Mehta, Shyamal

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second-most common neurodegenerative disease. With more than 20,000 new diagnosed cases each year, PD affects millions of individuals worldwide and is most prevalent in the elderly population. The current clinical methods for the diagnosis and severity assessment of PD rely on the visual and physical examination of subjects and identifying key disease motor signs and symptoms such as bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability. In the present study, we developed a method for the diagnosis and severity assessment of PD using Gramian Angular Fields (GAFs) in combination with deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Our model was applied to PD gait signals captured using pressure sensors embedded into insoles. Our results indicated an accuracy of 98.6%, a true positive rate (TPR) of 99.2%, and a true negative rate (TNR) of 98.5%, showcasing superior classification performance for PD diagnosis compared to the methods used in recent studies in the literature. The estimation of disease severity scores using gait signals showed a high accuracy for the Hoehn and Yahr score as well as the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test score (R2 > 0.8), while we achieved a lower prediction performance for the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and its motor component (UPDRSM) scores (R2 < 0.2). These results were achieved using gait signals recorded in time windows as small as 10 s, which may pave the way for shorter, more accessible assessment tools for diagnosis and severity assessment of PD.

Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are frequent in Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, but a higher NPS burden is found in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Lewy body (LB) pathology frequently co-occurs with AD pathology and may not meet neuropathological criteria for DLB (ADLB). NPS trajectories over disease course in these subgroups is not well understood. Objective We investigated changes in NPS severity over time, at two time points, comparing clinicopathologically defined cohorts of AD (without LB), ADLB, DLB, and controls. Methods Cases with two available Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPIQ), at the time of enrollment and within 2.5 years of death, were selected from the Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Differences and rate of change in NPIQ scores were compared between AD (n = 75), ADLB (n = 48) DLB (n = 65), and controls (n = 32) with covariates for age, sex, and cognition. Results First NPIQ scores were highest in ADLB when compared to AD (p = 0.04) and controls (p = 0.01) but not different from DLB. A significant increase in NPS severity was observed in DLB and AD (p < 0.001) over a mean follow up time of 4.9 ± 3.0 years, and the rate of change was significantly greater in DLB when compared to other groups. Final NPIQ scores were highest in DLB when compared to AD (p = 0.03) but not ADLB, and in DLB, ADLB, and AD than controls ( all p < 0.001). Conclusions Early NPS burden as well as NPS severity progression rate, independently of cognitive status, might be useful clinical metrics and may help predict underlying pathological diagnoses.