Back to Authors

Duara, Ranjan

0000-0001-8060-6309

Mayo Clinic

Mount Sinai Medical Center

Citations 72

Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) in a multisite study of early‐onset Alzheimer's disease
Njamnshi, Wepnyu Yembe , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Tsoy, Elena , Blazhenets, Ganna , Maiti, Piyush , Zhang, J. , Allen, Isabel Elaine , Rocha, Salma, Shankar, Ranjani , Amuiri, Alinda, Lawson, Mawuli, Aisen, Paul , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Koeppe, Robert, Toga, Arthur W., Clark, David A. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Grant, Ian , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Kramer, Joel H. , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Jack, Clifford R. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Carrillo, Marı́a C., Apostolova, Liana G. , Possin, Katherine L. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La , Carrillo, María C. , Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , La Joie, Renaud , Jack, Clifford R , Day, Gregory S , Rabinovici, Gil D , Blazhenets, Ganna , Wingo, Thomas S , Chiotis, Konstantinos , Rocha, Salma, Lawson, Mawuli, Beckett, Laurel , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Toga, Arthur W. , Atri, Alireza , Clark, David, Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Nudelman, Kelly

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 15, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71012 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Brief digital cognitive measures may be a valuable and scalable alternative to traditional tests for improving early detection and disease monitoring in patients with early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). METHODS We examined the convergent, diagnostic, and neuroanatomical validity of Tablet‐based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) tests in the multisite Longitudinal Early‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Study. Four hundred seventy‐five participants from 16 sites (83 cognitively unimpaired participants, 146 individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 246 with mild dementia) underwent TabCAT testing, including two executive/attentional tasks (Match and Flanker) and two visuospatial tasks (Line Length and Line Orientation). RESULTS TabCAT tests showed good convergent validity with traditional pen‐and‐paper tests. Match was the most accurate TabCAT test in differentiating among clinical groups (controls vs. MCI vs. dementia) and predicting amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) positivity in clinically impaired participants. TabCAT tests were associated with regional tau PET patterns. DISCUSSION TabCAT digital measures have promise for frontline identification of patients with EOAD. Highlights Four hundred seventy‐five participants from 16 US sites underwent tablet‐based cognitive assessment. Digital tests assessed executive function and visuospatial abilities. Digital tests correlated with traditional pen‐and‐paper cognitive tests. Match (test of executive function) differentiated clinical groups. Digital tests were associated with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) status and regional tau PET patterns.
Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity
Raghavan, Sheelakumari, Costoya‐Sánchez, Alejandro , Mainta, Ismini , Rodríguez-Fonseca, Omar Darío, Perissinotti, Andrés , Gu, Yuna , Yun, Jihwan, Peretti, Débora Elisa , Aguiar, Pablo , Bischof, Gérard N. , Seo, Sang Won , Villeneuve, Sylvia , O’Brien, John T. , Jagust, William, Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Pontecorvo, Michael J. , Johnson, Keith A. , Weiner, Michael W. , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Schöll, Michael , Labonté, Anne , Faubert, Anne‐Marie, Mathieu, Axel, Madjar, Cécile , Carrier, Charles Edouard, Kazazian, Christina, Lepage, Claude, Maillet, David , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Dea, Doris, Courcot, Blandine, Debacker, Clément , Fontaine, David, Knopman, David S. , Multhaup, Gerhard, Maltais, Jean‐Robert, Breitner, John C.S. , Poirier, Judes, Cheewakriengkrai, Laksanun, Sager, Mark A., Dauar‐Tedeschi, Marina, Rajah, Natasha, Aisen, Paul, Toussaint, Paule‐Joanne , Pierre, Bellec, Kostopoulos, Penelope, Étienne, Pierre , Tariot, Pierre N. , Orban, Pierre , Hoge, Rick, Thomas, Ronald J. , Gauthier, Serge , Craft, Suzanne , Montine, Thomas J. , Nair, Vasavan, Bohbot, Véronique D. , Venugopalan, Vinod, Ituria‐Medina, Yasser, Khachaturian, Zaven S., Teigner, Eduard, Anthal, Elena, Yu, Elsa, Ferdinand, Fabiola, Pogossova, Galina, Mayrand, Ginette, Duclair, Guerda, Gagné, Guylaine, Newbold‐Fox, Holly, Leppert, Illana, Tremblay‐Mercier, Jennifer , Frenette, Joanne, Frappier, Josée, Kat, Justin, Miron, Justin , Wan, Karen, Mahar, Laura, Carmo, Leopoldina, Théroux, Louise, Dufour, Marianne, Lafaille‐Magnan, Marie‐Élyse, Savard, Mélissa, Tuwaig, Miranda, Petkova, Mirela, Rioux, Pierre, Meyer, P.T., El‐Khoury, Rana, Gordon, Renee, Giles, Renuka, Das, Samir, Wang, Seqian, Tabrizi, Shirin , Mathotaarachchi, Sulantha , Dubuc, Sylvie, Lee, Tanya , Beaudry, Thomas, Gervais, Valérie, Pagé, Véronique, Desautels, René, Benbouhoud, Fatiha, Saint‐Fort, Eunice Farah, Verfaillie, Sander C.J. , Farzin, Sarah , Salaciak, Alyssa , Tullo, Stéphanie , Daoust, Leslie‐Ann, Köbe, Theresa , McSweeney, Melissa, Nilsson, Nathalie , Pishnamazi, Morteza, Bedetti, Christophe , Hudon, Louise, Greco, Claudia, Chapleau, Marianne , St‐Onge, Frédéric , Boutin, Sophie , Geddes, Maiya R. , Ducharme, Simon , Jean, Gabriel, Sylvain, Elisabeth, Élie, Marie‐Josee, Leblond‐Baccichet, Gloria, Soucy, Jean‐Paul , Ozlen, Hazal , Bailly, Julie, Mohammediyan, Béry, Chen, Yalin , Remz, Jordana, Rentz, Dorene M., Amariglio, Rebecca E. , Blacker, Deborah , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Dickerson, Brad C., Donovan, Nancy J. , Farrell, Michelle E. , Gómez, Cristina Lois, Marshall, Gad A. , Oaoo, Kate, Price, Julie, Prokopiou, Prokopis C. , Reynolds, Gretchen , Skylar-Scott, Irina A., Vila‐Castelar, Clara , Yang, Hyun‐Sik , Trojanowki, John Q., Green, Robert C, Perrin, Richard J. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Potter, William Z. , Bernard, Marie , Jackson, Jonathan, Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Fleisher, Adam , Fockler, Juliet , Conti, Cat, Jin, Chengshi , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ashford, Mariam, Flenniken, Derek , Kormos, Adrienne, Montine, Tom, Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Gessert, Devon, Salazar, Jennifer, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Cabrera, Yuliana, Walter, Sarah , Miller, Garrett, Coker, Godfrey, Clanton, Taylor, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Smith, Stephanie , Adegoke, Olusegun, Mahboubi, Payam, Moore, Shelley, Pizzola, Jeremy, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Harvey, Danielle, Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Borowski, Bret, Ward, Chad, Gunter, Jeff, Kantarci, Kejal, Thompson, Paul , Jahanshad, Neda , DeCarli, Charles , Knaack, Alexander , Fletcher, Evan, Chen, Stephanie R, Choe, Mark, Crawford, Karen , Yuschkevich, Paul A, Reiman, Eric M. , Mathis, Chet, Landau, Susan , Cairns, Nigel J. , Householder, Erin, Franklin, Erin , Bernhardt, Haley, Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michal, Neu, Scott, Nho, Kwangsik, Foroud, Tatiana M., Faber, Kelley , Wilmes, Kristi, Thal, Leon J., Dage, Jeffrey L. , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Kramer, Joel, Legarde, Julien, Murray, Melissa E., Newell, Kathy L. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Clark, David , Day, Gregory S, Duara, Ranjan , Graff-Radford, Neill R, Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Carrillo, María C. , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Jack, Clifford R , Schöll, Michael , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Rial, Alexis Moscoso , Heeman, Fiona , Raghavan, Sheelakumari , Essen, Martijn van , Camacho, Valle , Silva‐Rodríguez, Jesús , Ribaldi, Federica , Coomans, Emma M. , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Grothe, Michel J. , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Malpetti, Maura , Rowe, James B. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Smith, Ruben , Hansson, Oskar , Garibotto, Valentina , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , LaMontagne, Pamela , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Tam, Angela , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Dansereau, Christian , Picard, Cynthia , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Cuello, A. Claudio , Barkun, Alan , Evans, Alan Charles , Tardif, Christine Lucas , Knopman, David S. , Near, Jamie , Leoutsakos, Jeannie‐Marie , Brandt, Jason , Pruessner, Jens C. , Morris, John C. , Collins, D. Louis , Chakravarty, M. Mallar , Eisenberg, Mark Jeffrey , Rajah, Maria Natasha , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Bellec, Pierre , Thomas, Ronald, Fonov, Vladimir , Vallee, Isabelle, Vogel, Jacob W. , Dadar, Mahsa , Appleby, Melissa , Meyer, Pierre‐François, Gonneaud, Julie , Pascoal, Tharick Ali , Vachon‐Presseau, Étienne , Spreng, R. Nathan , Rentz, Dorene M. , Buckley, Rachel F. , Gagliardi, Geoffroy Pierre , Gatchel, Jennifer R. , Guzmán‐Vélez, Edmarie , Jacobs, Heidi I.L. , Jutten, Roos J. , Pardilla‐Delgado, Enmanuelle , Price, Julie C. , Quiroz, Yakeel T. , Schultz, Aaron P. , Schultz, Stephanie A. , Sepulcre, Jorge , Vannini, Patrizia , Toga, Arthur W. , Beckett, Laurel , Saykin, Andrew J. , Potter, William, Barnes, Lisa L. , Gonzalez, Hector, Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jackson, Jonathan , Veitch, Dallas P. , Neuhaus, John M , Rafii, Michael S. , Jimenez‐Maggiora, Gustavo Adolfo , Donohue, Michael , Arani, Arvin , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Jones, David T. , Kantarci, Kejal , Senjem, Matthew L. , Reid, Robert I. , Fox, Nick C. , Malone, Ian B. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Nir, Talia M. , Tosun, Duygu , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Chen, Kewei , Risacher, Shannon L. , Shen, Li , Nudelman, Kelly , Ghetti, Bernardino , Grinberg, Lea T. , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Murray, Melissa E. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, S. J. , Womack, Kyle

JAMA | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 229

10.1001/jama.2025.7817 Get It

Importance Tau positron emission tomography (PET) allows in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, a core neuropathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective To provide estimates of the frequency of tau PET positivity and its associated risk of clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal study using data pooled from 21 cohorts, comprising a convenience sample of 6514 participants from 13 countries, collected between January 2013 and June 2024. Cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD dementia, or other neurodegenerative disorders were included. Exposures Tau PET with flortaucipir F 18, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and clinical examinations. Tau PET scans were visually rated as positive according to a US Food and Drug Administration– and European Medicines Agency–approved method, designed to indicate the presence of advanced neurofibrillary tangle pathology (Braak stages V-VI). Main Outcomes and Measures Frequency of tau PET positivity and absolute risk of clinical progression (eg, progression to MCI or dementia). Results Among the 6514 participants (mean age, 69.5 years; 50.5% female), median follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 years. Of 3487 cognitively unimpaired participants, 349 (9.8%) were tau PET positive; the estimated frequency of tau PET positivity was less than 1% in those aged younger than 50 years, and increased from 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) at 60 years to 19% (95% CI, 16%-24%) at 90 years. Tau PET positivity frequency estimates increased across MCI and AD dementia clinical diagnoses (43% [95% CI, 41%-46%] and 79% [95% CI, 77%-82%] at 75 years, respectively). Most tau PET–positive individuals (92%) were also Aβ PET positive. Cognitively unimpaired participants who were positive for both Aβ PET and tau PET had a higher absolute risk of progression to MCI or dementia over the following 5 years (57% [95% CI, 45%-71%]) compared with both Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–negative (17% [95% CI, 13%-22%]) and Aβ PET–negative/tau PET–negative (6% [95% CI, 5%-8%]) individuals. Among participants with MCI at the time of the tau PET scan, an Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–positive profile was associated with a 5-year absolute risk of progression to dementia of 70% (95% CI, 59%-81%). Conclusions and Relevance In a large convenience sample, a positive tau PET scan occurred at a nonnegligible rate among cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the combination of Aβ PET positivity and tau PET positivity was associated with a high risk of clinical progression in both preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD. These findings underscore the potential of tau PET as a biomarker for staging AD pathology.
Dissociable spatial topography of cortical atrophy in early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: A head‐to‐head comparison of the LEADS and ADNI cohorts
Katsumi, Yuta , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Eloyan, Ani , Eckbo, Ryan, Zaitsev, Alexander, Joie, Renaud La , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Jack, Clifford R. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Hammers, Dustin B. , Newell, Kathy L. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Aisen, Paul, Reman, Rema, Kramer, Joel H. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon, Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Jack, Clifford R , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Lagarde, Julien , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Nudelman, Kelly , Foroud, Tatiana , Hammers, Dustin B , Ghetti, Bernardino , Murray, Melissa E. , Beckett, Laurel , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon J. , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Alzheimer's & Dementia | February 19, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14489 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD and LOAD, respectively) have distinct clinical manifestations, with prior work based on small samples suggesting unique patterns of neurodegeneration. The current study performed a head‐to‐head comparison of cortical atrophy in EOAD and LOAD, using two large and well‐characterized cohorts (LEADS and ADNI). METHODS We analyzed brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquired from 377 sporadic EOAD patients and 317 sporadicLOAD patients who were amyloid positive and had mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia (i.e., early‐stage AD), along with cognitively unimpaired participants. RESULTS After controlling for the level of cognitive impairment, we found a double dissociation between AD clinical phenotype and localization/magnitude of atrophy, characterized by predominant neocortical involvement in EOAD and more focal anterior medial temporal involvement in LOAD. DISCUSSION Our findings point to the clinical utility of MRI‐based biomarkers of atrophy in differentiating between EOAD and LOAD, which may be useful for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment. Highlights Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset AD (LOAD) patients showed distinct and overlapping cortical atrophy patterns. EOAD patients showed prominent atrophy in widespread neocortical regions. LOAD patients showed prominent atrophy in the anterior medial temporal lobe. Regional atrophy was correlated with the severity of global cognitive impairment. Results were comparable when the sample was stratified for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.
Longitudinal cognitive performance of participants with sporadic early onset Alzheimer's disease from LEADS
Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Gao, Sujuan , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Kirby, Kala, Dage, Jeffrey L. , Aisen, Paul, Reman, Rema, Joie, Renaud La , Clark, David W. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Honig, Lawrence S., Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Carrillo, María C. , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Hammers, Dustin B , Beckett, Laurel , Kirby, Kala, Nudelman, Kelly , Reman, Rema, Lagarde, Julien , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Womack, Kyle , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, S. J. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14439 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) manifests prior to the age of 65, and affects 4%–8% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The current analyses sought to examine longitudinal cognitive trajectories of participants with early‐onset dementia. METHODS Data from 307 cognitively normal (CN) volunteer participants and those with amyloid‐positive EOAD or amyloid‐negative cognitive impairment (EOnonAD) were compared. Cognitive trajectories across a comprehensive cognitive battery spanning 42 months were examined using mixed‐effects modeling. RESULTS The EOAD group displayed worse cognition at baseline relative to EOnonAD and CN groups, and more aggressive declines in cognition over time. The largest effects were observed on measures of executive functioning domains, while memory declines were blunted in EOAD. DISCUSSION EOAD declined 2–4× faster than EOnonAD, and EOAD pathology is not restricted to memory networks. Early identification of deficits is critical to ensure that individuals with sporadic EOAD can be considered for treatment using disease‐modifying medications. Highlights Represents the most comprehensive longitudinal characterization of sporadic EOAD to date. The trajectory of cognitive declines was steep for EOAD participants and worse than for other groups. Executive functioning measures exhibited the greatest declines over time in EOAD.
Differences in baseline cognitive performance between participants with early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: Comparison of LEADS and ADNI
Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Gao, Sujuan , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Kirby, Kala, Dage, Jeffrey L. , Aisen, Paul , Reman, Rema, Joie, Renaud La , Clark, David A. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Grant, Ian , Rogalskı, Emily , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Hammers, Dustin B , Beckett, Laurel , Kirby, Kala, Nudelman, Kelly , Lagarde, Julien , Atri, Alireza , Clark, David, Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Womack, Kyle , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, David A. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14218 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) share similar amyloid etiology, but evidence from smaller‐scale studies suggests that they manifest differently clinically. Current analyses sought to contrast the cognitive profiles of EOAD and LOAD. METHODS Z‐ score cognitive‐domain composites for 311 amyloid‐positive sporadic EOAD and 314 amyloid‐positive LOAD participants were calculated from baseline data from age‐appropriate control cohorts. Z‐ score composites were compared between AD groups for each domain. RESULTS After controlling for cognitive status, EOAD displayed worse visuospatial, executive functioning, and processing speed/attention skills relative to LOAD, and LOAD displayed worse language, episodic immediate memory, and episodic delayed memory. DISCUSSION Sporadic EOAD possesses distinct cognitive profiles relative to LOAD. Clinicians should be alert for non‐amnestic impairments in younger patients to ensure proper identification and intervention using disease‐modifying treatments. Highlights Both early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) participants displayed widespread cognitive impairments relative to their same‐aged peers. Cognitive impairments were more severe for EOAD than for LOAD participants in visuospatial and executive domains. Memory and language impairments were more severe for LOAD than for EOAD participants Results were comparable after removing clinical phenotypes of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (lv‐PPA), and frontal‐variant AD.
A Protocol for the Inclusion of Minoritized Persons in Alzheimer Disease Research From the ADNI3 Diversity Taskforce
Okonkwo, Ozioma C. , Ashford, Miriam T. , Conti, Catherine , Strong, Joe, Raman, Rema , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Flenniken, Derek , Miller, Melanie J. , Diaz, Adam , Soto, Annabelle M., Ances, Beau M. , Beigi, Maryam , Doraiswamy, P. Murali , Duara, Ranjan , Farlow, Martin R. , Grossman, Hillel, Mintzer, Jacobo , Reist, Christopher , Rogalskı, Emily , Sabbagh, Marwan N. , Salloway, Stephen, Schneider, Lon S. , Petersen, Ronald C. , Aisen, Paul , Weiner, Michael W., Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, Ances, Beau M , Mindt, Mónica Rivera , Donohue, Michael , Duara, Ranjan , Shah, Raj C. , Initiative, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging

JAMA Network Open | August 9, 2024 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 8 | Pages: e2427073

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27073 Get It

ImportanceBlack or African American (hereinafter, Black) and Hispanic or Latino/a/x (hereinafter, Latinx) adults are disproportionally affected by Alzheimer disease, but most research studies do not enroll adequate numbers of both of these populations. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative-3 (ADNI3) launched a diversity taskforce to pilot a multipronged effort to increase the study inclusion of Black and Latinx older adults.ObjectiveTo describe and evaluate the culturally informed and community-engaged inclusion efforts to increase the screening and enrollment of Black and Latinx older adults in ADNI3.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study used baseline data from a longitudinal, multisite, observational study conducted from January 15, 2021, to July 12, 2022, with no follow-up. The study was conducted at 13 ADNI3 sites in the US. Participants included individuals aged 55 to 90 years without cognitive impairment and those with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease.ExposuresEfforts included (1) launch of an external advisory board, (2) changes to the study protocol, (3) updates to the digital prescreener, (4) selection and deployment of 13 community-engaged research study sites, (5) development and deployment of local and centralized outreach efforts, and (6) development of a community-science partnership board.Main Outcomes and MeasuresScreening and enrollment numbers from centralized and local outreach efforts, digital advertisement metrics, and digital prescreener completion.ResultsA total of 91 participants enrolled in the trial via centralized and local outreach efforts, of which 22 (24.2%) identified as Latinx and 55 (60.4%) identified as Black (median [IQR] age, 65.6 [IQR, 61.5-72.5] years; 62 women [68.1%]). This represented a 267.6% increase in the monthly rate of enrollment (before: 1.11 per month; during: 4.08 per month) of underrepresented populations. For the centralized effort, social media advertisements were run between June 1, 2021, and July 31, 2022, which resulted in 2079 completed digital prescreeners, of which 1289 met criteria for subsequent site-level screening. Local efforts were run between June 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. A total of 151 participants underwent site-level screening (100 from local efforts, 41 from centralized efforts, 10 from other sources).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of pilot inclusion efforts, a culturally informed, community-engaged approach increased the inclusion of Black and Latinx participants in an Alzheimer disease cohort study.
Clinicopathologic Heterogeneity and Glial Activation Patterns in Alzheimer Disease
Frankenhauser, Isabelle , Peng, Zhongwei , Labuzan, Sydney A. , Boon, Baayla D.C. , Moloney, Christina M. , Pottier, Cyril , Wickland, Daniel P. , Tranovich, Jessica F., Wood, Ashley , Hinkle, Kelly M., Lincoln, Sarah, Spychalla, Anthony J., Przybelski, Scott A. , Kwan, Rain S., Lesser, Elizabeth R. , Carter, Rickey E. , Ross, Owen A. , Lachner, Christian , Ertekin‐Taner, Nilüfer , Ferman, Tanis J. , Fields, Julie A. , Nguyen, Aivi T. , Reichard, R. Ross , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Petersen, Ronald C. , Jack, Clifford R. , Kantarci, Kejal , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Lowe, Val J. , Murray, Melissa E. , Kouri, Naomi , Caetano-Anolles, Kelsey, Corriveau-Lecavalier, Nick , Wood, Ashley C., Lincoln, Sarah J, Engelberg-Cook, Erica , Crook, Julia E. , Jack, Clifford R , Ross, Owen A , Carter, Rickey E , Kantarci, Kejal , Day, Gregory S , Murray, Melissa E , Ferman, Tanis J , Nguyen, Aivi T , Pottier, Cyril , Caetano-Anollés, Kelsey , Corriveau‐Lecavalier, Nick , Wood, Ashley C., Senjem, Matthew L. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Machulda, Mary M. , Ramanan, Vijay K. , Jones, David T. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Knopman, David S. , Duara, Ranjan , Dickson, Dennis W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi

JAMA Neurology | April 15, 2024 | Volume: 81 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 619

10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0784 Get It

Importance Factors associated with clinical heterogeneity in Alzheimer disease (AD) lay along a continuum hypothesized to associate with tangle distribution and are relevant for understanding glial activation considerations in therapeutic advancement. Objectives To examine clinicopathologic and neuroimaging characteristics of disease heterogeneity in AD along a quantitative continuum using the corticolimbic index (CLix) to account for individuality of spatially distributed tangles found at autopsy. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was a retrospective medical record review performed on the Florida Autopsied Multiethnic (FLAME) cohort accessioned from 1991 to 2020. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to December 2023. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tau positron emission tomography (PET) were evaluated in an independent neuroimaging group. The FLAME cohort includes 2809 autopsied individuals; included in this study were neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases (FLAME-AD). A digital pathology subgroup of FLAME-AD cases was derived for glial activation analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinicopathologic factors of heterogeneity that inform patient history and neuropathologic evaluation of AD; CLix score (lower, relative cortical predominance/hippocampal sparing vs higher, relative cortical sparing/limbic predominant cases); neuroimaging measures (ie, structural MRI and tau-PET). Results Of the 2809 autopsied individuals in the FLAME cohort, 1361 neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases were evaluated. A digital pathology subgroup included 60 FLAME-AD cases. The independent neuroimaging group included 93 cases. Among the 1361 FLAME-AD cases, 633 were male (47%; median [range] age at death, 81 [54-96] years) and 728 were female (53%; median [range] age at death, 81 [53-102] years). A younger symptomatic onset (Spearman ρ = 0.39, P < .001) and faster decline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (Spearman ρ = 0.27; P < .001) correlated with a lower CLix score in FLAME-AD series. Cases with a nonamnestic syndrome had lower CLix scores (median [IQR], 13 [9-18]) vs not (median [IQR], 21 [15-27]; P < .001). Hippocampal MRI volume (Spearman ρ = −0.45; P < .001) and flortaucipir tau-PET uptake in posterior cingulate and precuneus cortex (Spearman ρ = −0.74; P < .001) inversely correlated with CLix score. Although AD cases with a CLix score less than 10 had higher cortical tangle count, we found lower percentage of CD68-activated microglia/macrophage burden (median [IQR], 0.46% [0.32%-0.75%]) compared with cases with a CLix score of 10 to 30 (median [IQR], 0.75% [0.51%-0.98%]) and on par with a CLix score of 30 or greater (median [IQR], 0.40% [0.32%-0.57%]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Findings show that AD heterogeneity exists along a continuum of corticolimbic tangle distribution. Reduced CD68 burden may signify an underappreciated association between tau accumulation and microglia/macrophages activation that should be considered in personalized therapy for immune dysregulation.
Baseline neuropsychiatric symptoms and psychotropic medication use midway through data collection of the Longitudinal Early‐ Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS) Cohort
Wonderlin, Ryan J., Hammers, Dustin B. , Garcia, Alex Pena, Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Gao, Sujuan , Kirby, Kala, Aisen, Paul , Griffin, Percy , Iaccarino, Leo, Kramer, Joel H. , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Rumbaugh, Malia, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan C., Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon, Dickerson, Brad C., Apostolova, Liana G. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Hammers, Dustin B , Beckett, Laurel , Wang, Sophia , Logan, Paige E. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Foroud, Tatiana , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kukull, Walter A. , Joie, Renaud La , Mundada, Nidhi S. , Murray, Melissa E. , Nudelman, Kelly , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Atri, Alireza , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, David A. , Womack, Kyle , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: S24 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.083140 Get It

AbstractBackgroundWe examined neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and psychotropic medication use at the midway point of data collection of the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study (LEADS). We compared amyloid‐positive early‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) participants and amyloid‐negative early‐onset non‐Alzheimer’s disease [EOnonAD]) participants across NPS domains and psychotropic medication categories.Method282 participants enrolled in LEADS were compared across diagnostic groups – amyloid‐positive EOAD (n = 212) and amyloid‐negative EOnonAD (n = 70). All participants were between ages 40 and 64 at baseline. NPS were measured with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory – Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) and Geriatric Depression Scale – Short Form (GDS‐SF). Medications were categorized into psychotropic category (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines). Groups were compared on NPI‐Q using binary logistic regression adjusting for sex and disease severity, on GDS‐SF using linear regression adjusting for sex and disease severity, and on psychotropic medication use using Chi square or Fisher’s exact test.ResultDemographic data are presented in Table 1. Average total NPI‐Q score was higher in EOnonAD than EOAD (p = .002, ŋp 2 = .03). Regardless of diagnostic group, informants endorsed Affective behaviors most frequently (76.2%). EOAD informants endorsed fewer Distress‐Tension behaviors (p = .02, OR = .498) and Impulse Control behaviors (p = .01, OR = .438). EOAD informants also endorsed apathy (p < .001, OR = .316), irritability (p = .02, OR = .498), and disinhibition (p = .04, OR = .476) at lower frequency than EOnonAD. GDS‐SF showed that the EOnonAD participants self‐reported more symptoms of depression than the EOAD group (p = .002, ŋp 2 = .03). (Table 2A). A minority of participants, regardless of diagnostic group, reported psychotropic medication use (35%). There was higher use in EOnonAD (38%) than EOAD (24%) (p = .03, Cohen W = .14) (Table 2B).ConclusionNPS burden and psychotropic medication use were higher in EOnonAD than EOAD participants, despite EOnonAD being less severely impaired. LEADS continues to collect data. Future studies will examine etiologies that may be larger drivers of NPS than AD neuropathology, mediators (e.g., race, ethnicity) in the association between NPS and diagnostic group classication, compare NPS in EOAD vs. LOAD, and examine longitudinal changes in neuropsychiatric profiles.
Cognitive Clusters of Early‐onset non‐Alzheimer’s disease
Kim, Hee Jin , Lane, Kathleen A. , Gao, Sujuan , Hammers, Dustin B. , Aisen, Paul , Eloyan, Ani , Iaccarino, Leo, Kramer, Joel H. , Rumbaugh, Malia, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Taurone, Alexander, Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan C., Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon, Dickerson, Brad C., Apostolova, Liana G. , Hammers, Dustin B , Logan, Paige E. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Foroud, Tatiana , Grinberg, Lea T. , Jack, Clifford R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kukull, Walter A. , Joie, Renaud La , Mundada, Nidhi S. , Murray, Melissa E. , Nudelman, Kelly , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Atri, Alireza , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, David A. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: S24 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.083061 Get It

AbstractBackgroundApproximately 10‐25% of amnestic early‐onset dementia are negative for amyloid (Early‐onset non‐Alzheimer’s Disease, EOnonAD). EOnonAD is a heterogenous group with various etiologies. In order to better understand the traits of EOnonAD, we clustered amnestic EOnonAD individuals according to cognitive patterns.MethodCognitive data of 62 EOnonAD individuals from the Longitudinal Early‐onset AD study (LEADS) were Z‐normalized to 91 intact individuals after adjusting for age, sex, and education. This led to domain‐averaged composite Z‐scores for memory, language, speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function. Cluster analysis using the Ward method on the residuals for the five composites was performed. We used Scree plot using the pseudo T‐squared to determine the optimal number of clusters. We compared demographics, imaging biomarkers (amyloid and tau PET SUVR, hippocampal volume), plasma (pTau231, Aß40, Aß42, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament light chain (NfL)), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (Aß42/40, NfL, Neurogranin, Visinin‐like protein, YKL‐40, and Synaptosome Associated Protein 25) across the clusters after adjusting for age, sex, and education. We compared gray matter density of each EOnonAD cluster to controls (n = 84) using voxel‐wise multiple linear regressions in SPM12, adjusting for age, sex, education, and intracranial volume.ResultScree plot using the pseudo‐T‐squared suggested three clusters. Cluster 1 (38/62, 61.3%) was characterized by having the mildest cognitive impairment in all domains. Cluster 2 (19/62, 30.6%) was characterized by more severe memory and language impairment. Cluster 3 (5/62, 8.1%) was characterized by more severe impairment in speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function (Table 1). Cluster 3 showed significantly higher NfL for both plasma (Cluster 1 vs 3, p<0.001; Cluster 2 vs 3, p < 0.004) and CSF (Cluster 1 vs 3, p = 0.001). Other biomarkers did not show significant difference (Table 1). Only Cluster 3 showed significant atrophy in the bilateral fronto‐parietal areas at p<0.01, uncorrected (Figure 1).ConclusionWe identified heterogeneity in cognitive patterns among amnestic EOnonAD individuals. Cluster 1 had mildest cognitive impairment; Cluster 2 had predominant impairment in memory and language; and Cluster 3 had predominant impairment in speed/attention, visuospatial, and executive function, with significant fronto‐parietal atrophy and high NfL indicating active neurodegeneration.
Digital pathology analysis reveals TDP‐43 pathology as a strong predictor of glial activation in Alzheimer’s disease
Frankenhauser, Isabelle , Peng, Zhongwei , Tranovich, Jessica F., Lesser, Elizabeth R. , Lachner, Christian , Ertekin‐Taner, Nilüfer , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Kouri, Naomi , Boon, Baayla D.C. , Labuzan, Sydney A. , Crook, Julia E. , Duara, Ranjan , Dickson, Dennis W. , Carter, Rickey E. , Murray, Melissa E.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2023 | Volume: 19 | Issue: S12 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.080535 Get It

AbstractBackgroundGlial activation plays a critical role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis and is associated with amyloid‐β plaques and neurofibrillary tangles composed of phosphorylated tau (phospho‐tau). With approximately 40%‐60% of AD cases having limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC), TDP‐43 pathology has become more the rule than the exception in AD brains. However, the effect of LATE‐NC in AD‐related glial activation is unknown.MethodWe analyzed the effect of TDP‐43 pathology on glial activation in three AD subtypes: hippocampal sparing (HpSp) AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. Twenty cases of each subtype (n = 60 total) were selected from the FLorida Autopsied Multi‐Ethnic (FLAME) cohort. Cases were immunohistochemically evaluated on serial sections of the hippocampus in the CA1 and subiculum subsectors, and superior temporal, inferior parietal, and mid‐frontal cortices with antibodies to CD68 (phagocytosis), GFAP (astrogliosis), GT‐38 (conformation‐specific AD‐type tau), 6F/3D (amyloid‐β), and phospho‐Serine 409/410 of TDP‐43 (pTDP‐43). Digital pathology was employed to quantify immunohistochemical staining. Multivariable regression modeling was utilized to understand the relationship between glial activation and AD pathologies.ResultThe level of glial activation, defined as % of immunoreactive surface area for CD68 and GFAP, was lowest in HpSp AD (0.54%, 13%), whereas typical AD (1.3%, 33%) and limbic predominant AD (1.3%, 30%) had similar levels suggesting a ceiling effect, or plateau, of gliosis levels (both p<0.001). HpSp AD was more often male (p<0.001) and younger at disease onset (p<0.001) compared to both typical AD and limbic predominant AD. Multivariable regression modeling of CD68 (subiculum R2 = 0.60) identified advanced tau to be a significant predictor of CD68 in all brain regions. LATE‐NC stage predicted increased CD68 levels in limbic brain regions. Multivariable regression modeling of GFAP (CA1 R2 = 0.60) showed that Aβ was the strongest predictor of astrogliosis in CA1 and subiculum (p<0.001). Advanced tau in CA1 and parietal cortex, LATE‐NC in subiculum and temporal cortex, and APOE4 genotype in CA1 predicted a significant increase in GFAP.ConclusionThese findings highlight the significant role TDP‐43 pathology plays in affecting the microenvironment and interplay between neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration and have important implications for therapeutic strategies in AD with co‐morbid LATE‐NC.