Reinicke, Kathryn E.

Abstract Background: In tamoxifen (TAM) treated patients, both CYP2D6 metabolism and low steady state concentrations of endoxifen (END), the active metabolite of TAM, have been associated with a higher risk of recurrence (Madlensky L, Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 89(5):718-25). END drug development is ongoing at Mayo and NCI, and our previous data demonstrated that 1) END had high oral bioavailability in mice and yielded plasma concentrations and total exposure 20-fold greater as compared to an equivalent oral dose of TAM (MM Ames et al, Cancer Res 2011;70(8 Suppl 1):Abstract nr 3603) and 2) END is superior to TAM in both HER2 (Reinicke AACR 2011) and aromatase expressing (Goetz, SABC 2011) MCF-7 xenograft models. While subcutaneous (SQ) TAM is used by most researchers to study and develop models of TAM resistance, little is known about 1) whether murine and human TAM pharmacokinetics are comparable and 2) whether the route of administration affects concentrations of the active metabolites. Therefore, we conducted murine pharmacokinetic studies evaluating both the oral and SQ administration of TAM and END. Results: Following administration of TAM, concentrations of the active metabolites (END and 4-hydroxy TAM [4HT]) were therapeutic (Cmax- END 35.9 nM, 4HT 62.8 nM) only after a 0.5 mg oral dose of TAM. In contrast, following all doses of SQ TAM, concentrations of the active metabolites (END and 4HT) were sub-therapeutic (Cmax- END 5.2 nM; 4HT 18.7 nM). In contrast to humans, the Cmax of N-desmethyl TAM, the most abundant human TAM metabolite, was < 16.5 nM in mice after oral and SQ TAM. SQ administration of END and TAM resulted in substantially greater bioavailability of the parent drug compared with oral dosing. Following administration of 0.25-5 mg oral END and 0.0625-0.625 mg subcutaneous END, the increase in AUC was greater than dose proportional and active concentrations (>80 nM) were detected in plasma at every dose and both dosing routes. Comparable END and TAM plasma concentrations were achieved with a 0.0625 mg SQ END and a 0.5 mg SQ TAM, respectively. Conclusions: Our data strongly suggest that SQ dosing of TAM results in non-therapeutic concentrations of the active hydroxylated metabolites, and may be a simple pharmacokinetic factor influencing response and resistance in a murine in vivo xenograft model. Given the nonlinear pharmacokinetics and differences in metabolism, the dose and route of END must be carefully selected for comparative studies with TAM. These data support the ongoing human studies designed to bypass the need for TAM metabolism by the direct administration of END. Supported by the Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center Grant (CA15083) and the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer SPORE (CA 116201; MMA, JMR, MPG). Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3781. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3781

Abstract Background: In estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is associated with resistance to tamoxifen (Tam). Endoxifen is the most abundant active metabolite of Tam, resulting in part from cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) metabolism. While Tam has been extensively used to model proliferative ER/HER2 cross-talk, there are no published data regarding endoxifen's effect on ER/HER2 nongenomic nor ER genomic signaling. Methods: Using ER+ cells (MCF7) and ER+/HER2+ cells (MCF7-HER2, BT474) we compared the effects of Tam and endoxifen on proliferation using crystal violet assays, Erk1/2 phosphorylation by western blotting, and E2-stimulated ER-regulated gene expression of amphiregulin (AREG), c-Myc (MYC) and progesterone receptor (PGR) by real-time RT-PCR assays. To examine the anti-proliferative affects of endoxifen compared to Tam in vivo we performed E2-stimulated MCF7-HER2 xenograft studies in athymic nude mice. Endoxifen doses of 25 (low) and 75 mg/kg (high) were used based on our prior pharmacokinetic studies showing achievable steady state levels of 100 nM and 1 uM, respectively. Z-Endoxifen HCl was synthesized by NCI. Results: Endoxifen, unlike Tam, potently inhibits growth in both ER+ and ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines at concentrations observed in human CYP2D6 intermediate and extensive metabolizers (>40 nM). Tam (10-1000 nM) stimulates phosphorylation of Erk1/2 in stark contrast to endoxifen at similar doses. Endoxifen (100-1000 nM) significantly decreases E2-stimulated transcription of ER-regulated genes in MCF7-HER2 cells; AREG 2-3 fold, MYC 1-2 fold, and PGR 2-4 fold. Conversely, Tam (10-1000 nM) maintains or stimulates transcription; AREG 2-3 fold, MYC 0.5-2.5 fold, and PGR 0-3 fold. After 7 weeks of treatment of MCF7-HER2 xenografts, both high (p=0.001) and low dose endoxifen (p=0.01) resulted in greater antitumor activity than Tam, with high dose superior to low dose endoxifen (p=0.024). MCF7-HER2 xenografts that progressed on Tam to 200% growth at 7 weeks were randomized to either continued Tam or endoxifen. Four weeks after randomization endoxifen was superior to Tam (p<0.0001) with tumor size decreased by ≥ 20%. No significant toxicity was observed.Conclusions: We have demonstrated in both ER+ and ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cell lines that in contrast to Tam, endoxifen potently inhibits growth (both in vitro and in vivo), does not activate Erk1/2 signaling, and inhibits E2-stimulated transcription of ER-regulated genes. Endoxifen exhibited potent antitumor activity in MCF7-HER2 xenografts refractory to Tam. These data support the ongoing NCI sponsored phase I studies of Z-endoxifen at Mayo Clinic and NCI. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2283. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2283

Abstract Background: First in human studies of Z-endoxifen hydrochloride (E), the active metabolite of tamoxifen (T), are underway in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Previous data have demonstrated the superiority of aromatase inhibitors (AI's) over T in estrogen receptor (ER) + BC. Using an in vivo aromatase expressing model (MCF7/AC1), we compared the antitumor activity of E with T and Letrozole (L), as well as the antitumor activity and global gene expression changes of E with T in an L-resistant model. Methods: MCF7/AC1 tumors were stimulated with androstenedione. Once tumor size reached 300 mm3, mice (30/group) were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: control (daily, po), T (500 μg/day, sc), endoxifen 25 mg/kg/day p.o.(LDE) endoxifen 75 mg/kg/day p.o. (HDE) or letrozole, 10 μg/day s.c for 4 weeks. Tumors were harvested from control, T, and E groups while the L group continued treatment until the development of resistance defined as an increase in tumor volume of at least 300% from day 1. Mice with L-resistant tumors were randomly assigned to T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks and then sacrificed. Gene expression in L-resistant tumors was quantified using Affymetrix U133+2 and changes in gene expression profiles [comparing T and E with L-resistant (n=3)] were analyzed. Genes identified as significantly different were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR assays. Results: At the 4 week time point, both doses of E and L resulted in greater anti-tumor activity than control (Wilcoxon rank sum test: all p < 0.0001); however, tumor burden did not differ between T and control (p=0.095). HDE resulted in significantly less tumor burden than T (p=0.002) but was similar to L. In mice that continued on L, resistance developed at 24 weeks in 9/25 mice. These mice were randomly assigned to either T (n=4) or E (n=5) for 4 weeks. Tumor volume (expressed as a% of its size prior to randomization) was significantly different comparing E (73.3%; range: 69.3 to 80.75%) versus T (148.39%; range: 114.07 to 165.99%) (Wilcoxon rank sum test p=0.016). Compared to control, microarray studies identified 1518 unique probe sets regulated by E (p<0.001) compared to 441 for T including estrogen-regulated genes such as progesterone receptor (PGR) and amphiregulin (AREG) that were significantly down-regulated in the E group [PGR (−6.2 fold, p=0.000008) and AREG (−3.2 fold, p=.0006) but unchanged or up-regulated in the T group (PGR unchanged and AREG +9.2 fold p=0.00002). These findings were confirmed by RT-PCR. Conclusions: Using the MCF7/AC1 model previously used to show the superiority of AI's over T, HDE demonstrated similar antitumor activity to L and was superior to T. In cells resistant to L, E was superior to T and gene expression changes demonstrate that E down-regulates while T activates estrogen regulated genes. These findings support the ongoing development of E for the treatment of ER+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD01-06.

Abstract Background: Endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen (Tam), is currently being developed as a drug for the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) + breast cancer (BC). HER2 expression in ER+ BC is associated with Tam resistance, and in vivo Tam administration to mice bearing ER+/HER2+ xenografts stimulates BC growth (Shou, JNCI 2004). In humans, endoxifen is the most important Tam metabolite responsible for inhibiting estrogen induced BC growth (Wu, Cancer Research 2009). CYP2D6 metabolism affects the concentrations (conc) of endoxifen (Stearns, JNCI, 2003) and associated with worse disease free survival (DFS) in Tam treated BC (Goetz, JCO, 2005). We sought to determine the activity of Tam and its metabolites in ER+/HER2+ BC cell lines and to evaluate the role of CYP2D6 metabolism in Tam-treated patients (pts) with ER+/HER2+ BC. Additionally, we sought to determine endoxifen conc in mice administered oral Tam.Methods: MCF7 (parental and HER2-expressing) and BT474 (ER+/HER2+) cells were used to compare the activity of Tam, 4HT, and endoxifen on estrogen- stimulated growth. Oral tam PK were characterized in mice treated with standard dose of Tam (4 mg/kg; 100 μg). Clinical data were obtained via a retrospective analysis of Tam-treated pts with ER+/ HER2+ BC randomized to receive 5 years of Tam (NCCTG 89-30-52). CYP2D6 metabolism (extensive or decreased) was based on CYP2D6 genotype (*3, 4, 6, 10, 17, 41) and co-administration of a CYP2D6 inhibitor (yes/no). HER2 was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or FISH (tumors 0, 1, or 2+ by IHC). The association between CYP2D6 and DFS was assessed using the log-rank test and proportional hazards modeling.Results: Compared to Tam, endoxifen potently inhibited the growth of estrogen- stimulated BT474 cells. In MCF7 cells, expression of HER2 shifted the conc of endoxifen required for 50% inhibition of growth (IC50) from 54 nM (parental) to 131 nM (HER2 expressing). Using the range of conc of Tam and its metabolites observed in humans (Tam, 300-500 nM; 4HT, 5-10 nM; and endoxifen, 10-200 nM), only endoxifen potently inhibited estrogen- stimulated growth of MCF7HER2+ cells and only at conc achievable in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (>50nM). In mice, conc of 4HT and endoxifen were below 15 nM following an oral dose of 4 mg/kg. In NCCTG 89-30-52, both CYP2D6 phenotype and HER2 status was determined in 201/256 randomized pts. HER2 was expressed in 23/215 (11%) but not associated with DFS overall (p=0.62). In the HER2+ subset, pts with decreased CYP2D6 metabolism (n=10) had significantly shorter DFS compared to extensive metabolizers (n=9) (HR 9.5, p=0.03; 95% CI 1.16-76.9).Conclusions: Our in vitro and clinical data provide a simple pharmacological model for understanding HER2 resistance in Tam-treated breast cancer. Mice, which lack the CYP2D6 enzyme, may not be an appropriate model for understanding tam resistance given low conc of both 4HT and endoxifen. Given that the in vitro conc of endoxifen needed to inhibit the growth of ER+/HER-2+ BC are achievable in only a subset of humans (CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers), the primary administration of endoxifen could overcome de novo Tam resistance in ER+/HER2+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 2006.