Macedo, Luciana F.

Abstract Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling has been implicated in the resistance to hormonal therapy in breast cancer. Using a model of postmenopausal, estrogen-dependent breast cancer, we investigated the antitumor effects of the dual IGF-1R/InsR tyrosine kinase inhibitor BMS-754807 alone and in combination with letrozole or tamoxifen. BMS-754807 exhibited antiproliferative effects in vitro that synergized strongly in combination with letrozole or 4-hydroxytamoxifen and fulvestrant. Similarly, combined treatment of BMS-754807 with either tamoxifen or letrozole in vivo elicited tumor regressions not achieved by single-agent therapy. Notably, hormonal therapy enhanced the inhibition of IGF-1R/InsR without major side effects in animals. Microarray expression analysis revealed downregulation of cell-cycle control and survival pathways and upregulation of erbB in response to BMS-754807 plus hormonal therapy, particularly tamoxifen. Overall, these results offer a preclinical proof-of-concept for BMS-754807 as an antitumor agent in combination with hormonal therapies in hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Cooperative cell-cycle arrest, decreased proliferation, and enhanced promotion of apoptosis may contribute to antitumor effects to be gauged in future clinical investigations justified by our findings. Cancer Res; 71(24); 7597–607. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract Resistance to hormonal therapy is a clinically unmet need in breast cancer. IGF signaling has been identified as a major mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy in breast cancer. As components of the IGF signaling pathway are expressed in most breast cancers, the development of IGF-1R monoclonal antibody (mAb) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are active areas of clinical investigations. A key distinction between the mAb and TKIs are their differences in their ability to inhibit the Insulin Receptor (InsR). While targeting the InsR with TKIs may have a theoretical liability of hyperglycemia, targeting only the IGF-1R may have the theoretical liability of incompletely blocking IGF signaling. As InsR isoform A expression, which can transduce IGF-II-mediated proliferation, is higher in breast cancers compared to normal breast tissue, we investigated whether IGF-1R or IGF-1R/InsR inhibition was sufficient for overcoming resistance to hormonal therapy. To determine the optimal combination strategies for clinical investigations, we tested the hypothesis that IGF signaling inhibition could overcome primary (or de novo/intrinsic) and secondary (or acquired/selected) resistance to hormonal therapy. For these studies, we used either hormone therapy-naïve or hormone therapy-resistant variants of the breast cancer model, MCF-7/AC-1, which has been engineered to stably express full-length human aromatase. We employed and compared a novel, potent dual kinase inhibitor of the IGF-1R and InsR, BMS-754807, which is currently in early clinical investigations, with the IGF-1R antibody mAb391. BMS-754807 has been shown to induce apoptosis more potently than mAb391 in Rh41 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. In vitro, BMS-754807 demonstrated profound synergy in combination with tamoxifen and letrozole (median effect combination index <0.1). In vivo, BMS-754807 enhanced the anti-tumor activity of tamoxifen and letrozole in hormone-naïve tumors and induced regression of tumors resistant to tamoxifen or letrozole when combined with letrozole. This activity was not observed with mAb therapy, which resulted in greater up-regulation of InsR-A and erbB receptor expression and activation. This suggested a greater susceptibility to resistance pathways with mAb therapy. Dual IGF-1R/InsR blockade alone or in combination was tolerated by the animals and has no significant change in glucose homeostasis. Gene expression profiling experiments to compare the difference between the effects of tamoxifen in combination with BMS-754807 and with mAb revealed alternative pathway signaling is one of the potential mechanisms of resistance.In summary, combined hormonal therapy with BMS-754807 overcomes primary and secondary resistance to tamoxifen and letrozole and was well tolerated. IGF-1R blockade with a mAb alone is insufficient to overcome resistance and induces InsR over-expression. Thus, IGF signaling through either InsR or IGF-1R may be a major mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy. These data suggest that blockade of IGF-1 and IGF-II from activation of IGF-1R and InsR, with agents such as BMS-754807 have promise in extending the benefits of hormonal therapy in breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 402.

Abstract Purpose: To optimize treatment strategies for postmenopausal breast cancer patients, we investigated the efficacy of the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane alone or in combination with the antiestrogen tamoxifen in a xenograft model of postmenopausal breast cancer. We also determined the effects of these agents in sequential second-line therapy and the effect of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole on tumors that progressed on the above treatments. Experimental: Aromatase-transfected human estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells (MCF-7Ca) were grown as tumors in ovariectomized athymic mice. Animals received subcutaneous injection with vehicle, tamoxifen, exemestane, tamoxifen plus exemestane, and letrozole. Tumor volumes were measured weekly. Results: All treatments were effective initially in suppressing tumor growth as first-line therapy compared with vehicle treatment. Exemestane suppressed tumor growth to a greater extent than tamoxifen. However, the combination of tamoxifen plus exemestane was more effective than either drug alone. After tumor volumes doubled on initial treatment, the mice were crossed over to receive exemestane or tamoxifen. Tumor growth slowed briefly in mice treated with tamoxifen and crossed over to exemestane, but tumor growth continued unabated in those changed from exemestane to tamoxifen. However, letrozole was effective in both groups as third-line therapy for a limited period. Letrozole as initial single agent was the best overall treatment in terms of the degree of tumor suppression and the length of effectiveness of treatment. Conclusion: Exemestane was more effective in controlling tumor growth than tamoxifen. In addition, the combination of exemestane plus tamoxifen was clearly more effective than sequential use of these agents in the tumor model. However, the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line therapy was overall the most effective treatment in controlling tumor growth.