Hou, X

Abstract Breast and ovarian cancers are major causes of cancer mortality in women with frequent relapse after curative intent treatment, underscoring the need for novel therapeutics. To this end, we identified CTPS1 as an essential gene in multiple breast and ovarian cancer models, including those resistant to chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors. CTPS1 and CTPS2 are responsible for de novo synthesis of cytidine triphosphate (CTP) which is required for DNA/RNA polymerization, phospholipid synthesis and protein glycosylation. We found CTPS1 to be the predominant isoform expressed in cancer cells, with significantly higher levels in advanced and resistant disease models compared to normal tissue, benign lesions and treatment naïve cancers. Using CTPS1 siRNAs and CTPS1-dTAG (degradation tag) cell lines, we discovered that depletion of CTPS1 induces S-phase cell cycle arrest followed by apoptosis. Leveraging a first-in-class, highly selective, and orally bioavailable CTPS1 inhibitor (STP938) developed by Step Pharma, we identified nanomolar IC50 values across a panel of cell lines, both in 2D and 3D culture systems, and potent anti-neoplastic activity ex vivo and in vivo using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. STP938 also synergized with standard-of-care chemotherapy agents and PARP inhibitors, including in therapy-resistant models. Given the essentiality of CTP for biosynthetic processes, we performed bulk and single cell RNA-seq, total and phospho-proteomics, metabolomics, and lipidomic strategies to examine changes induced by acute and chronic STP938 exposure. This revealed that cancer cells are able to overcome pharmacologic CTPS1 inhibition by rewiring of pyrimidine and purine synthesis pathways, upregulation of the pentose phosphate pathway, and extensive remodeling of lipid synthesis pathways including shifts in PC/PE content, increased lysophospholipid production, and altered mitochondrial lipid composition (decreased cardiolipin and increased PG). To identify genetic drivers of STP938 resistance and synthetic lethal vulnerabilities, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen together with a PRISM drug sensitivity screen. Genes regulating dNTP biosynthesis, S-phase progression, and RNA processing were identified as primary escape mechanisms, while DHODH inhibitors, purine and nucleoside analogs, and mitosis modifiers were implicated as synthetic lethal opportunities. Notably, we discovered that 25% of ovarian tumors lack CTPS2 protein expression, suggesting near complete reliance on CTPS1 for survival. Thus, a Phase 1a/b clinical trial of STP938 (NCT06297525) has been initiated, including an expansion cohort for patients with CTPS2-null ovarian tumors. These laboratory discoveries and ongoing clinical efforts aim to enable broader uptake of this novel therapeutic approach to improve long-term outcomes in patients with CTPS1-dependent disease. Citation Format: Xiyin Wang, Michael Emch, Lauren Voll, Rebecca Epp, Esther Rodman, Noa Odell, Hannah Smith, Nicole Pearson, Xiaonan Hou, Matthew Goetz, Scott Kaufmann, S. John Weroha, Phillip Beer, John Hawse. CTPS1 as a metabolic vulnerability and novel therapeutic target in breast and ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 4560.

Abstract Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) remains a major gynecologic malignancy driven in part by aberrant estrogen receptor (ER) signaling. The active tamoxifen metabolite (Z)-endoxifen exhibits dual SERM/SERD-like activity, modulating ER function while exerting additional noncanonical antiproliferative effects. Understanding (Z)-endoxifen’s mechanisms of action and its interaction with cell-cycle regulators is critical to optimizing targeted therapy in EC. This study investigated the molecular and functional effects of (Z)-endoxifen, alone and in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib, across diverse EC models to define mechanistic activity and translational potential. Methods: ER+ (Ishikawa, HCI-EC23, patient derived organoid U1561.005) and ER-variable (ARK1, ARK2) EC models were treated with estrogen (0-10 nM), (Z)-endoxifen (125 nM-10 µM) or fulvestrant (0-2.5 μM), and abemaciclib (0-10 μM), as single agents or in combination. Cell viability was assessed using luminescence-based assays. Dose-response analyses and combinatorial synergy were evaluated to determine endocrine sensitivity, ER dependency, and downstream cell-cycle effects. Results: Estrogen induced biphasic proliferative responses in ER+ models, confirming ligand-driven mitogenic signaling. (Z)-Endoxifen monotherapy suppressed viability across all cell lines, demonstrating superior potency to fulvestrant and activity independent of ER expression status. Mechanistically, (Z)-endoxifen abrogated estrogen-induced proliferative peaks, consistent with ER antagonism and potential receptor degradation, while also exerting ER-independent effects suggestive of cell-cycle modulation. Abemaciclib monotherapy inhibited viability in both ER+ and ER− models, and its combination with (Z)-endoxifen yielded strong synergistic activity (Chou-Talalay combination index < 1), including in ER-negative ARK2 and the ER+ U1561.005 organoid. This synergy likely arises from concurrent disruption of ER signaling and CDK4/6-cyclin D regulatory pathways. Conclusions: (Z)-Endoxifen demonstrates dual ER-dependent and ER-independent activity in EC preclinical models. Synergy was observed in combination a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. These findings broaden the current understanding of (Z)-endoxifen’s efficacy and support further exploration of its potential therapeutic role in ER-driven and mixed-phenotype EC, including evaluation of responses across ER expression levels. Citation Format: Grace Choong, Xiaonan Hou, Sandra Suarez Hammer, Scott M. Blackburn, John Weroha, Steven C. Quay. (Z)-endoxifen modulates estrogen receptor and cell-cycle signaling to induce synergistic antiproliferative effects with CDK4/6 inhibition in endometrial cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 405.

Abstract Purpose: Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer is limited by low response rates to salvage chemotherapy. Novel small molecule inhibitors to Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) have been proposed to potentiate the cytotoxic effect of one such salvage treatment, gemcitabine, by interrupting the DNA damage repair pathway. Patient derived tumorgrafts were characterized by responsiveness to gemcitabine +/- MK8776 (Chk1 inhibitor). Response was correlated with markers of Chk1 activity. Methods: Patient-derived tumorgraft models were created from patients undergoing surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. Gemcitabine response was characterized in five high-grade serous models (PH044, PH048, PH070, PH080, and PH110). Two models (PH048 and PH080) were treated with gemcitabine monotherapy (240 mg/kg qweek x 4 doses), MK8776 monotherapy (32 mg/kg qweek x 4 doses), and with combination therapy (Gemcitabine 190 mg/kg and MK8776 32 mg/kg qweek x 4 doses). Animals were monitored for cytotoxicity, and tumors were measured weekly with ultrasound. Response to gemcitabine and to combination therapy was correlated to immunohistochemistry of γH2AX and immunoblotting for p345-Chk1 and p296-Chk1. Results: Gemcitabine monotherapy did not affect tumor growth in two models (PH044 and PH048). Significant in vivo response to gemcitabine was seen in PH070 and PH080. Significant growth attenuation but not tumor regression was seen in PH110. MK8776 did not have any effect on tumor growth as monotherapy or in combination with gemcitabine in the gemcitabine resistant model, PH048. In contrast, in a gemcitabine sensitive model, PH080, MK8776 monotherapy significantly attenuated tumor growth, and there was a trend for MK8776 to potentiate the cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine in PH080 (p=0.16). Final tumor weights in the PH080 model after 4 doses of chemotherapy were 1.7 g (90%CI: 1.5-1.9g), 0.3g (90%CI: 0.18-0.35g), and 0.14g (90%CI: 0.08-.19g) in the control, gemcitabine alone, and gemcitabine with MK8776 groups respectively. Decrease in the tumor auto-phosphorylation of Chk1 at Serine-296 was observed in some, but not all models in response to MK8766 treatment. γH2AX increased in response to the addition of MK8776 to gemcitabine. Conclusions: Chk1 inhibition may enhance the activity of gemcitabine in some, but not all ovarian tumors. Further work is needed to find markers that will predict response to Chk1 inhibitors to help select patients for future clinical trials. While pChk1-S296 previously demonstrated potential utility as a biomarker of Chk1 inhibition, in vivo assessments of its differential expression may demonstrate the unreliability of this marker. This work supports the use of patient derived tumorgrafts in drug development for ovarian cancer. Citation Format: A Kumar, S Weroha, M Becker, X Hou, S Greiner, L Karnitz, P Haluska. Chk1 inhibitor (MK8776) enhances cytotoxicity of gemcitabine in select patient-derived ovarian tumorgraft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 8-9, 2014; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2015;21(16 Suppl):Abstract nr POSTER-THER-1419.