Collins, Jerry M.

Abstract Background: Endx is a Tam metabolite with promising antitumor activity in Tam and aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistant estrogen receptor (ER) positive (+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This randomized phase II study compared progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity of Endx 80 mg/day to Tam 20 mg/day in patients (pts) with ER+ MBC. Eligibility included postmenopausal women, ECOG PS 0-2, prior progression on AI but not Tam (unlimited endocrine therapy [ET] lines allowed), and a preregistration biopsy confirming ER+ (>10% nuclear staining) and HER2-negative MBC. Stratified randomization was used balancing prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i) use and/or everolimus (yes/no), measurable disease (yes/no) and endocrine resistance (primary/secondary) between arms. Pts randomized to Tam were allowed to cross over to Endx at progression. Due to short expected median PFS, differences in PFS were assessed using approaches for interval-censored data (ICD). 40 eligible pts were to be randomized to each arm so a one-sided alpha=0.10 generalized log-rank test (GLRT) would have a 90% chance of detecting a 50% decrease in hazard of disease progression with Endx (median: 6 months) relative to Tam (median: 3 months). Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate (stable or partial response > 6 cycles) (CBR) for measurable and non-measurable disease. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data were obtained Day (d) 1 (4 hour), end of cycle 2, and at time of progression. Results: From March 2015 to March 2017, 108 women with endocrine refractory recurrent or MBC were preregistered. 27 pts did not register due to: biopsy demonstrating ER-/HER2- (3 pts), ER+/HER2+ (5 pts), cancer other than breast (3 pts), no cancer in specimen (6 pts), brain metastases (2 pts), acute infection (1 pt), progression on or recent use of Tam (2 pts), or pt refusal (5 pts). 4/81 pts who registered were excluded due to ineligibility (3 pts) or refusal to start protocol treatment (1 pt). The study cohort consisted of 40 pts randomized to Endx and 37 pts to Tam. The median (m) number of ETs in the metastatic setting was 2 (range 1-4) for each arm including prior CDK 4/6i (Endx: 42.5%, Tam: 29.7%) and everolimus (Endx: 35.0%, Tam: 40.5%). The m cycle number was 6 for Endx (range: 1-35) and 3 for Tam (range: 1-42). PFS for Endx was not significantly different compared to Tam (HR= 0.77; 95% CI: 0.49-1.22, GLRT p=0.309; mPFS: Endx 130 days [95% CI: 76-138 days] and Tam 42 days [95%CI: 24-129 days]). However, PFS was significantly longer in pts with no prior CDK 4/6i in the Endx arm (GLRT p=0.002; HR(no/yes)=0.31; 95%CI: 0.15-0.65) but not in the Tam arm (GLRT p=0.708) (unplanned analysis). Severe (grade (G) 3+) toxicities included: Endx G3 hypertriglyceridemia (3 pts); Tam: G3 hypertension with G2 stroke (1 pt), G3 thromboembolic event (1 pt), and G3 abdominal, bone and liver pain (1 pt). In Endx arm, d1 m Endx plasma concentration (conc) was 216 ng/ml (n=17; range: 144-400). For Tam arm, d1 m Tam conc was 17 ng/ml (n=17; range:11-23) (Endx not detectable). For the 25 pts that crossed over to Endx, CBR was 28.0% (90% CI: 14.0-46.2%) and 14 pts had pk data at progression. A lower median Endx conc (6 ng/ml range: 3.3-16.3) was observed in Tam patients at progression who then had Endx clinical benefit compared to Tam pts without clinical benefit after Endx crossover (median Endx 12 ng/ml; range 4.4-36.6).Conclusions: In endocrine-resistant breast cancer, Z-Endx was not significantly superior to Tam, but clinical benefit was observed in 28% that crossed over to Endx after Tam progression. In pts with no prior CDK 4/6i, the observation of significantly longer PFS in the Endx arm is hypothesis generating. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN), https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Clinical Trials.gov Identifier:NCT02311933 Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J Suman, Joel M Reid, Mary Kuffel, Sarah A Buhrow, Renee M McGovern, John Black, Travis Dockter, William F Symmans, Minetta C Liu, John R Hawse, James Doroshow, Anna M Storniolo, Jerry M Collins, Howard Streicher, Matthew M Ames, James N Ingle, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey. A randomized phase II trial of tamoxifen versus Z-endoxifen HCL in postmenopausal women with metastatic estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-06.

1043 Background: In estrogen receptor (ER) positive MBC, mutations (e.g. ESR1), identified from tumor biopsies or cfDNA, confer resistance. The concordance between mutations observed in tumor and cfDNA and the implications for response to Z-endoxifen, a potent anti-estrogen, are unknown. Methods: We previously conducted a phase I trial of Z-endoxifen in endocrine refractory, ER positive MBC. Seven dose levels were considered ranging from 20 to 160 mg/day followed by expansion cohorts (EC) of 40, 80, and 100 mg/day. Pretreatment blood samples (all pts) and fresh tumor biopsies (EC) were collected prospectively. Tumor and cfDNA were evaluated by targeted NGS. Results: 41 pts (38 evaluable) were enrolled. Prior endocrine therapy included aromatase inhibitors (37/38, 97%), fulvestrant (22/38, 58%) and tamoxifen (26/38, 68%). Substantial endoxifen exposure without DLTs at doses above 80 mg/day led to a halt in dose escalation and opening of the EC. Overall clinical benefit (stable > 6 months [7 pts.] or partial response by RECIST criteria [3 pts.]) rate was 26.3% (95%CI: 13.4-43.1%). cfDNA was obtained from 36 pts and mutations were identified in 13 (36%) including ESR1 [ Y537N or D538G] (5), PIK3CA [ H1047R or E542K] (8), TP53 [ K132R, R248Q, R267Q, or H179Y] (4), AKT ( Q79K) (1), and KRAS ( G12D) (1). In 5 pts with cf ESR1 mutations, 4 had additional cfDNA mutations including PIK3CA (3), and TP53 (1). PFS was shorter in pts with cfDNA mutations relative to those without (median: 61 vs.132 days; log-rank p = 0.021). Discordance was observed between tumor and cfDNA mutations where 3/7 PIK3CA tumor mutations were detected by cfDNA, 1/2 TP53 tumor mutations were detected by cfDNA, and 0/1 AKT tumor mutations were detected by cfDNA. Conversely, 2 pts had cfDNA mutations (either ESR1, TP53 or AKT) undetected in tumor. Conclusions: The absence of cfDNA mutations in patients with endocrine resistant, MBC treated with Z-Endoxifen was associated with significantly longer PFS. Given the discordance between tumor and cfDNA sequence data, future studies must determine which approach maximizes prognosis and prediction of benefit for estrogen-targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01327781.

Purpose Endoxifen is a tamoxifen metabolite with potent antiestrogenic activity. Patients and Methods We performed a phase I study of oral Z-endoxifen to determine its toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity. Eligibility included endocrine-refractory, estrogen receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer. An accelerated titration schedule was applied until moderate or dose-limiting toxicity occurred, followed by a 3+3 design and expansion at 40, 80, and 100 mg per day. Tumor DNA from serum (circulating cell free [cf); all patients] and biopsies [160 mg/day and expansion]) was sequenced. Results Of 41 enrolled patients, 38 were evaluable for MTD determination. Prior endocrine regimens during which progression occurred included aromatase inhibitor (n = 36), fulvestrant (n = 21), and tamoxifen (n = 15). Patients received endoxifen once daily at seven dose levels (20 to 160 mg). Dose escalation ceased at 160 mg per day given lack of MTD and endoxifen concentrations > 1,900 ng/mL. Endoxifen clearance was unaffected by CYP2D6 genotype. One patient (60 mg) had cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (pulmonary embolus). Overall clinical benefit rate (stable > 6 months [n = 7] or partial response by RECIST criteria [n = 3]) was 26.3% (95% CI, 13.4% to 43.1%) including prior tamoxifen progression (n = 3). cfDNA mutations were observed in 13 patients ( PIK3CA [n = 8], ESR1 [n = 5], TP53 [n = 4], and AKT [n = 1]) with shorter progression-free survival ( v those without cfDNA mutations; median, 61 v 132 days; log-rank P = .046). Clinical benefit was observed in those with ESR1 amplification (tumor; 80 mg/day) and ESR1 mutation (cfDNA; 160 mg/day). Comparing tumor biopsies and cfDNA, some mutations ( PIK3CA, TP53, and AKT) were undetected by cfDNA, whereas cfDNA mutations ( ESR1, TP53, and AKT) were undetected by biopsy. Conclusion In endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer, Z-endoxifen provides substantial drug exposure unaffected by CYP2D6 metabolism, acceptable toxicity, and promising antitumor activity.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer recurrence has been shown to differ based upon CYP2D6 genotype and endoxifen (Endx) exposure following treatment with tamoxifen (TAM) in the adjuvant setting. The average Endx Css is 29 nM (range, 2-80 nM) in TAM treated patients at a dose of 20 mg/day. Administration of Endx itself to patients is predicted to provide adequate, consistent, active drug levels in all treated patients, resulting in clinical benefit. As part of two phase 1 trials of oral Endx to determine the safety, tolerability, and MTD, we characterized the pharmacokinetics and in vivo metabolism of Endx. Methods: Patients were given escalating daily oral doses of Endx (28 day cycle) over the dose range of 20 - 160 mg/day in Phase I trials at the Mayo Clinic and NCI. Pharmacokinetics sampling was performed on days 1, 7, 14 and 28, and prior to subsequent cycles. Endx plasma concentrations and metabolite profiles were determined by HPLC and LC/MS/MS. Results: 44 patients with ECOG PS 0-1 have been enrolled to date encompassing 8 dose levels in the Mayo (25 women with AI refractory MBC; median age 58 yrs, range 41-83 yrs) and NCI (19 women with ovary (9), breast (4), desmoid (2), fallopian tube (2), endometrial cancer (2); median age 64 yrs, range 43-75 yrs) studies. Day 1 Endx peak concentrations (Cmax) were reached 4h after the Endx oral dose and mean values of Cmax, C24h, and AUC0-24h increased in proportion to dose. Css was achieved on day 7 and 3.5-fold accumulation (t1/2= 50.5 h) was observed on day 28. At the starting dose ( 20 mg/day) and highest dose level (160 mg/day), Endx Css values of 146 ng/ml (390 nM) and 1950 ng/ml (5200 nM), respectively, were achieved and maintained throughout the 28-day treatment. Endx Css values remained unchanged following continuous dosing for 8-10 months. The mean apparent steady-state clearance was 6.2 L/h. We also characterized the Endx metabolite profile in patient plasma and urine. Metabolites detected in plasma include nor-Endx, N-hydroxy-Endx, Endx-catechol, methoxy-Endx catechol, and Endx-glucuronide, and appear in amounts much lower compared to Endx. Like the parent drug, metabolites accumulated in plasma over the 28-day cycle. Characterization of the pharmacokinetics of Nor-Endx, a putative aromatase inhibitor, is ongoing and will be presented. Conclusion: In these ongoing Phase I studies, daily administration of Endx is well tolerated with Css consistently above those obtained following administration of standard dose tamoxifen. In the Mayo study, expansion at 20 and 100 mg/day has commenced to perform translational studies and further characterize Endx PK. In the NCI study, dose escalation continues to establish the maximum tolerated dose. Supported in part by R01CA 133049, U01 CA69912, P30CA 15083, P50CA 116201 and NCI Contracts CM52206 and HHSN261201100014C. Citation Format: Joel M. Reid, Matthew P. Goetz, Shivaani Kumar, Renee M. McGovern, Sarah A. Buhrow, Stephanie L. Safgren, Vera J. Suman, Travis J. Docktor, Charles Erlichman, Howard Streicher, James H. Doroshow, Jerry Collins, Matthew M. Ames. Pharmacokinetics and in vivo metabolism of Z-endoxifen: Results from two phase I studies in women with ER+ breast cancer, gynecologic malignancies and desmoids. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4631. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4631

Abstract Endoxifen (END), the active metabolite of tamoxifen (TAM), is currently being developed as a drug for the treatment of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer based on recent in vitro and clinical data demonstrating that TAM drug effect is substantially related to circulating plasma concentrations of END, a secondary metabolite produced by human CYP2D6 metabolism. Women with deficient CYP2D6 metabolism have lower END concentrations and a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence. We characterized the pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of END in female rats and dogs. We further compared END exposure following equivalent doses of END and TAM. Rats were administered 2 mg/kg i.v. END, 20 − 200 mg/kg oral END or 80 mg/kg oral TAM. Fasted dogs were administered 0.5 mg/kg i.v. END, 15 − 100 mg/kg oral END or 30 mg/kg oral TAM. Plasma END concentrations were also measured in rats or dogs after oral dosing once per day for 4 consecutive days. Plasma samples were analyzed using a validated reverse-phase HPLC method with fluorescence detection. In the single-dose administration study, terminal elimination half-life and plasma clearance values in rats given 2 mg/kg i.v. END were 6.3 h and 2.4 L/h/kg, respectively. Plasma concentrations above 0.1 µM and 1 µM END were achieved with 20 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg doses, respectively, and those concentrations were maintained for longer than 24 h. Oral absorption of END was linear over the range of 20 − 140 mg/kg with a bioavailability greater than 67%. END exposure in rats following 80 mg/kg oral END was 100-fold greater than END exposure following 80-mg/kg oral TAM. Following 0.5 mg/kg i.v. END to dogs, terminal elimination half-life and plasma clearance values were 9.2 h and 0.4 L/h/kg, respectively. Plasma concentrations above 1 µM and 10 µM were achieved with the 15 mg/kg dose and 100 mg/kg, respectively, and those concentrations were maintained for longer than 24 h. Absorption was linear over the range of 15 − 100 mg/kg with a bioavailability greater than 50%. END exposure in dogs following 30 mg/kg oral END was 10-fold greater than END exposure following 30-mg/kg oral TAM. In the repeated-dose administration study, the day 4 END peak plasma concentration in rats increased from 1 to 9 µM as the daily END dose was increased from 20 to 200 mg/kg. The day 4 END peak plasma concentration in dogs exceeded 20 µM and plasma concentrations remained above 2 µM for 24 hours following 4 daily doses of 30 mg/kg END. Based on these data, we conclude that END has high oral bioavailability; high concentrations may be maintained after repeated dosing in dogs and rats; and substantially higher END concentrations are achievable following an oral dose of END in comparison to a similar dose of TAM. Supported by NCI contract N01-CM-52206. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2607.