Özyılkan, Özgür

Abstract The addition of two years (yrs) of adjuvant abemaciclib to ET resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) over ET in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC. At 7 yrs, abemaciclib+ET demonstrated sustained IDFS and DRFS benefits ([HR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.82), and (HR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.84)]). Higher nodal involvement (N2 or N3) is an independent prognostic factor for worse outcomes in EBC. However, previous monarchE data highlight that pts with limited nodal disease (1-3 axillary lymph nodes (ALN)) are at high recurrence risk when additional clinical risk factors are present, such as high-grade (G) tumor and/or large tumor size. Here, we show subgroup analyses by ALN.monarchE is a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial in pts with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC. Pts were randomized (1:1) to receive ET for at least 5 yrs +/- abemaciclib for 2 yrs (treatment (tx) period). High-risk EBC was defined as either 1-3 ALN (N1) with G3 disease and/or tumor ≥5 cm or, ≥4 ALN (N2: 4-9, N3: ≥10) (Cohort 1 (C1)). A smaller group of pts were enrolled with N1, G≤2, tumor size <5 cm, and central Ki-67 ≥20% (C2). IDFS, DRFS and OS were assessed in C1 by ALN (N1, N2, N3) using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, and unstratified Cox proportional hazard model including interaction effect between tx arm and ALN. Of 5120 randomized pts in C1, 1761 (34.4%) had N1, 2223 (43.4%) had N2, and 1123 (21.9%) had N3 disease. At this analysis (data cut off:15Jul2025), in the ET arm, a comparable number of patients with N1 and N2 disease had IDFS events at 6 yrs (21.6% and 25.4%), while event no. in the N3 subgroup was notably higher (38.1%). A similar trend was observed in DRFS and OS (Table). With a median follow-up time of 76.8 months in C1, the addition of abemaciclib to ET reduced the risk of developing an IDFS event by 24.8% (N1), 31.5% (N2) and 27.4% (N3) compared to ET. The absolute improvements in IDFS rates at 6 yrs were 4.6% (N1), 6.9% (N2), and 8.1% (N3). Reductions in the risk of developing DRFS events were 25.2% (N1), 31.2% (N2), and 25.7% (N3), with corresponding 6yr absolute benefit of 3.8% (N1), 6.4% (N2), and 6.8% (N3). Abemaciclib+ET consistently reduced the risk of death compared to ET across ALN subgroups by 12.3% (N1), 15.5% (N2), and 26.8% (N3), which resulted in absolute improvements in OS of 1.4% (N1), 1.6% (N2), and 2.7% (N3). Baseline disease characteristics, IDFS and DRFS KM curves by ALN will be presented. In the ET arm, pts with N1 + ≥1 additional risk factor had recurrence and death risks comparable to pts with N2, while pts with N3 had poorer prognosis. The addition of adjuvant abemaciclib to ET led to a clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of recurrence and death regardless of nodal burden, confirming the consistent and sustained benefit of 2 yrs of tx with abemaciclib and supporting its use in eligible pts with node-positive high-risk EBC. Citation Format: J. Cortes, S. R. D. Johnston, M. Martín, S. M. Tolaney, M. Goetz, H. Rugo, J. Sohn, O. Ozyilkan, M. Henriques Abreu, M. Zaiss, K. Maia Vianna, H. Melgaard Nielsen, A. Chan, H. Kalofonos, S. Morales, B. San Antonio, M. Munoz, B. R Grimes, S. Amdur, P. Neven. monarchE: subgroup analysis of adjuvant abemaciclib + endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2-, high-risk early breast cancer by nodal status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-08-08.

Abstract: Worldwide, ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death among women. Despite the recent progress in the treatment of advanced OC, oncologists in many parts of the world still face several difficulties and constraints in their daily management of their patients. In addition to the shortage of resources and expertise, non-adherence to the up to date international guidelines has been identified as a major obstacle towards the improvement of treatment outcomes in the majority of developing countries, including the Middle East and North African (MENA) countries. A multidisciplinary gynecological oncology panel from the MENA region met virtually in December 2020 to discuss the challenges and hurdles faced by the community oncologists in the management of advanced OC. This manuscript reviews the key molecular and clinical studies that shaped the current international guidelines and suggests several modifications to make them more adaptable to the health status of developing countries of this region