Ames, Matthew M.

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for Z‐endoxifen in patients with advanced solid tumors and to identify clinical variables that influence pharmacokinetic parameters. Z‐endoxifen‐HCl was administered orally once a day on a 28‐day cycle (±3 days) over 11 dose levels ranging from 20 to 360 mg. A total of 1256 Z‐endoxifen plasma concentration samples from 80 patients were analyzed using nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for Z‐endoxifen. A 2‐compartment model with oral depot and linear elimination adequately described the data. The estimated apparent total clearance, apparent central volume of distribution, and apparent peripheral volume of distribution were 4.89 L/h, 323 L, and 39.7 L, respectively, with weight‐effect exponents of 0.75, 1, and 1, respectively. This model was used to explore the effects of clinical and demographic variables on Z‐endoxifen pharmacokinetics. Weight, race on clearance, and aspartate aminotransferase on the absorption rate constant were identified as significant covariates in the final model. This novel population pharmacokinetic model provides insight regarding factors that may affect the pharmacokinetics of Z‐endoxifen and may assist in the design of future clinical trials.

10017 Background: In preclinical models, temozolomide (TMZ) and vincristine (VCR) are synergistic with irinotecan (IRN). We sought to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of orally administered IRN given on two different schedules together with TMZ and VCR in children with refractory solid tumors, using cefixime to reduce IRN-associated diarrhea. Methods: Schedule A: Oral IRN daily for 5 days for 2 weeks (dx5x2), with VCR 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and TMZ 100 mg/m2 on days 1 - 5. Schedule B: Oral IRN daily for 5 days for 1 week (dx5x1) with VCR 1.5 mg/m2 on day 1 and TMZ 100 - 150 mg/m2 on days 1 - 5. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. A standard cohorts of 3 + 3 design was used. Results: On Schedule A, 18 evaluable patients (median age 15 yrs, range 3 - 21) received 55 courses. At IRN 50 mg/m2/day, 4/12 pts had DLT (hepatotoxicity, abdominal pain, anorexia, hypokalemia, and thrombocytopenia). The oral IRN MTD on this dx5x2 schedule was 35 mg/m2/d (1/6 pts with DLT of hypoalbuminemia). On Schedule B, 18 evaluable patients (median age 9 yrs, range 3–21) received 71 courses of oral IRN 70 - 90 mg/m2/d x 5 with TMZ 100 - 150 mg/m2/d x 5. At oral IRN 90 mg/m2/d with TMZ 150 mg/m2/d, 0/6 pts had DLT, and no Grade 4 toxicities were seen. No further doses were explored. First-course and cumulative toxicity appeared worse with Schedule A, including 3 patients with responding or stable tumors who withdrew due to fatigue, nausea, and weight loss. UGT1A1*28genotype did not correlate with DLT. At the oral IRN MTD of 90 mg/m2/d, the median SN-38 AUCinf was 72 ng/ml*h. One patient with osteosarcoma had a confirmed partial response. Unconfirmed complete and partial responses were seen in 2 Ewing sarcoma patients. Eight additional patients received > 6 courses, including 2 each with neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma. Conclusions: The dx5x1 schedule of VOIT was well tolerated, with SN-38 exposures similar to those achieved with intravenous IRN. Activity on this and prior studies suggests a potential role for VOIT in sarcoma patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Background: Endx is a Tam metabolite with promising antitumor activity in Tam and aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistant estrogen receptor (ER) positive (+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This randomized phase II study compared progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity of Endx 80 mg/day to Tam 20 mg/day in patients (pts) with ER+ MBC. Eligibility included postmenopausal women, ECOG PS 0-2, prior progression on AI but not Tam (unlimited endocrine therapy [ET] lines allowed), and a preregistration biopsy confirming ER+ (>10% nuclear staining) and HER2-negative MBC. Stratified randomization was used balancing prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i) use and/or everolimus (yes/no), measurable disease (yes/no) and endocrine resistance (primary/secondary) between arms. Pts randomized to Tam were allowed to cross over to Endx at progression. Due to short expected median PFS, differences in PFS were assessed using approaches for interval-censored data (ICD). 40 eligible pts were to be randomized to each arm so a one-sided alpha=0.10 generalized log-rank test (GLRT) would have a 90% chance of detecting a 50% decrease in hazard of disease progression with Endx (median: 6 months) relative to Tam (median: 3 months). Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate (stable or partial response > 6 cycles) (CBR) for measurable and non-measurable disease. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data were obtained Day (d) 1 (4 hour), end of cycle 2, and at time of progression. Results: From March 2015 to March 2017, 108 women with endocrine refractory recurrent or MBC were preregistered. 27 pts did not register due to: biopsy demonstrating ER-/HER2- (3 pts), ER+/HER2+ (5 pts), cancer other than breast (3 pts), no cancer in specimen (6 pts), brain metastases (2 pts), acute infection (1 pt), progression on or recent use of Tam (2 pts), or pt refusal (5 pts). 4/81 pts who registered were excluded due to ineligibility (3 pts) or refusal to start protocol treatment (1 pt). The study cohort consisted of 40 pts randomized to Endx and 37 pts to Tam. The median (m) number of ETs in the metastatic setting was 2 (range 1-4) for each arm including prior CDK 4/6i (Endx: 42.5%, Tam: 29.7%) and everolimus (Endx: 35.0%, Tam: 40.5%). The m cycle number was 6 for Endx (range: 1-35) and 3 for Tam (range: 1-42). PFS for Endx was not significantly different compared to Tam (HR= 0.77; 95% CI: 0.49-1.22, GLRT p=0.309; mPFS: Endx 130 days [95% CI: 76-138 days] and Tam 42 days [95%CI: 24-129 days]). However, PFS was significantly longer in pts with no prior CDK 4/6i in the Endx arm (GLRT p=0.002; HR(no/yes)=0.31; 95%CI: 0.15-0.65) but not in the Tam arm (GLRT p=0.708) (unplanned analysis). Severe (grade (G) 3+) toxicities included: Endx G3 hypertriglyceridemia (3 pts); Tam: G3 hypertension with G2 stroke (1 pt), G3 thromboembolic event (1 pt), and G3 abdominal, bone and liver pain (1 pt). In Endx arm, d1 m Endx plasma concentration (conc) was 216 ng/ml (n=17; range: 144-400). For Tam arm, d1 m Tam conc was 17 ng/ml (n=17; range:11-23) (Endx not detectable). For the 25 pts that crossed over to Endx, CBR was 28.0% (90% CI: 14.0-46.2%) and 14 pts had pk data at progression. A lower median Endx conc (6 ng/ml range: 3.3-16.3) was observed in Tam patients at progression who then had Endx clinical benefit compared to Tam pts without clinical benefit after Endx crossover (median Endx 12 ng/ml; range 4.4-36.6).Conclusions: In endocrine-resistant breast cancer, Z-Endx was not significantly superior to Tam, but clinical benefit was observed in 28% that crossed over to Endx after Tam progression. In pts with no prior CDK 4/6i, the observation of significantly longer PFS in the Endx arm is hypothesis generating. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN), https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Clinical Trials.gov Identifier:NCT02311933 Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J Suman, Joel M Reid, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A Buhrow, Renee M McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, William F Symmans, Minetta C Liu, John R Hawse, James Doroshow, Anna M Storniolo, Jerry M Collins, Howard Streicher, Matthew M Ames, James N Ingle, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey. A randomized phase II trial of tamoxifen versus Z-endoxifen HCL in postmenopausal women with metastatic estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-06.

e17017 Background: Epigenetic up-regulation of EBV and cellular genes via demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition can induce EBV lytic replication enhancing immune mediated tumor killing and up-regulation of tumor suppressor genes resulting in tumor apoptosis. Methods: Patients (Pt) with relapsed or refractory NPC and NK-T cell lymphomas were enrolled to determine safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics and preliminary anti-tumor activity using a dose escalation design. 5AC was administered on days 1 to 10 sub-cutaneously while SAHA was administered on days 1 to 14 orally. PK for SAHA, EBV viral load, characterization of circulating EBV, Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and EBV promoter methylation analysis in tumor tissue were performed. Results: 11 pt have been treated (M:F 8:3, median age 48, R: 35-71) at 3 dose levels – 5AC 50 mg/m2 and SAHA 200 mg b.i.d. (dose level 1), 5AC 37.5 mg/m2 and SAHA 200 mg q. am and 100 mg q. pm (dose level 2), and 5AC 25 mg/m2 and SAHA 100 mg b.i.d (dose level 3). Median number of previous treatment regimens was 3 (R:1-6). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were seen in 2/2 pts at dose level 1: grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1 pt), grade 3 nausea, vomiting and fatigue (2 pts), and grade 5 hepatic failure (1 pt). Two of six patients at dose level 2 experienced DLT: grade 3 fatigue (1 pt) and worsening of pre-existing Sweet’s Syndrome (1 pt). Common AEs (G1/2) included fatigue (73%), cough (64%), anorexia (55%), and injection site reaction (45%). One minor response was seen and 5 pt had prolonged stable disease (>16 weeks), including one patient for 88 weeks. Analysis of post-treatment tumor biopsies showed demethylation of EBV lytic cycle gene promoters after treatment. SAHA PK, IHC results for EBV gene expression in tumor tissue, EBV viral load and characterization of circulating EBV will be presented. Conclusions: 5AC/SAHA appears to be tolerable at dose level 3 with suggestion of clinical benefit. Analysis of post-treatment tumor and blood samples suggests that modulation of EBV gene expression may play a role in the mechanism underlying clinical benefit. Continued accrual at dose level 3 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00336063.

9581 Background: AKT, a serine threonine protein kinase, is activated downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) which transmits signals from cytokines, growth factors and oncoproteins to multiple targets. Activated AKT regulates survival, proliferation, and growth. The PI3K/AKT pathway is downstream of most of the common growth factor tyrosine kinase receptors in cancer, e.g., EGFR, HER2, IGFR, etc., and is a driver of tumor progression in many cancers. AKT protein kinase is activated in many pediatric solid tumors, including glioblastoma, malignant rhabdoid tumors, neuroblastoma, synovial sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and medulloblastoma. MK2206, an oral allosteric AKT1, 2,3 inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo cancer models.A phase I trial evaluating MK2206 was conducted in children with refractory solid tumors. Methods: Using a rolling-6 design, MK2206 was administered either once every 7 days (schedule 1), or once every other day (schedule 2) in a 28-day cycle. Serial PK studies were obtained on day 1, cycle 1 and trough samples were obtained on days 7, 14, 21 and 28. Biological studies included analysis of PI3K/PTEN/AKT-cell signaling pathway in pre and post-therapy in PBMC and in tumors at diagnosis or recurrence. Results: Forty-five patients [23 males, median age 13.6 years (range 3.1-21.9)] with malignant glioma (14), ependymoma (4), hepatocellular carcinoma (3), gliomatosis cereberi (2) or other tumors (22) were enrolled; 34 were fully evaluable for toxicity (schedule 1 n=17; schedule 2 n=17). Schedule 1 DLTs included: grade 3 dehydration in 1/6 patients at 28 mg/m2; grade 4 hyperglycemia and neutropenia in 1/6 patients at 45 mg/m2. There were no DLTs at 35 mg/m2 and dose level 4 (58 mg/m2) is currently open for patient accrual with one enrollment. Schedule 2 DLTs included: grade 3 alkaline phosphatase in 1/6 patients at 90 mg/m2; grade 3 rash in 1/6 patients at 120 mg/m2), and grade 3 rash in 2/6 patients at 155 mg/m2. Conclusions: The recommended pediatric phase II dose of weekly MK2206 is 120 mg/m2 and the last cohort of patients to the every other day dosing schedule of MMK206 is enrolling. PK and PD data are currently being analyzed and will be presented.

9019 Background: Pemetrexed is a new multi-targeted antifol that inhibits enzymes involved in the de novo biosynthesis of thymidine and purine nucleotides. Methods: A phase 1 dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study (PK) was performed in children with refractory solid tumors to define the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and a recommended phase 2 dose. Pemetrexed was administered as a 10 min iv infusion every 21 days. All patients received folic acid (400 mcg/day po), vitamin B12 (500–1000 mcg every 3rd course IM) and dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/dose bid × 3 days each course) . Cohorts of 3 to 6 children were enrolled at dose levels of 400, 520, 670, 870, 1,130, 1,470, 1,910 and 2,480 mg/m2. DLT was defined as any Gr. 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity (except nausea/vomiting, alopecia, or AST/ALT elevation that returns to Gr. 1), Gr. 4 neutropenia or Gr. 4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days. Results: 33 subjects (31 fully evaluable for toxicity), median age of 12 yrs (range, 1–21), with diagnoses including osteosarcoma (12), Ewing’s sarcoma (3), hepatoblastoma (2), renal cell carcinoma (2), brainstem glioma (3), glioma (3), and other (n=8) were enrolled. DLT occurred in 1/6 patients at 1,470 mg/m2 (Gr. 3 AST and ALT), and in 2/4 at 2,480 mg/m2 (Gr. 3 ANC and Gr. 3 rash in both). Other DLTs at 2,480 mg/m2 that occurred in 1 patient included Gr. 3 diarrhea and rectal hemorrhage, and Gr. 4 thrombocytopenia, lipase, GGT, hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia and hyponatremia. At 1,910 mg/m2, 0/6 patients had DLT. The median number of courses administered was 1 (range 1 to 17). No CRs or PRs have been observed. Results of PK and other correlative studies will be presented. Conclusions: The recommended phase 2 dose of pemetrexed for children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors is 1,910 mg/m2 administered q21 days with dexamethasone, folic acid and B12 supplementation. A phase II COG study is planned. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9018 Background: A pediatric phase I study of 17-allylaminogeldanamycin (17-AAG), an Hsp90 inhibitor, was conducted to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), the recommended phase II dose, the pharmacokinetics (PK), and to evaluate a surrogate marker for Hsp90 inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Methods: Cohorts of 3–6 pts were enrolled at dose levels of 150, 200, 270 and 360 mg/m2/dose, administered as a 60 min infusion, on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. PK and PBMC evaluations were done during the first course of therapy. Results: 17 pts (7 male), median 7 yrs of age (range 1–19), were enrolled. 5 pts who developed PD prior to completing a full cycle of therapy were not considered evaluable for toxicity. No DLTs occurred. Non-DLTs included elevated transaminases (n=6), anemia (n=3), and vomiting (n=3). Based on the adult recommended dose and challenges posed by infusing the large volumes of DMSO, dose escalation was stopped at dose level 4. No CRs or PRs were observed; 3 patients remain on therapy at 6, 7 and 9 months with SD. One patient with hepatoblastoma had a reduction in AFP and SD over 3 cycles. PK data is available from the initial 3 dose levels. Drug exposure increases in proportion to dose for both17-AAG and its metabolite 17-AG. At 270 mg/m2/dose the Cmax and AUC of 17-AAG were 5,303 ± 1,591 ng/ml and 13,150 ± 5,086 ng/ml*hr, respectively, similar to the exposure in adults. The mean terminal half-life for 17-AAG was 3.0 ± 0.5 hrs. Induction of Hsp72, a surrogate marker for inhibition of Hsp90 was detected at all dose levels. Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of 17AAG is 360mg/m2/day. Non-DMSO formulations may allow for further dose escalation in children and should be studied. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9014 Background: MGd, a radiosensitizer that selectively accumulates in tumors, generates reactive oxygen species intracellularly. In preclinical experiments, MGd enhances RT-induced apoptosis. Methods: A multi-institutional Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic (PK) study was performed in children with newly diagnosed BSG to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of MGd administered i.v. 2 to 5 hours prior to involved field radiotherapy (RT) (1.8 Gy/day, total 54 Gy). Cohort 1 received MGd, 1.7 mg/kg/dose M-F × 3 wks and cohort 2 received the same dose M, W and F × 6 wks. The 6 subsequent cohorts of 3 to 6 pts received MGd M-F × 6 weeks at doses of 1.9, 3.4, 4.4, 5.5, 7.1 and 9.2 mg/kg/dose. Serum for PK analysis, and MRI scans (MGd is detectable by MR), were obtained for analysis of drug accumulation and responses. Results: 44 pts (42 fully evaluable for toxicity) with a median age of 6 years (range 2–20) were enrolled. At the 9.2 mg/kg/dose, 2/2 pts experienced DLT. During subsequent expansion of the 7.1 and 5.5 mg/kg/dose cohorts, DLTs, including transaminitis, hypertension and urticaria, were observed in 2/5 and 2/6 pts. At the MTD of 4.4 mg/kg/dose, 1/6 pts had reversible grade 3 serum transaminase elevations. PK analysis showed biphasic elimination with a terminal t 1/2 of 6.4 h. At the MTD, serum MGd concentrations were >250 ng/ml for 24 h. Serum clearance and steady-state volume of distribution were 0.0243 L/h/kg and 0.162 L/kg. MRI for intra-tumoral MGd distribution is ongoing. One patient had a CR and 4 had a PR. The estimated median survival is 10.3 months (95% confidence interval: 8.1 months-11.5 months). Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of MGd for children with BSG is 4.4 mg/kg/d administered M-F × 6 weeks with involved field RT. A COG phase II trial is planned. [Table: see text]

504 Background: CYP2D6 genetic variants and concurrent administration of potent inhibitors (Inh) of the enzyme markedly reduce the plasma concentrations of endoxifen (Jin. JNCI 2005;97:30–9). We have shown that genetic variation in CYP2D6 is associated with a higher risk of relapse in Tam treated patients (pts) (Goetz. JCO 2005;23:9312–18), but the impact of CYP2D6 inhibition on Tam clinical outcome is unknown. Methods: Using the North Central Cancer Treatment Group 89–30–52 adjuvant Tam trial (1989–1994), we evaluated the effect of co-administration of CYP2D6 Inh and CYP2D6*4 genotype on relapse in pts receiving tam alone. Patient charts were reviewed at each randomizing site to record the following known CYP2D6 Inh: fluoxetine (F), paroxetine (P), sertraline (S), cimetidine (C), amiodarone (A), doxepin (D), ticlopidine (T) and haloperidol (H). Poor metabolizers (PM) were defined as pts who were CYP2D6 *4/*4 and/or known to receive a CYP2D6 Inh. Intermediate metabolizers (IM) were defined as WT/*4 without CYP2D6 Inh, and extensive metabolizers (EM) as WT/WT without CYP2D6 Inh. The association between CYP2D6 status and Tam clinical outcome was determined using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox modeling was performed using traditional prognostic factors. Results: CYP2D6*4 genotype was obtained in 190 of 256 eligible pts, with a CYP2D6*4/*4 genotype frequency of 6.8% as described previously (Goetz JCO 2005). Medication history was available in 171/256 eligible pts and in 143/190 pts with CYP2D6 genotype. Eleven of 173 patients were concomitantly administered these CYP2D6 Inh: F(2), P(2), S(2), H(1), C(4), and D(1). The median duration of use was 2.5 yrs. Twenty-four pts met criteria for PM [13 by *4/*4 genotype and 11 by CYP2D6 Inh (7 WT/WT, 1 WT/*4, and 3 unknown genotype)], 21 for IM, and 102 for EM. Compared with either IM or EM, PMs had significantly worse time to recurrence and disease free survival in both the univariate (HR 2.5, p=0.02; and 2.2, p=0.01) and multivariate (HR 2.7, p=0.01; and HR 2.2 p=.02) analyses utilizing tumor size, nodal status, and tumor grade. Conclusion: Our data indicate that CYP2D6 status can be used to identify pts who should receive tam therapy and tam treated pts should not be co-administered potent CYP2D6 inhibitors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.