Hays, John L.

TPS4168 Background: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis, and improvements in therapy have been challenging. Alongside efforts in developing novel agents, there is a need to optimize and maximize the benefit of currently approved drugs. Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel is a frequently used regimen for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Nab-paclitaxel is albumin–bound chemotherapy; hence the role of albumin uptake is critical for its effect. Caveolae are small membrane invaginations essential for transendothelial albumin uptake. Cav-1 is the principal structural component of caveolae. Williams and colleagues have published a series of preclinical studies demonstrating that tumor cell-specific Cav-1 expression directly correlates with albumin and albumin-bound chemotherapy uptake and subsequent apoptotic response in tumor cells. In vitro studies showed that exposure of pancreatic cancer cells to Gemcitabine resulted in up-regulation of Cav-1 peaking 48 hours after gemcitabine exposure. This Cav-1 up-regulation correlated with increased temporal albumin cellular uptake. In addition, Williams and colleagues noted that exposure of pancreatic cancer cell lines to Gemcitabine resulted in a time–specific re-entry of cells into the G2/M phase (nab-paclitaxel cytotoxicity phase) between 48-60 hours after gemcitabine treatment. Collectively this data suggest that infusing nab-paclitaxel after 48 hours of gemcitabine infusion would be optimal for both increased uptake as well as increased susceptible tumor cells. We had previously shown this effect on multiple cell lines as well as mouse models. Methods: This is a phase II trial; patients will receive a standard of care chemotherapy regimen consisting of FDA-approved Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel with modification of the schedule to deliver nab-paclitaxel 48 hours (2 days) after gemcitabine infusions. The primary endpoint is ORR, with a null hypothesis of 20% vs. a target of 35%. Employing a 2-stage design (minimax) and assuming 80% power and a 0.05 significance level, a total of 53 patients will be required. In the first stage, if at least 7/31 patients respond to therapy, an additional 22 patients will be added for a total of 53 patients. The study will be terminated early if ≤ six patients respond in the first stage. Observation of response in at least 16/53 patients would be required to warrant further investigation of this infusion schedule of combination therapy. The secondary endpoints include the safety of the regimen schedule, Relative dose intensity, disease control rate, PFS, and OS. The trial opened to enrollment in June 2020 and is accepting patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04115163.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CR-PM). However, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to CRS-HIPEC is poorly understood. A retrospective review of adult patients with CR-PM who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC from 2000–2017 was performed. Among 298 patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC, 196 (65.8%) received NAC while 102 (34.2%) underwent surgery first (SF). Patients who received NAC had lower peritoneal cancer index score (12.1 + 7.9 vs. 14.3 + 8.5, p = 0.034). There was no significant difference in grade III/IV complications (22.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.650), readmission (32.3% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.114), or 30-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.411) between groups. NAC patients experienced longer overall survival (OS) (median 32.7 vs. 22.0 months, p = 0.044) but similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median 13.8 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.456). After controlling for confounding factors, NAC was not independently associated with improved OS (OR 0.80) or RFS (OR 1.04). Among patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC for CR-PM, the use of NAC was associated with improved OS that did not persist on multivariable analysis. However, NAC prior to CRS+/-HIPEC was a safe and feasible strategy for CR-PM, which may aid in the appropriate selection of patients for aggressive cytoreductive surgery.

746 Background: Pelareorep is a proprietary formulation of live, replication-competent, naturally occurring Reovirus Type 3 Dearing strain. A randomized phase II trial of pelareorep in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of metastatic PDAC (NCT01280058) was performed. Although pelareorep did not improve the primary endpoint of progression-free survival compared to carboplatin and paclitaxel alone, impressive durable responses were seen in the pelareorep arm in some patients (pts). Further, prior studies have noted the immunomodulatory carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM6/CD66c) as a receptor for specific viral subtypes. We thus speculated that altered CEACAM6 levels may be predictive for pelareorep sensitivity. Methods: Pre-treatment tissue biopsies were collected prior enrolment for all 73 pts on study. Evaluable pts with transcriptomic data was available for only 31 pts. RNA was purified from FFPE tissue and gene expression analysis was performed using SensationPlus FFPE Amplification and WT labelling kit and the Human Transcriptome Array 2.0. CEACAM6 protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Differential gene expression and survival analysis using were performed in R/Bioconductor. Appropriate corrections for multiplicity were performed. Results: When comparing extraordinary responders in the pelareorep treated arm to those with poor outcomes, low levels of CEACAM6 mRNA expression were associated with prolonged PFS in pelareorep-treated pts (adjusted p = 0.05). This effect was not seen in non-pelareorep treated pts. The luminal, but not the cytoplasmic immunohistochemistry score, was highly correlated with mRNA expression levels of CEACAM6, p = 0.001. Modulation of CEACAM6 in vitro and in vivo are underway. Conclusions: CEACAM6 may be a candidate biomarker of sensitivity to pelareorep and, in theory, could improve viral trafficking of this compound in tumor cells. Clinical trial information: NCT01280058 . [Table: see text]

e15168 Background: 2-8% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are in younger adults (YAs), patients (pts) less than age 50. However, current understanding of CRC in YAs is inadequate, especially that of sporadic onset. We conducted a study to describe the landscape of genomic alterations in YA CRC pts presenting to a large academic practice. Methods: Adult pts with CRC presenting to The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center oncology clinics were offered next generation sequencing (NGS) through a customized 22-gene Ion AmpliSeq Mutation Panel as part of clinical care. Commonly mutated areas of select genes (including AKT1, ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2/4, FBXW7, FGFR1/2/3, KRAS/NRAS, MET, NOTCH1, PIK3CA, PTEN, TP53) were sequenced from tumor sections. Institutional review board approval was obtained to retrospectively analyze this NGS testing between 1/2013-3/2016. Results: 258 CRC pts underwent genomic profiling. 57 pts (22.1%) were YAs at diagnosis (range 22-49 years); 20 pts (7.8%) were 40 years old or younger. 31 YA pts (54.4%) had metastatic disease. Of the YAs with CRC, 18 pts (31.6%) were diagnosed with R-sided colon, 16 pts (28.1%) with L-sided colon, and 22 pts (38.6%) with rectal cancer. 110 genomic alterations were found in YA pts, with a mean of 1.9 mutations per tumor (range 0-6); 35 (31.8%) of these in 32 (56.1%) YA pts were actionable. Of these 110 alterations, 41.8% were in TP53, 28.2% in KRAS/NRAS, 10.0% in PIK3CA, 3.6% in BRAF, 3.6% in FBXW7, and 2.73% in PTEN. 6 YA pts (10.5%) had microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Only 1 pt had concomitant MSI-H and a BRAF mutation; 4 pts with BRAF mutations were microsatellite stable. Comparing our YA pts to a separate cohort of pts age > 50 who had testing done, no significant difference was seen in mutation incidence in KRAS/NRAS (p = 1.0), TP53 (p = 0.3), PIK3CA (p = 0.128), or BRAF (p = 1.0). Conclusions: Genomic profiling through a targeted NGS panel is feasible as part of routine clinical practice. There is disagreement in the literature on genetic mutations in YA compared to older age CRC pts. Knowledge of the genomic landscape in YAs with CRC will lead to improved understanding of the underlying biology of CRC in YAs as it differs from CRC in older pts, and could impact future care of this cohort.