Quay, Steven C.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapies remain central to estrogen receptor alpha-positive (ERα+) breast cancer treatment, yet their predominantly cytostatic effects highlight the need for combinatorial approaches that promote tumor cell death. We therefore tested BH3 mimetics as single agents and in combination with (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) across endocrine sensitive and endocrine resistant ERα+ breast cancer models. Methods: Six BH3 mimetics were tested in MCF7 and T47D cells and matched ENDX-resistant and fulvestrant-resistant derivatives. ENDX combinations were assessed using 2D proliferation and synergy assays, 3D RASTRUM® bioprinted cultures, migration assays, and in vivo MCF7 xenograft studies. Results: BH3 mimetics showed broad anti-proliferative activity as single agents in endocrine sensitive and resistant models. ENDX combinations were predominantly additive in 2D assays, with limited synergy confined to specific dose windows. In 3D culture, selected combinations of an MCL1 inhibitor (MCL1i) or navitoclax with ENDX produced greater suppression than single agents and, in several conditions, reduced growth below baseline, consistent with loss of viability. Combination treatment also enhanced suppression of migration under select concentrations. In MCF7 xenograft studies, ENDX robustly suppressed tumor growth; however, adding MCL1i or navitoclax did not provide additional antitumor benefit at the doses, schedules, and timeframes tested. Conclusion: BH3 mimetics show activity in ERα+ breast cancer models in vitro , including endocrine resistant models. Although ENDX combination benefit did not translate in vivo under the conditions tested, these data support further study of optimized BH3 mimetic combinations, including evaluation of dose, ratio, schedule, tumor target engagement, and other clinically advanced agents.

TPS655 Background: Early (14-28 day) on-treatment suppression of tumor proliferation during neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is strongly associated with favorable long-term outcomes in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) HER2– breast cancer. In premenopausal women, tamoxifen with or without ovarian function suppression (OFS) results in suboptimal Ki-67 suppression compared with aromatase inhibitor + OFS. (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX), the active metabolite of tamoxifen, dually inhibits ER signaling and PKCβ1-mediated AKT activation, supporting its evaluation as an alternative NET strategy in this population. Methods: EVANGELINE (NCT05607004) is an ongoing, multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study evaluating daily 40 mg ENDX plus goserelin administered every 28 days as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with ER+/HER2–, cT2–3, cN0–1 breast cancer. The primary objective is to determine the proportion of patients with baseline Ki-67 >10% who achieve Ki-67 ≤10% after 4 weeks of therapy. A Simon two-stage design is used to test whether the Week 4 Ki-67 ≤10% rate is at least 65%, with 20 patients enrolled into the first stage and, if promising, another 25 patients enrolled into the second stage (cohort A). A parallel cohort of 20 patients with baseline Ki-67 ≤10% (cohort B) is enrolled to assess objective response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Secondary objectives include examining safety and tolerability, residual cancer burden, and PEPI score. Correlative analyses include examining effect of treatment on select tumor and plasma biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT05607004 .

Abstract Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) remains a major gynecologic malignancy driven in part by aberrant estrogen receptor (ER) signaling. The active tamoxifen metabolite (Z)-endoxifen exhibits dual SERM/SERD-like activity, modulating ER function while exerting additional noncanonical antiproliferative effects. Understanding (Z)-endoxifen’s mechanisms of action and its interaction with cell-cycle regulators is critical to optimizing targeted therapy in EC. This study investigated the molecular and functional effects of (Z)-endoxifen, alone and in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib, across diverse EC models to define mechanistic activity and translational potential. Methods: ER+ (Ishikawa, HCI-EC23, patient derived organoid U1561.005) and ER-variable (ARK1, ARK2) EC models were treated with estrogen (0-10 nM), (Z)-endoxifen (125 nM-10 µM) or fulvestrant (0-2.5 μM), and abemaciclib (0-10 μM), as single agents or in combination. Cell viability was assessed using luminescence-based assays. Dose-response analyses and combinatorial synergy were evaluated to determine endocrine sensitivity, ER dependency, and downstream cell-cycle effects. Results: Estrogen induced biphasic proliferative responses in ER+ models, confirming ligand-driven mitogenic signaling. (Z)-Endoxifen monotherapy suppressed viability across all cell lines, demonstrating superior potency to fulvestrant and activity independent of ER expression status. Mechanistically, (Z)-endoxifen abrogated estrogen-induced proliferative peaks, consistent with ER antagonism and potential receptor degradation, while also exerting ER-independent effects suggestive of cell-cycle modulation. Abemaciclib monotherapy inhibited viability in both ER+ and ER− models, and its combination with (Z)-endoxifen yielded strong synergistic activity (Chou-Talalay combination index < 1), including in ER-negative ARK2 and the ER+ U1561.005 organoid. This synergy likely arises from concurrent disruption of ER signaling and CDK4/6-cyclin D regulatory pathways. Conclusions: (Z)-Endoxifen demonstrates dual ER-dependent and ER-independent activity in EC preclinical models. Synergy was observed in combination a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. These findings broaden the current understanding of (Z)-endoxifen’s efficacy and support further exploration of its potential therapeutic role in ER-driven and mixed-phenotype EC, including evaluation of responses across ER expression levels. Citation Format: Grace Choong, Xiaonan Hou, Sandra Suarez Hammer, Scott M. Blackburn, John Weroha, Steven C. Quay. (Z)-endoxifen modulates estrogen receptor and cell-cycle signaling to induce synergistic antiproliferative effects with CDK4/6 inhibition in endometrial cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 405.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) is a standard endocrine strategy for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, poor tolerability to AI+OFS limits its use, leaving tamoxifen as the only alternative. Prospective studies demonstrated that premenopausal women treated with neoadjuvant ET whose tumors exhibit Ki-67 ≤ 10% following 4 weeks of therapy achieve 5-year distant disease-free survival > 96%. Problematically, only 41% of patients reach this threshold with tamoxifen compared to 78% with AI+OFS (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent selective estrogen receptor modulator that dually targets ERα and PKCβ1. At plasma concentrations of 3-5 ng/mL, it inhibits ERα; at ≥ 500 ng/mL, it targets PKCβ1, leading to AKT suppression. The EVANGELINE trial aims to examine endocrine sensitivity in terms of Week 4 Ki-67 in premenopausal women whose baseline Ki-67 > 10%, and objective response rate after 24 weeks of ENDX + goserelin in premenopausal women with baseline Ki-67≤ 10%. Methods: EVANGELINE (NCT05607004) is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2 study comprised of three parts. Eligible patients are premenopausal women with Stage IIA/IIB ER+/HER2- breast cancer. • Part 1 (PK Run-in): assessed 40mg vs 80mg ENDX (+/- OFS) in 22 patients. • Part 2: patients with baseline Ki-67 >10% were randomized to 40 mg ENDX + goserelin or exemestane + goserelin for 6 months with the primary objective being 4-week ESD rate. Patients with a baseline Ki-67 ≤10% were assigned to a single-arm cohort of 40 mg ENDX monotherapy (no OFS) to evaluate the 24-week endocrine sensitivity disease rate. • Part 3 (replaces Part 2): all patients are treated with ENDX 40mg daily + goserelin every 28 days. A two stage Phase II design was chosen to assess outcomes as follows: Part 3a: Up to 45 patients with baseline Ki-67> 10% to assess Week 4 Ki-67≤ 10% rate is at least 65%. If 9 or more of these patients have a Week 4 Ki-67>10%, enrollment will be stopped due to futility. Otherwise, enrollment will continue. Part 3b: Up to 20 patients enrolled with baseline Ki-67≤ 10% to assess Week 24 objective response rate. Ki-67 levels are determined by central laboratory and images are centrally reviewed. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, surgical outcomes, and biomarker analysis using paired biopsies (baseline, week 4) and surgical specimens. Results: The PK run-in (completed Fall 2024) enrolled 22 patients and assessed ENDX doses (40 mg daily vs 80 mg daily (+/-OFS)). The Week 4 Ki-67 ≤ 10% rate with ENDX was 86% and did not differ according to dose. Early safety, PK, efficacy and compliance data supported the selection of 40 mg ENDX daily as the optimal dose. Enrollment in Part 2 began in May 2025. Part 3 will replace Part 2 with simplification of the trial design. Conclusions: EVANGELINE is the first trial to evaluate (Z)-endoxifen + OFS as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer. By targeting both ER and PKC pathways, ENDX may offer a well-tolerated alternative to AI-based regimens and expand endocrine therapy options for this population. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05607004 Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. J. Suman, C. Lopez, H. Erickson, L. Beaulieu, S. S. Hammer, L. Mina, R. Leon-Ferre, K. N. Hunt, M. Piltin, A. Degnim, J. N. Ingle, J. C. Boughey, B. A. Sarah, J. M. Reid, M. Schellenberg, J. R. Hawse, P. Advani, K. Giridhar, F. Batalini, D. Flora, J. M. Jones, N. A. Bagegni, J. Jakub, V. Abramson, V. Dabak, W. J. Irvin, E. Sima, K. Seema, S. C. Quay. A Phase 2 Trial of (Z)-endoxifen + Goserelin as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Premenopausal Women with ER+, HER2-, Breast Cancer (EVANGELINE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-12-16.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AI) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) is standard for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, many premenopausal women are intolerant of AI + OFS, leaving tamoxifen (with or without OFS) as their only option. Extensive studies have demonstrated that premenopausal women treated with neoadjuvant ET whose tumors exhibit Ki-67 ≤ 10% following 4 weeks of therapy (defined as endocrine sensitive disease (ESD)) achieve 5-year distant disease-free survival > 96%. Problematically, only 41% of patients reach this ESD threshold with tamoxifen compared to 78% with AI+OFS (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that inhibits ERα at plasma concentrations of 3-5 ng/ml and dually targets PKCβ1, a suspected oncogene in breast tumors, at concentrations ≥ 500 ng/ml. We therefore developed the EVANGELINE study (NCT05607004) is an open label, randomized neoadjuvant phase II study that includes a pharmacokinetic (PK) Run-in, aiming to evaluate whether ENDX +/- goserelin is non-inferior to exemestane plus goserelin with respect to ESD rate. Following the completed PK run-in portion of the study, where 40mg/day or 80mg/day ENDX were assessed, the 40 mg/day dose was selected for further evaluation in the second part of the trial. The second part is comprised of a randomized treatment cohort, for patients with a Ki-67% >10% at preregistration randomized to either 40mg (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin or exemestane + goserelin neoadjuvant treatment and a Single Arm Treatment Cohort for patients who have a Ki-67 ≤ 10% at pre-registration assigned to 40mg/day (Z)-endoxifen monotherapy neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: To investigate ENDX further in premenopausal women, a multicenter study in the United States, was designed(EVANGELINE; NCT05607004). This phase 2, open-label, randomized, neoadjuvant trial includes a PK run-in phase designed to assess whether the 4-week ESD rate with (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin is non-inferior to that of exemestane + goserelin in premenopausal women with Stage IIA or IIB ER+/HER2- breast cancer with diagnostic Ki67 > 10%. Additionally, a single arm Phase 2, open-label neoadjuvant Cohort was designed to assess the 4-week ESD rate with ENDX monotherapy in premenopausal women with Stage IIA or IIB ER+/HER2- BC with diagnostic Ki67 ≤10%. Subjects will undergo neoadjuvant treatment for six months before receiving surgical treatment in the involved breast. This study will additionally assess safety, tolerability, response rates, surgical outcomes, and monitor disease progression. Comprehensive biomarker evaluations will be conducted using paired tumor biopsies and blood samples collected at baseline and week four, as well as 6 month surgical specimens. Enrollment in the PK run-in phase (n-22) was completed in Fall 2024 with the second portion of the trial slated to begin early in 2025. Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Claudia Lopez, Hayley Erickson, Lonnissa Nguyen, Sandra S. Hammer, Lida Mina, Pooja Advani, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Felipe Batalini, Daniel Flora, Jason M. Jones, Nusayba A. Bagegni, Katie N. Hunt, Mara Piltin, Amy Degnim, James N. Ingle, Judy C. Boughey, Sarah A. Buhrow, Joel M. Reid, Matthew Schellenberg, John R. Hawse, Steven C. Quay. A randomized phase 2 non-inferiority trial of (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin and exemestane + goserelin as neoadjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer (EVANGELINE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT237.

Abstract Approximately 80% of breast cancers express estrogen receptor alpha (ERα, ESR1), which drives cancer progression. Despite the array of targeted therapies, ERα+ breast cancer exhibits the highest recurrence and late distant relapse rates among subtypes. (Z)-Endoxifen (ENDX), an active metabolite of tamoxifen, is a potent, orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor modulator with a favorable safety profile now under development for breast health applications. Its synthesis yields endoxifen-related byproducts that are new chemical entities (NCEs), including AT416E, AT416Z, AT402E and AT402Z. This study compared the anti-estrogenic effects of these compounds to ENDX in ERα+ breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, T47D, UCD12), including those with ESR1 mutations (Y537S, D538G) linked to endocrine resistance. In 2D cultures with estrogen (E2), ENDX and all NCEs showed significant anti-proliferative effects across all lines, achieving 20-90% inhibition at 0.02-5 μM (p<0.0001). ENDX was the most effective in MCF7; ENDX, AT416Z, and AT402Z in T47D; and ENDX, AT416E, and AT416Z in UCD12. Under E2-deficient conditions, all NCEs had lower IC50 values than ENDX in MCF7 cells, while AT416Z and AT402Z outperformed ENDX in UCD12. In T47D D538G mutants, ENDX, AT416E, and AT402Z exhibited the highest potency, while all NCEs showed comparable efficacy in Y537S mutants. In MCF7 cells, ENDX, AT402E, and AT402Z demonstrated similar activity against Y537S mutants, while AT402Z was the most potent in D538G mutants. In 3D cultures at a clinically relevant concentration (∼1 μM), all compounds significantly reduced proliferation (∼75-90%; p<0.0001), with ENDX and AT402Z showing superior potency. AT416E outperformed ENDX in wound-healing assays (p<0.0001). All NCEs induced comparable G1 cell cycle arrest in MCF7 (p<0.0001), while AT402E and AT402Z showed stronger promotion of G1-to-S phase arrest and S/G2/M inhibition compared to ENDX in T47D cells (p<0.05). These NCEs also significantly induced apoptosis in MCF7 cells at 1-5 μM (p<0.0001), with AT416Z, AT402E, and AT402Z surpassing ENDX (p<0.0001). In T47D cells, apoptosis was significantly induced by ENDX, AT416E, and AT416Z (p<0.0001 vs. vehicle), with ENDX showing superior activity. RT-qPCR analysis at 0.1 μM revealed ENDX and AT416Z as the most potent inhibitors of E2-induced ERα target gene expression in MCF7 cells, with ENDX surpassing all NCEs in T47D cells. Synergy assays indicated that the NCEs do not synergize with ENDX, supporting their potential use as stand-alone agents. These findings highlight four NCEs with notable anti-cancer activity, with some matching or surpassing ENDX in several cancer-relevant cellular readouts, marking them as novel candidates for ERα+ breast cancer therapy. Further studies will advance one or more of these NCEs into in vivo models to confirm their therapeutic efficacy and potential for clinical application. Citation Format: Lena Batoon, Rajeev S. Muthyala, Sandra S. Hammer, Natalie Farris, Steven C. Quay, John R. Hawse. Novel (Z)-endoxifen-related new chemical entities exhibit potent anti-cancer activity in ERα+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4742.

Abstarct Introduction: (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and the most active metabolite of tamoxifen. Given its effective anti-estrogen activity and favorable safety profile, ENDX is being developed as a therapeutic solution in breast health. During its synthesis, two chemical biproducts (compound AT416 and AT402) with Z- and E- isomeric forms are produced. This study aimed to assess the anti-estrogenic activity of these four ENDX-related compounds with ENDX in ERα+ breast cancer. Methods: Compounds AT416E/Z are formed by acetylation of the final API with ethyl acetate during Step 3 of the manufacturing process of ENDX. Compounds AT402 E/Z are formed by coupling of impurity AT300 with propiophenone as a side reaction during Step 2 of the ENDX manufacturing process. The anti-cancer activities of the four ENDX-related compounds were tested across multiple ERα+ breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, T47D, UCD12), including those with ESR1 mutations (Y537S and D538G) known to confer endocrine resistance. Studies included cell proliferation, migration and invasion assays, cell cycle progression assessments, induction of apoptosis, activity of an estrogen response element (ERE) luciferase reporter construct and RT-qPCR analyses of ERα target gene expression. Results: In estrogen-containing media, ENDX exhibited strong anti-proliferative activity in MCF7 cells, regardless of ESR1 mutations. In MCF7 cells cultured in estrogen-deficient media, the four compounds demonstrated more pronounced anti-proliferative effects than ENDX. In T47D cells with the ESR1 Y537S mutation, AT416E showed superior anti-proliferative activity compared to ENDX, while in T47D cells with the D538G mutation, these two compounds exhibited comparable effects. In UCD12 cells, ENDX displayed the strongest anti-proliferative effects. Regarding the inhibition of migration and invasion, AT416E consistently outperformed ENDX in both T47D and MCF7 cells. ENDX was the most effective at inducing G1 phase cell cycle arrest followed. Both AT402E and AT402Z elicited pro-apoptotic effects comparable to ENDX in MCF7 cells, while in T47D cells, ENDX was the most effective at inducing apoptosis, followed by AT402E and AT402Z. In T47D and MCF7 cells, luciferase-based transactivation assays showed that ENDX was the most potent anti-estrogen followed by AT402Z. Finally, based on RT-qPCR analyses, ENDX was a more effective inhibitor of estrogen-induced ERα target gene expression, compared to the biproducts. Summary: These studies have revealed that four novel compounds derived from the manufacturing process of ENDX confer notable anti-tumor activity, with some performing comparably to or better than ENDX in several cancer-relevant cellular readouts. Future studies will validate these findings in additional in vitro/in vivo breast cancer models with the goal of identifying the basis for their varied anti-estrogenic and anti-cancer effects. Such discoveries should allow for the rational design of novel molecules with more potent therapeutic efficacy. Citation Format: Natalie Farris, Lena Batoon, Rajeev S. Muthyala, H. Lawrence Remmel, Sandra S. Hammer, John R. Hawse, Steven C. Quay. Anti-cancer activity of (Z)-endoxifen-related compounds in ERα+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Optimizing Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability through Cancer Chemistry; 2024 Dec 9-11; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(12_Suppl):Abstract nr A007.

Abstract Background: Ovarian function suppression (OFS) combined with tamoxifen (TAM) or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) is standard for premenopausal (PM) ER+, HER2- breast cancer (BC). However, > 40% PM patients (pts) are intolerant of OFS. For these pts, TAM is the only FDA approved option. In the neoadjuvant endocrine setting, pts with endocrine sensitive disease (ESD) (Ki-67 ≤ 10% at 4 weeks) have 5yr dDFS > 97%; however, only 45% of TAM pts vs >75% with AI+OFS achieve 4 wk ESD (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent anti-estrogen superior to TAM and AI in xenograft models and with antitumor activity in endocrine-resistant postmenopausal pts. ENDX additionally targets protein kinase C beta 1 (PKCβ1) at concentrations >500 ng/mL, resulting in AKT inhibition and apoptosis (Jayaraman npj Breast Cancer 2023). We hypothesize that ENDX dual targeting of ERα and PKCβ1 will obviate the need for OFS and be non-inferior to AI plus OFS for PM pts with ER+/HER2- BC. Methods: EVANGELINE (NCT05607004) is an ongoing phase 2 multicenter neoadjuvant study with pharmacokinetic (PK) run-in assessing ENDX in PM women with ER+/HER2- BC. The primary objective for the PK run-in is to identify a dose (40 or 80 mg/day) resulting in ENDX steady state concentrations (Css) of 500-1000 ng/mL (to target both ERα and PKCβ1) without significant toxicity. Following PK run-in, the randomized phase II goal is to assess whether the ESD rate with ENDX is non-inferior to exemestane plus goserelin. Women with ESD at wk4 continue treatment for 24 weeks followed by surgery. Here we report the results from the 40 mg/day PK run-in. Results: Seven PM women (6 White, 1 Asian) aged 28-51 (median 46) received ENDX 40 mg/day. Pt characteristics on study were: ER > 90% (all pts), median Ki-67 = 13 (range 4-33%), cTstage (cT2: 6 pts, cT3: 1 pt), and tumor grade (G1: 1 pt, G2: 6 pts). The median ENDX 28 day Css (ng/mL) was 263.6 (range 180.3-376.6). One pt discontinued due to wk4 Ki-67 remaining > 10%. The remaining 6 had ESD, with either wk4 Ki-67 remaining ≤ 10% (3 pts) or decreasing to ≤ 10% (3 pts) and after 24 wks underwent surgery with surgical Ki-67 ≤ 3% (range 0-3%). MRI central review (wk12 and wk24) demonstrated target lesion decreases in all pts with 1 CR, 1 PR and 4 SD (RECIST). Treatment related toxicities included grade 3 headache (n=1), grade 2 amenorrhea (n=1), and grade 2 hot flashes (n=1). The median (range) baseline estrone (n=5) was 54 pg/mL (19-114) with median (range) fold increase from baseline of 9.0 (1.3-23.2) at wk4 and 4.7 (0.4 - 25.9) at wk24. The median baseline estradiol level (n=5) was 29 pg/mL (19-209) with median fold increases from baseline of 17.9 (0.4-57.0) at wk4 and 8.1 (0.04 - 56.6) at wk24. Additional surgical and blood biomarker data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: ENDX (40 mg/day) exhibits promising antitumor activity for PM ER+/HER2- BC but with ENDX Css below target. Enrollment is ongoing to the 80 mg/day dose level. Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Heather Fraser, Lida Mina, Pooja Advani, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Felipe Batalini, Katie N. Hunt, Swaathi Jayaraman, James Jakub, Patricia Cronin, Mara Piltin, Amy Degnim, James N. Ingle, Judy C. Boughey, Sarah Buhrow, Joel Reid, Matthew Schellenberg, John Hawse, Steven Quay. Neoadjuvant (Z)-endoxifen in premenopausal ER+, HER2- breast cancer: Evaluation of the first pharmacokinetic cohort of the EVANGELINE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT205.

TPS633 Background: Ovarian function suppression (OFS) when combined with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor is the standard of care for premenopausal estrogen receptor positive (ER+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) based on SOFT (Francis 2022) and TEXT (Pagani 2022) clinical trials and confirmed in a metanalysis (EBCTCG 2022). However, estrogen deprivation in premenopausal women is associated with significant morbidity and up to 40% of premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- BC are intolerant of OFS. For these women, tamoxifen monotherapy is the only FDA approved option. Therefore, there is substantial room to improve endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- BC. (Z)-endoxifen is one of the most active anti-estrogen tamoxifen metabolites, with preclinical data demonstrating superiority to tamoxifen and letrozole in aromatase expressing xenograft models and evidence for antitumor activity in early phase clinical trials in patients with prior progression on endocrine therapy including tamoxifen. In addition to its ability to potently block ERa, (Z)-endoxifen at clinically achievable concentrations inhibits protein kinase C beta 1 (PKCβ1), resulting in downstream AKT inhibition and apoptosis. It is hypothesized that (Z)-endoxifen, when delivered as monotherapy at doses that dually target both ERα and PKCβ1, will potently inhibit BC proliferation while obviating the need for OFS in premenopausal women. If successful, this innovative approach could spare women with endocrine sensitive BC from the side effects of OFS. Methods: To further study (Z)-endoxifen in premenopausal women, a multicenter study in the United States, with possible expansion to other countries was designed (EVANGELINE; NCT05607004). This is a Phase 2, open-label, randomized, neoadjuvant study in premenopausal women with Stage IIA or IIB ER+/HER2- BC. Subjects are randomized 1:1 to either exemestane plus goserelin or (Z)-endoxifen. The primary objective is to determine whether the endocrine sensitive disease (ESD) rate (defined as Ki-67 ≤ 10% after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant therapy) with (Z)-endoxifen is non-inferior to exemestane plus goserelin. Subjects will be enrolled with the intent of surgical treatment in the involved breast(s) after completing 6 months of neoadjuvant treatment. Safety, tolerability, response rates and surgical outcomes will be assessed. Disease progression will be monitored throughout study participation. Paired tumor biopsies and blood sampling will allow for a robust biomarker evaluation. Prior to initiating the Treatment Cohort (162 subjects), up to 12 subjects will be enrolled in a pharmacokinetic (PK) Run-in Cohort to identify the optimal dose for the Treatment Cohort. Enrolment in the PK Run-in cohort began in February 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05607004 .