Koubek, Emily J.

Abstract Introduction: We aimed to characterize the preclinical pharmacokinetics (PK) of a series of 20 anticancer agents in highly immunodeficient female NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice to provide clearance and exposure data for agents under investigation by the NCI PDX Development and Trial Centers Research Network (PDXNet). Methods: The series of 20 anticancer agents (inhibitors of CDK4/6, PI3K-β/PI3K-δ, ATR, MEK1/2, PI3K, microtubule, EZH2, BCL-2, PARP, histone deacetylase, γ-secretase, FGFR, SHP2, and ERK1/2, as well as a SMAC mimetic) were administered to female NSG mice via IV, PO, or IP routes to characterize plasma exposures under conditions used for PDX efficacy testing. Serial plasma samples were collected 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, 480, and 1440 minutes after dosing. Drug concentrations were quantified using validated LC-MS/MS assays. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Results: The PK for each agent was determined, and the clearance and half-life values are listed in the table below. The PK metrics for Navitoclax could not be calculated. Due to higher metabolic rates, mice show faster PK processes. They generally had shorter half-lives and higher weight-normalized clearance than humans. Copanlisib, Navitoclax, and Trametinib were exceptions. Conclusion: These PK data are critical for understanding the antitumor activities of agents studied by the PDXNet and will aid investigators in developing new approach methodologies for preclinical safety studies in preparation for human clinical trials. Citation Format: Mohd Beshr Chama, Emily J. Koubek, Sarah A. Buhrow, Renee A. Schoon, Joel M. Reid. Pharmacokinetics of a series of anticancer agents in immunodeficient female NOD scid gamma mice [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3156.

Abstract Introduction: The binding of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) on the surface of tumor cells to PD-1 on T cells prevents T-cell-mediated anti-cancer immune responses. Immune checkpoint blockades that target the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction have improved survival rates but have several critical limitations. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of PD-L1, such as glycosylation, are crucial for its stability and engagement with PD-1. Thus, targeting PD-L1 PTMs may be a novel method to improve immune checkpoint blockade efficacy. The mevalonate pathway (MVP) generates various substances involved in PTMs process. Here, we explore the effect of MVP in altering the PTMs of PD-L1 and its impacts on cell surface PD-L1 function. Methods: The triple-negative human breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines MDA-MB-231 and BT549 were treated with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin (LOV) with or without the addition of IFN-γ and/or MVP intermediates for 48 hours. PD-L1 transcription was evaluated by qPCR. Alterations in PD-L1 size were detected by Western blotting. PD-L1 surface levels were measured by flow cytometry. HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) knockdown was performed to validate the non-off-target effect of LOV. The binding of PD-1 protein to the cell surface PD-L1 was measured by PD-1/PD-L1 binding assay. PD-L1 glycosylation levels were measured by Concanavalin A (Con A) lectin binding assay with immunoprecipitated PD-L1 protein. Results: LOV treatment caused a significant molecular weight shift of PD-L1 from approximately 45 kDa to 40 kDa and reduced the cell surface PD-L1 levels. However, PD-L1 transcription was not affected by LOV. HMGCR knockdown produced similar changes, indicating LOV's impact on PD-L1 was not due to off-target effects. The addition of MVP intermediates mevalonate (MEV) or geranylgeraniol, but not farnesol prevented LOV-induced changes in PD-L1 molecular weight and surface levels. Interestingly, the addition of 25-hydroxycholesterol, but not dolichol, partially prevented LOV-induced decreases in PD-L1 surface levels. Geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor GGTI-286, which prevents protein geranylgeranylation, also altered PD-L1 molecular weight and decreased surface levels. In addition, LOV impaired the binding of PD-1 protein to tumor cells' surface PD-L1, which was reversed by the addition of MVP substrate MEV. Con A lectin-binding of immunoprecipitated PD-L1 showed that the LOV did not reduce the N-glycosylation level of PD-L1. Conclusions: This study reveals the involvement of the MVP in regulating PD-L1 PTMs and highlights the MVP as a potential therapeutic target to modulate PD-L1’s molecular weight and function and improve the efficacy of immunotherapy interventions, presenting a promising avenue for further investigation. Citation Format: Ruoheng Zhang, Emily J. Koubek, Jessie L. Reed, Jeffrey D. Neighbors, Joel M. Reid, Raymond J. Hohl. The role of the mevalonate pathway in post-translational modifications of PD-L1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4265.

507 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263) is an oral Bcl-2 homology-3 mimetic that binds with high affinity to pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins, resulting in apoptosis. Sorafenib, an oral multi kinase inhibitor inhibits tumor angiogenesis and also promotes apoptosis. The efficacy of either agent alone is limited; however, preclinical studies demonstrate synergy with the combination of navitoclax and sorafenib. Methods: In this phase 1 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study (NCT01364051), we evaluated the combination of navitoclax and sorafenib in a dose escalation cohort of patients with refractory solid tumors, with an expansion cohort in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study agents were provided by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at National Cancer Institute under CRADA. Navitoclax and sorafenib were administered continuously on days 1 through 21 of 21-day cycles. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined using the continual reassessment method. Results: Ten patients were enrolled in the dose escalation cohort and 15 patients with HCC were enrolled in the expansion cohort. Two dose levels were tested, dose level 1 (navitoclax 150 mg daily plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily) and dose level 2 (navitoclax 200 mg daily plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily). At dose level 1, one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) [grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation] was observed among 6 patients treated at this dose level. In a cohort of 3 patients treated at dose level 2, two DLTs were observed (grade 3 hypertension, and grade 3 rash), hence dose level 1 was identified as the MTD. Among all patients, the most common grade 3 toxicity was thrombocytopenia (5 patients, 20%): there were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities (Table). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range 1-36 cycles) and all patients were off study treatment at data cut off. Six patients in the expansion cohort had stable disease, 5 had progressive disease and 4 with unavailable data. There were no partial or complete responses. Drug-drug interaction between navitoclax and sorafenib was not observed. The combination of navitoclax and sorafenib did not increase induction of apoptosis compared with navitoclax alone. Conclusions: Navitoclax plus sorafenib resulted in manageable, but not ideal toxicities for continuous oral administration which precluded dose escalation. The lack of clinical benefit in the HCC expansion cohort does not support further development of this combination for the treatment of advanced HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01364051 . [Table: see text]

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for Z‐endoxifen in patients with advanced solid tumors and to identify clinical variables that influence pharmacokinetic parameters. Z‐endoxifen‐HCl was administered orally once a day on a 28‐day cycle (±3 days) over 11 dose levels ranging from 20 to 360 mg. A total of 1256 Z‐endoxifen plasma concentration samples from 80 patients were analyzed using nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for Z‐endoxifen. A 2‐compartment model with oral depot and linear elimination adequately described the data. The estimated apparent total clearance, apparent central volume of distribution, and apparent peripheral volume of distribution were 4.89 L/h, 323 L, and 39.7 L, respectively, with weight‐effect exponents of 0.75, 1, and 1, respectively. This model was used to explore the effects of clinical and demographic variables on Z‐endoxifen pharmacokinetics. Weight, race on clearance, and aspartate aminotransferase on the absorption rate constant were identified as significant covariates in the final model. This novel population pharmacokinetic model provides insight regarding factors that may affect the pharmacokinetics of Z‐endoxifen and may assist in the design of future clinical trials.

Abstract Prior in vitro work in the human hepatoma cell lines Huh7 and HEP3B indicated that combination treatment of the BH3 mimetic, navitoclax, and the multi-kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, was more effective at inducing apoptosis than either compound alone. This current study was part of a phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of concurrent navitoclax and sorafenib treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory solid organ tumors and sought to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of both agents in combination. Cleavage of cytokeratin 18 by caspase 3 was used as a biomarker for therapy-induced activation of apoptosis to determine if combination treatment results in an increase in apoptosis as previously observed in in vitro work. PK were assessed in 26 patients (ages 32 - 80) enrolled in a phase I clinical trial (NCT02143401). 150 mg of oral navitoclax was administered once daily for a seven day run-in (beginning Day -7) prior to 150 mg (Dose level 1) or 200 mg (Dose level 2) navitoclax concomitant treatment with 400 mg of twice daily oral sorafenib (Day 1). Samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained on Day -7 and Day 1 prior to dosing and at 1, 2, 4, 8-12, and 24 hours post dosing. PK parameters were estimated by noncompartmental analysis using Phoenix® WinNonlin® Version 6.4. To examine the PD of both agents in combination, cytokeratin 18 cleavage was quantified by ELISA after the 7-day navitoclax run-in and on Day 2 or 4 and Day 8 of navitoclax and sorafenib combination treatment. PK estimates of maximum concentration, exposure, volume of distribution, and clearance for navitoclax on Day -7 and Day 1 were not significantly different, indicating a lack of navitoclax accumulation. Finally, no correlation was found between navitoclax exposure and apoptosis as indicated by cytokeratin-18 cleavage. This work was supported by the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA15083 and NCI Experimental Therapeutics Phase I Grant UM1 CA186686. Citation Format: Emily J. Koubek, Brian A. Costello, Jun Yin, Renee M. McGovern, Sarah A. Buhrow, Renee A. Schoon, Carrie A. Strand, Yixing Jiang, Mitesh J. Borad, Naoko Takebe, Scott H. Kaufmann, Alex A. Adjei, Joel M. Reid. Pharmacokinetic analysis of navitoclax in combination with sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory solid organ tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT114.