Back to Authors

Yang, Ximing J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3370-6208

Mayo Clinic

Northwestern University

Citations 4

A phase 2 randomized trial of neoadjuvant enoblituzumab versus standard of care in men with high-risk localized prostate cancer: The help elucidate and attack longitudinally (HEAT) prostate cancer randomized study.
Wang, Hao , Shah, Paras , Yang, Ximing J. , Murugan, Paari , Gupta, Sounak , Warlick, Christopher A. , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Ross, Ashley E. , Shenderov, Eugene , Marzo, Angelo M. De , Lotan, Tamara Levin , Schaeffer, Edward M. , Hussain, Maha , Sartor, Oliver , Pavlovich, Christian P. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Allaf, Mohamad E

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 6, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: TPS5125-TPS5125

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.tps5125 Get It

TPS5125 Background: B7-H3 is a member of the B7 superfamily, which includes PD-L1 (B7-H1) and PD-L2 (B7-DC). Enoblituzumab is a humanized Fc-optimized B7-H3–targeting antibody that induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). A recent investigator-initiated trial demonstrated that enoblituzumab therapy, used in the neoadjuvant prostate cancer setting, is feasible, safe, may enhance short-term clinical outcomes, and appears to stimulate intratumoral immune activation including CD8+ T cell infiltration and peripheral expansion of tumor-infiltrating T-cell clones that correlated with undetectable PSA at 1-year post-prostatectomy. To assess the impact of enoblituzumab on recurrence-free survival following prostatectomy, a phase 2, randomized, neoadjuvant clinical trial in high-risk localized prostate cancer patients has been started. We hypothesize that targeting B7-H3 with enoblituzumab will delay or prevent recurrence following prostatectomy compared to standard of care (SOC) . Methods: The HEAT trial is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized, phase 2 study that is presently enrolling (NCT06014255). Eligible patients will undergo a pre-treatment prostate biopsy and conventional imaging (CT and bone scan) as well as PSMA-PET. Patients who have clinical stage cT1c-T3b, cN0 cM0 disease by conventional imaging (N1 by PSMA allowed with up to 3 LNs each ≤1 cm) will be eligible as long as concurrent hormonal or radiation therapy is not given. Prostate biopsy, within 3 months of enrollment, needs to show at least 3 positive cores containing at least 1 core with at least 50% disease involvement with Gleason ≥4+3=7 disease (with at least 1 additional high-risk feature such as PSA>20 ng/ml or cT3) or a Gleason sum ≥8. Patients will receive enoblituzumab at a dose of 15mg/kg IV biweekly for 6 doses (12 weeks) on the treatment arm, followed by prostatectomy, or will be scheduled for prostatectomy directly within 4-8 weeks on the SOC arm. 219 patients will be randomized (2:1) to treatment versus SOC. Pre-treatment, on-treatment, and post-treatment biomarkers of response and resistance will be collected. Patients will be followed according to standard institutional practices, but will require PSA evaluations every 3 (±1) months during year 1 and every 6 (±2) months during years 2-5. In both arms, salvage or adjuvant therapy will occur after biochemical or radiographic progression. The primary endpoint is recurrence-free survival (RFS) defined as any metastasis events, local pelvic visceral or lymph node recurrence, detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA), or start of subsequent local or systemic therapy (including salvage or adjuvant therapy), or death for any cause, whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints include additional clinical and immunologic correlates. Clinical trial information: NCT06014255 .
A randomized phase III double-blind placebo-controlled trial of first line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab for patients with HER2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer: a trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E1105)
Mezzanotte-Sharpe, Jessica , O’Neill, Anne, Arteaga, Carlos L. , Yang, Ximing J. , Cella, David , Meropol, Neal J. , Alpaugh, R. Katherine , Saphner, Thomas J. , Swaney, Robert E., Hoelzer, Karen L., Gradishar, William J. , Sundaram, P. Kothai, Jilani, Shamim Z., Perez, Edith A. , Jahanzeb, Mohammad , Reid, Sonya , Mayer, Ingrid A. , Wagner, Lynne I. , Abramson, Vandana G. , Lin, Nancy U. , Wolff, Antonio C. , Sledge, George W.

No container title available | April 29, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-4295044/v1 Get It

Abstract Background In 2008, bevacizumab received accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on the preclinical and preliminary clinical activity of the trastuzumab and bevacizumab combination, ECOG-ACRIN E1105 trial was developed to determine if the addition of bevacizumab to a chemotherapy and trastuzumab combination for first-line therapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive MBC. Findings: 96 patients were randomized to receive standard first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab between November 2007 and October 2009, and 93 began protocol therapy. Induction therapy was given for 24 weeks, followed by maintenance trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab. 60% (56/93) began carboplatin and 74% (69/93) completed 6 cycles of induction therapy. Primary endpoint was PFS. Median PFS was 11.1 and 13.8 months for placebo and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 95%, Confidence Interval [Cl] for bevacizumab vs. placebo: 0.73 [0.43–1.23], p = 0.24), and at a median follow-up of 70.7 months, median survival was 49.1 and 63 months (HR [95% Cl] for OS: 1.09 [0.61–1.97], p = 0.75). The most common toxicities across both arms were neutropenia and hypertension, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, fatigue, and sensory neuropathy reported more frequently with bevacizumab. Conclusions In this trial, the addition of bevacizumab did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Although the trial was underpowered due to smaller than anticipated sample size, these findings corroborated other clinical trials during this time.
The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer
Epstein, Jonathan I. , Amin, Mahul B. , Fine, Samson W. , Algaba, Ferrán, Aron, Manju , Baydar, Dilek Ertoy , Brimo, Fadi , Cheville, John C. , Colecchia, Maurizio , Cunha, Isabela Werneck da , Delprado, Warick, Giannico, Giovanna A. , Gordetsky, Jennifer , Hansel, Donna E. , Hirsch, Michelle S. , Huang, Jiaoti , Humphrey, Peter A. , Jiménez, Rafael E. , Khani, Francesca , Kong, Qingnuan , Kunju, Lakshmi P., Lal, Priti , Latour, Mathieu, Lotan, Tamara, Mehra, Rohit , Miyamoto, Hiroshi , Montironi, Rodolfo , Netto, George J. , Nguyen, Jane , Osunkoya, Adeboye O. , Robinson, Brian D. , Rubin, Mark A. , So, Jeffrey , Takahashi, Hiroyuki , Tavora, Fabio, Tretiakova, Maria , True, Lawrence D. , Wobker, Sara E. , Yang, Ximing J. , Zhou, Ming , Zynger, Debra L. , Trpkov, Kiril , Távora, Fábio , Gordetsky, Jennifer B , Tretiakova, Maria S , Robinson, Brian D. , Rubin, Mark A , Trpkov, Kiril , López-Beltrán, Antonio , Compérat, Éva , Marzo, Angelo M. De , Guo, Charles Chuanhai , Kryvenko, Oleksandr N. , Maclean, Fiona M. , Magi‐Galluzzi, Cristina , Menon, Santosh , Parwani, Anil Vasdev , Shah, Rajal B.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | June 26, 2020 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 461-493

10.5858/arpa.2020-0015-ra Get It

Context.— Controversies and uncertainty persist in prostate cancer grading. Objective.— To update grading recommendations. Data Sources.— Critical review of the literature along with pathology and clinician surveys. Conclusions.— Percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) is as follows: (1) report %GP4 in needle biopsy with Grade Groups (GrGp) 2 and 3, and in needle biopsy on other parts (jars) of lower grade in cases with at least 1 part showing Gleason score (GS) 4 + 4 = 8; and (2) report %GP4: less than 5% or less than 10% and 10% increments thereafter. Tertiary grade patterns are as follows: (1) replace “tertiary grade pattern” in radical prostatectomy (RP) with “minor tertiary pattern 5 (TP5),” and only use in RP with GrGp 2 or 3 with less than 5% Gleason pattern 5; and (2) minor TP5 is noted along with the GS, with the GrGp based on the GS. Global score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are as follows: (1) when multiple undesignated cores are taken from a single MRI-targeted lesion, an overall grade for that lesion is given as if all the involved cores were one long core; and (2) if providing a global score, when different scores are found in the standard and the MRI-targeted biopsy, give a single global score (factoring both the systematic standard and the MRI-targeted positive cores). Grade Groups are as follows: (1) Grade Groups (GrGp) is the terminology adopted by major world organizations; and (2) retain GS 3 + 5 = 8 in GrGp 4. Cribriform carcinoma is as follows: (1) report the presence or absence of cribriform glands in biopsy and RP with Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma (IDC-P) is as follows: (1) report IDC-P in biopsy and RP; (2) use criteria based on dense cribriform glands (>50% of the gland is composed of epithelium relative to luminal spaces) and/or solid nests and/or marked pleomorphism/necrosis; (3) it is not necessary to perform basal cell immunostains on biopsy and RP to identify IDC-P if the results would not change the overall (highest) GS/GrGp part per case; (4) do not include IDC-P in determining the final GS/GrGp on biopsy and/or RP; and (5) “atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP)” is preferred for an intraductal proliferation of prostatic secretory cells which shows a greater degree of architectural complexity and/or cytological atypia than typical high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, yet falling short of the strict diagnostic threshold for IDC-P. Molecular testing is as follows: (1) Ki67 is not ready for routine clinical use; (2) additional studies of active surveillance cohorts are needed to establish the utility of PTEN in this setting; and (3) dedicated studies of RNA-based assays in active surveillance populations are needed to substantiate the utility of these expensive tests in this setting. Artificial intelligence and novel grading schema are as follows: (1) incorporating reactive stromal grade, percent GP4, minor tertiary GP5, and cribriform/intraductal carcinoma are not ready for adoption in current practice.
A randomized phase III double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab for patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC): A trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncolog
Arteaga, Carlos L. , O’Neill, Anne, Swaby, Ramona F., Alpaugh, R. Katherine , Yang, Ximing J. , Meropol, Neal J. , Saphner, Thomas J. , Jahanzeb, Mohammad , Perez, Edith A. , Mayer, Ingrid A. , Wagner, Lynne I. , Lin, Nancy U. , Sledge, George W.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 605-605

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.605 Get It

605 Background: Pre-clinical and nonrandomized clinical data support synergy of the combination of bevacizumab and trastuzumab. We conducted a randomized double-blinded phase III trial of chemotherapy/trastuzumab ± bevacizumab to evaluate efficacy (PFS after treatment initiation) of the addition of bevacizumab in first-line treatment of HER2+ MBC. Methods: Days 1, 8 and 15 paclitaxel ± carboplatin were administered with trastuzumab and either placebo or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for a total of 6 months. Antibody therapy was then continued without chemo every 3 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease assessments were performed every 3 months. Results: Ninety-six of the planned 489 analyzable patients (pts) were accrued between 2007 and 2009, at which time the study terminated due to poor accrual. Seventy % of pts were post-menopausal, 60% had ER+/HER2+ BC. Median age was 55 years (28-80). Outcomes and toxicities are summarized on the tables below. Median follow-up was 30 months. Conclusions: The combination of chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and bevacizumab did not significantly increased toxicity, and was overall safe and well tolerated. No significant differences in clinical benefit were observed between both treatment arms. Data on CTCs and Quality of Life will be presented at the meeting. This study was conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (Robert L. Comis, MD, Chair) and supported in part by Public Health Service Grants CA23318, CA66636, CA21115, CA32291, CA31946, CA49957, CA27525, CA14548, CA17145, CA32102, CA25224, CA49. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]