Goetz, M. P.

Abstract Background: The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is clinically validated to stratify patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), early-stage BC based on the risk of overall (0-10 years [y]) and late (5-10 y) distant recurrence (DR) with N0/N1 lymph node involvement. Validation of BCI in patients with HR+ HER2+ BC has been limited, especially in patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. The HOXB13 and IL17BR genes constitute the predictive component of BCI and are known to exhibit an ER-dependent correlation pattern with HER2. We evaluated the prognostic performance of BCI in patients with HR+ HER2+ disease enrolled in the NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) trial treated with the combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Methods: All available tumor specimens from patients with HR+ HER2+ N0/N1 BC in arms B (sequential trastuzumab) and C (concurrent trastuzumab) of the trial were included. BCI testing was performed blinded to clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). BCI (N0) and BCIN+ (N1) risk groups were calculated based on prespecified cut points. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing were used to assess the prognostic significance of BCI/BCIN+ risk groups based on DR. Cox proportional hazard models with and without clinical covariates were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 454 HR+ patients (234 arm B, 220 arm C), including 69 N0 and 385 N1 patients, were analyzed (median age was 47 y, 85% N1, 55% T2, 63% G3). BCIN+ scores were available for 378 of the 385 N1 patients due to missing tumor grade for 7 patients. The median follow-up was 12.7 years. In the overall cohort, BCI/BCIN+ stratified 51 (11%), 24 (5%) and 372 (83%) patients as low-, intermediate- and high-risk with 10-y DRFI rates of 96% (95% CI: 84-99%), 100% (100-100%) and 89% (86-92%), respectively. Since the low and intermediate risk groups had few patients and a similar risk of 10-y DRFI, they are combined into a single low-risk group hereafter. Thus, for overall 10-y DR, 75 (17%) and 372 (83%) of patients were classified by BCI/BCIN+ as low and high risk with 10-y DRFI rates of 97% (95% CI: 89-99%) and 89% (95% CI: 86-92%), respectively (HR=4.50, 95% CI: 1.09-18.61; p = 0.038). BCI/BCIN+ remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis, adjusting for age, treatment, and nodal status (HR=7.54, 95% CI: 1.34-42.64; p = 0.022). For 69 N0 patients, BCI stratified 54 (78%) and 15 (22%) patients as low and high risk with 10-y DRFI rates of 100% (95% CI, 100-100%) and 77% (95% CI, 44-92%), respectively (p = 0.012). For 378 N1 patients, BCIN+ stratified 21 (6%) and 357 (94%) of patients as low and high risk with 10-y DRFI of 90% (95% CI, 66-97%) and 90% (95% CI, 86-93%), respectively (p = 0.07). Of the 21 patients classified as BCIN+ low-risk, two had BCIN+ scores of 6.75 and 6.73 in close proximity to the cut point (6.93) and experienced DR after 5 years, resulting in the same 10-y DRFI for both BCIN+ low- and high-risk patients. Conclusions: BCI is significantly prognostic for the risk of overall DR (0-10 y) in patients with HR+ HER2+ disease treated with adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Optimization of BCI cut points may further improve prognostic performance in HR+ HER2+. Additional validation in other HR+ HER2+ cohorts treated in the modern setting with anti-HER2-based therapy is warranted, given the small sample size of N0 patients and relatively low DR rate in the late recurrence cohort. In summary, these results provide further evidence of BCI’s utility to support clinical decision-making for adjuvant endocrine therapies for HR+ HER2+ BC. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, Genentech; Clinicaltrials.gov Id: NCT00005970; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Citation Format: S. Chumsri, E. Liu, K. Edwards, Y. Wen, Y. Zhang, A. K. Anderson, A. H. Partridge, L. Carey, K. Ballman, E. Perez, K. Treuner, M. Goetz, E. Thompson. Prognostic performance of Breast Cancer Index in patients with early-stage HR+ HER2+ breast cancer (BC) treated with adjuvant trastuzumab: NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-08-08.

Abstract Purpose Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), the contrast enhancement of normal fibroglandular tissue on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI, is hormonally dependent and fluctuates with the menstrual cycle, lactation, and pregnancy. In patients with breast cancer, both endocrine therapy and chemotherapy can decrease BPE levels during treatment. Notably, a lack of BPE suppression was associated with inferior response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) cancer. In HR+ breast cancer, BPE may be particularly relevant as estrogen fuels the tumor’s growth. However, there is limited clinical research directly comparing BPE and serum estradiol levels. This study aimed to investigate 1) the correlation between BPE and serum estradiol levels in treatment-naïve premenopausal patients with HR+ breast cancer and 2) the association between BPE suppression and serum estradiol suppression during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). Methods We retrospectively reviewed data from premenopausal patients enrolled in the Endocrine Optimization Pilot (EOP), a sub-study of the I-SPY 2 TRIAL, which tests new endocrine strategies in patients with stage 2/3, MammaPrint (MP) low-risk (index 0 to 1), HR+/HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Patients with MP High1 (index -0.57 to 0) tumors were eligible if clinically node negative. This study included 58 EOP patients who had both serial serum estradiol levels (drawn monthly) and BPE data available. These patients started ovarian function suppression (OFS) at various times based on their assigned treatment regimen: before NET start, n=28; at cycle 1, n=16; at cycle 2, n=14. The average estradiol levels over six months on NET were categorized into two groups: suppressed to the postmenopausal range (<10 pg/mL) or non-suppressed (≥10 pg/mL). MRI scans at baseline (before NET) and pre-surgery (after six months of NET) were analyzed. BPE was calculated on the contralateral breast as the mean early (∼150s post-contrast injection) percent enhancement of the central 50% of the axial slices. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to examine the relationship between BPE and estradiol. Results Treatment-naïve estradiol levels were available for 25 of the 58 patients, with the median [1st, 3rd quartile] of 82.7 [32.4, 250] pg/mL. A positive correlation was observed between treatment-naïve estradiol and baseline BPE, with a correlation coefficient of ρ = 0.74 (p < 10-5). There was no significant difference in the treatment-naïve estradiol levels between patients who later showed estradiol suppression to the menopausal range during NET (n=14 [56 %]) and those who did not (n=11 [44 %]) (81.3 pg/mL versus 86.5 pg/mL, respectively (p=0.39)). During NET, estradiol levels were suppressed to the postmenopausal range in 26 of the 58 patients (45%). Estradiol suppression was significantly associated with greater reduction in post-treatment BPE: -42.7% [-54.3, -21.8] BPE reduction for the suppressed estradiol group versus -15.0% [-40.6, 6.85] for the non-suppressed estradiol group (p=0.002). Conclusion This study demonstrates the estrogen dependency of BPE in premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Baseline estradiol levels positively correlated with baseline BPE, and the suppression of on-treatment estradiol was associated with greater BPE suppression following NET. Our findings further support exploration of the use of BPE as a reflection of estradiol level under NET and OFS in addition to other MRI biomarkers such as functional tumor volume. These complementary imaging biomarkers could independently reflect both non-malignant and tumor-specific biological processes to improve predicted performance. Citation Format: S. Choi, N. Onishi, P. Metanat, R. Mukhtar, K. Giridhar, M. P. Goetz, L. Huppert, A. Elias, O. Olopade, I-SPY2 Imaging Working Group, I-SPY2 Investigator Network, L. Esserman, J. Chien, N. Hylton. Correlation between MRI background parenchymal enhancement and serum estradiol in premenopausal patients on neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-07-22.

Abstract Background: (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is an oral SERM that dually targets ERα (> 5 ng/ml) and PKCβ1 (>500 ng/ml). It has been tested in the endocrine resistant setting at doses of 20-360 mg/day; however, the optimal dose in an endocrine naïve population is not defined. We explored 10 mg/day dose of neoadjuvant ENDX in the Endocrine Optimization Pilot (EOP) of I-SPY2. Methods: EOP eligibility included pts with Stage II/III HR+ HER2- breast cancer, MammaPrint (MP) low. Pts with MP High1 scores were eligible if clinically node-negative. Pts received ENDX 10 mg orally once daily for 6 cycles (each cycle = 28 days). Premenopausal pts started ovarian function suppression on cycle 2, day 1. ENDX was continued until the day prior to surgery. The primary study endpoint was feasibility, defined as >75% of pts completing >75% of ENDX. Baseline (T0), 3-wk (T1) biopsies, and the surgical specimen (T3) were assessed centrally for Ki-67. Rates of modified preoperative endocrine prognostic index (mPEPI) 0 were reported, defined as pT1-2 pN0, Ki67< 2.7%, or pathologic complete response. A genomic index for sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET) index was done at T0. Breast MRI measurement of functional tumor volume (FTV) was performed at T0, T1, 12 weeks (T2), and pre-operatively (T3). Blood was collected for tumor informed ctDNA at T0, T1, T2, T3 and for pharmacokinetic (PK) steady state concentrations (Css) at T1. Safety data using CTCAE V5 is reported. Results: Between March 2023 and May 2024, 20 pts were enrolled in this arm. The median age was 52.5 years (range 32 -73), 13 (65%) were premenopausal, and 55% had clinically positive lymph nodes. Tumors were MPHigh1 in 3 pts (15%) and SET2,3 index high in 16 pts (80%). The primary endpoint was met with 95% of study participants completing ≥75% of therapy. The T0 median Ki-67 was 10.5% (range 2-60%). At T1 (n=19) and T3 (n=18), median Ki-67 was 5% (range 0-35%) and 5% (range 0-45%), respectively. The 3-week rate of Ki-67 ≤10% at T1 was 61.5% in premenopausal and 71.4% in postmenopausal women. The rate of Ki-67 ≤10% at surgery was 81.8% in premenopausal and 57.1% in postmenopausal women. An mPEPI score of 0 was observed in 1 (5%) of participants. The median T0 FTV was 8.9 ccs (range 0.9 to 251.1). The median T3 FTV was 1.3 ccs (range 0 to 11.2) and the median change in FTV from T0 to T3 was -72.0% (range -88.5% to -61.6%). ctDNA analysis was performed in 17 pts longitudinally across 64 blood samples.10 pts had positive ctDNA at T0, with 7 converting to ctDNA undetectable during treatment with ENDX. 1/7 pts who was ctDNA negative at T0 became positive at T1 and then reverted to undetectable ctDNA. The other 6 pts remained ctDNA negative at all timepoints. The median ENDX T1 Css was 79.3 ng/mL (range 73.6 - 906.4 ng /mL). The most common side effects reported were Grade 1 hot flush (70%), nausea (40%), fatigue (40%), and insomnia (35%). Grade 2 side effects included fatigue (15%) and night sweats (5%). No dose reductions or discontinuations due to toxicity occurred. Conclusions: ENDX at 10 mg was well tolerated and demonstrated reductions in Ki-67, MRI FTV, and ctDNA. The ISPY2 EOP is currently enrolling patients to ENDX 40 mg/day (intended to dually target ERα and PKCβ1) in combination with abemaciclib (with and without OFS). Citation Format: K. V. Giridhar, M. P. Goetz, C. Yau, A. M. Wallace, C. Falkson, J. Boughey, M. Arora, E. Stringer-Reasor, C. Nangia, C. Gallagher, A. Elias, A. Zimmer, M. S. Trivedi, C. Omene, L. van 't Veer, L. Brown Swigart, G. L. Hirst, W. Symmans, A. D. Borowsky, N. Onishi, N. Hylton, C. Vakalvas, M. Wei, J. M. Reid, S. Alhafaji, N. Chen, R. M. Mukhtar, L. Huppert, O. Opopade, L. J. Esserman, A. Chein. Low dose (Z)-endoxifen in the I-SPY2 Endocrine Optimization Pilot [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-07-10.

Abstract Introduction: Patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer associated with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 exhibit distinct clinicopathological features compared to sporadic cases. However, the optimal endocrine therapy strategies for these patients remain undefined. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a validated gene expression-based signature that stratifies patients based on the risk of overall (0-10 years) and late (post-5 years) distant recurrence and predicts the likelihood of benefit from extended endocrine therapy (EET) in early-stage, HR+ breast cancer. Here we utilize BCI to investigate endocrine sensitivity and the predicted EET benefit in a cohort of ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients with BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 PVs. Methods: BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 PV carriers with ER+/HER2- breast cancer diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 1996 and 2024 at Mayo Clinic were identified from a registry tracking germline test result. For comparison, we utilized the BCI Registry, a prospective, multi-institutional tumor registry of patients with early-stage ER+/HER2- breast cancer undergoing BCI testing, regardless of germline PV status. The analysis was restricted to women with invasive, early-stage locoregional breast cancer and available pre-treatment tumor specimens. BCI testing was performed by RT-PCR blinded to clinical outcome. BCI prognostic and BCI predictive categories were compared between the Mayo Clinic germline PV cohort and the BCI Registry using descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test. Results: The final analysis included 123 PVcarriers (BRCA1: 36; BRCA2: 40; CHEK2: 47) from the MayoClinic cohort and 2,563 women from the BCI Registry. The proportion of patientsdiagnosed before age 50 was higher among PV carriers—52.8% in BRCA1,50.0% in BRCA2, and 21.3% in CHEK2—compared to 7.0% in the BCIRegistry. PV carriers were also more likely to be premenopausal andnode-positive at diagnosis. Based on BCI score, a significant higher proportionof BRCA1 (75.0%, p=0.002) andBRCA2 (70.0%, p=0.01) PV carriers wereclassified as high risk, compared to 48.5% of patients in the BCI Registry, butno significant difference was seen for CHEK2 PV carriers (46.8%,p=0.88). A significantly higher proportion of BRCA1 PV carriers werepredicted to benefit from EET compared to the BCI Registry cohort (77.8% vs.33.9%, p<0.001), whereas no significant differences in BCI Predictivecategories were observed for BRCA2 or CHEK2 PV carriers. Overall,compared to breast cancer cases in the BCI registry, a significant differencein the distribution of the combined BCI prognostic and predictive categorieswas noted for BRCA1 (p<0.001)and BRCA2 (p=0.02) PV carriers,but not for CHEK2 PV carriers (p=0.66). In particular, BRCA1 andBRCA2 PV carriers were enriched for high-risk tumors with a high likelihoodof EET benefit (66.7% and 37.5%, respectively vs 25.1%, p<0.001 and p=0.02),whereas only a small non-significant increase was observed for CHEK2 PVcarriers (29.8% vs 25.1%, p=0.66) compared to breast cancer cases in the BCIRegistry. Conclusions: Genomicclassification by BCI reveals distinct patterns of endocrine sensitivity andpredicted EET benefit among germline PV carriers, particularly in BRCA1and BRCA2 PV carriers. These findings warrant further investigation andmay inform personalized endocrine therapy strategies for women with germlinePV-associated ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Citation Format: S. Yadav, B. O'Neal, S. Yasir, N. Siuliukina, A. Karki, Y. Zhang, A. K. Anderson, K. Treuner, M. P. Goetz, F. J. Couch. Endocrine Sensitivity and Predicted Benefit of Extended Endocrine Therapy based on Breast Cancer Index (BCI) in BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers with ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-08-25.

Abstract Background: Most patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) will ultimately develop resistance. A large unmet need exists especially when resistance occurs following treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i), which is potentially driven by a mutation in the ERα-coding gene, ESR1. Lasofoxifene (LAS), an oral, next-generation ET and ER breast antagonist, was evaluated in two phase 2 studies of women with ER+/HER2- mBC and an ESR1 mutation who had disease progression on previous ET and CDK4/6i. In the ELAINE 1 trial, LAS monotherapy provided numerically greater progression-free survival (PFS, median 5.6 mos vs 3.7 mos; HR: 0.669 [95% CI, 0.445‒1.125], P=0.138), objective response rate (ORR, 13% vs 3%; P=0.124), and clinical benefit rate (CBR, 37% vs 22%; P=0.117) compared with the ER degrader fulvestrant (fulv), with a favorable safety profile (Goetz MP et al. Ann Oncol 2023;34:1141‒51). The single-arm, ELAINE 2 trial showed that LAS combined with abemaciclib (Abema) was well tolerated with a median PFS of ∼13 mos, ORR of 56%, and CBR of 66% (Damodaran S et al. Ann Oncol 2023;34:1131‒40). The phase 3, registrational, ELAINE 3 trial was initiated based on these promising earlier-phase data. Recent results from postMONARCH confirmed superior efficacy of fulv/Abema over fulv/placebo (mPFS 6.0 mos vs 5.3 mos, HR 0.73 [0.57‒0.95], nominal P-value 0.017) in non-biomarker‒selected, mBC patients after progression on a prior CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI), with similar HR in an ESR1-mutated cohort (Kalinsky K et al. J Clin Oncol 2025;43:1101‒12). Additionally, recent data from EMBER-3 demonstrated meaningful PFS with a novel ET combined with abemaciclib after progression on AI/CDK4/6i (Jhaveri KL et al. N Engl J Med 2025;392:1189‒202). The ELAINE 3, global trial will compare LAS/Abema with fulv/Abema in a post-CDK4/6i, ESR1-mutation‒selected, mBC population. Methods: ELAINE 3 (NCT05696626) is an open-label, phase 3, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LAS plus Abema versus fulv plus Abema. Patients are being enrolled at approximately 152 sites in 13 countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Italy, Israel, Poland, Romania, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States). Key inclusion criteria are pre- and postmenopausal women and men aged ≥18 yrs; ER+/HER2-, locally advanced and/or mBC (measurable and/or non-measurable disease); ≥1 acquired ESR1 mutation; progression on an AI plus palbociclib or ribociclib as their first hormonal treatment for advanced/mBC; and ≤1 line of chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive LAS 5 mg/day plus Abema 150 mg BID, or fulv 500 mg IM (days 1, 15, and 29, then once monthly) plus Abema 150 mg BID. Treatment will continue until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint is PFS per RESIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR); key secondary endpoints are ORR, overall survival, CBR, duration of response, and time to response. Safety, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and quality of life (including vaginal health) will also be evaluated. Blood samples for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) will be collected for genomic analyses at screening, at weeks 4 and 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter, and at the final visit. Outcomes with LAS/Abema and fulv/Abema will be compared using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model and stratified logrank test with an expected PFS hazard ratio of 0.68 at final analysis. Enrollment is currently ongoing to meet the target sample size of 500 patients. Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, S. A. Wander, T. Bachelot, G. Curigliano, A. de Nonneville, E. N. Gal-Yam, K. Jhaveri, S. L. Sammons, S. Shen, C. J. Twelves, G. Gasper, P. V. Plourde, D. J. Portman, S. Damodaran. Open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, ELAINE 3 study of the efficacy and safety of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating ER+/HER2-, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-30.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) is a standard endocrine strategy for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, poor tolerability to AI+OFS limits its use, leaving tamoxifen as the only alternative. Prospective studies demonstrated that premenopausal women treated with neoadjuvant ET whose tumors exhibit Ki-67 ≤ 10% following 4 weeks of therapy achieve 5-year distant disease-free survival > 96%. Problematically, only 41% of patients reach this threshold with tamoxifen compared to 78% with AI+OFS (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent selective estrogen receptor modulator that dually targets ERα and PKCβ1. At plasma concentrations of 3-5 ng/mL, it inhibits ERα; at ≥ 500 ng/mL, it targets PKCβ1, leading to AKT suppression. The EVANGELINE trial aims to examine endocrine sensitivity in terms of Week 4 Ki-67 in premenopausal women whose baseline Ki-67 > 10%, and objective response rate after 24 weeks of ENDX + goserelin in premenopausal women with baseline Ki-67≤ 10%. Methods: EVANGELINE (NCT05607004) is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2 study comprised of three parts. Eligible patients are premenopausal women with Stage IIA/IIB ER+/HER2- breast cancer. • Part 1 (PK Run-in): assessed 40mg vs 80mg ENDX (+/- OFS) in 22 patients. • Part 2: patients with baseline Ki-67 >10% were randomized to 40 mg ENDX + goserelin or exemestane + goserelin for 6 months with the primary objective being 4-week ESD rate. Patients with a baseline Ki-67 ≤10% were assigned to a single-arm cohort of 40 mg ENDX monotherapy (no OFS) to evaluate the 24-week endocrine sensitivity disease rate. • Part 3 (replaces Part 2): all patients are treated with ENDX 40mg daily + goserelin every 28 days. A two stage Phase II design was chosen to assess outcomes as follows: Part 3a: Up to 45 patients with baseline Ki-67> 10% to assess Week 4 Ki-67≤ 10% rate is at least 65%. If 9 or more of these patients have a Week 4 Ki-67>10%, enrollment will be stopped due to futility. Otherwise, enrollment will continue. Part 3b: Up to 20 patients enrolled with baseline Ki-67≤ 10% to assess Week 24 objective response rate. Ki-67 levels are determined by central laboratory and images are centrally reviewed. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, surgical outcomes, and biomarker analysis using paired biopsies (baseline, week 4) and surgical specimens. Results: The PK run-in (completed Fall 2024) enrolled 22 patients and assessed ENDX doses (40 mg daily vs 80 mg daily (+/-OFS)). The Week 4 Ki-67 ≤ 10% rate with ENDX was 86% and did not differ according to dose. Early safety, PK, efficacy and compliance data supported the selection of 40 mg ENDX daily as the optimal dose. Enrollment in Part 2 began in May 2025. Part 3 will replace Part 2 with simplification of the trial design. Conclusions: EVANGELINE is the first trial to evaluate (Z)-endoxifen + OFS as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer. By targeting both ER and PKC pathways, ENDX may offer a well-tolerated alternative to AI-based regimens and expand endocrine therapy options for this population. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05607004 Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. J. Suman, C. Lopez, H. Erickson, L. Beaulieu, S. S. Hammer, L. Mina, R. Leon-Ferre, K. N. Hunt, M. Piltin, A. Degnim, J. N. Ingle, J. C. Boughey, B. A. Sarah, J. M. Reid, M. Schellenberg, J. R. Hawse, P. Advani, K. Giridhar, F. Batalini, D. Flora, J. M. Jones, N. A. Bagegni, J. Jakub, V. Abramson, V. Dabak, W. J. Irvin, E. Sima, K. Seema, S. C. Quay. A Phase 2 Trial of (Z)-endoxifen + Goserelin as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Premenopausal Women with ER+, HER2-, Breast Cancer (EVANGELINE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-12-16.

Abstract Introduction: An Our Practice Advisory (OPA), formerly known as Best Practice Advisory (BPA), is an electronic health record (EHR) tool. OPAs identify key parameters to alert providers of potential interventions that could enhance quality of care. Such functionality is increasingly relevant given the rapid pace of new drug approvals. Within the Mayo Clinic system, we previously identified that amongst Mayo Clinic patients (pts) meeting the MonarchE criteria, 28% of pts did not undergo a documented discussion with their provider regarding the role of adjuvant abemaciclib (Premji, SABCS 2024). Further, a Flatiron study identified that only 40% of eligible pts received abemaciclib (Sandoval, Miami Breast 2025). To address this practice gap, in 2024 we began to implement EHR clinical decision support by creating an OPA trigger for pts eligible for an adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Here we report on ‘action taken’ versus not for the OPA and the most common reasons for re-prompts. Methods: The Mayo Breast Disease Group designed an OPA including pts who are within 14 months of a clinical or pathologic diagnosis of high-risk early-stage breast cancer. We leveraged structured data captured in the Epic staging forms (Epic Systems) to identify pts with clinical or pathologic T-stage, N-stage, grade, ± Ki-67/ multigene signature to identify ER+/HER2- pts eligible for adjuvant ribociclib or abemaciclib based on FDA approvals. The OPA was triggered by a patient encounter in oncology when endocrine therapy (but not CDK4/6i) was on the active medication list resulting in a hard stop. The OPA gathered limited details about whether adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors were discussed and whether the provider followed a link that resulted in prescribing one—considered an indicator of action taken. In this IRB-exempt quality improvement project, we describe the responses captured in the OPA trigger utilizing Epic tools. Results: The OPA went live on 1/10/2025. Over a 5-month period post OPA initiation, we identified 517 OPA alerts among 332 unique pts. Their median age was 62.5 years, and the majority were female (97%). The median time to resolve the OPA was 17.5 seconds (range 2-567 seconds). 12.6% (65/517) of the time there was ‘action taken’ by selecting the hyperlink to potentially start a treatment plan. Providers selected the following OPA pre-set responses: ‘re-prompt in one month’ 248 (48%), ‘patient not a candidate for therapy’ 48 (9%), ‘patient declines’ 69 (13%), ‘outside oncologist will prescribe’ 36 (7%), ‘not discussed’ 44 (9%), and unknown 72 (14%). The most common free text comments among the 517 OPA alerts (summarized) included: ‘revisit in future’ 108 (21%), ‘too early’ 65 (13%), ‘patient declines’ 66 (13%), ‘outside oncologist will start’ 31 (6%), ‘not a candidate’ 26 (5%), and ‘co-morbidities’ 18 (3%). Erroneous OPA prompting occurred in 14 (3%) who previously failed a CDK4/6i due to toxicity and in 18 (3%) for pts currently on a CDK4/6i. 30 (6%) OPA comments noted that they discussed or started therapy that day. Conclusion: The OPA offered clinical decision support and ensured that clinicians considered prescribing CDK 4/6i in all pts identified as eligible, and captured deferrals. Refinements are needed to ensure appropriate timing of OPA and minimize erroneous firing. The OPA remains active and captures the reason for deferral of adjuvant CDK 4/6i prescription. This data pairs real world decision making to better understand clinically meaningful application of improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Citation Format: S. Premji, P. Advani, S. Chumsri, L. Mina, J. Taraba, J. Carroll, J. Hoppenworth, E. Cathcart-Rake, T. Haddad, B. Rudder, G. Choong, D. Idossa, C. O’Sullivan, S. Yadav, K. Ruddy, P. Peethambaram, T. Hobday, M. Goetz, R. Rao, B. Ernst, F. Batalini, R. Leon-Ferre, A. Tevaarwerk, K. Giridhar. Implementing an Our Practice Advisory (OPA) to provide clinical decision support for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in early-stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-11-10.

Abstract Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for up to 15% of breast cancer (BC) cases and has distinct clinical and biological features compared to invasive carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST). Prior studies, including PENELOPE-B, suggested greater benefit from adjuvant palbociclib (palbo) in ILC. We assessed the prognostic and predictive value of histology in patients (pts) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± palbo. Methods: PALLAS is a global, phase III trial in which pts with stage II-III, HR+/HER2− BC were randomized to 2 years (y) of adjuvant palbo + ET or ET alone. Pts with IBC-NST or pure ILC per local pathology assessment were included. Endpoints included invasive disease-free (IDFS; primary), distant recurrence-free (DRFS), locoregional recurrence-free (LRRFS), and overall survival (OS). Prognostic value was assessed using univariable and multivariate Cox models adjusted for age, T and N stage, grade, and progesterone receptor. Predictive value was assessed using histology-by-treatment interactions. Results: Among 5,748 pts in the ITT population, 4,982 (87%) were included (3,838 IBC-NST [67%], 1,144 ILC [20%]); median follow-up 6.9y. Compared with IBC-NST, ILC was associated with older age (median 54 vs 51 y), higher T stage (T3/T4: 41.7% vs 20.4%), fewer grade 3 tumors (12.7% vs 33.5%), higher mastectomy rates (74.5% vs 58.4%), less (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (72.2% vs 86.2%), and less tamoxifen as initial ET (28.8% vs 34.5%) (all p<0.001). ILC prevalence varied by country: lower in Asia (Japan 10.5%, Korea 0%, Taiwan 2.8%) and higher in Europe (23.1%) and North America (24.0%). When evaluating the predictive value, palbo appeared to confer greater benefit in ILC for all endpoints (HRs ranging from 0.41 to 0.86) and not in IBC-NST (HRs ranging from 0.97 to 1.01), although the histology-by-treatment interaction was significant only for LRRFS (Table). In the overall population, 7-year IDFS was 79.3% for IBC-NST and 75.8% for ILC. While the difference was significant in univariable analysis (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.35), it was not in multivariable analysis (HR 1.06, 0.91-1.24). Notably, the proportional hazards assumption was violated, and time-dependent modeling demonstrated that worse outcomes for ILC on IDFS, DRFS, and other endpoints emerged predominantly beyond 3 years. Conclusions: In this large, randomized dataset of pts with early HR+/HER2− breast cancer with long-term follow-up, ILC demonstrated distinct clinicopathologic features and geographic distribution. While ILC was not an independent prognostic factor over the entire follow-up, time-dependent modeling revealed worse long-term outcomes which only emerged after 3 years. Palbo appeared to be associated with more favorable outcomes in ILC than in IBC-NST across endpoints. These findings suggest a potential benefit of palbo in ILC that warrants further investigation in other adjuvant trials evaluating CDK4/6 inhibitors. Citation Format: G. Nader-Marta, C. Desmedt, D. Hlauschek, A. DeMichele, G. Zoppoli, E. Blondeaux, E. de Azambuja, M. Bellet-Ezquerra, O. Metzger-Filho, J. M. Suga, G. Pfeiler, M. P. Goetz, M. Ruiz-Borrego, S. Loibl, J. Meisel, A. Ring, K. Van Baelen, E. P. Mamounas, N. Zdenkowski, E. Agostinetto, M. Lambertini, E. Gauthier, L. Soelkner, A. C. Dueck, M. Gnant, E. L. Mayer. Long-term prognostic and predictive value of lobular histology in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-11-06.

Abstract Background: In the treatment of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC), randomized phase II/III trials testing selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs) and selective ER modulators (SERMs) (mostly compared to fulvestrant) have demonstrated modest (1-2 months) improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), mainly limited to patients with ESR1-mutated MBC. In these studies, the median PFS (mPFS) ranges from 3 to 6 months, with shorter mPFS in patients with prior progression on CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Here we report the final results of a randomized phase II study that compared Z-endoxifen (Endx) 80 mg/day with tamoxifen (Tam) 20 mg/day in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)- positive/ HER2-negative MBC, and report outcomes according to ESR1, PIK3CA, PTEN and AKT alterations (Alliance A011203; NCT02311933). Methods: Postmenopausal women with unlimited prior endocrine regimens (including CDK 4/6i) and up to two chemotherapy regimens for MBC, with tumor biopsy confirmation of ER+ (>10% nuclear staining) and negative for HER2 amplification/overexpression were eligible. Prior adjuvant Tam was allowed if relapse was > 1 year following Tam completion. Patients randomized to Tam could cross over to Endx at progression. The primary end point was PFS analyzed by the interval censored data analytic approach. ctDNA was analyzed for ESR1 and PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT alterations using Guardant360 CDx 74-gene next-generation sequencing-based assay (Guardant Health). Results: Among 108 women who preregistered, 76 (Endx: 40; Tam: 36) were randomized and eligible. Patients were heavily pretreated; all patients had prior exposure to an aromatase inhibitor (AI), 50% had ≥ 2 AI based regimens in the metastatic setting and 50% in each arm had received fulvestrant. Approximately half on each arm received at least one chemotherapy regimen in the metastatic setting. Prior CDK 4/6i therapy was imbalanced (48% on Endx and 28% on Tam). Endx did not significantly prolong PFS compared to Tam (median PFS [mPFS] 4.3 vs 1.7 months; HR 0.72, p=0.168). Because arms were imbalanced according to prior CDK 4/6i exposure, we performed an unplanned analysis demonstrating that Endx improved PFS relative to Tam in CDK 4/6i-naïve patients (mPFS 8.3 vs 2.1 months; HR 0.39, p=0.0097) but not in patients treated with prior CDK 4/6i (mPFS 3.0 vs 1.5 months). In the subset of patients who consented for ctDNA testing (n=28), the mPFS for those with either an activating alteration in the PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT pathway or with an ESR1 mutation was similar as the overall trial. For the 24 patients who progressed on Tam and crossed-over to Endx, the median PFS was 3.5 months (range 1.5-15.0 months) with a 6-month clinical benefit rate of 33.3% (8/24; 90% CI: 17.8-52.1%). Conclusions: Endx did not meet the prespecified threshold for concluding that it significantly improved PFS relative to Tam in a cohort of heavily pretreated MBC. However, the observations of a > 6-month improvement in mPFS in CDK 4/6i-naïve patients, anti-tumor activity following crossover to Tam, and mPFS estimates similar to other novel endocrine agents in development all support the ongoing development of Endx. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN) and 5P50CA116201. Clinicaltrials.gov Id: NCT02311933. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. Suman, J. Reid, T. Dockter, C. Strand, W. F. Symmans, J. Hawse, A. Storniolo, J. Doroshow, J. M. Collins, H. Streicher, M. M. Ames, A. Tarnower, O. M. Hahn, J. N. Ingle, L. Carey, A. Partridge. Final results from the Randomized Phase II study of Z-Endoxifen and Tamoxifen in Endocrine Refractory, Estrogen Receptor Positive, HER2 negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (Alliance A011203) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-08-07.

Abstract The addition of two years (yrs) of adjuvant abemaciclib to ET resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) over ET in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC. At 7 yrs, abemaciclib+ET demonstrated sustained IDFS and DRFS benefits ([HR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.82), and (HR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.84)]). Higher nodal involvement (N2 or N3) is an independent prognostic factor for worse outcomes in EBC. However, previous monarchE data highlight that pts with limited nodal disease (1-3 axillary lymph nodes (ALN)) are at high recurrence risk when additional clinical risk factors are present, such as high-grade (G) tumor and/or large tumor size. Here, we show subgroup analyses by ALN.monarchE is a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial in pts with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC. Pts were randomized (1:1) to receive ET for at least 5 yrs +/- abemaciclib for 2 yrs (treatment (tx) period). High-risk EBC was defined as either 1-3 ALN (N1) with G3 disease and/or tumor ≥5 cm or, ≥4 ALN (N2: 4-9, N3: ≥10) (Cohort 1 (C1)). A smaller group of pts were enrolled with N1, G≤2, tumor size <5 cm, and central Ki-67 ≥20% (C2). IDFS, DRFS and OS were assessed in C1 by ALN (N1, N2, N3) using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, and unstratified Cox proportional hazard model including interaction effect between tx arm and ALN. Of 5120 randomized pts in C1, 1761 (34.4%) had N1, 2223 (43.4%) had N2, and 1123 (21.9%) had N3 disease. At this analysis (data cut off:15Jul2025), in the ET arm, a comparable number of patients with N1 and N2 disease had IDFS events at 6 yrs (21.6% and 25.4%), while event no. in the N3 subgroup was notably higher (38.1%). A similar trend was observed in DRFS and OS (Table). With a median follow-up time of 76.8 months in C1, the addition of abemaciclib to ET reduced the risk of developing an IDFS event by 24.8% (N1), 31.5% (N2) and 27.4% (N3) compared to ET. The absolute improvements in IDFS rates at 6 yrs were 4.6% (N1), 6.9% (N2), and 8.1% (N3). Reductions in the risk of developing DRFS events were 25.2% (N1), 31.2% (N2), and 25.7% (N3), with corresponding 6yr absolute benefit of 3.8% (N1), 6.4% (N2), and 6.8% (N3). Abemaciclib+ET consistently reduced the risk of death compared to ET across ALN subgroups by 12.3% (N1), 15.5% (N2), and 26.8% (N3), which resulted in absolute improvements in OS of 1.4% (N1), 1.6% (N2), and 2.7% (N3). Baseline disease characteristics, IDFS and DRFS KM curves by ALN will be presented. In the ET arm, pts with N1 + ≥1 additional risk factor had recurrence and death risks comparable to pts with N2, while pts with N3 had poorer prognosis. The addition of adjuvant abemaciclib to ET led to a clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of recurrence and death regardless of nodal burden, confirming the consistent and sustained benefit of 2 yrs of tx with abemaciclib and supporting its use in eligible pts with node-positive high-risk EBC. Citation Format: J. Cortes, S. R. D. Johnston, M. Martín, S. M. Tolaney, M. Goetz, H. Rugo, J. Sohn, O. Ozyilkan, M. Henriques Abreu, M. Zaiss, K. Maia Vianna, H. Melgaard Nielsen, A. Chan, H. Kalofonos, S. Morales, B. San Antonio, M. Munoz, B. R Grimes, S. Amdur, P. Neven. monarchE: subgroup analysis of adjuvant abemaciclib + endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2-, high-risk early breast cancer by nodal status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-08-08.