Huang, Jiaoti

Context.— Controversies and uncertainty persist in prostate cancer grading. Objective.— To update grading recommendations. Data Sources.— Critical review of the literature along with pathology and clinician surveys. Conclusions.— Percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) is as follows: (1) report %GP4 in needle biopsy with Grade Groups (GrGp) 2 and 3, and in needle biopsy on other parts (jars) of lower grade in cases with at least 1 part showing Gleason score (GS) 4 + 4 = 8; and (2) report %GP4: less than 5% or less than 10% and 10% increments thereafter. Tertiary grade patterns are as follows: (1) replace “tertiary grade pattern” in radical prostatectomy (RP) with “minor tertiary pattern 5 (TP5),” and only use in RP with GrGp 2 or 3 with less than 5% Gleason pattern 5; and (2) minor TP5 is noted along with the GS, with the GrGp based on the GS. Global score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are as follows: (1) when multiple undesignated cores are taken from a single MRI-targeted lesion, an overall grade for that lesion is given as if all the involved cores were one long core; and (2) if providing a global score, when different scores are found in the standard and the MRI-targeted biopsy, give a single global score (factoring both the systematic standard and the MRI-targeted positive cores). Grade Groups are as follows: (1) Grade Groups (GrGp) is the terminology adopted by major world organizations; and (2) retain GS 3 + 5 = 8 in GrGp 4. Cribriform carcinoma is as follows: (1) report the presence or absence of cribriform glands in biopsy and RP with Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma (IDC-P) is as follows: (1) report IDC-P in biopsy and RP; (2) use criteria based on dense cribriform glands (>50% of the gland is composed of epithelium relative to luminal spaces) and/or solid nests and/or marked pleomorphism/necrosis; (3) it is not necessary to perform basal cell immunostains on biopsy and RP to identify IDC-P if the results would not change the overall (highest) GS/GrGp part per case; (4) do not include IDC-P in determining the final GS/GrGp on biopsy and/or RP; and (5) “atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP)” is preferred for an intraductal proliferation of prostatic secretory cells which shows a greater degree of architectural complexity and/or cytological atypia than typical high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, yet falling short of the strict diagnostic threshold for IDC-P. Molecular testing is as follows: (1) Ki67 is not ready for routine clinical use; (2) additional studies of active surveillance cohorts are needed to establish the utility of PTEN in this setting; and (3) dedicated studies of RNA-based assays in active surveillance populations are needed to substantiate the utility of these expensive tests in this setting. Artificial intelligence and novel grading schema are as follows: (1) incorporating reactive stromal grade, percent GP4, minor tertiary GP5, and cribriform/intraductal carcinoma are not ready for adoption in current practice.

Abstract Expression of DLL3 was examined in additional tumor types, as it was found to be highly expressed in tumor-initiating cells (TIC) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), where a DLL3-targeted antibody drug conjugate (ADC), rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T; SC16LD6.5; Saunders et al. 2015 Sci Transl Med 7:302ra136)) exerted clinically meaningful anti-tumor effects in a phase I trial (Spigel et al. 2016 Lancet Oncology; In Press). DLL3 expression was profiled by qRT-PCR, ELISA and immunohistochemistry in multiple tumor types. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) from melanoma and ovarian small cell carcinoma were established and used for efficacy studies to determine the ability of Rova-T to impact tumor growth and TIC frequency. DLL3 expression was seen in metastatic melanoma (55%), low grade gliomas (90%), glioblastoma (70%), medullary thyroid cancer (65%), carcinoids (33%), dispersed neuroendocrine tumors in the pancreas (9%), bladder (57%) and prostate (24%), testicular cancer (90%), and lung adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine features (80%). Unlike SCLC, where DLL3 does not predict clinical outcome on standard therapies, DLL3 expression negatively correlates with overall survival in melanoma and small cell bladder cancer. In mice bearing DLL3 positive melanoma PDX, treatment with a single dose of Rova-T resulted in effective and durable responses (>100 days), which correlated with a significant impact on TIC frequency. Similarly, in mice bearing DLL3-positive ovarian small cell PDX, a single dose of Rova-T resulted in effective and durable responses (>100 days). Our results show that DLL3 is expressed in many neuroendocrine tumors (lung, ovarian, prostate, bladder, etc), metastatic melanoma, medullary thyroid cancer, low-grade gliomas and glioblastoma. Given pre-clinical results showing efficacy of Rova-T in melanoma and ovarian small cell carcinoma, as well as encouraging clinical data with Rova-T in patients with recurrent/refractory SCLC, clinical evaluation of Rova-T in DLL3-positive melanoma, glioblastoma, medullary thyroid cancer and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas is warranted. A “basket” trial enrolling patients with DLL3-positive solid tumors is now recruiting patients (NCT02709889). Citation Format: Laura R. Saunders, Samuel A. Williams, Sheila Bheddah, Kumiko Isse, Sarah Fong, Marybeth A. Pysz, Himisha Beltran, Loredana Puca, Verena Sailer, Juan M. Mosquera, Yu Yin, Jiaoti Huang, Andrew J. Armstrong, Jorge Garcia, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Vadim Koshkin, Petros Grivas, Farhad Kosari, John Cheville, Justin C. Moser, Thomas J. Flotte, Thorvardur Halfdanarson, Aaron Mansfield, Konstantinos N. Leventakos, Julian R. Molina, Douglas W. Ball, Barry D. Nelkin, Jill E. Shea, Courtney L. Scaife, Scott J. Dylla. Expression of DLL3 in metastatic melanoma, glioblastoma and high-grade extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas as potential indications for rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T; SC16LD6.5), a delta-like protein 3 (DLL3)-targeted antibody drug conjugate (ADC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3093. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3093