Ames, M

Abstract Background: In the treatment of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC), randomized phase II/III trials testing selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs) and selective ER modulators (SERMs) (mostly compared to fulvestrant) have demonstrated modest (1-2 months) improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), mainly limited to patients with ESR1-mutated MBC. In these studies, the median PFS (mPFS) ranges from 3 to 6 months, with shorter mPFS in patients with prior progression on CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Here we report the final results of a randomized phase II study that compared Z-endoxifen (Endx) 80 mg/day with tamoxifen (Tam) 20 mg/day in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)- positive/ HER2-negative MBC, and report outcomes according to ESR1, PIK3CA, PTEN and AKT alterations (Alliance A011203; NCT02311933). Methods: Postmenopausal women with unlimited prior endocrine regimens (including CDK 4/6i) and up to two chemotherapy regimens for MBC, with tumor biopsy confirmation of ER+ (>10% nuclear staining) and negative for HER2 amplification/overexpression were eligible. Prior adjuvant Tam was allowed if relapse was > 1 year following Tam completion. Patients randomized to Tam could cross over to Endx at progression. The primary end point was PFS analyzed by the interval censored data analytic approach. ctDNA was analyzed for ESR1 and PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT alterations using Guardant360 CDx 74-gene next-generation sequencing-based assay (Guardant Health). Results: Among 108 women who preregistered, 76 (Endx: 40; Tam: 36) were randomized and eligible. Patients were heavily pretreated; all patients had prior exposure to an aromatase inhibitor (AI), 50% had ≥ 2 AI based regimens in the metastatic setting and 50% in each arm had received fulvestrant. Approximately half on each arm received at least one chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting. Prior CDK 4/6i therapy was imbalanced (48% on Endx and 28% on Tam). Endx did not significantly prolong PFS compared to Tam (median PFS [mPFS] 4.3 vs 1.7 months; HR 0.72, p=0.168). Because arms were imbalanced according to prior CDK 4/6i exposure, we performed an unplanned analysis demonstrating that Endx improved PFS relative to Tam in CDK 4/6i-naïve patients (mPFS 8.3 vs 2.1 months; HR 0.39, p=0.0097) but not in patients treated with prior CDK 4/6i (mPFS 3.0 vs 1.5 months). In the subset of patients who consented for ctDNA testing (n=28), the mPFS for those with either an activating alteration in the PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT pathway or with an ESR1 mutation was similar as the overall trial. For the 24 patients who progressed on Tam and crossed-over to Endx, the median PFS was 3.5 months (range 1.5-15.0 months) with a 6-month clinical benefit rate of 33.3% (8/24; 90% CI: 17.8-52.1%). Conclusions: Endx did not meet the prespecified threshold for concluding that it significantly improved PFS relative to Tam in a cohort of heavily pretreated MBC. However, the observations of a > 6-month improvement in mPFS in CDK 4/6i-naïve patients, anti-tumor activity following crossover to Tam, and mPFS estimates similar to other novel endocrine agents in development all support the ongoing development of Endx. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN) and 5P50CA116201. Clinicaltrials.gov Id: NCT02311933. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. Suman, J. Reid, T. Dockter, C. Strand, W. F. Symmans, J. Hawse, A. Storniolo, J. Doroshow, J. M. Collins, H. Streicher, M. M. Ames, A. Tarnower, O. M. Hahn, J. N. Ingle, L. Carey, A. Partridge. Final results from the Randomized Phase II study of Z-Endoxifen and Tamoxifen in Endocrine Refractory, Estrogen Receptor Positive, HER2 negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (Alliance A011203) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-08-07.

Abstract Background: The primary mechanism by which tamoxifen (Tam) and its metabolites exert their biologic effects is through estrogen receptor (ER) binding and inhibition of ER signaling. We and others demonstrated that endoxifen (Endx) has greater antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo compared to Tam and the first-in-human Endx phase I study demonstrated its antitumor activity in patients with prior progression on Tam (Goetz SABC 2015). PKCs are a family of serine/threonine-specific protein kinases that regulate signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and tumorigenic transformation. Our prior protein docking studies suggested endoxifen may be a substrate for PKCs. Here we report the effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 binding, kinase activity, as well as interactions between PKCβ1 and ERα. Methods: Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR, Biacore T200, GE Healthcare) was used to evaluate binding of Tam, N-desmethyl Tam (NDMT), 4-HT, and Endx to PKCβ1 and PKCβ2. The effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 kinase activity were determined. Proliferation and colony formation in MCF7 parental and PKCβ1 overexpressing cells were evaluated. siRNA silencing was used to knockdown PKCβ1 expression in the following cells: MCF7 aromatase expressing cells that were either sensitive (MCF7/AC1) or resistant to letrozole (MCF7/AC1 L-resistant); T47D; and MDA-MB-361. Coimmunoprecipitation assay and DUOlink in situ proximity ligation were used to investigate the interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα. Results: Endx more potently inhibited PKCβ1 kinase activity compared to Tam ( IC50 350 nM vs 47.8 μM ) with KDs for PKCβ1 binding as follows: Endx (100 nM ), Tam ( 2 μM ), 4-HT ( 2 μM ) and NDMT (> 7 μM ). None of the SERMs exhibited PKCβ2 binding. In the MCF7/AC1 and MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, PKCβ1 knockdown resulted in ERα degradation and potently inhibited cell proliferation. These results were confirmed in T47D and MDA-MB-361 cells. Notably, PKCβ1 knockdown in MCF7/AC1 cells resulted in significantly greater E2 induced proliferation comparing siRNA knockdown vs. control. To further explore these effects, we evaluated the effects of PKCβ1 overexpression in MCF7 cells and demonstrated that PKCβ1 overexpression reduced cell proliferation and colony formation compared to parental MCF-7 cells without affecting ERα protein stability. Coimmunoprecipitation assays in transient transfected MCF-7 cells with exogenous PKCβ1 as well as PKCβ1 expressing MDA-MB-231 cells transiently or stably transfected with ERα demonstrated PKCβ1 and ERα interaction, with confirmation by Duolink assay that this interaction occurs in the cytoplasm. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that endoxifen binds and inhibits PKCβ1 at relevant concentrations achieved in the endoxifen clinical trial studies. PKCβ1 interacts with cytoplasmic ERα and PKCβ1 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and enhances ERα turnover. However, in PKCβ1 overexpressing cells, PKCβ1 may exhibit tumor suppressive effects. These data suggest a complex interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα and that endoxifen's effects on PKCβ1 may alter drug response of endocrine therapy. Further studies are ongoing to characterize the role of PKCβ1 and its role in ER biology and response to endoxifen. Citation Format: Guo C, Kuffel MJ, Kudgus RA, Huang Z, Bode AM, Cheng J, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Bruinsma ES, Subramaniam M, Ames MM, Hawse JR, Goetz MP. Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-03.

Abstract Background: AI's are more effective than TAM in ER+ breast cancer. In AI refractory MBC, the response rate to TAM is 0% (Osborne 2011). Z-Endx is an active metabolite of TAM and among TAM treated women in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, reduced CYP2D6 metabolism and low Endx concentrations (Css <20 nM) have been associated with increased likelihood of disease recurrence. Preclinical studies have demonstrated greater Z-Endx exposure and anti-tumor activity with oral Z-Endx compared to equivalent doses of oral TAM (Reid 2014) Methods: We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities, clinical activity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Z-Endx in patients (pts) with ER+, AI refractory MBC. Unlimited prior endocrine regimens were allowed. An accelerated titration schedule was applied (2 pts/dose level) until moderate toxicity or DLT, followed by a 3+3 design and then to expansion cohorts (40, 80, and 100 mg/day). Z-Endx was administered orally once daily (28 day cycle). Eye exams were performed at baseline, and end of cycles 2 and 6. PK was performed during cycle 1 and prior to subsequent cycles. For pts in the expansion cohorts, tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline for DNA sequencing (Foundation Medicine). Plasma cholesterol levels were obtained at baseline and after 1 cycle. Results: From March 2011 to Dec 2014, 41 pts (38 evaluable), median age 60, received Z-Endx once daily encompassing 7 dose levels (20-160 mg/daily). The median number of prior hormonal regimens was 2 and 3 for the dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Dose escalation was stopped at 160 mg/day given MTD not reached and attainment of mean Endx Css of 3.6 uM. Cycle 1 DLT (PE) was observed in one patient (60 mg). No eye toxicity was observed. PK demonstrated mean Endx Css of > 1 uM at all dose levels ≥ 40 mg/day. Antitumor activity was observed at multiple dose levels including 3 confirmed partial responses and an additional 7 with stable disease for ≥6 cycles. Of these 10 pts, 9 had prior progression on both AI and fulvestrant and 3 additionally on TAM. After 1 cycle, total and LDL cholesterol decreased > 20 points in 54% and 40% of pts, respectively. Tumor sequencing in the expansion cohorts (n=14) did not identify ESR1 mutations; however, ESR1 amplification was identified in 1 pt with prolonged stable disease (>200 days). Of 6 pts with rapid progression (≤2 cycles), 4/6 had either CCND1 amplification (n=1) or at least one of the following activating mutations: ERBB2 L755S (n=1), AKT1 E17K (n=1), MTOR E1799K (n=1). Conclusions: The direct administration of Z-END provides substantial drug exposure, acceptable toxicity, and "proof of principle" antitumor activity in endocrine resistant MBC. While the MTD was not determined, the goal of achieving Endx Css concentrations of > 1 uM was achieved. Tumor sequencing identified pts with predicted and confirmed endocrine resistance. A randomized phase II comparing endoxifen (80 mg/day) with TAM in AI refractory MBC was recently activated (NCT02311933). Supported in part by CA 133049, CA186686, CA15083, CA116201, and CA15083. Citation Format: Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Northfelt DW, Mahr MA, Dockter T, Kuffel M, Buhrow SA, Safgren SL, McGovern RM, Collins JM, Streicher H, Hawse JR, Haddad TC, Erlichman C, Ames MM, Ingle JN. Final results of a first-in-human phase I study of the tamoxifen (TAM) metabolite, Z-Endoxifen hydrochloride (Z-Endx) in women with aromatase inhibitor (AI) refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT01327781). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.

Abstract Background: CYP2D6 is the rate limiting enzyme responsible for the metabolic activation of tamoxifen (tam) to endoxifen. Compared to CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM), tam-treated CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM) have higher endoxifen concentrations, more vasomotor symptoms (Goetz, MP J Clin Oncol 2005), and are more likely to discontinue tam (Rae, JM 2009. Pharmacogenomics J). Additionally, higher endoxifen concentrations are associated with a stepwise increase in tam side-effects (Lorizio, W Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012). The data regarding CYP2D6 genotype and recurrence is mixed. Venlafaxine is a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor not known to alter tam pharmacokinetics (PK) and commonly recommended for tam induced hot flashes. We conducted a multicenter pharmacological study to determine whether venlafaxine altered the PK of tam and to determine the distribution of CYP2D6 genotypes in this population Methods: Women taking tam for at least 4 weeks and for whom venlafaxine was recommended for the treatment of hot flashes were eligible. Blood samples were collected prior to and 8–16 weeks following initiation of venlafaxine for steady state tam and metabolites. Genotyping was performed for alleles associated with no (PM; *3, *4, *5,*6); reduced (intermediate, IM; *10, 17 and *41); and ultra-rapid (UM; *1×2) metabolism. Power calculations demonstrated that 17 patients with paired samples were required (two-sided alpha=0.05 t-test, 90% power) to detect a 25% change in endoxifen levels after at least 8 weeks of concurrent treatment. Results: 30 women (median age 48.5) initiated venlafaxine. CYP2D6 genotypes were within Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE). CYP2D6 UM allele frequency (6.7%) was higher while CYP2D6 *4 (13.3%) was lower than expected compared to an unselected population (0.5 and 21% respectively; Sachse Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997), resulting in the absence of CYP2D6 PM/PM. Mean (min/max) baseline endoxifen concentrations (8.73; 1.5–20.5 ng/ml) were correlated with CYP2D6 phenotype as follows: intermediate (EM/PM, PM/IM): 6.8 (1.5–11.2); extensive (EM/EM, EM/IM): 9.4 (1.5–20.5) and ultra-rapid (UM/EM: 11.0; 7.8–14) (r2 = 0.35 p = 0.05). In patients with paired samples (n = 20), venlafaxine resulted in a 23% decrease in endoxifen (−2.06 ng/ml; 95% CI −0.69 to −3.04; p = 0.004), but not tam, NDMT, or 4HT concentrations. Following initiation of venlafaxine, CYP2D6 genotype was no longer associated with endoxifen concentrations (r2 = 0.28 p = 0.23). For women with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism [EM/PM (n = 9) or PM/IM (n = 1)], venlafaxine lowered endoxifen concentrations (−2.98 ng/ml) to a level (5.41 ng/ml) reported to be associated with a higher risk of recurrence in adjuvant tam treated patients (Madlensky, L Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011). Conclusions: In this study, women with tam-induced vasomotor symptoms requiring venlafaxine were comprised predominantly of CYP2D6 EM and UM metabolizers. Venlafaxine significantly decreased endoxifen concentrations. Although the optimal concentration of endoxifen is unknown, given prior data linking low endoxifen concentrations with recurrence, venlafaxine should be used with caution in tam treated patients. (Supported by R01CA133049) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-08.

Abstract Background: In AI refractory MBC, TAM anti-tumor activity is limited (median PFS 4.5 months). In patients (pts) receiving TAM in the adjuvant and metastatic setting, breast cancer recurrence has been shown to differ based upon CYP2D6 genotype and Endx exposure. In collaboration with NCI, Z-Endx (NSC #750393) was synthesized and preclinical pharmacology studies demonstrated that oral Z- Endx resulted in > 20 fold Endx exposure compared to an equivalent dose of TAM and significantly greater anti-tumor activity than TAM in AI sensitive and resistant MCF7 xenografts. We conducted a phase I study of Z-Endx in women with ER+, AI refractory MBC to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and a dose associated with steady state concentrations (Css) of ≥ 2 uM, based on the IC50 of recently identified Endx substrates: PKC and PI3K. Methods: Pts were enrolled to an accelerated titration schedule (2 pts/dose level) until moderate toxicity or DLT, and then to a 3+3 design. Z-Endx was administered orally once daily (28 day cycle). Eye exams were performed at baseline, end of cycle 2, and after 6 cycles. PK was performed on days 1-2, 3, 7, 14, and 28, and prior to subsequent cycles. Results: 23 women with AI refractory MBC (median 56 yrs, range 41-83) received Z-Endx once daily encompassing 7 dose levels (Table 1). The median number of prior chemotherapies and hormonal therapies in the metastatic setting were 2 and 2, respectively. Dose escalation continues at 160 mg/day and the MTD has yet to be determined. Cmax and AUC increased in a dose-dependent manner. A 20 and 100 mg/day dose yields Css of 0.39 and 2.48 uM, respectively. Significant anti-tumor activity was observed including 1 pt (100 mg/day) with a PR lasting 225 days; 1 pt (80 mg/day) with a 30% reduction in tumor size (PFS 169 days) and 2 pts (60 and 80 mg/day) with stable disease for >270 days. No eye toxicity was observed. Conclusions: In women with AI refractory MBC, the MTD of Z-Endx HCl has not been determined but Endx Css concentrations of > 2 uM and substantial anti-tumor activity has been observed. Following completion of the 160 mg/day dose, expansion at 20 and 100 mg/day will commence to perform translational studies and further characterize Endx pk. A randomized phase II examining two different doses of Z-Endx is planned in AI refractory MBC. Supported in part by CA 133049, CA69912, CA15083, CA116201, and CA15083. Table 1Dose Level (mg/day)Number of Treatment CyclesModerate or Severe Toxicities ReportedTumor ResponseProgression-free Survival (days)28 day Z-Endx Css (uM) 20 (n = 2)2; 3Gr 2 hot flashes (1 pt)----60; 850.39 40 (n = 2)2; 6noneStable (1 pt)61; 1670.66 60 (n = 6)1; 2; 2; 5; 8; 14Gr 4 Triglycerides (1 pt);Gr 3 thromboembolic event (1 pt); Gr 2 hot flashes, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia (1 pt)Stable (3 pts)125+; 56; 57; 132; 232; 4331.01 80 (n = 3)4; 6; 10Gr 2 hot flashesStable (3 pts)113; 169; 2961.61 100 (n = 3)1; 2; 8Gr 2 nausea (1 pt); Gr 2 irritability (1 pt)PR (1 pt)30; 56; 2252.48 120 (n = 3)1; 2; 4Gr 2 hypersomnia, paresthesia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (1 pt)—39; 54; 1082.18 * Bold face toxicities occurred during cycle 1 Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD3-4.

Abstract Background: Endoxifen (Endx) is being developed as a drug for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer (BC). We previously demonstrated that Endx was superior to TAM in both a letrozole (L) sensitive and resistant MCF7/AC1 model. Tamoxifen (TAM) and its most commonly studied metabolite, 4-hydroxy TAM (4HT), are known to activate critical ER co-regulators such as SRC3, which are oncogenic, and contribute to acquired and de novo endocrine resistance. While both Endx and 4HT are more potent inhibitors of genomic ERα functions compared to TAM, the effects of Endx on non-genomic signaling have not been characterized and its efficacy as an anti-cancer agent compared to RAD001 in AI resistant BC is unknown. Methods: We evaluated the 1 hour in vitro effects of TAM, 4HT, Endx, and L, in terms of activation of multiple signaling cascades using an MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells and long term estrogen deprived (LTED) cells (MDA 361 and ZR75). Protein Docking studies (shape screening, pharmacophore modeling and ligand-protein docking) for oncogenic kinases, and their associated IC50's were determined for TAM and Endx. The in vivo activity of Endx (50 mg/kg, oral) was determined in MCF/AC1 L-resistant xenograft tumors and compared with L control (10 ug/day, sc), Exemestane (E) (250 ug/d, sc) and E+RAD001 (2.5 mg/kg/d, oral). Results: In MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, 1 hr treatment with either TAM (100 nM or 5 uM) or 4HT (100 nM or 5 uM) phosphorylated SRC3 (AIB1) and resulted in downstream activation (phosphorylation) of IGF1R, PDK1, AKT, and p70S6K. In contrast, Endx (100 nM and 5 uM) did not phosphorylate SRC3 nor any downstream kinases but resulted in a dose dependent decrease in AKT phosphorylation. Similar findings were observed in LTED cells MDA 361 and ZR75. Docking studies identified a significant decrease in the binding energy (>2 kcal/mol) of Endx compared to TAM for PKC and PI3K and subsequent kinase profiling demonstrated that Endx more potently inhibits PKCβ1 (IC50 357nM) and PI3KΔ (2.5uM) compared to TAM (IC50 4.8μM and 6.2μM respectively). Therefore, we evaluated the in vivo anti-tumor activity of Endx with E and E+RAD001 in MCF7 L-resistant xenograft tumors. After 9 weeks, the% change in tumor volume relative to baseline was significantly lower for both Endx (median -34%, p = 0.0002) and E+RAD001 (median +1.5%, p = 0.0002) as compared to L controls (median +301%). In contrast, E alone was non-significantly lower (median +172%, (p = 0.09). No significant differences were observed comparing Endx and E+RAD001 (p = 0.56). Conclusions: Endx inhibits PKCβ1 and PI3KΔ at concentrations that are pharmacologically relevant, and unlike TAM and 4HT, does not activate SRC3 nor induce oncogenic signaling pathways in AI resistant cells. Importantly, Endx elicits substantial anti-tumor effects in AI resistant models that are similar to the current standard of care of E+RAD001. These data suggest that Endx may be superior to TAM for the treatment of ER+ BC and may result in clinical benefit for patients with AI resistant disease. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-09-08.

Abstract Background: First in human studies of Z-endoxifen hydrochloride (E), the active metabolite of tamoxifen (T), are underway in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Previous data have demonstrated the superiority of aromatase inhibitors (AI's) over T in estrogen receptor (ER) + BC. Using an in vivo aromatase expressing model (MCF7/AC1), we compared the antitumor activity of E with T and Letrozole (L), as well as the antitumor activity and global gene expression changes of E with T in an L-resistant model. Methods: MCF7/AC1 tumors were stimulated with androstenedione. Once tumor size reached 300 mm3, mice (30/group) were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: control (daily, po), T (500 μg/day, sc), endoxifen 25 mg/kg/day p.o.(LDE) endoxifen 75 mg/kg/day p.o. (HDE) or letrozole, 10 μg/day s.c for 4 weeks. Tumors were harvested from control, T, and E groups while the L group continued treatment until the development of resistance defined as an increase in tumor volume of at least 300% from day 1. Mice with L-resistant tumors were randomly assigned to T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks and then sacrificed. Gene expression in L-resistant tumors was quantified using Affymetrix U133+2 and changes in gene expression profiles [comparing T and E with L-resistant (n=3)] were analyzed. Genes identified as significantly different were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR assays. Results: At the 4 week time point, both doses of E and L resulted in greater anti-tumor activity than control (Wilcoxon rank sum test: all p < 0.0001); however, tumor burden did not differ between T and control (p=0.095). HDE resulted in significantly less tumor burden than T (p=0.002) but was similar to L. In mice that continued on L, resistance developed at 24 weeks in 9/25 mice. These mice were randomly assigned to either T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks. Tumor volume (expressed as a% of its size prior to randomization) was significantly different comparing E (73.3%; range: 69.3 to 80.75%) versus T (148.39%; range: 114.07 to 165.99%) (Wilcoxon rank sum test p=0.016). Compared to control, microarray studies identified 1518 unique probe sets regulated by E (p<0.001) compared to 441 for T including estrogen-regulated genes such as progesterone receptor (PGR) and amphiregulin (AREG) that were significantly down-regulated in the E group [PGR (−6.2 fold, p=0.000008) and AREG (−3.2 fold, p=.0006) but unchanged or up-regulated in the T group (PGR unchanged and AREG +9.2 fold p=0.00002). These findings were confirmed by RT-PCR. Conclusions: Using the MCF7/AC1 model previously used to show the superiority of AI's over T, HDE demonstrated similar antitumor activity to L and was superior to T. In cells resistant to L, E was superior to T and gene expression changes demonstrate that E down-regulates while T activates estrogen regulated genes. These findings support the ongoing development of E for the treatment of ER+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD01-06.

Abstract Background: NSABP P1 and P2 are the largest prevention trials of tamoxifen and raloxifene in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. Both agents have been shown to decrease, but not eliminate breast cancer risk in these women. The goal of our study was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with development of breast cancer in high-risk women treated with tamoxifen or raloxifene. Methods: We performed a nested matched case-control genome-wide association study (GWAS) in subjects entered on the P2, which included only postmenopausal women, and subjects at least 50 years old entered on the P1 phase III prevention trials who were treated with tamoxifen or raloxifene. Cases were defined as subjects who developed invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and each was matched to two controls based on trial (P1, P2), age at trial entry, Gail risk score, history of lobular carcinoma in situ, and time on study. The study was restricted to the 94% of subjects self-identified as Caucasian. Genotyping was performed with the Illumina Human610-Quad chip. Eigenstrat analyses were performed to control for population stratification. SNPs were imputed within 200 Kb on either side of regions containing SNPs with p ≤ 3E-05. CYP2D6 genotyping was performed on all subjects. Results: The GWAS included 592 cases and 1171 controls. 547,356 SNPs were used in the analyses after removing 14,019 for call rates less than 98%, 30,560 for minor allele frequencies <1%, and 301 with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p-value <1E-06. Eigenvectors did not alter the results when used as covariates. Eleven genotyped SNPs with p-values ranging from 2.12E-06 to 9.98E-06 (conditional logistic regression with eigenvector adjustment) were identified; and 22 SNPs with p < 4E-05 were identified by imputation around these SNPs on chromosomes (Chr) 4, 8, 9, 13, 16 and 22, which were then genotyped with the Invader platform. Following imputation and genotyping, initial functional genomic studies have focused on 8 SNPs on Chr 16 (p-values 1.81E-06 to 9.55E-06, with the lowest p-value for an imputed and fine mapped SNP), all of which were in ZNF423, a gene known to encode a protein that associates with SMAD family members. In lymphoblastoid cell lines genotyped for the 2 top SNPs in ZNF423 (rs8060157 and rs11076499) and stably transfected with estrogen receptor-α, the variant and wild type SNPs displayed striking differences in estradiol-induced expression of ZNF423, SMAD3, BRCA1, and BRCA2. Conclusions: This GWAS revealed SNPs associated with the development of breast cancer in high-risk women treated with tamoxifen or raloxifene. Genome-wide significance was not achieved, but SNPs in ZNF423 identified on Chr 16 were associated with differential expression of ZNF423, SMAD3, BRCA1, and BRCA2 in response to estradiol in vitro, providing direction for future research. (Supported in part by NIH grants U01GM61388, U01GM63173, P50CA116201, U10CA77202, U10CA37377, U10CA69974, U24CA114732, and the Biobank Japan Project funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-02.

Abstract Abstract #6037 Background: Tamoxifen (Tam) is biotransformed to the potent antiestrogen, endoxifen, by the CYP2D6 enzyme. We previously demonstrated that patients (pts) receiving adjuvant TAM with impaired CYP2D6 metabolism due to CYP2D6 (*4) and/or concurrent administration of a CYP2D6 inhibitor had a higher risk of recurrence. Other studies suggest CYP2C19*17 (Schroth JCO 2007) and SULT1A1*2 (Nowell JNCI 2002) may be associated with treatment outcome. With extended follow-up, we sought to evaluate the importance of comprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping as well as the potential association between CYP2C19*17 and SULT1A1 copy number with clinical outcome in pts randomized to TAM in NCCTG 89-30-52.
 Methods: Using DNA derived from paraffin embedded sections, CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotype were determined using quantitative multiplex PCR and CYP2C19 by sequencing. Pts administered the following CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, cimetidine, amiodarone, doxepin, ticlopidine and haloperidol) were considered as intermediate (IM) or poor metabolizers (PM) based on the potency of CYP2D6 inhibition. CYP2D6 phenotype was defined as follows: extensive metabolizers (EM) were pts not administered an inhibitor who did not carry a null allele (*3, *4, *6) and who were not homozygous for an IM allele (*10, *17, *41). CYP2D6 IM were either heterozygous for a null allele or homozygous for an IM allele but not administered an inhibitor or CYP2D6 EM administered a weak inhibitor. PM were pts homozygous for a null allele, or any patient administered a potent inhibitor. The association between genotype or CYP2D6 phenotype and clinical outcome was determined using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox modeling was performed using traditional prognostic factors.
 Results: The median follow-up of living pts is now 14.5 years. Of 256 pts. randomized to TAM, genotype was determined for CYP2D6 (n=210), CYP2C19*17 (n=170), and SULT1A1 (n=169) with the following allele frequencies: CYP2D6 *3 (.02), *4(.20), *6 (.01), *10 (.03), *17 (.00), *41(.08), and CYP2C19*17 (.22). The frequency of SULT1A1 copy number alleles (CNA) was 1 (4%), 2 (67%), 3 (20%), and 4+ (9%). 14/227 patients (6%) were administered an inhibitor. A multivariate analysis accounting for nodal status and tumor size demonstrated that compared to CYP2D6 EM, CYP2D6 PM had significantly shorter time to recurrence (TTR) (HR 4.0, p=0.001) and DFS (HR 2.0, p=0.02) and CYP2D6 IM tended to have shorter TTR (HR 1.8, p=0.08) and DFS (HR 1.4, p=0.10). DFS did not differ by SULT1A1 copy number (p=0.62) or CYP2C19 *17 (p=0.47)
 Conclusion: Long term follow-up of pts in NCCTG 89-30-52 confirms the importance of CYP2D6 metabolism and further demonstrates the importance of comprehensive genotyping and phenotyping with CYP2D6 inhibitors. We could not identify an association between CYP2C19*17 or SULT1A1 copy number with recurrence but further evaluation is needed in larger cohorts. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6037.