Brodie, Angela

Abstract Estrogen receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer is the most common form of breast cancer that is accountable for the majority of breast cancer mortality. Currently, the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy represents the new standard first and second line therapy for patients with metastatic HR+ breast cancer. While palbociclib has been shown to significantly improved progression free survival in combination with aromatase inhibitor (AI) and fulvestrant, resistance will inevitably occur in patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, the mechanisms of resistance to the combination of palbociclib and AI remain largely unknown. It is also unclear whether resistance mechanisms would be the same if palbociclib was given as first line treatment in combination with letrozole vs. if palbociclib was given as second line treatment after letrozole resistance had already occurred. To address this, previously well established and well characterizied letrozole-sensitive MCF7Ca cells and letrozole-resistant LTLTCa cells were subjected to continuous, long term treatment with increasing doses of letrozole and palbociclib until resistance to both drugs was achieved (MCF7Calet+palb and LTLTCapalb, respectively). Preliminary MTT cell viability assays indicate palbociclib IC50s of 750 nM in MCF7Ca and LTLTCa cells vs. 21 uM in palbociclib and letrozole-resistant cells. First line and second line palbociclib resistance correlated with changes in morphology, protein expression, and cancer stem cell characteristics. Under phase contrast microscopy, first line and second line palbociclib-resistant MCF7Ca and LTLTCa cells were larger in size, more irregular in shape, and tended not to grow in epithelial cell-like groups compared to palbociclib-sensitive MCF7Ca and letrozole cells, with second-line palbociclib resistant cells exhibiting these characteristics the most. Western blot showed that ER protein expression in ER+/HER2- MCF7Ca cells decreased with first line palbociclib and letrozole resistance, and that both ER and HER2 protein expression were decreased with second line palbociclib resistance in ERlow/HER2+ LTLTCa cells. Lastly, mammosphere assays demonstrated increasing percentage of cancer stem cells with letrozole resistance alone (4 per 1000 cells plated MCF7Ca vs. 58 per 1000 planted LTLTCa) and with palbociclib and palbociclib resistance (317 per 1000 cells plated MCF7Ca and 202 per 1000 cells plated LTLTCa cells). Overall, these results indicate that 1) resistance to palbociclib, whether as first line or second line treatment has significant effects on breast cancer cells that may be relevant to patient diagnosis and treatment. Citation Format: Armina A. Kazi, Antony Sare, Saranya Chumsri, Angela Brodie. Mechanisms of resistance to palbociclib and aromatase inhibitors in hormone receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2053. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2053

Abstract Background: First in human studies of Z-endoxifen hydrochloride (E), the active metabolite of tamoxifen (T), are underway in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Previous data have demonstrated the superiority of aromatase inhibitors (AI's) over T in estrogen receptor (ER) + BC. Using an in vivo aromatase expressing model (MCF7/AC1), we compared the antitumor activity of E with T and Letrozole (L), as well as the antitumor activity and global gene expression changes of E with T in an L-resistant model. Methods: MCF7/AC1 tumors were stimulated with androstenedione. Once tumor size reached 300 mm3, mice (30/group) were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: control (daily, po), T (500 μg/day, sc), endoxifen 25 mg/kg/day p.o.(LDE) endoxifen 75 mg/kg/day p.o. (HDE) or letrozole, 10 μg/day s.c for 4 weeks. Tumors were harvested from control, T, and E groups while the L group continued treatment until the development of resistance defined as an increase in tumor volume of at least 300% from day 1. Mice with L-resistant tumors were randomly assigned to T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks and then sacrificed. Gene expression in L-resistant tumors was quantified using Affymetrix U133+2 and changes in gene expression profiles [comparing T and E with L-resistant (n=3)] were analyzed. Genes identified as significantly different were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR assays. Results: At the 4 week time point, both doses of E and L resulted in greater anti-tumor activity than control (Wilcoxon rank sum test: all p < 0.0001); however, tumor burden did not differ between T and control (p=0.095). HDE resulted in significantly less tumor burden than T (p=0.002) but was similar to L. In mice that continued on L, resistance developed at 24 weeks in 9/25 mice. These mice were randomly assigned to either T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks. Tumor volume (expressed as a% of its size prior to randomization) was significantly different comparing E (73.3%; range: 69.3 to 80.75%) versus T (148.39%; range: 114.07 to 165.99%) (Wilcoxon rank sum test p=0.016). Compared to control, microarray studies identified 1518 unique probe sets regulated by E (p<0.001) compared to 441 for T including estrogen-regulated genes such as progesterone receptor (PGR) and amphiregulin (AREG) that were significantly down-regulated in the E group [PGR (−6.2 fold, p=0.000008) and AREG (−3.2 fold, p=.0006) but unchanged or up-regulated in the T group (PGR unchanged and AREG +9.2 fold p=0.00002). These findings were confirmed by RT-PCR. Conclusions: Using the MCF7/AC1 model previously used to show the superiority of AI's over T, HDE demonstrated similar antitumor activity to L and was superior to T. In cells resistant to L, E was superior to T and gene expression changes demonstrate that E down-regulates while T activates estrogen regulated genes. These findings support the ongoing development of E for the treatment of ER+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD01-06.

Abstract Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling has been implicated in the resistance to hormonal therapy in breast cancer. Using a model of postmenopausal, estrogen-dependent breast cancer, we investigated the antitumor effects of the dual IGF-1R/InsR tyrosine kinase inhibitor BMS-754807 alone and in combination with letrozole or tamoxifen. BMS-754807 exhibited antiproliferative effects in vitro that synergized strongly in combination with letrozole or 4-hydroxytamoxifen and fulvestrant. Similarly, combined treatment of BMS-754807 with either tamoxifen or letrozole in vivo elicited tumor regressions not achieved by single-agent therapy. Notably, hormonal therapy enhanced the inhibition of IGF-1R/InsR without major side effects in animals. Microarray expression analysis revealed downregulation of cell-cycle control and survival pathways and upregulation of erbB in response to BMS-754807 plus hormonal therapy, particularly tamoxifen. Overall, these results offer a preclinical proof-of-concept for BMS-754807 as an antitumor agent in combination with hormonal therapies in hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Cooperative cell-cycle arrest, decreased proliferation, and enhanced promotion of apoptosis may contribute to antitumor effects to be gauged in future clinical investigations justified by our findings. Cancer Res; 71(24); 7597–607. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract Resistance to hormonal therapy is a clinically unmet need in breast cancer. IGF signaling has been identified as a major mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy in breast cancer. As components of the IGF signaling pathway are expressed in most breast cancers, the development of IGF-1R monoclonal antibody (mAb) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are active areas of clinical investigations. A key distinction between the mAb and TKIs are their differences in their ability to inhibit the Insulin Receptor (InsR). While targeting the InsR with TKIs may have a theoretical liability of hyperglycemia, targeting only the IGF-1R may have the theoretical liability of incompletely blocking IGF signaling. As InsR isoform A expression, which can transduce IGF-II-mediated proliferation, is higher in breast cancers compared to normal breast tissue, we investigated whether IGF-1R or IGF-1R/InsR inhibition was sufficient for overcoming resistance to hormonal therapy. To determine the optimal combination strategies for clinical investigations, we tested the hypothesis that IGF signaling inhibition could overcome primary (or de novo/intrinsic) and secondary (or acquired/selected) resistance to hormonal therapy. For these studies, we used either hormone therapy-naïve or hormone therapy-resistant variants of the breast cancer model, MCF-7/AC-1, which has been engineered to stably express full-length human aromatase. We employed and compared a novel, potent dual kinase inhibitor of the IGF-1R and InsR, BMS-754807, which is currently in early clinical investigations, with the IGF-1R antibody mAb391. BMS-754807 has been shown to induce apoptosis more potently than mAb391 in Rh41 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. In vitro, BMS-754807 demonstrated profound synergy in combination with tamoxifen and letrozole (median effect combination index <0.1). In vivo, BMS-754807 enhanced the anti-tumor activity of tamoxifen and letrozole in hormone-naïve tumors and induced regression of tumors resistant to tamoxifen or letrozole when combined with letrozole. This activity was not observed with mAb therapy, which resulted in greater up-regulation of InsR-A and erbB receptor expression and activation. This suggested a greater susceptibility to resistance pathways with mAb therapy. Dual IGF-1R/InsR blockade alone or in combination was tolerated by the animals and has no significant change in glucose homeostasis. Gene expression profiling experiments to compare the difference between the effects of tamoxifen in combination with BMS-754807 and with mAb revealed alternative pathway signaling is one of the potential mechanisms of resistance.In summary, combined hormonal therapy with BMS-754807 overcomes primary and secondary resistance to tamoxifen and letrozole and was well tolerated. IGF-1R blockade with a mAb alone is insufficient to overcome resistance and induces InsR over-expression. Thus, IGF signaling through either InsR or IGF-1R may be a major mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy. These data suggest that blockade of IGF-1 and IGF-II from activation of IGF-1R and InsR, with agents such as BMS-754807 have promise in extending the benefits of hormonal therapy in breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 402.