Yadav, S.

Abstract Introduction: Patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer associated with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 exhibit distinct clinicopathological features compared to sporadic cases. However, the optimal endocrine therapy strategies for these patients remain undefined. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a validated gene expression-based signature that stratifies patients based on the risk of overall (0-10 years) and late (post-5 years) distant recurrence and predicts the likelihood of benefit from extended endocrine therapy (EET) in early-stage, HR+ breast cancer. Here we utilize BCI to investigate endocrine sensitivity and the predicted EET benefit in a cohort of ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients with BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 PVs. Methods: BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 PV carriers with ER+/HER2- breast cancer diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 1996 and 2024 at Mayo Clinic were identified from a registry tracking germline test result. For comparison, we utilized the BCI Registry, a prospective, multi-institutional tumor registry of patients with early-stage ER+/HER2- breast cancer undergoing BCI testing, regardless of germline PV status. The analysis was restricted to women with invasive, early-stage locoregional breast cancer and available pre-treatment tumor specimens. BCI testing was performed by RT-PCR blinded to clinical outcome. BCI prognostic and BCI predictive categories were compared between the Mayo Clinic germline PV cohort and the BCI Registry using descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test. Results: The final analysis included 123 PVcarriers (BRCA1: 36; BRCA2: 40; CHEK2: 47) from the MayoClinic cohort and 2,563 women from the BCI Registry. The proportion of patientsdiagnosed before age 50 was higher among PV carriers—52.8% in BRCA1,50.0% in BRCA2, and 21.3% in CHEK2—compared to 7.0% in the BCIRegistry. PV carriers were also more likely to be premenopausal andnode-positive at diagnosis. Based on BCI score, a significant higher proportionof BRCA1 (75.0%, p=0.002) andBRCA2 (70.0%, p=0.01) PV carriers wereclassified as high risk, compared to 48.5% of patients in the BCI Registry, butno significant difference was seen for CHEK2 PV carriers (46.8%,p=0.88). A significantly higher proportion of BRCA1 PV carriers werepredicted to benefit from EET compared to the BCI Registry cohort (77.8% vs.33.9%, p<0.001), whereas no significant differences in BCI Predictivecategories were observed for BRCA2 or CHEK2 PV carriers. Overall,compared to breast cancer cases in the BCI registry, a significant differencein the distribution of the combined BCI prognostic and predictive categorieswas noted for BRCA1 (p<0.001)and BRCA2 (p=0.02) PV carriers,but not for CHEK2 PV carriers (p=0.66). In particular, BRCA1 andBRCA2 PV carriers were enriched for high-risk tumors with a high likelihoodof EET benefit (66.7% and 37.5%, respectively vs 25.1%, p<0.001 and p=0.02),whereas only a small non-significant increase was observed for CHEK2 PVcarriers (29.8% vs 25.1%, p=0.66) compared to breast cancer cases in the BCIRegistry. Conclusions: Genomicclassification by BCI reveals distinct patterns of endocrine sensitivity andpredicted EET benefit among germline PV carriers, particularly in BRCA1and BRCA2 PV carriers. These findings warrant further investigation andmay inform personalized endocrine therapy strategies for women with germlinePV-associated ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Citation Format: S. Yadav, B. O'Neal, S. Yasir, N. Siuliukina, A. Karki, Y. Zhang, A. K. Anderson, K. Treuner, M. P. Goetz, F. J. Couch. Endocrine Sensitivity and Predicted Benefit of Extended Endocrine Therapy based on Breast Cancer Index (BCI) in BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers with ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-08-25.

Abstract Background: Pathogenic variants (PVs) in PALB2 are known to confer high-to-moderate risk for breast cancer. However, breast cancer risk estimates for PALB2 PVs for different populations are not well defined and associations with other cancers are still unclear. Using data from a large clinical genetic testing cohort we have established cancer-specific risks associated with PALB2 PVs. Methods: We analyzed the associations of PALB2 PVs with breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers in individuals tested at Ambry Genetics. Cancer-specific odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by comparing PV carrier frequencies in cancer cases to population controls from AllofUs matched by sex and adjusting for age and genetic ancestry and gnomAD v4.1 matched by sex and adjusting for ancestry. Two-sided p-values are reported. Results: Of 1,119,667 individuals tested, 357,109 had breast cancer, 37,468 ovarian cancer, 22,112 pancreatic cancer and 32,738 prostate cancer. PALB2 PVs were observed in 0.79% of breast cancer cases, 0.30% of ovarian cancer cases, 0.78% of pancreatic cancer cases, and 0.47% of prostate cancer cases, with mean age at diagnosis of 54.2 years for breast, 60.1 years for ovarian, 62.8 years for pancreatic and 66.7 years for prostate. Whereas only 2.4% of breast cancer cases with PVs had a personal history of ovarian or pancreatic, 13.4% of ovarian cases and 33.3% of pancreatic cases had a history of breast cancer. Analysis of PV types found that frameshift PVs accounted for 50% of PVs, nonsense for 30%, canonical splice sites for 5% and copy number variants for 8-9% of cases in all cancer types. Among 10,077 individuals with multiple primary cancers, PALB2 PVs were detected in 0.65% of cases, with the highest frequencies observed in combinations of breast and pancreatic cancer (1.87%) and pancreatic and prostate cancer (0.79%). To refine estimates of risks for breast cancer, association studies were performed separately with GnomAD v4.1 and AllofUs controls. PALB2 PVs were consistently associated with high risks of breast cancer with lower 95%CI above 4 (GnomADv.4.1 OR=6.85, 95%CI=5.94-7.96, p=3.05x10-145; AllofUs OR=5.65, 95%CI=4.83-6.65, p=2.54x10-155). This was significantly different and increased over breast cancer risk estimates from the CARRIERS and BRIDGES population-based studies (OR=4.67, 95%CI=3.73-5.85, p=3.95x10-27) and the UK Biobank population-based study (OR=3.87, 95%CI=3.09-4.83, p=4.62x10-27). Similarly, high risks of pancreatic cancer were confirmed (GnomADv.4.1 OR=5.14, 95%CI=4.15-6.32, p=3.38x10-52; AllofUs OR=5.59, 95%CI=3.92-7.85, p=2.78x10-18). Importantly, associations between PALB2 PVs and moderate risks of both ovarian cancer (GnomADv.4.1 OR=2.68, 95%CI=2.11-3.40, p=5.94x10-16; AllofUs OR=2.15, 95%CI=1.62-2.85, p=2.97x10-7) and prostate cancer (enriched for aggressive disease) (GnomADv.4.1 OR=2.45, 95%CI=2.01-2.97, p=1.52x10-19) were observed. Conclusions: This large-scale study provides robust estimates of PALB2 PV prevalence and associated cancer risks in a U.S. clinical genetic testing population. The findings provide refined risk estimates for breast and pancreatic cancers but also establish that PALB2 PVs confer increased risk for ovarian and prostate cancers. These results help clarify ongoing uncertainty, particularly for ovarian and prostate cancer, and highlight the importance of PALB2 in broader hereditary cancer risk assessment and multigene panel testing. Citation Format: Y. Y. Tan, C. Hu, H. Huang, N. J. Boddicker, W. Chen, M. Kaul, T. J. Rao, A. N. Monteiro, T. Pesaran, R. Karam, S. M. Domchek, S. Yadav, M. E. Richardson, F. J. Couch. Cancer-specific risks associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants from a large clinical genetic testing cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF5-01.

Abstract Introduction: An Our Practice Advisory (OPA), formerly known as Best Practice Advisory (BPA), is an electronic health record (EHR) tool. OPAs identify key parameters to alert providers of potential interventions that could enhance quality of care. Such functionality is increasingly relevant given the rapid pace of new drug approvals. Within the Mayo Clinic system, we previously identified that amongst Mayo Clinic patients (pts) meeting the MonarchE criteria, 28% of pts did not undergo a documented discussion with their provider regarding the role of adjuvant abemaciclib (Premji, SABCS 2024). Further, a Flatiron study identified that only 40% of eligible pts received abemaciclib (Sandoval, Miami Breast 2025). To address this practice gap, in 2024 we began to implement EHR clinical decision support by creating an OPA trigger for pts eligible for an adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Here we report on ‘action taken’ versus not for the OPA and the most common reasons for re-prompts. Methods: The Mayo Breast Disease Group designed an OPA including pts who are within 14 months of a clinical or pathologic diagnosis of high-risk early-stage breast cancer. We leveraged structured data captured in the Epic staging forms (Epic Systems) to identify pts with clinical or pathologic T-stage, N-stage, grade, ± Ki-67/ multigene signature to identify ER+/HER2- pts eligible for adjuvant ribociclib or abemaciclib based on FDA approvals. The OPA was triggered by a patient encounter in oncology when endocrine therapy (but not CDK4/6i) was on the active medication list resulting in a hard stop. The OPA gathered limited details about whether adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors were discussed and whether the provider followed a link that resulted in prescribing one—considered an indicator of action taken. In this IRB-exempt quality improvement project, we describe the responses captured in the OPA trigger utilizing Epic tools. Results: The OPA went live on 1/10/2025. Over a 5-month period post OPA initiation, we identified 517 OPA alerts among 332 unique pts. Their median age was 62.5 years, and the majority were female (97%). The median time to resolve the OPA was 17.5 seconds (range 2-567 seconds). 12.6% (65/517) of the time there was ‘action taken’ by selecting the hyperlink to potentially start a treatment plan. Providers selected the following OPA pre-set responses: ‘re-prompt in one month’ 248 (48%), ‘patient not a candidate for therapy’ 48 (9%), ‘patient declines’ 69 (13%), ‘outside oncologist will prescribe’ 36 (7%), ‘not discussed’ 44 (9%), and unknown 72 (14%). The most common free text comments among the 517 OPA alerts (summarized) included: ‘revisit in future’ 108 (21%), ‘too early’ 65 (13%), ‘patient declines’ 66 (13%), ‘outside oncologist will start’ 31 (6%), ‘not a candidate’ 26 (5%), and ‘co-morbidities’ 18 (3%). Erroneous OPA prompting occurred in 14 (3%) who previously failed a CDK4/6i due to toxicity and in 18 (3%) for pts currently on a CDK4/6i. 30 (6%) OPA comments noted that they discussed or started therapy that day. Conclusion: The OPA offered clinical decision support and ensured that clinicians considered prescribing CDK 4/6i in all pts identified as eligible, and captured deferrals. Refinements are needed to ensure appropriate timing of OPA and minimize erroneous firing. The OPA remains active and captures the reason for deferral of adjuvant CDK 4/6i prescription. This data pairs real world decision making to better understand clinically meaningful application of improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Citation Format: S. Premji, P. Advani, S. Chumsri, L. Mina, J. Taraba, J. Carroll, J. Hoppenworth, E. Cathcart-Rake, T. Haddad, B. Rudder, G. Choong, D. Idossa, C. O’Sullivan, S. Yadav, K. Ruddy, P. Peethambaram, T. Hobday, M. Goetz, R. Rao, B. Ernst, F. Batalini, R. Leon-Ferre, A. Tevaarwerk, K. Giridhar. Implementing an Our Practice Advisory (OPA) to provide clinical decision support for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in early-stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-11-10.

Abstract Introduction: Women with a germline pathogenic variant (PV) in PALB2 face a lifetime risk of breast cancer, generally exceeding 40%. We have initiated an international clinical follow up study of women with stage 0 to stage 4 breast cancer and a PALB2 PV to evaluate clinical characteristics and to determine optimal treatments. The objective of the current study was to estimate and to identify factors predictive of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk. Methods: Clinical data, including diagnostic, treatment, and follow-up data, were collected by medical record review for eligible women with breast cancer and a germline PV in PALB2. PV carriers were followed every two years to collect information about recurrences, new cancers, and vital status. Data was summarized using descriptive statistics. The risk of CBC was estimated by following women from the date of breast cancer diagnosis until the date of: 1) contralateral breast cancer, 2) contralateral mastectomy, 3) death from any cause, or 4) last follow-up. The cumulative incidence of CBC was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with contralateral breast cancer risk. Covariates included age at diagnosis, ER status, grade, nodal status, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, tamoxifen, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (time-dependent). Results: Among 888 PALB2 carriers, the mean age at diagnosis of breast cancer was 49.3 years (range 22 to 83 years). Overall, 36 women (4.1%) were diagnosed with synchronous bilateral breast cancer. 73.6% of the breast cancers were ER-positive, and 29% were lymph node-positive. Patients were followed for a mean of 5.6 years (range 0.3 to 22 years) from date of diagnosis. During the follow-up period, 53 patients were diagnosed with a metachronous CBC. The 15-year risk of metachronous CBC was 26.4% overall; 19.5% for those diagnosed younger than 50 years, and 34.8% for those diagnosed at 50 years or older. In a multivariate analysis, ER status was not significantly associated with CBC risk (RR 1.15, 95%CI 0.45-2.93, p=0.77). Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of CBC (RR 0.17, 95%CI 0.04-0.70, p=0.02). In the follow-up period, 47 women were diagnosed with another incident cancer, including seven with pancreatic cancer and three with ovarian cancer Conclusion: The high 15-year risk of contralateral breast cancer suggests that bilateral mastectomy should be considered for primary surgical intervention. Moreover, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) significantly reduces the risk of CBC and should be considered post-treatment. Citation Format: K. Metcalfe, A. Stachowski, F. Couch, M. Marabelli, S. Wong, S. Domchek, A. Aeilts, A. Eisen, R. Kim, T. Ramon y Cajal, R. Fruscio, S. Yadav, C. Hoey, S. Karamali, P. Sun, J. Lubinski, S. Narod, T. Pal. Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in Women with PALB2-Associated Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-11.

Abstract Background: International guidelines recommend that all patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) are offered testing for germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) and other biomarkers to aid treatment decisions. This retrospective study describes real-world testing patterns for germline/tumor (g/t)BRCAm and other biomarkers among US pts with HER2-negative [HER2−] mBC. Methods: Data were captured from US pts aged ≥18 years with HER2− mBC from January 12, 2018, to March 31, 2024, in the deidentified, electronic health record-derived Flatiron Health Research Database. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and testing patterns for g/tBRCAm and other actionable biomarkers were examined. Testing rates, test timing, and biomarker status were described across subgroups defined by demographics (including age, race, and ethnicity), tumor subtype (hormone receptor-positive [HR+]/HER2− mBC or triple-negative mBC [mTNBC]), and disease stage at mBC diagnosis (recurrent/de novo). Results: The BRCA testing rate among pts with mBC increased from 2018 (48%) to 2023 (62%); the overall testing rate was 19,820/34,379 (58%): 5880 pts (17%) received a gBRCA test only, 7285 (21%) received a tBRCA test only, and 6655 (19%) received both gBRCA and tBRCA tests. BRCA testing rates were numerically lower in pts with HR+/HER2− mBC (56%) versus mTNBC (68%), and in pts aged >65 years (HR+/HER2− mBC, 48%; mTNBC, 62%) versus ≤65 years (HR+/HER2− mBC, 64%; mTNBC, 74%; Table). The proportion of pts who received a test before initiation of first-line (1L) therapy was lower among pts with HR+/HER2− mBC than with mTNBC (recurrent, 60% vs 81%; de novo, 37% vs 57%). Among tested pts, 1067/15,168 (7%) with HR+/HER2− mBC and 494/4539 (11%) with mTNBC had a positive result for g/tBRCAm; 365/1067 (34%) pts with g/tBRCAm HR+/HER2− mBC and 138/494 (28%) pts with g/tBRCAm mTNBC were aged >65 years. Among 528 pts with gBRCAm HR+/HER2− mBC, co-mutations in PIK3CA, ESR1, PTEN, and AKT1 were identified in 48 (9%), 38 (7%), 20 (4%), and 3 (<1%) pts, respectively. Among pts diagnosed with gBRCAm HR+/HER2− mBC in 2020-2023 (median follow-up: 15 months), 175/371 (47%) did not receive a test for PIK3CA mutations at any time, and 48/97 (49%) pts diagnosed in 2023 (median follow-up: 6 months) did not receive a test for ESR1 mutations. In 2021-2023, 72/256 (28%) pts with g/tBRCAm mTNBC had tumors with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score ≥10; 88 (34%) pts did not receive a PD-L1 test. Conclusions: Although BRCA testing rates increased from 2018 to 2023, 38% of US pts diagnosed with HER2− mBC in 2023 did not receive any BRCA test. BRCA testing rates were low among pts with HR+/HER2− mBC and/or aged >65 years, suggesting that many g/tBRCAm remained undetected. Wider and timelier testing for germline and tumor biomarkers is warranted to identify pts who are eligible for targeted therapies. Citation Format: S. Yadav, Q. Li, Z. Tan, K. E. Mishkin, J. F. Hayes, X. Xu, F. J. Couch. Real-world biomarker testing patterns in US patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-08.

Abstract Background: BRCA2 variants with partially aberrant RNA splicing have been associated with a relatively lower breast cancer risk (reduced penetrance) relative to canonical pathogenic variants. However, the existence of partial loss of function (hypomorphic) missense variants, conferring reduced penetrance, is less certain. Identification and assessment of the clinical relevance of such reduced penetrance pathogenic variants (RPPVs) is needed to provide accurate risk estimates. Methods: Comprehensive functional characterization of hypomorphic missense variants (n=70) in the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain, initially identified through homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) assays, was conducted through multiple independent functional assays, including HDR, CRISPR/Cas9-based endogenous targeting, RAD51 foci formation assay, and Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor response assay. Risk estimates were obtained using two large datasets from patients referred for hereditary cancer testing. A ClinGen/ACMG/AMP model was used for clinical classification. Results: The variants consistently demonstrated hypomorphic HDR activity and endogenous survival in HAP1 targeted cells, decreased RAD51 foci formation, and increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. These variants were associated with a moderate increase in breast cancer risk, as shown in two independent studies: one using multivariable logistic analysis adjusted for age, ancestry and family history (OR=2.41, 95%CI=1.51-3.85) and another comparing frequencies of variants in breast cancer cases to public reference controls adjusted for ancestry (OR=2.09, 95% CI=1.16-4.08). The mean age of breast cancer diagnosis for carriers of hypomorphic variants was 57 years, which was significantly older than the mean age of diagnosis of 51 years for carriers of protein truncating variants. Functional data were combined with other evidence sources in a ClinGen/ACMG/AMP model to classify 14 variants as “likely pathogenic”. Conclusions: We identified partially functional, hypomorphic missense variants associated with reduced penetrance for breast cancer. Cancer risk management guidelines for this new category of variants should be revisited given that the associated breast cancer risks warrant high risk screening but do not meet the threshold at which risk reducing mastectomy is offered. This study supports a shift in paradigm to considering variant-based risks on a continuum, with implications for risk-appropriate cancer risk management. Citation Format: H. Huang, C. Hu, J. Na, M. Kucera, T. Simmons, E. Mundt, C. C. Young, Z. Heidari, P. C. Lyra, Y. Y. Tan, K. L. Nathanson, T. Pal, R. Karam, T. Pesaran, S. Yadav, S. M. Domchek, A. N. Monteiro, E. Hughes, N. Boddicker, W. Chen, M. E. Richardson, F. J. Couch. Partially functional (hypomorphic) missense variants in BRCA2 are reduced penetrance pathogenic variants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-05.