Back to Authors

Atri, Alireza

0000-0003-4405-6973

Mayo Clinic

Banner Health

Citations 62

Distinct Tau PET Dynamics in Early vs. Late Age-of-Onset Alzheimer’s disease
Chiotis, Konstantinos, Soleimani-Meigooni, David N, Aisen, Paul S, Amuiri, Alinda, Atri, Alireza, Beckett, Laurel, Brickhouse, Michael , Clark, David G, Dage, Jeffrey L, Day, Gregory S, Duara, Ranjan, Eloyan, Ani , Foroud, Tatiana, Graff-Radford, Neill R, Grant, Ian M, Hammers, Dustin B, Honig, Lawrence S, Johnson, Erik C. B., Jones, D. Richard, Kirby, Kala, Koeppe, Robert, Kramer, Joel H, Kukull, Walter A, Leuzy, Antoine , Masdeu, Joseph C., Mendez, Mario F., Musiek, Erik, Nudelman, Kelly N., Onyike, Chiadi U., Riddle, Meghan, Rocha, Salma, Rogalski, Emily, Salloway, Stephen, Schonhaut, Daniel R., Sha, Sharon, Shankar, Ranjani, Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Toga, Arthur W., Touroutoglou, Alexandra, Turner, Raymond Scott, Vemuri, Prashanthi, Wingo, Thomas S., Wolk, David A., Womack, Kyle, Zhang, J. , Carrillo, Maria C., Dickerson, Bradford C., Apostolova, Liana G., Joie, Renaud La, Rabinovici, Gil D., Chiotis, Konstantinos , Blazhenets, Ganna , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Aisen, Paul , Atri, Alireza , Beckett, Laurel , Clark, David G., Dage, Jeffrey L. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Foroud, Tatiana , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Hammers, Dustin B , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Jones, David T. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kramer, Joel H. , Kukull, Walter A. , Lagarde, Julien , Maiti, Piyush , Masdeu, Joseph C , Mendez, Mario F. , Musiek, Erik , Nudelman, Kelly , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen, Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Sha, Sharon J. , Shankar, Ranjani , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Toga, Arthur W. , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Turner, Raymond Scott , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Carrillo, María C. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Apostolova, Liana G. , Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D.

No container title available | January 26, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.01.25.26344738 Get It

Abstract Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) and Late-onset AD (LOAD) differ in clinical presentations and rates of progression. We aimed to compare baseline and longitudinal tau PET burden, and their relationship with clinical variables in amyloid-PET positive, cognitively impaired participants from the Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (EOAD; n=390) and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (LOAD; n=211). Patients with EOAD showed higher baseline tau PET retention, broader neuroanatomical involvement and faster accumulation rates over time compared to LOAD, after adjusting for amyloid load and clinical stage. Tau PET showed stronger correlations with baseline amyloid burden and clinical measures of global cognition and function in EOAD than LOAD. We conclude that earlier age of onset in AD is linked to a more aggressive tauopathy, which in turn is a primary driver of clinical decline. These findings suggest that optimal therapeutic targets and strategies may differ between EOAD and LOAD. One Sentence Summary Younger patients with Alzheimer’s disease show more aggressive tau spread, suggesting age of onset defines distinct disease pathways with key clinical implications.
Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk in early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease
Pentchev, Julian V., Jackson, Trever, Khan, Naazneen , Rosewood, Thea , Huang, Yen‐Ning, Nho, Kwangslk, Saykin, Andrew J., Eloyan, Ani, Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Riddle, Meghan, Salloway, Steven, Atri, Alireza, Honig, Lawrence S., Johnson, Erik C. B., Turner, Raymond Scott, Masdeu, Joseph C. , Foroud, Tatiana M., Clark, David, Hammers, Dustin B., Dage, Jeffrey L., Kirby, Kala, Ghetti, Bernardino, Newell, Kathy, Onyike, Chiadi U., Day, Gregory S., Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Murray, Melissa E., Jones, D. Richard, Jack, Clifford R., Vemuri, Prashanthi, Touroutoglou, Alexandra, Duara, Ranjan, Grant, Ian, Sha, Sharon, Wingo, Thomas S., Beckett, Laurel A., Rogalski, Emily J, Mendez, Mario F., Kramer, Joel, Joie, Renaud La, Grinberg, Lea T., Koeppe, Robert, Wolk, David A., Aisen, Paul, RAMAN, REMA , Toga, Arthur, Kukull, Walter A., Musiek, Erik, Womack, Kyle, Carrillo, Maria C., Rabinovici, Gil D., Dickerson, Bradford C., Apostolova, Liana G., Nudelman, Kelly N. H., Murray, Melissa E. , Carrillo, María C. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La , Day, Gregory S. , Day, Gregory S , Murray, Melissa E , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Huang, Yen‐Ning, Nho, Kwangsik T. , Saykin, Andrew J. , Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Riddle, Meghan , Salloway, Steve , Atri, Alireza , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Foroud, Tatiana , Clark, David, Hammers, Dustin B , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Ghetti, Bernardino , Newell, Kathy L. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Jones, David T. , Jack, Clifford R. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Duara, Ranjan , Sha, Sharon J. , Beckett, Laurel , Rogalskı, Emily , Mendez, Mario F. , Kramer, Joel, Blazhenets, Ganna , Grinberg, Lea T. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Wolk, David A. , Aisen, Paul , Toga, Arthur W. , Kukull, Walter A. , Musiek, Erik , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Apostolova, Liana G. , Nudelman, Kelly

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71066 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION The genetic basis of sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) remains largely unknown, prompting evaluation of late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) polygenic risk in EOAD. METHODS A LOAD polygenic score (PGS) was calculated in the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study and tested for associations with AD risk, cognitive performance, and imaging and fluid biomarkers. RESULTS Though PGS was elevated in LOAD and EOAD, it was not a significant predictor of EOAD adjusting for APOE ε4 carrier status and was not associated with age of EOAD onset ( p = 0.106) or with cognitive performance ( p = 0.417). In LEADS, greater LOAD PGS was associated with differences in neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers, including elevated synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25) ( p = 2.3 × 10 −5 ). DISCUSSION While LOAD polygenic risk contributed minimally to EOAD onset and cognitive dysfunction, PGS association with fluid biomarkers in LEADS suggests a role for LOAD polygenic risk in EOAD pathophysiology. Highlights LOAD PGSs were elevated in both LOAD and EOAD compared to controls; however, LOAD PGS did not significantly predict EOAD risk, age at onset, or cognitive performance independent of APOE ε4 in the LEADS. Higher LOAD PGS was associated with lower amyloid PET Centiloids (less brain amyloid deposition) as well as lower CSF biomarker Aβ42 in LEADS (proxy marker suggesting higher brain amyloid deposition) in LEADS; these contradictory findings support the need for larger studies to further investigate whether LOAD PGS is associated with increased amyloid deposition in EOAD. Higher LOAD PGS was also associated with higher levels of CSF synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25), a key component of the SNARE complex, suggesting that LOAD genetic factors may contribute to dysregulation of synaptic transmission and/or pathological protein aggregation in EOAD.
Imaging‐neuropathology evaluation of Amyloid Related Imaging Abnormality sulcal effusion in a DIAN‐TU‐001 participant treated with gantenerumab
Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly, Chen, Charles D., Hobbs, Diana A, Flores, Shaney, Scott, Jalen, Anand, Sanjana, Franklin, Erin E., Lu, Ruijin , Gordon, Brian A., Jack, Clifford R., Cruchaga, Carlos, Hassenstab, Jason J., Ibanez, Laura, Li, Yan, Wang, Guoqiao, Renton, Alan E., Xiong, Chengjie, Atri, Alireza, Snider, B. Joy, Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J., Clifford, David B., McDade, DO Eric, Bateman, Randall J., Wang, Qing, Perrin, Richard J., Benzinger, Tammie L.S., team, DIAN‐TU study, Joseph‐Mathurin, Nelly , Jiang, Meng, Flores, Shaney , Franklin, Erin , Gordon, Brian A. , Jack, Clifford R. , Cruchaga, Carlos , Hassenstab, Jason , Ibanez, Laura , Li, Yan, Wang, Guoqiao , Renton, Alan , Xiong, Chengjie , Atri, Alireza , Snider, B. Joy, Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Clifford, David B. , McDade, Eric , Bateman, Randall J. , Wang, Qing , Perrin, Richard J. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 10, 2026 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_107139 Get It

Abstract Background Amyloid related imaging abnormality edema (ARIA‐E) occurs in about 19% of individuals with autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) treated with an anti‐amyloid‐b monoclonal antibody (Salloway et al., 2021). In a previously reported case, ARIA‐E appeared to colocalize with decreases in PiB‐PET uptake (Joseph‐Mathurin, Llibre‐Guerra, et al, 2022), suggesting an association between amyloid‐b (Aβ) removal and ARIA‐E. Here, we compare longitudinal neuroimaging and corresponding neuropathology in an ADAD individual treated with gantenerumab, who experienced multiple ARIA‐E episodes as sulcal effusions that resolved by the end of the four‐year trial. Methods PiB‐PET and MRI were collected pre‐ and post‐randomization (2 and 4 years). The participant consented to brain donation, which was received a year after trial completion. Four tissue samples were taken from the location of the ARIA‐E in the parieto‐occipital left hemibrain as identified by MRI (one block contained the sulcus affected by ARIA‐E; the rest of the coronal section was captured in the remaining three blocks). Area fractions (AFs) of Aβ (10D5 immunohistochemistry (IHC)), tauopathy (PHF1), microglia (Iba1), and astrocytes (GFAP) in one sulcal region of interest (ROI) from each block and PiB‐PET SUVRs of corresponding ROIs were extracted ( n = 4, Figure 1). Additionally, we included PiB‐PET SUVRs corresponding to ARIA‐E findings observed in the right hemisphere at baseline, two‐year, and four‐year visits ( n = 6). Results Overall PiB‐PET uptake increased during the first two years (before ARIA‐E) and decreased during the last two years (including ARIA‐E episodes) (0.03±0.05 vs. ‐0.04±0.04 SUVR/year, p ‐value=0.01, Figure 2). The decrease seemed more pronounced in ARIA‐E ROIs versus normal‐appearing sulcus ROIs (‐0.05±0.04 vs. ‐0.02±0.03 SUVR/year). Lower PiB uptake at last visit appeared associated with lower Aβ AF (estimates=0.03±0.01, p ‐value=0.07). The ARIA‐E ROI had an Aβ AF of 0.009 while normal‐appearing sulcus ROIs had a mean of 0.02+0.003 (Figure 3). AFs for tauopathy, microglia, and astrocytes were within the range of those of normal‐appearing sulcus ROIs, suggesting an Aβ‐specific effect, although unexamined markers may play a role. Conclusions Our preliminary findings indicated that ARIA‐E is associated with longitudinal PiB‐PET decrease and Aβ AF, supporting the link between ARIA‐E, changes in PiB‐PET, and local Aβ removal observed at autopsy. Funding : K01AG080123; U01AG042791; R01AG046179; R01AG053267
Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) in a multisite study of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease
Njamnshi, Wepnyu Yembe , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Tsoy, Elena , Blazhenets, Ganna , Maiti, Piyush , Zhang, J. , Allen, Isabel Elaine , Rocha, Salma, Shankar, Ranjani , Amuiri, Alinda, Lawson, Mawuli, Aisen, Paul , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Koeppe, Robert, Toga, Arthur W., Clark, David A. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Grant, Ian , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Kramer, Joel H. , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Jack, Clifford R. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Carrillo, Marı́a C., Apostolova, Liana G. , Possin, Katherine L. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La , Carrillo, María C. , Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , La Joie, Renaud , Jack, Clifford R , Day, Gregory S , Rabinovici, Gil D , Blazhenets, Ganna , Wingo, Thomas S , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Rocha, Salma, Lawson, Mawuli, Beckett, Laurel , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Toga, Arthur W. , Atri, Alireza , Clark, David, Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Nudelman, Kelly

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 15, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71012 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Brief digital cognitive measures may be a valuable and scalable alternative to traditional tests for improving early detection and disease monitoring in patients with early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). METHODS We examined the convergent, diagnostic, and neuroanatomical validity of Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) tests in the multisite Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study. Four hundred seventy‐five participants from 16 sites (83 cognitively unimpaired participants, 146 individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 246 with mild dementia) underwent TabCAT testing, including two executive/attentional tasks (Match and Flanker) and two visuospatial tasks (Line Length and Line Orientation). RESULTS TabCAT tests showed good convergent validity with traditional pen‐and‐paper tests. Match was the most accurate TabCAT test in differentiating among clinical groups (controls vs. MCI vs. dementia) and predicting amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) positivity in clinically impaired participants. TabCAT tests were associated with regional tau PET patterns. DISCUSSION TabCAT digital measures have promise for frontline identification of patients with EOAD. Highlights Four hundred seventy‐five participants from 16 US sites underwent tablet‐based cognitive assessment. Digital tests assessed executive function and visuospatial abilities. Digital tests correlated with traditional pen‐and‐paper cognitive tests. Match (test of executive function) differentiated clinical groups. Digital tests were associated with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) status and regional tau PET patterns.
Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity
Raghavan, Sheelakumari, Costoya‐Sánchez, Alejandro , Mainta, Ismini , Rodríguez-Fonseca, Omar Darío, Perissinotti, Andrés , Gu, Yuna , Yun, Jihwan, Peretti, Débora Elisa , Aguiar, Pablo , Bischof, Gérard N. , Seo, Sang Won , Villeneuve, Sylvia , O’Brien, John T. , Jagust, William, Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Pontecorvo, Michael J. , Johnson, Keith A. , Weiner, Michael W. , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Schöll, Michael , Labonté, Anne , Faubert, Anne‐Marie, Mathieu, Axel, Madjar, Cécile , Carrier, Charles Edouard, Kazazian, Christina, Lepage, Claude, Maillet, David , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Dea, Doris, Courcot, Blandine, Debacker, Clément , Fontaine, David, Knopman, David S. , Multhaup, Gerhard, Maltais, Jean‐Robert, Breitner, John C.S. , Poirier, Judes, Cheewakriengkrai, Laksanun, Sager, Mark A., Dauar‐Tedeschi, Marina, Rajah, Natasha, Aisen, Paul, Toussaint, Paule‐Joanne , Pierre, Bellec, Kostopoulos, Penelope, Étienne, Pierre , Tariot, Pierre N. , Orban, Pierre , Hoge, Rick, Thomas, Ronald J. , Gauthier, Serge , Craft, Suzanne , Montine, Thomas J. , Nair, Vasavan, Bohbot, Véronique D. , Venugopalan, Vinod, Ituria‐Medina, Yasser, Khachaturian, Zaven S., Teigner, Eduard, Anthal, Elena, Yu, Elsa, Ferdinand, Fabiola, Pogossova, Galina, Mayrand, Ginette, Duclair, Guerda, Gagné, Guylaine, Newbold‐Fox, Holly, Leppert, Illana, Tremblay‐Mercier, Jennifer , Frenette, Joanne, Frappier, Josée, Kat, Justin, Miron, Justin , Wan, Karen, Mahar, Laura, Carmo, Leopoldina, Théroux, Louise, Dufour, Marianne, Lafaille‐Magnan, Marie‐Élyse, Savard, Mélissa, Tuwaig, Miranda, Petkova, Mirela, Rioux, Pierre, Meyer, P.T., El‐Khoury, Rana, Gordon, Renee, Giles, Renuka, Das, Samir, Wang, Seqian, Tabrizi, Shirin , Mathotaarachchi, Sulantha , Dubuc, Sylvie, Lee, Tanya , Beaudry, Thomas, Gervais, Valérie, Pagé, Véronique, Desautels, René, Benbouhoud, Fatiha, Saint‐Fort, Eunice Farah, Verfaillie, Sander C.J. , Farzin, Sarah , Salaciak, Alyssa , Tullo, Stéphanie , Daoust, Leslie‐Ann, Köbe, Theresa , McSweeney, Melissa, Nilsson, Nathalie , Pishnamazi, Morteza, Bedetti, Christophe , Hudon, Louise, Greco, Claudia, Chapleau, Marianne , St‐Onge, Frédéric , Boutin, Sophie , Geddes, Maiya R. , Ducharme, Simon , Jean, Gabriel, Sylvain, Elisabeth, Élie, Marie‐Josee, Leblond‐Baccichet, Gloria, Soucy, Jean‐Paul , Ozlen, Hazal , Bailly, Julie, Mohammediyan, Béry, Chen, Yalin , Remz, Jordana, Rentz, Dorene M., Amariglio, Rebecca E. , Blacker, Deborah , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Dickerson, Brad C., Donovan, Nancy J. , Farrell, Michelle E. , Gómez, Cristina Lois, Marshall, Gad A. , Oaoo, Kate, Price, Julie, Prokopiou, Prokopis C. , Reynolds, Gretchen , Skylar-Scott, Irina A., Vila‐Castelar, Clara , Yang, Hyun‐Sik , Trojanowki, John Q., Green, Robert C, Perrin, Richard J. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Potter, William Z. , Bernard, Marie , Jackson, Jonathan, Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Fleisher, Adam , Fockler, Juliet , Conti, Cat, Jin, Chengshi , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ashford, Mariam, Flenniken, Derek , Kormos, Adrienne, Montine, Tom, Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Gessert, Devon, Salazar, Jennifer, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Cabrera, Yuliana, Walter, Sarah , Miller, Garrett, Coker, Godfrey, Clanton, Taylor, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Smith, Stephanie , Adegoke, Olusegun, Mahboubi, Payam, Moore, Shelley, Pizzola, Jeremy, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Harvey, Danielle, Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Borowski, Bret, Ward, Chad, Gunter, Jeff, Kantarci, Kejal, Thompson, Paul , Jahanshad, Neda , DeCarli, Charles , Knaack, Alexander , Fletcher, Evan, Chen, Stephanie R, Choe, Mark, Crawford, Karen , Yuschkevich, Paul A, Reiman, Eric M. , Mathis, Chet, Landau, Susan , Cairns, Nigel J. , Householder, Erin, Franklin, Erin , Bernhardt, Haley, Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michal, Neu, Scott, Nho, Kwangsik, Foroud, Tatiana M., Faber, Kelley , Wilmes, Kristi, Thal, Leon J., Dage, Jeffrey L. , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Kramer, Joel, Legarde, Julien, Murray, Melissa E., Newell, Kathy L. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Clark, David , Day, Gregory S, Duara, Ranjan , Graff-Radford, Neill R, Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Carrillo, María C. , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Jack, Clifford R , Schöll, Michael , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Rial, Alexis Moscoso , Heeman, Fiona , Raghavan, Sheelakumari , Essen, Martijn van , Camacho, Valle , Silva‐Rodríguez, Jesús , Ribaldi, Federica , Coomans, Emma M. , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Grothe, Michel J. , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Malpetti, Maura , Rowe, James B. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Smith, Ruben , Hansson, Oskar , Garibotto, Valentina , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , LaMontagne, Pamela , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Tam, Angela , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Dansereau, Christian , Picard, Cynthia , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Cuello, A. Claudio , Barkun, Alan , Evans, Alan Charles , Tardif, Christine Lucas , Knopman, David S. , Near, Jamie , Leoutsakos, Jeannie‐Marie , Brandt, Jason , Pruessner, Jens C. , Morris, John C. , Collins, D. Louis , Chakravarty, M. Mallar , Eisenberg, Mark Jeffrey , Rajah, Maria Natasha , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Bellec, Pierre , Thomas, Ronald, Fonov, Vladimir , Vallee, Isabelle, Vogel, Jacob W. , Dadar, Mahsa , Appleby, Melissa , Meyer, Pierre‐François, Gonneaud, Julie , Pascoal, Tharick Ali , Vachon‐Presseau, Étienne , Spreng, R. Nathan , Rentz, Dorene M. , Buckley, Rachel F. , Gagliardi, Geoffroy Pierre , Gatchel, Jennifer R. , Guzmán‐Vélez, Edmarie , Jacobs, Heidi I.L. , Jutten, Roos J. , Pardilla‐Delgado, Enmanuelle , Price, Julie C. , Quiroz, Yakeel T. , Schultz, Aaron P. , Schultz, Stephanie A. , Sepulcre, Jorge , Vannini, Patrizia , Toga, Arthur W. , Beckett, Laurel , Saykin, Andrew J. , Potter, William, Barnes, Lisa L. , Gonzalez, Hector, Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jackson, Jonathan , Veitch, Dallas P. , Neuhaus, John M , Rafii, Michael S. , Jimenez‐Maggiora, Gustavo Adolfo , Donohue, Michael , Arani, Arvin , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Jones, David T. , Kantarci, Kejal , Senjem, Matthew L. , Reid, Robert I. , Fox, Nick C. , Malone, Ian B. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Nir, Talia M. , Tosun, Duygu , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Chen, Kewei , Risacher, Shannon L. , Shen, Li , Nudelman, Kelly , Ghetti, Bernardino , Grinberg, Lea T. , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Murray, Melissa E. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, S. J. , Womack, Kyle

JAMA | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 229

10.1001/jama.2025.7817 Get It

Importance Tau positron emission tomography (PET) allows in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, a core neuropathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective To provide estimates of the frequency of tau PET positivity and its associated risk of clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal study using data pooled from 21 cohorts, comprising a convenience sample of 6514 participants from 13 countries, collected between January 2013 and June 2024. Cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD dementia, or other neurodegenerative disorders were included. Exposures Tau PET with flortaucipir F 18, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and clinical examinations. Tau PET scans were visually rated as positive according to a US Food and Drug Administration– and European Medicines Agency–approved method, designed to indicate the presence of advanced neurofibrillary tangle pathology (Braak stages V-VI). Main Outcomes and Measures Frequency of tau PET positivity and absolute risk of clinical progression (eg, progression to MCI or dementia). Results Among the 6514 participants (mean age, 69.5 years; 50.5% female), median follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 years. Of 3487 cognitively unimpaired participants, 349 (9.8%) were tau PET positive; the estimated frequency of tau PET positivity was less than 1% in those aged younger than 50 years, and increased from 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) at 60 years to 19% (95% CI, 16%-24%) at 90 years. Tau PET positivity frequency estimates increased across MCI and AD dementia clinical diagnoses (43% [95% CI, 41%-46%] and 79% [95% CI, 77%-82%] at 75 years, respectively). Most tau PET–positive individuals (92%) were also Aβ PET positive. Cognitively unimpaired participants who were positive for both Aβ PET and tau PET had a higher absolute risk of progression to MCI or dementia over the following 5 years (57% [95% CI, 45%-71%]) compared with both Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–negative (17% [95% CI, 13%-22%]) and Aβ PET–negative/tau PET–negative (6% [95% CI, 5%-8%]) individuals. Among participants with MCI at the time of the tau PET scan, an Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–positive profile was associated with a 5-year absolute risk of progression to dementia of 70% (95% CI, 59%-81%). Conclusions and Relevance In a large convenience sample, a positive tau PET scan occurred at a nonnegligible rate among cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the combination of Aβ PET positivity and tau PET positivity was associated with a high risk of clinical progression in both preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD. These findings underscore the potential of tau PET as a biomarker for staging AD pathology.
Associations Between Neuropsychiatric Symptom Burden, Change in Cognitive Status and Survival in Autopsy-confirmed Cohorts of Lewy Body Disease and Alzheimer’s Disease (P1-5.028)
Chiu, Shannon , Shill, Holly A. , Mehta, Shyamal H. , Driver‐Dunckley, Erika , Belden, Christine M. , Tremblay, Cécilia , Zhang, Nan , Adler, Charles H. , Shprecher, David , Serrano, Geidy E. , Beach, Thomas, Atri, Alireza , Choudhury, Parichita

Neurology | April 7, 2025 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 7_Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.0000000000209009 Get It

Amyloid PET in Sporadic Early‐ Versus Late‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease: Comparison of the LEADS and ADNI
Lagarde, Julien , Blazhenets, Ganna , Zhang, J. , Eloyan, Ani , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Allen, Isabel Elaine , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Raya, Maison Abu , Smith, Karen, Shankar, Ranjani , Amuiri, Alinda, Rocha, Salma, Hammers, Dustin B. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Kirby, Kala, Aisen, Paul, Koeppe, Robert, Landau, Susan, Carrillo, María C. , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Raman, Rema , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan, Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Grant, Ian , Rogalskı, Emily , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Blazhenets, Ganna , Soleimani-Meigooni, David , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Abu Raya, Maison , Vrillon, Agathe , Nudelman, Kelly N , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Day, Gregory S , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon , Wingo, Thomas S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Maiti, Piyush , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Hammers, Dustin B , Nudelman, Kelly , Kirby, Kala, Vemuri, Prashanthi , Beckett, Laurel , Atri, Alireza , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T., Womack, Kyle , Wolk, David A. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Annals of Neurology | March 17, 2025 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 236-248

10.1002/ana.27233 Get It

Objective Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) differ in many respects. Here, we address the issue of possible differences in fibrillar amyloid pathology as measured by positron emission tomography (PET), which remains unresolved due to the lack of large‐scale comparative studies. Methods Three hundred ninety‐nine cognitively impaired participants younger than 65 years of age from the multicenter Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and 450 cognitively impaired participants older than 65 years from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) underwent clinical assessment, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and amyloid PET and were included in this study. We compared amyloid PET outcomes (positivity rate based on visual read and quantified tracer uptake expressed as Centiloids [CLs]) between the 2 cohorts and studied their association with age, sex, APOE genotype, and cognition. Results The amyloid positivity rate was higher in LEADS (78%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 74–82) than in ADNI (71%, 95% CI = 67–75, p = 0.02). Lower Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) and APOE4 genotype increased the odds of amyloid positivity in both cohorts. Visually positive scans had higher CLs in LEADS (EOAD, mean = 95.3 ± 26.1) than in ADNI (LOAD, mean = 80.9 ± 36.8, p < 0.0001), predominantly in parietal cortex/precuneus, superior temporal, and frontal cortices. In amyloid‐positive patients, (1) CLs were higher in female patients in both cohorts; (2) APOE4 carriership was associated with lower CLs in EOAD, which was not observed in LOAD; and (3) correlations between CLs and MMSE scores were significantly stronger in EOAD than in LOAD. Interpretation Differences in the burden of amyloid pathology may contribute to differences in clinical and anatomic patterns in sporadic EOAD and LOAD, and have implications for optimizing therapeutic strategies in each group. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:236–248
Associations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and pathology in clinicopathologically defined Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's disease with Lewy bodies, and dementia with Lewy bodies
Tremblay, Cécilia , Shakir, Neha , Zhang, Nan , Adler, Charles H. , Shill, Holly A. , Mehta, Shyamal H. , Driver‐Dunckley, Erika , Belden, Christine M. , Beach, Thomas G., Mehta, Shyamal , Serrano, Geidy E , Choudhury, Parichita , Belden, Christine , Adler, C H , Atri, Alireza , Beach, Thomas G. , Serrano, Geidy E. , Choudhury, Parichita

Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease | March 14, 2025 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 933-942

10.1177/13872877251320670 Get It

Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are frequent in Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, but a higher NPS burden is found in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Lewy body (LB) pathology frequently co-occurs with AD pathology and may not meet neuropathological criteria for DLB (ADLB). NPS trajectories over disease course in these subgroups is not well understood. Objective We investigated changes in NPS severity over time, at two time points, comparing clinicopathologically defined cohorts of AD (without LB), ADLB, DLB, and controls. Methods Cases with two available Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPIQ), at the time of enrollment and within 2.5 years of death, were selected from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Differences and rate of change in NPIQ scores were compared between AD (n = 75), ADLB (n = 48) DLB (n = 65), and controls (n = 32) with covariates for age, sex, and cognition. Results First NPIQ scores were highest in ADLB when compared to AD (p = 0.04) and controls (p = 0.01) but not different from DLB. A significant increase in NPS severity was observed in DLB and AD (p < 0.001) over a mean follow up time of 4.9 ± 3.0 years, and the rate of change was significantly greater in DLB when compared to other groups. Final NPIQ scores were highest in DLB when compared to AD (p = 0.03) but not ADLB, and in DLB, ADLB, and AD than controls ( all p < 0.001). Conclusions Early NPS burden as well as NPS severity progression rate, independently of cognitive status, might be useful clinical metrics and may help predict underlying pathological diagnoses.
Dissociable spatial topography of cortical atrophy in early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: A head‐to‐head comparison of the LEADS and ADNI cohorts
Katsumi, Yuta , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Eloyan, Ani , Eckbo, Ryan, Zaitsev, Alexander, Joie, Renaud La , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Jack, Clifford R. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Hammers, Dustin B. , Newell, Kathy L. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Aisen, Paul, Reman, Rema, Kramer, Joel H. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon, Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Jack, Clifford R , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Lagarde, Julien , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Nudelman, Kelly , Foroud, Tatiana , Hammers, Dustin B , Ghetti, Bernardino , Murray, Melissa E. , Beckett, Laurel , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon J. , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Alzheimer's & Dementia | February 19, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14489 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD, respectively) have distinct clinical manifestations, with prior work based on small samples suggesting unique patterns of neurodegeneration. The current study performed a head‐to‐head comparison of cortical atrophy in EOAD and LOAD, using two large and well‐characterized cohorts (LEADS and ADNI). METHODS We analyzed brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquired from 377 sporadic EOAD patients and 317 sporadicLOAD patients who were amyloid positive and had mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia (i.e., early‐stage AD), along with cognitively unimpaired participants. RESULTS After controlling for the level of cognitive impairment, we found a double dissociation between AD clinical phenotype and localization/magnitude of atrophy, characterized by predominant neocortical involvement in EOAD and more focal anterior medial temporal involvement in LOAD. DISCUSSION Our findings point to the clinical utility of MRI‐based biomarkers of atrophy in differentiating between EOAD and LOAD, which may be useful for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment. Highlights Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset AD (LOAD) patients showed distinct and overlapping cortical atrophy patterns. EOAD patients showed prominent atrophy in widespread neocortical regions. LOAD patients showed prominent atrophy in the anterior medial temporal lobe. Regional atrophy was correlated with the severity of global cognitive impairment. Results were comparable when the sample was stratified for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.
MRI and PET findings with long‐term gantenerumab treatment: results from the DIAN‐TU trial
Hornbeck, Russ C. , Li, Yan , Clifford, David B., Santacruz, Anna , Wang, Guoqiao , Klein, Gregory , Baudler, Monika, Doody, Rachelle S., Kerchner, Geoffrey A. , Team, The DIAN‐TU Study, Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Gordon, Brian A. , McCullough, Austin , Flores, Shaney , Koeppe, Robert A. , Jack, Clifford R. , McDade, Eric , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Mills, Susan, Supnet, Charlene , Ibanez, Laura , Atri, Alireza , Bateman, Randall J. , Team, The DIAN‐TU Study

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.094832 Get It

AbstractBackgroundAnti‐amyloid monoclonal antibody therapies for AD have documented plaque removal on amyloid PET scans. We evaluate the findings for amyloid PET, tau PET, FDG PET and volumetric MRI over the course the open label extension (OLE) for the DIAN‐TU gantenerumab treatment, compared to the last imaging obtained prior to the OLE (to evaluate for potential rebound effects) and in comparison to longitudinal imaging in the DIAN Observational study.MethodThis double‐blind, phase 2/3 trial (2012‐2019), followed by open‐label extension (OLE), investigated varying gantenerumab doses up to 1500 mg SQ q2 weeks [NCT NCT01760005]. We report long‐term amyloid‐plaque removal by PET and findings for metabolic FDG PET and tau PET, and additionally changes of atrophy on volumetric MRI. Imaging measures were secondary outcome analyses. Comparison is made between the treatment cohort and controls (DB placebo participants who didn’t enter OLE, plus external controls from the DIAN OBS). Estimated years to onset was included as a covariate. The gap period of ∼1 year is specifically analyzed to estimate any “rebound” effect on amyloid or tau accumulation or neurodegeneration. Volumetric MRI measures include hippocampal volumes, lateral ventricular volumes, and white matter hyperintensities.ResultIn participants who were asymptomatic at baseline and treated with gantenerumab (n = 53), amyloid‐plaque removal measured by PIB‐PET in Centiloids was dose‐dependent. Few participants had reached completely negative levels (below 24). No statistical significance was found for FDG PET, tau PET, or volumetric MRI, including hippocampal volumes. Impact of the gap period of ∼1 year (gap in treatment) on the rate of amyloid accumulation compared to the rate of accumulation predicted in observational studies of this cohort is under evaluation, as are the other imaging measures.ConclusionWhile no overall effect was observed in the total group for non‐amyloid measures, results suggest dose dependent clearance of amyloid plaque in asymptomatic DIAD mutation carriers following long‐term, high‐dose gantenerumab. The potential “rebound effect” of elevated amyloid accumulation for participants for whom there was a significant gap in therapy between the trial and the OLE is under evaluation and will be presented, as will the variables for FDG PET, tau PET, and volumetric MRI.