it significantly improved PFS relative to Tam in a cohort of heavily pretreated MBC. However, the observations of a > 6-month improvement in mPFS in CDK 4/6i-naïve patients, anti-tumor activity following crossover to Tam, and mPFS estimates similar to other novel endocrine agents in development all support the ongoing development of Endx. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN) and 5P50CA116201. Clinicaltrials.gov Id: NCT02311933. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. Suman, J. Reid, T. Dockter, C. Strand, W. F. Symmans, J. Hawse, A. Storniolo, J. Doroshow, J. M. Collins, H. Streicher, M. M. Ames, A. Tarnower, O. M. Hahn, J. N. Ingle, L. Carey, A. Partridge. Final results from the Randomized Phase II study of Z-Endoxifen and Tamoxifen in Endocrine Refractory, Estrogen Receptor Positive, HER2 negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (Alliance A011203) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-08-07.

Background In this open-label, randomized, non-comparative, multicenter phase II study (Alliance A091401) we report on three expansion cohorts treated with nivolumab (N) with and without ipilimumab (N+I) and provide a multi-omic correlative analysis of actionable biomarkers. Methods Patients were randomized (non-comparative) to receive either N or N+I. The primary endpoint was a 6-month confirmed response rate (CRR) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Multi-omic correlative analyses were conducted using samples from both the primary and expansion cohorts. Results A total of 66 patients were evaluated for the primary endpoint with disease including gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST, n=18), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS, n=24), and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS, n=24). Neither N nor N+I achieved a complete or partial response in the GIST expansion cohort. In DDLPS and UPS, the primary response endpoint of CRR was met with N+I (both 16.6%, 2/12) but not with N alone (both 8.3%, 1/12). In the GIST cohort, TRAE was higher with N+I treatment, halting enrollment as required per protocol. In a correlative analysis of patients for the expansion cohort and the original cohort (n=86), traditional biomarkers of immunotherapy response were not correlated with response in any histological subtype. Markers of genomic instability including the presence of gene fusions and increased subclonal mutations correlated with improved clinical outcomes. Conclusions This expansion cohort reaffirms the outcomes of A091401. There remains a pressing need to determine the role of and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in sarcoma. Trial registration number NCT02500797.

Abstract Background This investigator-initiated phase II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in previously treated patients with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Methods Eligible patients with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed on 1 prior line of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy received a 2-week run-in of cabozantinib monotherapy followed by CaboNivoIpi for 4 cycles (cycle length = 6 weeks), followed by cabozantinib plus nivolumab (cycle length = 4 weeks) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) within the first 6 months of treatment. A Simon optimal 2-stage design allowed for an interim analysis after accrual of 10 evaluable patients. At least 5 responses were needed to proceed to stage 2. Results Among 11 patients enrolled, the median age was 69 years. Prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapies included lenvatinib, pazopanib, and sorafenib plus everolimus. Median follow-up was 13.4 months. Among 10 evaluable patients, ORR within the first 6 months of treatment was 10% (1 partial response). Median progression-free survival was 9 months (95% CI, 3.0–not reached) and median overall survival was 19.2 months (95% CI, 4.6–not reached). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were noted in 55% (6/11) and grade 5 AEs in 18% (2/11) of patients. The most common treatment-related AE was hypertension. The study did not reach its prespecified efficacy threshold. Conclusion CaboNivoIpi had low ORRs and a high rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. Clinical Trial Registration NCT03914300

2068 Background: There is a lack of effective therapy for recurrent high-grade meningiomas who relapsed after prior radiation therapy (RT). ETCTN 10186 is a phase I/II study to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary clinical efficacy of combining reirradiation using fractionated radiosurgery with nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab for recurrent high-grade meningiomas. The preliminary results from the phase I portion are reported here. Methods: Recurrent grade II-III meningioma patients were treated with radiosurgery plus nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years; ECOG score ≤ 2; tumor diameter 1-5 cm; prior radiation dose ≤ 70 Gy; normal organ function; no active autoimmunity. During the phase I portion, eligible patients were treated according to treatment-escalation schema following the modified 3+3 design (Table 1). The maximum tolerated combination (MTC) will be the regimen at which ≤ 1/6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) within 8 weeks of the start of study therapy. During the phase II portion, a total of 24 evaluable patients will be enrolled at the MTC using Simon’s MiniMax two-stage design. The primary endpoint of the phase I portion is to determine the MTC. Objective radiological responses (ORRs) are defined as per the Macdonald criteria. One cycle of immunotherapy is defined as 4 weeks of nivolumab with or without concurrent ipilimumab. Results: From 7/2019 to 3/2021, 13 patients were enrolled in the phase I, including 6 with regimen A and 7 with regimen B (Table). The median prior RT dose was 56 Gy (18-70) at a median interval of 2.8 years (1.3-13.3). There was no DLT in either cohort, so regimen B was deemed the MTC. The median cycles of immunotherapy completed were not significantly different between cohort A and B (11 vs. 6, p = 0.41, respectively). Three cohort A patients and 2 cohort B patients completed all planned doses of immunotherapy. Most patients stopped due to progression, and only one cohort B patient stopped due to treatment-related toxicity (grade 3 hypophysitis and encephalitis after 6 cycles of immunotherapy). After a median follow-up of 11.1 months, there have been 5 progressions and 4 deaths. The 6 month-PFS and 12 month-PFS rates are 62% and 54%, respectively. Two ORRs have been reported by institutional assessment, and central radiology review is ongoing and will be reported. Conclusions: Reirradiation using fractionated radiosurgery with nivolumab plus or minus ipilimumab are well tolerated for radiation-relapsed high-grade meningiomas. Phase II study of regimen B is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT03604978. [Table: see text]

11511 Background: In the open-label multicenter phase II study, A091401, nivolumab (N) and nivolumab+ipilimumab (N+I) demonstrated a confirmed response rate (RR) of 5% and 16%, respectively in patients (pts) with advanced sarcoma (D’Angelo SP et al Lancet Oncology 2018). Responses occurred in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), myxofibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, sarcoma not otherwise specified and alveolar soft part sarcoma. Here, we report efficacy of N and N+I, in each of 3 expansion cohorts [gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), UPS and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS)]. Methods: Pts refractory to ≥ 1 regimen(s) were randomized (non-comparative) to receive either N [N (3 mg/kg q2W)] or N+I [N (3 mg/kg Q3W x4, then Q2W) plus I (3 mg/kg q3W x4)]. The primary endpoint was 6 month confirmed RR (RECIST v1.1). For UPS and DDLS, 2 confirmed responses in the 1st 12 evaluable pts was needed (85% power, 1-sided alpha=0.15, 5 v 25% RR). For GIST, a confirmed response in the 1st 9 evaluable pts expanded enrollment to 24 (80% power, 1-sided alpha=0.10, 5 v 20% RR). Other endpoints: adverse events (AEs, TRAEs), progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS), and correlatives. Results: See table. Clinical trial information: NCT02500797 . Conclusions: Neither N or N+I lead to confirmed responses in GIST. In DDLS and UPS, the primary response endpoint was met with N+I but not with N alone (RR 14% for N+I vs. 7% and 8% for N alone). For the GIST cohort TRAE was higher with N+I, holding enrollment as required per protocol. There remains a pressing need to determine genomic and clinical biomarkers of response, resistance and toxicity. Correlative analyses (whole exome sequencing, multiplex IHC and RNAseq) are in progress. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02500797. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Endx is a Tam metabolite with promising antitumor activity in Tam and aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistant estrogen receptor (ER) positive (+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This randomized phase II study compared progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity of Endx 80 mg/day to Tam 20 mg/day in patients (pts) with ER+ MBC. Eligibility included postmenopausal women, ECOG PS 0-2, prior progression on AI but not Tam (unlimited endocrine therapy [ET] lines allowed), and a preregistration biopsy confirming ER+ (>10% nuclear staining) and HER2-negative MBC. Stratified randomization was used balancing prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i) use and/or everolimus (yes/no), measurable disease (yes/no) and endocrine resistance (primary/secondary) between arms. Pts randomized to Tam were allowed to cross over to Endx at progression. Due to short expected median PFS, differences in PFS were assessed using approaches for interval-censored data (ICD). 40 eligible pts were to be randomized to each arm so a one-sided alpha=0.10 generalized log-rank test (GLRT) would have a 90% chance of detecting a 50% decrease in hazard of disease progression with Endx (median: 6 months) relative to Tam (median: 3 months). Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate (stable or partial response > 6 cycles) (CBR) for measurable and non-measurable disease. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data were obtained Day (d) 1 (4 hour), end of cycle 2, and at time of progression. Results: From March 2015 to March 2017, 108 women with endocrine refractory recurrent or MBC were preregistered. 27 pts did not register due to: biopsy demonstrating ER-/HER2- (3 pts), ER+/HER2+ (5 pts), cancer other than breast (3 pts), no cancer in specimen (6 pts), brain metastases (2 pts), acute infection (1 pt), progression on or recent use of Tam (2 pts), or pt refusal (5 pts). 4/81 pts who registered were excluded due to ineligibility (3 pts) or refusal to start protocol treatment (1 pt). The study cohort consisted of 40 pts randomized to Endx and 37 pts to Tam. The median (m) number of ETs in the metastatic setting was 2 (range 1-4) for each arm including prior CDK 4/6i (Endx: 42.5%, Tam: 29.7%) and everolimus (Endx: 35.0%, Tam: 40.5%). The m cycle number was 6 for Endx (range: 1-35) and 3 for Tam (range: 1-42). PFS for Endx was not significantly different compared to Tam (HR= 0.77; 95% CI: 0.49-1.22, GLRT p=0.309; mPFS: Endx 130 days [95% CI: 76-138 days] and Tam 42 days [95%CI: 24-129 days]). However, PFS was significantly longer in pts with no prior CDK 4/6i in the Endx arm (GLRT p=0.002; HR(no/yes)=0.31; 95%CI: 0.15-0.65) but not in the Tam arm (GLRT p=0.708) (unplanned analysis). Severe (grade (G) 3+) toxicities included: Endx G3 hypertriglyceridemia (3 pts); Tam: G3 hypertension with G2 stroke (1 pt), G3 thromboembolic event (1 pt), and G3 abdominal, bone and liver pain (1 pt). In Endx arm, d1 m Endx plasma concentration (conc) was 216 ng/ml (n=17; range: 144-400). For Tam arm, d1 m Tam conc was 17 ng/ml (n=17; range:11-23) (Endx not detectable). For the 25 pts that crossed over to Endx, CBR was 28.0% (90% CI: 14.0-46.2%) and 14 pts had pk data at progression. A lower median Endx conc (6 ng/ml range: 3.3-16.3) was observed in Tam patients at progression who then had Endx clinical benefit compared to Tam pts without clinical benefit after Endx crossover (median Endx 12 ng/ml; range 4.4-36.6).Conclusions: In endocrine-resistant breast cancer, Z-Endx was not significantly superior to Tam, but clinical benefit was observed in 28% that crossed over to Endx after Tam progression. In pts with no prior CDK 4/6i, the observation of significantly longer PFS in the Endx arm is hypothesis generating. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN), https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Clinical Trials.gov Identifier:NCT02311933 Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J Suman, Joel M Reid, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A Buhrow, Renee M McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, William F Symmans, Minetta C Liu, John R Hawse, James Doroshow, Anna M Storniolo, Jerry M Collins, Howard Streicher, Matthew M Ames, James N Ingle, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey. A randomized phase II trial of tamoxifen versus Z-endoxifen HCL in postmenopausal women with metastatic estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-06.

11007 Background: Patients (pts) with metastatic sarcoma (SAR) have limited options. Nivolumab(N), a fully human anti-PD-1 mAb and ipilimumab (I), a humanized anti-CTLA-4 mAb, have favorable safety & efficacy in other tumors. Pembrolizumab demonstrated a response rate (RR) of 12% in SAR pts. We evaluated N, independently from N+I, in SAR pts. Methods: This open-label multi-center phase II study enrolled pts failing prior regimens. Randomized (non-comparative) pts received either N3 [N (3 mg/kg q2W)] or N3+I1 [N(3 mg/kg Q3W x4, then Q2W) & [I(1 mg/kg q3W x4)]. Treatment continued beyond progressive disease (PD) in 1st12 weeks. 5 confirmed responses in 38 evaluable pts yielded 90% power (0.05 1-sided alpha) to detect a 20% (vs 5%) confirmed RR. Other endpoints: adverse events (AEs), progression-free, overall survival (PFS, OS), and correlative studies including PD-L1 expression by IHC, mutational burden/neoantigen analysis, TCR clonality and TIL characterization. Results: 85 pts (43 - N3; 42 - N3+I1) were enrolled [mean age 54 yrs (21–81), 52% female). No significant differences in histological subtypes across cohorts: 36% LMS, 4% LPS, 10% UPS/MFH, 6% synovial, 5% bone, 5% Ewing’s, and 34% other. Pts were refractory to 1(20%), 2(22%), and ≥3 (58%) regimens. Grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 7% (N3) and 14% (N3+I1) and 0 Gr 5 TRAEs. 8% of pts stopped due to AEs (2% N3, 14% N3+I1). 2/3 confirmed responses on N3, with 2 ongoing (range 1.1-3.2 months). 6/7 confirmed responses (2 complete) on N3+N1, with 5 ongoing (range 6-13 months). Responses occurred in 7 histologies. See Table for pt outcomes. Conclusions: N + I showed acceptable safety and encouraging antitumor activity with most responses ongoing across multiple SAR histologies, passing efficacy criteria. There was minimal activity observed with N alone. Increased TRAEs were observed in N3+I1. Correlative analyses ongoing. NCT02500797. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, Conquer Cancer Foundation, BMS. Clinical trial information: NCT02500797. [Table: see text]