Adamson, Peter C.

9019 Background: Pemetrexed is a new multi-targeted antifol that inhibits enzymes involved in the de novo biosynthesis of thymidine and purine nucleotides. Methods: A phase 1 dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study (PK) was performed in children with refractory solid tumors to define the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and a recommended phase 2 dose. Pemetrexed was administered as a 10 min iv infusion every 21 days. All patients received folic acid (400 mcg/day po), vitamin B12 (500–1000 mcg every 3rd course IM) and dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg/dose bid × 3 days each course) . Cohorts of 3 to 6 children were enrolled at dose levels of 400, 520, 670, 870, 1,130, 1,470, 1,910 and 2,480 mg/m2. DLT was defined as any Gr. 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity (except nausea/vomiting, alopecia, or AST/ALT elevation that returns to Gr. 1), Gr. 4 neutropenia or Gr. 4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days. Results: 33 subjects (31 fully evaluable for toxicity), median age of 12 yrs (range, 1–21), with diagnoses including osteosarcoma (12), Ewing’s sarcoma (3), hepatoblastoma (2), renal cell carcinoma (2), brainstem glioma (3), glioma (3), and other (n=8) were enrolled. DLT occurred in 1/6 patients at 1,470 mg/m2 (Gr. 3 AST and ALT), and in 2/4 at 2,480 mg/m2 (Gr. 3 ANC and Gr. 3 rash in both). Other DLTs at 2,480 mg/m2 that occurred in 1 patient included Gr. 3 diarrhea and rectal hemorrhage, and Gr. 4 thrombocytopenia, lipase, GGT, hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia and hyponatremia. At 1,910 mg/m2, 0/6 patients had DLT. The median number of courses administered was 1 (range 1 to 17). No CRs or PRs have been observed. Results of PK and other correlative studies will be presented. Conclusions: The recommended phase 2 dose of pemetrexed for children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors is 1,910 mg/m2 administered q21 days with dexamethasone, folic acid and B12 supplementation. A phase II COG study is planned. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9017 Background: Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) that has demonstrated significant growth inhibition in several pre-clinical models of pediatric solid tumors. However, the agent has never been tested in pediatric patients. Methods: A phase I dose escalation study in children with refractory solid tumors was conducted to define the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), and to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended phase II dose of bevacizumab administered by IV infusion every 2 weeks in 28-day cycles. Cohorts were enrolled at dose levels of 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg; the final dose level was expanded to include at least 3 children <6 years of age. Serial blood samples were collected for PK, plasma VEGF concentration, and circulating mature and progenitor endothelial cells (CECs/CEPs). Results: 20 patients (10 male), median age 13 yrs (range 1–21), were enrolled at dose levels 5 (n=3), 10 (n=3), and 15 (n=14) mg/kg. 18 patients were fully evaluable for toxicity (one withdrew consent prior to treatment and the second was removed for rapid disease progression). A total of 67 cycles were administered with a median of 3 per patient (range 1–16). Treatment was well tolerated and no DLTs were observed. Only one grade 3 toxicity, lymphopenia, was attributed to drug. Non-dose limiting, grade 1–2 toxicities included infusional reaction (n=3), rash (n=3), mucositis (n=2), and proteinuria (n=3). There was no hypertension, hemorrhage or thrombosis reported. There were no partial or complete responses; 3 pts with Ewings and 2 pts with soft tissue sarcoma had disease stabilization for > 3 months. The serum exposure to bevacizumab as measured by AUC appeared to increase in proportion to dose. The median clearance of bevacizumab was 4.1 ml/day/kg (range 3.2–15.9), and the median T1/2 was 11.8 days (range 3.9–14.6). In some patients, a rapid rate of rise in plasma VEGF, increase in mature CECs or decrease in CEPs was observed. Conclusion: Bevacizumab at doses up to 15mg/kg every two weeks is well tolerated in children with solid tumors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9569 Background: Vorinostat, an orally administered histone deacetylase inhibitor, has potent antitumor activity against human cell lines in vitro (IC50 0.5 to 5 μM) and in xenograft models. A phase I trial of vorinostat was conducted in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK) of vorinostat, and to assess accumulation of histone acetylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Methods: Vorinostat was administered once daily at dose levels of 180, 230, and 300 mg/m2/d. Courses were 28 days in duration, without interruption. PK analysis was performed during the 1st course. Vorinostat's ability to induce acetyl-histone (H3) accumulation in vivo was studied by western blot analysis. Results: 30 patients, 17 males, median age 15 years (range 4–21), were enrolled; 24 patients were fully evaluable for toxicity. At 180 mg/m2/d, 1/6 pts developed DLT (deep vein thrombosis) and at 230 mg/m2/d 1/6 pts developed DLT (hypokalemia). At 300 mg/m2/d, DLTs consisted of reversible hypokalemia (n=1), neutropenia (n=1) and thrombocytopenia (n=2), defining the MTD as 230 mg/m2/d. Other non-dose limiting grade 3 or 4 toxicities included elevated ALT/AST, hyperbilirubinemia, leucopenia, and lymphopenia. Western blot analysis of PBMC protein isolates found clear evidence of dose- dependent accumulation of acetylated H3 histones. 1 patient with a spindle cell sarcoma received 8 courses and 1 patient with a low-grade astrocytoma had an unconfirmed minor response. Conclusions: Vorinostat is well tolerated in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors and inhibits histone deacetylase activity in PBMC. The recommended phase II dose for children with solid tumors is 230 mg/m2/d. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9563 Background: Both temozolomide (TEM) and vincristine (VCR) can increase the preclinical activity of low-dose protracted irinotecan (IRN) against pediatric solid tumors. Because these drugs have different dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and mechanisms of action, we combined these three agents and sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of orally administered IRN when given with fixed- dose TEM and VCR in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, using the antibiotic cefixime to reduce IRN-associated diarrhea. Methods: We studied two dose levels of oral IRN (35 or 50 mg/m2) administered on days 1–5 and 8–12, combined with oral TEM 100 mg/m2 on days 1–5 and intravenous VCR 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Courses were repeated every 21 days. Oral cefixime was started 5 days before chemotherapy and continued daily. Results: Of 21 patients enrolled, 17 (ages 3–21, median 14 yrs) were evaluable for toxicity and have to date received 46 courses (range 1–8, median 2). At the IRN dose of 50 mg/m2/d, 4 of 12 patients had DLT, including elevated ALT/AST (1), abdominal pain (1), hypokalemia (1), anorexia (1), thrombocytopenia (1), and fatal liver failure in a patient with metastatic disease in the liver and porta hepatis (1). In contrast, none of 5 patients treated at the dose of 35 mg/m2/d experienced first-course DLT, defining this dose as the MTD. UGT1A1 genotype did not correlate with DLT in this small trial. The median SN-38 lactone area under the curve (0–6h) at the IRN dose of 50 mg/m2/day was 13.5 ng/ml*h (range 3.8 to 30.9); pharmacokinetic analysis of patients treated at 35 mg/m2/day is ongoing. Six patients with the following tumors received more than 2 courses: neuroblastoma, ependymoma, hepatoblastoma, fibrillary astrocytoma, osteosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma. Central review of response data is underway. Three patients continue on therapy at the MTD. Conclusions: Oral administration of IRN together with TEM and VCR was feasible and well tolerated at the MTD of 35 mg/m2 given dx5x2. Further study using a shorter 5-day course of oral IRN is planned. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Abstract 573 Outcomes for children with relapsed ALL remain poor, especially when relapses occur early (<36 months) following initial diagnosis. A factor contributing to poor outcomes is much lower rates of successful induction of second remission (CR2). CD22 is almost universally expressed in children with B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL and we previously demonstrated the safety of adding the anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, epratuzumab, to reinduction chemotherapy in children with first marrow relapse (Raetz et al, JCO 2008 26:3756-62) (COG ADVL04P2). The primary aim of the second part of the COG ADVL04P2 study was to determine if addition of epratuzumab to an established chemotherapy platform improves rates of CR2 in individuals with BCP ALL and early bone marrow relapse. Children, adolescents and young adults, ages 2–30 years with first early marrow relapse of BCP ALL, with or without extramedullary disease, were eligible for this study. The primary study endpoint was CR2 rate at the end of the first block of chemotherapy plus epratuzumab as compared to the 67% CR2 rate for historical controls (COG AALL01P2; Raetz et al, JCO 2008 26:3971-8) treated with the same chemotherapy without epratuzumab. For addition of epratuzumab to be deemed effective, an improvement in CR2 rate of 13% (67% vs. 80%) was required. Because there is a significant difference in CR2 rate between patients with very early (<18 months from diagnosis) vs. early (18 to <36 months from diagnosis) relapse, the statistical design used a model to account for potential differences in time to relapse between these studies. ADVL04P2 had several stages. In part A, epratuzumab was given alone for 4 doses twice weekly in an upfront window to assess safety and response, followed by AALL01P2 chemotherapy plus epratuzumab weekly during the first block of therapy. In part B, patients received the AALL01P2 3-block platform chemotherapy plus epratuzumab (360 mg/m2/dose) during block 1. Initially during part B, epratuzumab was administered weekly for 4 doses starting on day 1 based on pharmacokinetic (PK) data from adults with lymphoma. However, ADVL04P2 PK data showed that the half-life of epratuzumab was much shorter in children with ALL. Thus, ADVL04P2 was amended to give epratuzumab twice weekly for 8 doses, starting on day 1. This report focuses on ADVL04P2 part B and includes results of both the weekly (B1) and twice weekly (B2) epratuzumab dosing schedules. Between 1/07 and 1/11, 116 patients (114 eligible) were enrolled; 54 on B1 and 60 on B2, including 23 (B1) and 19 (B2) very early relapses. Median age at relapse was 10.2 years for the B1 cohort and 8.4 years for the B2 cohort. Concomitant extramedullary disease was present in 3 and 9 of the B1 and B2 patients, respectively. At the end of block 1, 48 B1 patients and 50 B2 patients were evaluable for response with CR2 achieved in (31/48) 65% of B1 and (33/50) 66% of B2 patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was measured by flow cytometry in a COG reference laboratory at the end of block 1. Among the 62 pooled B1 and B2 patients who achieved CR2 and had MRD data available at the end of block 1, 26 (42%) (14/31 B1 and 12/31 B2) were MRD negative (< 0.01%), which was significantly higher than the 25% with chemotherapy alone on AALL01P2 (one-sided p=0.001). The addition of epratuzumab to reinduction chemotherapy was well tolerated with no significant increase in the baseline toxicity observed with the platform regimen alone with either schedule. Toxic deaths occurred in 3 patients (2.6%) during block 1 in part B (2 in B1, 1 in B2), compared to 2.4% with block 1 chemotherapy alone. PK analyses in a cohort of B2 patients showed that the epratuzumab trough serum concentration steadily increased to 501 ± 149 mcg/mL before the final dose on day 25 (n=26). The mean serum half-life of epratuzumab was 17.0 ± 4.9 days (n=17) and was shorter than the value of 23 days observed in adults treated with epratuzumab for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. No patient developed human anti-human antibodies. Epratuzumab, as given on the B1 and B2 schedules was tolerable in combination with chemotherapy in pediatric and young adult patients with early relapsed CD22-positive BCP ALL, but did not improve CR2 rates when compared to historical controls treated with chemotherapy alone. However, among patients who attained a complete remission, those treated with epratuzumab were significantly more likely to become MRD negative as compared to those treated without epratuzumab. Disclosures: Borowitz: BD Biosciences: Research Funding. Goldenberg:Immunomedics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Wegener:Immunomedics: Employment.

BackgroundGiven the success of immunotherapeutic approaches in hematologic malignancies, the COG designed a phase I/II study to determine whether the addition of epratuzumab (anti‐CD22) to an established chemotherapy platform improves rates of second remission (CR2) in pediatric patients with B‐lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) and early bone marrow relapse.ProcedureTherapy consisted of three established blocks of re‐induction chemotherapy. Epratuzumab (360 mg/m2/dose) was combined with chemotherapy on weekly × 4 (B1) and twice weekly × 4 [eight doses] (B2) schedules during the first re‐induction block. Remission rates and minimal residual disease (MRD) status were compared to historical rates observed with the identical chemotherapy platform alone.ResultsCR2 was achieved in 65 and 66%, of the evaluable B1 (n = 54) and B2 patients (n = 60), respectively; unchanged from that observed historically without epratuzumab. Rates of MRD negativity (<0.01%) were 31% in B1 (P = 0.4128) and 39% in B2 patients (P = 0.1731), compared to 25% in historical controls. The addition of epratuzumab was well tolerated, with a similar toxicity profile to that observed with the re‐induction chemotherapy platform regimen alone.ConclusionsEpratuzumab was well tolerated in combination with re‐induction chemotherapy. While CR2 rates were not improved compared to historical controls treated with chemotherapy alone, there was a non‐significant trend towards improvement in MRD response with the addition of epratuzumab (twice weekly for eight doses) to re‐induction chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:1171–1175. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Purpose: Aflibercept is a novel decoy receptor that efficiently neutralizes circulating VEGF. A pediatric phase I trial was conducted to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of aflibercept. Experimental Design: Cohorts of three to six children with refractory solid tumors received aflibercept intravenously over 60 minutes every 14 days, at 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 mg/kg/dose. PK sampling and analysis of peripheral blood biomarkers were conducted with the initial dose. Results: Twenty-one eligible patients were enrolled; 18 were fully evaluable for toxicity. One of six patients receiving 2.0 mg/kg/dose developed dose-limiting intratumoral hemorrhage and two of six receiving 3.0 mg/kg/dose developed either dose-limiting tumor pain or tissue necrosis. None of the six patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg/dose developed DLTs, defining this as the MTD. The most common non-DLTs were hypertension and fatigue. Three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatoblastoma and clear cell sarcoma had stable disease for &gt;13 weeks. At the MTD, the ratio of free-to-bound aflibercept serum concentration was 2.10 on day 8 but only 0.44 by day 15. A rapid decrease in VEGF (P &lt; 0.05) and increase in placental growth factor (PlGF; P &lt; 0.05) from baseline was observed in response to aflibercept by day 2. Conclusions: The aflibercept MTD in children of 2.5 mg/kg/dose every 14 days is lower than the adult recommended dose of 4.0 mg/kg. This dose achieves, but does not sustain, free aflibercept concentrations in excess of bound. Tumor pain and hemorrhage may be evidence of antitumor activity but were dose-limiting. Clin Cancer Res; 18(18); 5081–9. ©2012 AACR.

Purpose A phase I/II study of cixutumumab (IMC-A12) in children with refractory solid tumors was conducted. This study was designed to assess the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cixutumumab in children to determine a recommended phase II dose and to assess antitumor activity in Ewing sarcoma (ES). Patients and Methods Pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors were treated with cixutumumab as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once per week. Two dose levels—6 and 9 mg/kg—were evaluated using a standard three-plus-three cohort design. Patients with refractory ES were treated in an expanded phase II cohort at each dose level. Results Forty-seven eligible patients with a median age of 15 years (range, 4 to 28 years) were enrolled. Twelve patients were treated in the dose-finding phase. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild and infrequent. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 thrombocytopenia at 6 mg/kg and grade 3 dehydration at 9 mg/kg. Mean trough concentration (± standard deviation) at 9 mg/kg was 106 ± 57 μg/mL, which exceeded the effective trough concentration of 60 μg/mL observed in xenograft models. Three patients with ES had confirmed partial responses: one of 10 at 6 mg/kg and two of 20 at 9 mg/kg. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels consistently increased after one dose of cixutumumab. Tumor IGF-I receptor expression by immunohistochemistry did not correlate with response in patients with ES. Conclusion Cixutumumab is well tolerated in children with refractory solid tumors. The recommended phase II dose is 9 mg/kg. Limited single-agent activity of cixutumumab was seen in ES.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of vorinostat administered as a single agent and in combination 13-cis retinoic acid (13cRA) in children with refractory solid tumors; to evaluate the tolerability of the solid tumor MTD in children with refractory leukemias; and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a vorinostat suspension in children. Patients and Methods Vorinostat was administered orally daily starting at 180 mg/m2/d with escalations planned in 30% increments. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the initial dose. Acetyl-histone (H3) accumulation was assessed by Western blotting of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled on this multipart trial. In patients with solid tumors, the MTD was 230 mg/m2/d with dose-limiting neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia at 300 mg/m2/d. DLTs observed with the combination of 13cRA and vorinostat included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, and hypertriglyceridemia, resulting in a MTD of vorinostat 180 mg/m2/d 4 times per week and 13cRA 80 mg/m2/dose twice per day, days 1 through 14 every 28 days. Wide interpatient variability was noted in vorinostat disposition, with area under the concentration-time curves at 230 mg/m2/d for the capsule (range, 1,415 to 9,291 ng/mL × hr) and oral suspension (range, 1,186 to 4,780 ng/mL × hr). Significant accumulation of acetylated H3 histone in PBMC was observed after administration of vorinostat, particularly at higher doses. One patient with neuroblastoma experienced a complete response to the combination. Conclusion In children with recurrent solid tumors, vorinostat is well-tolerated at 230 mg/m2/d, with a modest dose reduction being required when combining vorinostat with 13cRA. Drug disposition is similar to that observed in adults.