Back to Authors

Blondeaux, Eva

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9566-4579

Mayo Clinic

Ospedale Policlinico San Martino

Citations 8

Abstract PS3-11-06: Long-term prognostic and predictive value of lobular histology in the PALLAS trial
Nader-Marta, G., DeMichele, A. M., Zoppoli, G., Azambuja, E. de, Metzger-Filho, O., Suga, J. M., Pfeiler, G., Goetz, M. P., Ruiz-Borrego, M., Loibl, S., Meisel, J. L., Ring, A., Mamounas, E. P., Lambertini, M., Gauthier, E., Soelkner, Lidija, Dueck, A. C., Gnant, M., Mayer, E. L., Marta, Guilherme Nader , Desmedt, Christine , Hlauschek, Dominik , DeMichele, Angela , Zoppoli, Gabriele M. , Blondeaux, Eva , Azambuja, Evandro de , Bellet, Meritxell , Suga, J.M., Pfeiler, Georg , Loibl, S., Baelen, Karen Van , Zdenkowski, Nicholas , Agostinetto, Elisa , Lambertini, M., Gauthier, ER, Dueck, A., Gnant, Michael

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PS3-11-06-PS3-11-06

10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-11-06 Get It

Abstract Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for up to 15% of breast cancer (BC) cases and has distinct clinical and biological features compared to invasive carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST). Prior studies, including PENELOPE-B, suggested greater benefit from adjuvant palbociclib (palbo) in ILC. We assessed the prognostic and predictive value of histology in patients (pts) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) ± palbo. Methods: PALLAS is a global, phase III trial in which pts with stage II-III, HR+/HER2− BC were randomized to 2 years (y) of adjuvant palbo + ET or ET alone. Pts with IBC-NST or pure ILC per local pathology assessment were included. Endpoints included invasive disease-free (IDFS; primary), distant recurrence-free (DRFS), locoregional recurrence-free (LRRFS), and overall survival (OS). Prognostic value was assessed using univariable and multivariate Cox models adjusted for age, T and N stage, grade, and progesterone receptor. Predictive value was assessed using histology-by-treatment interactions. Results: Among 5,748 pts in the ITT population, 4,982 (87%) were included (3,838 IBC-NST [67%], 1,144 ILC [20%]); median follow-up 6.9y. Compared with IBC-NST, ILC was associated with older age (median 54 vs 51 y), higher T stage (T3/T4: 41.7% vs 20.4%), fewer grade 3 tumors (12.7% vs 33.5%), higher mastectomy rates (74.5% vs 58.4%), less (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (72.2% vs 86.2%), and less tamoxifen as initial ET (28.8% vs 34.5%) (all p<0.001). ILC prevalence varied by country: lower in Asia (Japan 10.5%, Korea 0%, Taiwan 2.8%) and higher in Europe (23.1%) and North America (24.0%). When evaluating the predictive value, palbo appeared to confer greater benefit in ILC for all endpoints (HRs ranging from 0.41 to 0.86) and not in IBC-NST (HRs ranging from 0.97 to 1.01), although the histology-by-treatment interaction was significant only for LRRFS (Table). In the overall population, 7-year IDFS was 79.3% for IBC-NST and 75.8% for ILC. While the difference was significant in univariable analysis (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.35), it was not in multivariable analysis (HR 1.06, 0.91-1.24). Notably, the proportional hazards assumption was violated, and time-dependent modeling demonstrated that worse outcomes for ILC on IDFS, DRFS, and other endpoints emerged predominantly beyond 3 years. Conclusions: In this large, randomized dataset of pts with early HR+/HER2− breast cancer with long-term follow-up, ILC demonstrated distinct clinicopathologic features and geographic distribution. While ILC was not an independent prognostic factor over the entire follow-up, time-dependent modeling revealed worse long-term outcomes which only emerged after 3 years. Palbo appeared to be associated with more favorable outcomes in ILC than in IBC-NST across endpoints. These findings suggest a potential benefit of palbo in ILC that warrants further investigation in other adjuvant trials evaluating CDK4/6 inhibitors. Citation Format: G. Nader-Marta, C. Desmedt, D. Hlauschek, A. DeMichele, G. Zoppoli, E. Blondeaux, E. de Azambuja, M. Bellet-Ezquerra, O. Metzger-Filho, J. M. Suga, G. Pfeiler, M. P. Goetz, M. Ruiz-Borrego, S. Loibl, J. Meisel, A. Ring, K. Van Baelen, E. P. Mamounas, N. Zdenkowski, E. Agostinetto, M. Lambertini, E. Gauthier, L. Soelkner, A. C. Dueck, M. Gnant, E. L. Mayer. Long-term prognostic and predictive value of lobular histology in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-11-06.
Abstract PD4-07: Association between age at diagnosis and survival among young BRCA carriers with breast cancer: results from an international multicenter hospital-based cohort study
Meacci, Arianna , Gil, M. Fragío, Klocker, E., Coussy, Florence , Kim, H., Molho, R. Bernstein, Meglio, A. Di, Pogoda, K., Bajpai, J. , Wildiers, Hans, Balmana, J., Moore, H. C., Phillips, K., Partridge, A. H., Rousset-Jablonski, C., PeccatorI, F. A., Toss, Angela, Renaud, T., Anghelone, Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina, Cruz, A. Benitez, Lee, J. E., Fruscio, R, Cui, W., Wong, S. M., Lee, M., Rozenblit, M., Villarreal-Garza, C., Matikas, A., Dieci, M. V., Marchis, Laura De , Plichta, J. K., Ruddy, K. J., Guven, D. Can, Puglisi, F., Kemp, Zoë, Meireles, P. A., Delucchi, Virginia , Lambertini, M., Blondeaux, Eva , Gil, Mónica Fragío , Molho, R. Bernstein, Hilbers, Florentine , Meglio, Antonio Di , Kwong, Ava , Pogoda, K. , Agostinetto, Elisa , Moore, Halle C F , Partridge, Ann H. , Rousset‐Jablonski, Christine , Peccatori, Fedro A , Toss, Angela , Renaud, Tiphaine , Paluch–Shimon, Shani , Rozenblit, M., Vernieri, Claudio , Villarreal‐Garza, Cynthia , Matikas, Alexios , Plichta, J. K., Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Puglisi, Fabio , Kemp, Z.E., Meireles, P., Mastro, Lucia Del , Lambertini, Matteo

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD4-07-PD4-07

10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-pd4-07 Get It

Abstract Background Young age is a known risk factor for breast cancer recurrence and mortality, particularly in hormone receptor-positive disease. However, no specific evidence exists on whether age at diagnosis influences clinical behavior and outcomes among carriers of germline BRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs). Methods The BRCA BCY Collaboration (NCT03673306) is an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study including women with germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 PVs and diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer at the age of 40 years or younger between January 2000 and December 2020. The present analysis aimed to evaluate clinical features and outcomes of breast cancer in young BRCA carriers according to age at diagnosis, by comparing patients aged ≤30 years with those aged 31-35 and 36-40 years at breast cancer diagnosis. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), adjusting for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) (time-dependent), and stratifying by country, year of diagnosis, tumor size, nodal involvement, tumor grade and hormone receptor status. Results From 109 centers in 5 continents, 5350 young BRCA carriers were included, of whom 1106 (20.7%) were ≤30 years of age, 1945 (36.4%) were 31-35 years and 2299 (43.0%) were 36-40 years at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. Compared to patients aged 31-35 and 36-40 years, those aged ≤30 years were more likely to harbor BRCA1 PVs (71.3%, 62.4%, 61.1%, respectively), to present with high-grade (G3 in 71.3%, 66.6%, 65.0%, respectively), triple-negative breast cancer (56.3%, 48.1%, 46.6%, respectively), and less frequently smaller tumor size (T1: 31.7%, 36.6% and 39.5%, respectively). Consequently, chemotherapy was administered more frequently among patients aged ≤30 years (94.4%, 92.6%, 89.7%, respectively). At a median follow-up of 8.2 years (IQR, 4.7-12.8), 8-year DFS rate was 65.0% among patients aged ≤30 years, 64.7% in the 31-35 years group, and 65.8% in the 36-40 years group. No significant association between age at diagnosis and DFS outcome was observed (31-35 vs. ≤30 years: aHR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89-1.19; 36-40 vs. ≤30 years aHR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.16). Similarly, no significant association between age at diagnosis and OS was observed (31-35 vs. ≤30 years: aHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86-1.41; 36-40 vs. ≤30 years: aHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.43). Subgroup analyses by specific BRCA gene, tumor subtype, tumor size, nodal status, and chemotherapy use revealed no statistically significant interaction with age at diagnosis in terms of DFS or OS (all p for interaction > 0.05). Specifically, no significant differences between age groups were observed among patients with luminal-like tumors for both DFS and OS. Conclusions In this unique international cohort of BRCA carriers diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age (≤40 years), we found no significant differences in DFS nor OS across different age groups. Notably, very young age (≤30 years) at diagnosis was not associated with worse outcomes compared to 31-35 years or 36-40 years. Age per se should not be considered a negative prognostic factor in BRCA carriers when appropriate treatment is provided. Citation Format: E. Blondeaux, A. Meacci, M. Fragío Gil, E. Klocker, F. Coussy, H. Kim, R. Bernstein Molho, F. Hilbers, A. Di Meglio, A. Kwong, K. Pogoda, J. Bajpai, H. Wildiers, E. Agostinetto, J. Balmana, H. C. Moore, K. Phillips, A. H. Partridge, C. Rousset-Jablonski, F. A. Peccatori, A. Toss, T. Renaud, C. Anghelone, A. Benitez Cruz, S. Paluch-Shimon, J. Lee, R. Fruscio, W. Cui, S. M. Wong, M. Lee, M. Rozenblit, C. Vernieri, C. Villarreal-Garza, A. Matikas, M. Dieci, L. De Marchis, J. K. Plichta, K. J. Ruddy, D. Can Guven, F. Puglisi, Z. Kemp, P. A. Meireles, L. Del Mastro, V. Delucchi, M. Lambertini. Association between age at diagnosis and survival among young BRCA carriers with breast cancer: results from an international multicenter hospital-based cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-07.
Abstract PD12-01: Surgical management of young BRCA1/2 carriers with early onset breast cancer
Wong, S. M., Delucchi, Virginia , Coussy, F., Molho, R. Bernstein, Linn, S., Meglio, A. Di, Kwong, A., Pogoda, K., Nevelsteen, Ines , Balmana, J., Moore, H. C., Toss, Angela, Ferrari, A., Rousset-Jablonski, C., Renaud, T., Phillips, K., PeccatorI, F. A., Ipina, M. Agustina, Ryu, J. M., Kui, W., Lee, M., Fruscio, R, Rozenblit, M., Vernieri, C., Matikas, A., Dieci, M. V., Couch, F. J., Marchis, Laura De , Hwang, S. E., Mendez, D. Aguilar-y, Guven, D. Can, Swain, Monique , Gianni, Claudia, Montagna, G., Lambertini, M., Kim, H., Wong, S. M., Blondeaux, Eva , Coussy, Florence , Molho, R. Bernstein, Linn, Sabine C. , Meglio, Antonio Di , Kwong, Ava , Pogoda, K. , Agostinetto, Elisa , Moore, Halle C F , Toss, Angela , Rousset‐Jablonski, Christine , Renaud, Tiphaine , Peccatori, Fedro A , Paluch–Shimon, Shani , Rozenblit, M., Vernieri, C., Matikas, Alexios , Couch, F.J., Mendez, D Aguilar Y, Guven, D. Can, Gianni, C., Spinaci, Stefano , Montagna, Giacomo , Lambertini, M.

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD12-01-PD12-01

10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-pd12-01 Get It

Abstract Background: Young BRCA carriers may undergo breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy with or without contralateral risk reducing mastectomy at the time of an index breast cancer diagnosis. A variety of factors may influence surgical decision making. Methods: The BRCA BCY Collaboration (NCT03673306) is an international, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study conducted at 109 centres across 5 continents including women with germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV) in BRCA1/2 diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 with invasive stage I-III breast cancer prior to or at age 40 years. The primary objective of the present analysis was to evaluate surgical management in these patients. Breast surgery was defined as BCS, unilateral mastectomy, or bilateral mastectomy administered as part of primary treatment for a first diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with receipt of bilateral mastectomy. Results: Of 5660 eligible BRCA1/2 carriers, 4715 had unilateral stage I-III breast cancer with surgical treatment details available. The median age of the cohort was 35 years (IQR, 31-38 years). Overall, 1805 (38.3%) patients underwent BCS, 1752 (37.2%) underwent unilateral mastectomy, and 1158 (24.6%) underwent bilateral mastectomy. The proportion of young BRCA1/2 carriers undergoing BCS decreased over the study period (55.7% in 2000 vs. 27.0% in 2020), whereas the use of bilateral mastectomy significantly increased (8.0% in 2000 vs. 44.4% in 2020). Bilateral mastectomy was more common in women who had genetic testing performed before (57.0%) or within 6 months of a breast cancer diagnosis (38.5%), compared to those tested after diagnosis (5.1%, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, compared to those tested after diagnosis, earlier genetic testing remained the strongest predictor of bilateral mastectomy receipt (testing prior to diagnosis: OR 20.7 [95% CI 15.3-28.1]; testing at diagnosis: OR 6.8 [95% CI 5.4-8.7]). Other predictors of bilateral mastectomy receipt included geographic region, later year of diagnosis, smaller tumor size, node negative disease, and neoadjuvant treatment. In subgroup analysis including 2327 patients who had genetic testing performed before or within 6 months of diagnosis, 42.0% underwent bilateral mastectomy, with the lowest rates reported in Asia/Africa (26.1%) and the highest rates reported in North America (66.4%, p<0.001). In adjusted subgroup analyses, BRCA1 PV, later year of diagnosis, smaller tumor size, node negative disease, neoadjuvant treatment, and geographic region remained independently associated with bilateral mastectomy. Conclusions: In this large, international study of young affected BRCA carriers, geographic region and timing of genetic testing strongly impacted surgical management. These data support early genetic testing for young women with breast cancer to help optimize local therapy decisions. Citation Format: S. M. Wong, E. Blondeaux, V. Delucchi, F. Coussy, R. Bernstein Molho, S. Linn, A. Di Meglio, A. Kwong, K. Pogoda, E. Agostinetto, I. Nevelsteen, J. Balmana, H. C. Moore, A. Toss, A. Ferrari, C. Rousset-Jablonski, T. Renaud, K. Phillips, F. A. PeccatorI, M. Agustina Ipina, S. Paluch-Shimon, J. Ryu, W. Kui, M. Lee, R. Fruscio, M. Rozenblit, C. Vernieri, A. Matikas, M. Dieci, F. J. Couch, L. De Marchis, S. E. Hwang, D. Aguilar-y Mendez, D. Can Guven, M. Swain, C. Gianni, S. Spinaci, G. Montagna, M. Lambertini, H. Kim. Surgical management of young BRCA1/2 carriers with early onset breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD12-01.
Clinical Behavior of Breast Cancer in Young BRCA Carriers and Prediagnostic Awareness of Germline BRCA Status
Lambertini, Matteo , Blondeaux, Eva , Tomasello, Loredana Maria, Agostinetto, Elisa , Hamy, Anne‐Sophie , Kim, Hee Jeong , Franzoi, Maria Alice , Bernstein‐Molho, Rinat , Hilbers, Florentine , Pogoda, Katarzyna , Bajpai, Jyoti , Phillips, Kelly‐Anne , Rousset‐Jablonski, Christine , Renaud, Tiphaine , Cui, Wanyuan , Wong, Stephanie M. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Marchis, Laura De , Wildiers, Hans , Bajpai, Jyoti , Ignatiadis, Michail , Moore, Halle C F , Partridge, Ann H , Phillips, Kelly-Anne , Toss, Angela , Rousset-Jablonski, Christine , Criscitiello, Carmen , Ferrari, Alberta , Fruscio, Robert , Cui, Wanda , Wong, Stephanie M , Vernieri, Claudio , Ruddy, Kathryn J , Dieci, Maria Vittoria , Matikas, Alexios , Rozenblit, Mariya , Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia , De Marchis, Laura , Puglisi, Fabio , Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny A , Livraghi, Luca , Bruzzone, Marco , Boni, Luca , Balmaña, Judith , Lambertini, Matteo , Hamy, Anne-Sophie , Pogoda, K. , Wildiers, Hans , Ignatiadis, Michail , Moore, Halle C. F. , Partridge, Ann H. , Paluch–Shimon, Shani , Fruscio, Robert , Dieci, Maria Vittoria , Villarreal‐Garza, Cynthia , Duhoux, François P. , Livraghi, Luca , Bruzzone, Marco , Balmañà, Judith

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 1706-1719

10.1200/jco-24-01334 Get It

PURPOSE To investigate the clinical behavior of breast cancer in young BRCA carriers according to the specific BRCA gene ( BRCA1 v BRCA2 ) and the association of the timing of genetic testing (before v at diagnosis) with prognosis. METHODS This was an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study that included 4,752 patients harboring germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 , who were diagnosed with stage I-III invasive breast cancer at 40 years or younger between January 2000 and December 2020 in 78 centers worldwide (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673306 ). RESULTS Compared with BRCA2 carriers (n = 1,683), BRCA1 carriers (n = 3,069) had more frequently hormone receptor–negative (74.4% v 15.5%) and high-grade (77.5% v 49.1%) tumors. Similar outcomes were observed in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers but with a different pattern and risk of disease-free survival events over time. Compared with patients tested for BRCA at diagnosis (ie, between 2 months before and up to 6 months after diagnosis; n = 1,671), those tested before diagnosis (ie, any time up to 2 months before diagnosis; n = 411) had smaller tumors (T1: 61.3% v 32.4%), less nodal involvement (N0: 65.9% v 50.8%), less frequently received chemotherapy (84.4% v 92.9%), and axillary dissection (37.5% v 47.4%). Patients tested before diagnosis had better overall survival (OS; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.92]); however, this result lost statistical significance after adjustment for potential confounders including tumor stage (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.15]). CONCLUSION This global study provides evidence on the different clinical behavior of breast cancer in young BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Identifying a BRCA PV in healthy individuals was associated with earlier-stage breast cancer diagnosis and lower treatment burden, as well as better unadjusted OS.
Abstract GS02-13: Pregnancy after breast cancer in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants: results from an international cohort study
Kim, Hee Jeong , Chiodi, Camila , Lopez, Estela Carrasco, Bajpai, Jyoti , Toss, Angela, Renaud, Tiphaine , Cui, Wanda, Wong, Stephanie M. , Ruddy, Kathryn, Rozenblit, Mariya, Garza, Cynthia Villareal, Marchis, Laura De , Mriňáková, Bela , Meister, Sarah , Clatot, Florian, Yerushalmi, Rinat , Angelis, Carmine De , Cichowska-Cwalińska, Natalia, Berlière, Martine , Giorgi, Ugo De , Sonnenblick, Amir , Azim, Hatem A. , De Angelis, Carmine , Wong, Stephanie M , Lambertini, Matteo , Blondeaux, Eva , Agostinetto, Elisa , Hamy, Anne‐Sophie , Bernstein‐Molho, Rinat , Hilbers, Florentine , Pogoda, Katarzyna , Punie, Kevin , Ignatiadis, Michail , Moore, Halle C. F. , Phillips, Kelly‐Anne , Toss, Angela , Rousset‐Jablonski, Christine , Peccatori, Fedro A , Ferrari, Alberta , Paluch–Shimon, Shani , Fruscio, Robert , Vernieri, Claudio , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Dieci, Maria Vittoria , Matikas, Alexios , Rozenblit, Mariya , Mastro, Lucia Del , Puglisi, Fabio , Estevez-Diz, Maria Del Pilar , Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny A , Livraghi, Luca , Sánchez-Bayona, Rodrigo , Meattini, Icro , Salama, Mahmoud , Partridge, Ann H.

Cancer Research | May 2, 2024 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 9_Supplement | Pages: GS02-13-GS02-13

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-gs02-13 Get It

Abstract Background: Oncofertility counseling in BRCA carriers has unique challenges due to a possible negative impact of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) on reproductive potential and the indication to undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. While previous studies demonstrated the safety of pregnancy in women with prior breast cancer (BC) history, limited evidence exists in BRCA carriers specifically. We report the results of the largest study to date investigating likelihood of pregnancy after BC, reproductive and disease outcomes specifically in BRCA carriers. Methods: This was an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study including young BRCA carriers with history of BC (NCT03673306). Eligible patients were women harboring germline PVs in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 and diagnosed with stage I-III invasive BC at the age of ≤ 40 years between January 2000 and December 2020. BRCA healthy carriers or patients with BRCA variants of unknown significance, non-invasive BC, lack of follow-up, prior ovarian cancer or other malignancies without history of BC were excluded. Primary endpoints were pregnancy rate and disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS), BC specific survival (BCSS), pregnancy, fetal and obstetric outcomes were secondary endpoints. To mitigate the impact of guaranteed time bias, two survival analyses were performed: 1) Extended Cox model with occurrence of pregnancy as a time-varying covariate; 2) Case-control analysis by matching 1:3 patients with and without a pregnancy for type of BRCA PV, hormone receptor status, nodal status and year at diagnosis; moreover, each control had to have a disease-free interval longer than the time occurring between BC diagnosis and conception of the matched case. Results: From 78 centers worldwide, 4,732 patients were included, of whom 659 had at least one pregnancy after BC (pregnancy cohort) and 4,073 did not (non-pregnancy cohort). Patients in the pregnancy cohort were significantly more likely to carry BRCA1 PVs, to be younger at BC diagnosis, to have node-negative and hormone receptor-negative (HR-) BC (all p< 0.01). Pregnancy rate at 10 years was 22% (95% CI 21%-24%) overall, 18% (95% CI 16%-21%) and 26% (95% CI 24%-26%) in patients with HR+ and HR- BC, respectively (p< 0.01). Median time from BC diagnosis to conception was 3.5 years (IQR 2.2-5.3 years), significantly longer in patients with HR+ than HR- BC (4.3 vs 3.2 years, p< 0.01). Among 659 patients with a pregnancy after BC, 45 (6.8%) and 63 (9.6%) experienced an induced abortion or a miscarriage, respectively. Of the 517 (78.5%) patients with completed pregnancy, 54 (10.4%) had twins and 406 (78.5%) delivered at term (delivery ≥37 weeks). Among the 571 babies born, 5 (0.9%) had congenital anomalies. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (IQR, 4.5-12.6 years). No significant difference in DFS was observed between the pregnancy and non-pregnancy cohorts (unadjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15, p=0.74; adjusted HR [aHR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.81-1.20, p=0.90). Patients in the pregnancy cohort showed significantly better BCSS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.74, p< 0.01; aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.86, p< 0.01) and OS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.72, p< 0.01; aHR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.85, p< 0.01). Similar results were obtained in the case-control analysis. Subgroup analyses of survival endpoints according to patient, tumor and treatment characteristics will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: In this global study, 1 out of 5 young BRCA carriers conceived within 10 years after a BC diagnosis, higher than rates previously reported in unselected young BC populations. Pregnancy following BC in BRCA carriers did not appear to adversely impact maternal prognosis or fetal outcomes. These findings should be incorporated into oncofertility counseling of young BRCA carriers with BC. Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Eva Blondeaux, Elisa Agostinetto, Anne-Sophie Hamy-Petit, Hee Jeong Kim, Camila Chiodi, Rinat Bernstein-Molho, Florentine Hilbers, Katarzyna Pogoda, Estela Carrasco Lopez, Kevin Punie, Jyoti Bajpai, Michail Ignatiadis, Halle Moore, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Angela Toss, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Fedro Alessandro Peccatori, Tiphaine Renaud, Alberta Ferrari, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Robert Fruscio, Wanda Cui, Stephanie Wong, Claudio Vernieri, Kathryn Ruddy, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Alexios Matikas, Mariya Rozenblit, Cynthia Villareal Garza, Laura De Marchis, Lucia Del Mastro, Fabio Puglisi, Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz, Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg, Bela Mrinakova, Sarah Meister, Luca Livraghi, Florian Clatot, Rinat Yerushalmi, Carmine De Angelis, Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Icro Meattini, Natalia Cichowska-Cwalińska, Martine Berlière, Mahmoud Salama, Ugo De Giorgi, Amir Sonnenblick, Hatem Azim, Ann Partridge. Pregnancy after breast cancer in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants: results from an international cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS02-13.
Pregnancy After Breast Cancer in Young BRCA Carriers
Kim, Hee Jeong , Bernstein‐Molho, Rinat , Pogoda, Katarzyna , Carrasco, Estela , Bajpai, Jyoti , Phillips, Kelly‐Anne , Rousset‐Jablonski, Christine , Renaud, Tiphaine , Cui, Wanda, Wong, Stephanie M. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Rozenblit, Mariya, Marchis, Laura De , Mriňáková, Bela , Meister, Sarah , Livraghi, Luca , Clatot, Florian , Yerushalmi, Rinat , Angelis, Carmine De , Meattini, Icro , Cichowska-Cwalińska, Natalia, Berlière, Martine , Salama, Mahmoud , Giorgi, Ugo De , Sonnenblick, Amir , Chiodi, Camila , Maria, Camille, Azim, Hatem A. , Molinelli, Chiara , Paesmans, Marianne , Ameye, Lieveke , Hatse, Sigrid , Nevelsteen, Ines , Neven, Patrick , Rompuy, Chantal Van, Duhoux, François, Bini, Federica , Cont, Nicoletta Tomasi, Pais, Helena Luna , Mohar, Alejandro , Palacios, Tamara, Pastò, Brenno , Bonadio, Renata Colombo , Peretz‐Yablonski, Tamar , Anghelone, Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina, Valle, Angelica Della , Campanella, Maria, Bas, Raphaëlle, Talouet, Solenne de, Bonadona, Valérie, Lasset, Christine , Acheritogaray, Marion , Sénéchal, Claire , Mariño, Monica , Feldman, Didi, Pesce, Romina , Allemand, Carol, Riggi, Cecilia, Iriarte, Maria Belen, Salgado, Alfonso Cortés, Gión, María , Prat, Aleix , Hester, Anna, Dunckelmann, Sofia, Bartsch, Rupert , Mannsbarth, Constantin, Božović‐Spasojević, Ivana, Dimitrijević, Marija, Visani, Luca , Bettazzi, Beatrice, Sini, Valentina, Rognone, Alessia, Patricelli, Maria Grazia , Rabaiotti, Emanuela , Acconci, Giulia, Baldacci, Erica, Bianchini, Giulia, Kleiterp, Sieta, Moha, Daoud Ait, Sekar, Anberson, Loi, Francesco , Dessì, Mariele, O’Connor, Sarah , Nesci, Stephanie, Michael, Chris, Larson, Nicole L. , Lopetegui, Nerea M., Rocco, Roberta Di, Bengala, Carmelo , Haddad, Stephanie , Safran, Emma, Negri, Serena , Dell'Oro, Cristina, Marchetta, Liliana, Lustberg, Maryam B. , Blansky, Deanna , Ansari, Norin , Aguilar-y-Méndez, Dione, Swain, Monique , Miller, Madison , Leach, Richard E., Synowiec, Agnieszka , Hancinova, M., Tarbaj, L., Beslija, S. , Cerić, Timur , Hasanbegovic, B. , Bianchi, Manuel A., Álvaro, Laura, Bergman, Louise Eriksson, Damian, Cristina , Eriksson, Louise , Cui, Wanyuan , Prat, Aleix , De Angelis, Carmine , Meattini, Icro , Rousset-Jablonski, Christine , Phillips, Kelly-Anne , Cui, Wanda , Wong, Stephanie M , Livraghi, Luca , Lustberg, Maryam , Pogoda, K. , Lambertini, Matteo , Blondeaux, Eva , Agostinetto, Elisa , Hamy, Anne‐Sophie , Meglio, Antonio Di , Hilbers, Florentine , Punie, Kevin , Ignatiadis, Michail , Moore, Halle C. F. , Toss, Angela , Peccatori, Fedro A , Ferrari, Alberta , Paluch–Shimon, Shani , Fruscio, Robert , Vernieri, Claudio , Dieci, Maria Vittoria , Matikas, Alexios , Rozenblit, Mariya , Villarreal‐Garza, Cynthia , Mastro, Lucia Del , Puglisi, Fabio , Estevez-Diz, Maria Del Pilar , Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny A , Sánchez-Bayona, Rodrigo , Lee, Young‐Jin , Boni, Luca , Partridge, Ann H. , Azambuja, Evandro de , Amant, Frédéric , Brems, Hilde , Han, Sileny , Smeets, Ann , Wildiers, Hans , Giugliano, Federica , Criscitiello, Carmen , Borea, Roberto , Arecco, Luca , Chirco, Alessandra, Venturelli, Marta , Cortesi, Laura , Ponzone, Riccardo , Balmañà, Judith , Graffeo, Rossella , Ros, Lucia Da , Miolo, Gianmaria , Garutti, Mattia , Spazzapan, Simon , Viel, Alessandra , Fidalgo, José Alejandro Pérez , Guarneri, Valentina , Heudel, Pierre‐Etienne , Trédan, Olivier , Bonadona, Valérie , Córdoba, Octavi , Cortés, Javier , Saavedra, Cristina , Rodriguez, Adela R. , Adamo, Bárbara , Harbeck, Nadia , Marhold, Maximilian , POPOVIC, LAZAR S. , Krivokuća, Ana , Livi, Lorenzo , Sposetti, Caterina , Bianchini, Giampaolo , Gentilini, Oreste D , Fontana, Andrea , Pistelli, Mirco , Linn, Sabine C. , Sarin, Rajiv , Atzori, Francesco , O’Connor, Sarah, James, Paul A. , Michael, Chris, Couch, Fergus J. , Olson, Janet E. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Carey, Lisa A. , Abdou, Yara George , Zagami, Paola , Baldassarri, Margherita , Mariamidze, Elene , Graff, Stephanie L. , Matos, Leonor Vasconcelos de , Ferreira, Arlindo Rebelo , Dell’Oro, Cristina, Inzoli, Alessandra , Costa, Clarissa , Jeon, June Evelyn , Woodruff, Teresa K. , Fabi, Alessandra , Palazzo, Antonella , Paris, Ida , Kufel-Grabowska, Joanna , Sokolović, Emir , Foulkes, William D. , Bianchi, Manuel Alva, Tolosa, Pablo , Antone, Nicoleta Zenovia , Damian, Cristina

JAMA | December 7, 2023 | Volume: 331 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 49

10.1001/jama.2023.25463 Get It

ImportanceYoung women with breast cancer who have germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 face unique challenges regarding fertility. Previous studies demonstrating the feasibility and safety of pregnancy in breast cancer survivors included limited data regarding BRCA carriers.ObjectiveTo investigate cumulative incidence of pregnancy and disease-free survival in young women who are BRCA carriers.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsInternational, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study conducted at 78 participating centers worldwide. The study included female participants diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between January 2000 and December 2020 carrying germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2. Last delivery was October 7, 2022; last follow-up was February 20, 2023.ExposurePregnancy after breast cancer.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary end points were cumulative incidence of pregnancy after breast cancer and disease-free survival. Secondary end points were breast cancer–specific survival, overall survival, pregnancy, and fetal and obstetric outcomes.ResultsOf 4732 BRCA carriers included, 659 had at least 1 pregnancy after breast cancer and 4073 did not. Median age at diagnosis in the overall cohort was 35 years (IQR, 31-38 years). Cumulative incidence of pregnancy at 10 years was 22% (95% CI, 21%-24%), with a median time from breast cancer diagnosis to conception of 3.5 years (IQR, 2.2-5.3 years). Among the 659 patients who had a pregnancy, 45 (6.9%) and 63 (9.7%) had an induced abortion or a miscarriage, respectively. Of the 517 patients (79.7%) with a completed pregnancy, 406 (91.0%) delivered at term (≥37 weeks) and 54 (10.4%) had twins. Among the 470 infants born with known information on pregnancy complications, 4 (0.9%) had documented congenital anomalies. Median follow-up was 7.8 years (IQR, 4.5-12.6 years). No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed between patients with or without a pregnancy after breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81-1.20). Patients who had a pregnancy had significantly better breast cancer–specific survival and overall survival.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this global study, 1 in 5 young BRCA carriers conceived within 10 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Pregnancy following breast cancer in BRCA carriers was not associated with decreased disease-free survival.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03673306
Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lambertini, Matteo , Blondeaux, Eva , Bruzzone, Marco , Perachino, Marta , Anderson, Richard A. , Azambuja, Evandro de , Poorvu, Philip D. , Kim, Hee Jeong , Villarreal‐Garza, Cynthia , Pistilli, Barbara , Vaz-Luís, Inês , Saura, Cristina , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Franzoi, Maria Alice , Sertoli, Chiara, Azim, Hatem A. , Demeestere, Isabelle , Mastro, Lucia Del , Pagani, Olivia , de Azambuja, Evandro , Ceppi, Marcello , Azim, Hatem A , Amant, Frederic , Demeestere, Isabelle , Del Mastro, Lucia , Partridge, Ann H , Peccatori, Fedro A , Lambertini, Matteo , Saura, Cristina , Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia , Bruzzone, Marco , Amant, Frédéric , Partridge, Ann H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | July 1, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 29 | Pages: 3293-3305

10.1200/jco.21.00535 Get It

PURPOSE Many patients and physicians remain concerned about the potential detrimental effects of pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) in terms of reproductive outcomes and maternal safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at providing updated evidence on these topics. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after BC (PROSPERO number CRD42020158324). Likelihood of pregnancy after BC, their reproductive outcomes, and maternal safety were assessed. Pooled relative risks, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS Of 6,462 identified records, 39 were included involving 8,093,401 women from the general population and 112,840 patients with BC of whom 7,505 had a pregnancy after diagnosis. BC survivors were significantly less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with the general population (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.49). Risks of caesarean section (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25), low birth weight (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.73), preterm birth (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.88), and small for gestational age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33) were significantly higher in BC survivors, particularly in those with previous chemotherapy exposure, compared with the general population. No significantly increased risk of congenital abnormalities or other reproductive complications were observed. Compared to patients with BC without subsequent pregnancy, those with a pregnancy had better disease-free survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89) and overall survival (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68). Similar results were observed after correcting for potential confounders and irrespective of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pregnancy outcome, and timing of pregnancy. CONCLUSION These results provide reassuring evidence on the safety of conceiving in BC survivors. Patients' pregnancy desire should be considered a crucial component of their survivorship care plan.
Abstract GS3-09: Chances of pregnancy after breast cancer, reproductive and disease outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Poorvu, Philip D. , Kim, Hee Jeong , Pistilli, Barbara , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Sertoli, Chiara, Azim, Hatem A. , Pagani, Olivia , Blondeaux, Eva , Perachino, Marta , Bruzzone, Marco , Anderson, Richard A. , Azambuja, Evandro de , Villarreal‐Garza, Cynthia , Vaz-Luís, Inês , Saura, Cristina , Franzoi, Maria Alice , Ceppi, Marcello , Amant, Frédéric , Demeestere, Isabelle , Mastro, Lucia Del , Partridge, Ann H. , Peccatori, Fedro A , Lambertini, Matteo

Cancer Research | February 15, 2021 | Volume: 81 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: GS3-09-GS3-09

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-gs3-09 Get It

Abstract Background: Pregnancy-related issues are a priority for young breast cancer (BC) patients. Increasing evidence has shown that pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis is feasible. Nevertheless, few BC survivors conceive following anticancer treatment completion and many physicians remain concerned about the potentially detrimental effects of pregnancy after BC in terms of fetal/obstetrical outcomes and maternal prognosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at providing updated and solid evidence on these important issues. Methods: A systematic literature review up to January 31, 2020 with no language restriction was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis. Chances of pregnancy after BC, fetal and obstetrical outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Pooled relative risks (RRs), hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random effects models. The study is registered with the PROSPERO registration number CRD42020158324. Results: Overall, 39 studies were included. Out of the 8,265,713 young women included in these studies, 8,093,401 were from the general population, 57,739 had cancers other than BC, 114,573 had BC. Among the 114,573 BC patients, 7,505 had a pregnancy after BC diagnosis and 107,068 did not. Compared to women from the general population, BC patients had 60% reduced chances of having a pregnancy following anticancer treatment completion (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32-0.49). Among other cancer patients, only women with prior cervical cancer had lower pregnancy rates (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.31-0.35) than BC patients. Compared to the general population, BC survivors had significantly increased risks of low birth weight (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31-1.73), small for gestational age (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33), preterm delivery (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.88) and caesarean section (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25). No significant increased risk of congenital abnormalities (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.89-2.98) or other pregnancy or delivery complications (spontaneous or induced abortion, gestosis, antepartum or postpartum hemorrhage) was observed. Prior chemotherapy exposure or short pregnancy interval (defined as <2 or <5 years after BC diagnosis) were not associated with additional increased risk of complications. Pregnancy after BC was not associated with a negative impact on patients’ outcomes. Compared to BC patients without subsequent pregnancy, those with pregnancy after BC had better OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.67) and DFS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.94). Similar results were observed in the studies correcting for the potential “healthy mother effect” (OS: HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42-0.65; DFS: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.96). No detrimental prognostic effect of pregnancy after BC was observed in patients with hormone-receptor positive disease (DFS: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73-1.66), while better outcomes were observed for those with hormone-receptor negative disease (DFS: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95). The safety of pregnancy after BC was observed irrespective of BRCA status, nodal status, previous chemotherapy exposure, pregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: This large meta-analysis provides solid evidence on the safety of pregnancy after prior BC diagnosis. The increased risk of fetal and obstetrical complications (but not of congenital abnormalities) calls for ensuring a closer monitoring of these pregnancies. The significantly reduced chances of conceiving as compared to the general population and other cancer patients should raise further awareness on the need to improve the oncofertility counseling of young BC patients wishing to complete their family planning following anticancer treatment completion. Citation Format: Eva Blondeaux, Marta Perachino, Marco Bruzzone, Richard A. Anderson, Evandro De Azambuja, Philip D. Poorvu, Hee Jeong Kim, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Barbara Pistilli, Ines Vaz-Luis, Cristina Saura, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Maria Alice Franzoi, Chiara Sertoli, Marcello Ceppi, Hatem A. Azim, Jr., Frederic Amant, Isabelle Demeestere, Lucia Del Mastro, Ann H. Partridge, Olivia Pagani, Fedro A. Peccatori, Matteo Lambertini. Chances of pregnancy after breast cancer, reproductive and disease outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-09.