Pottier, Cyril

Abstract The genetic contributions of the X chromosome to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remain poorly understood yet are expected to importantly shape sex differences in AD. We therefore performed large-scale X-chromosome-wide association studies (N=1,240,451), evaluating differential risk due to sex, APOE *4, and escape from X-chromosome inactivation, finding most X-linked loci appear relevant to female-biased AD etiology. In evaluating genetic pleiotropy with hormonal, lipid, and brain imaging traits, we discovered X-linked AD loci converged on white matter traits, particularly in the anterior corona radiata and splenium of the corpus callosum. Through brain-centric functional genomics analyses, we then nominated candidate causal genes, including 5 that appeared highly robust. Notably, we found the escape gene RBBP7 decreases AD risk in APOE *4 carriers likely through higher expression in excitatory neurons to counter tau-related neurodegeneration. Altogether, we provide an atlas of sex and APOE *4-informed candidate X-linked AD risk loci, genes, and mechanisms that will guide future studies.

Importance Factors associated with clinical heterogeneity in Alzheimer disease (AD) lay along a continuum hypothesized to associate with tangle distribution and are relevant for understanding glial activation considerations in therapeutic advancement. Objectives To examine clinicopathologic and neuroimaging characteristics of disease heterogeneity in AD along a quantitative continuum using the corticolimbic index (CLix) to account for individuality of spatially distributed tangles found at autopsy. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was a retrospective medical record review performed on the Florida Autopsied Multiethnic (FLAME) cohort accessioned from 1991 to 2020. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to December 2023. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tau positron emission tomography (PET) were evaluated in an independent neuroimaging group. The FLAME cohort includes 2809 autopsied individuals; included in this study were neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases (FLAME-AD). A digital pathology subgroup of FLAME-AD cases was derived for glial activation analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinicopathologic factors of heterogeneity that inform patient history and neuropathologic evaluation of AD; CLix score (lower, relative cortical predominance/hippocampal sparing vs higher, relative cortical sparing/limbic predominant cases); neuroimaging measures (ie, structural MRI and tau-PET). Results Of the 2809 autopsied individuals in the FLAME cohort, 1361 neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases were evaluated. A digital pathology subgroup included 60 FLAME-AD cases. The independent neuroimaging group included 93 cases. Among the 1361 FLAME-AD cases, 633 were male (47%; median [range] age at death, 81 [54-96] years) and 728 were female (53%; median [range] age at death, 81 [53-102] years). A younger symptomatic onset (Spearman ρ = 0.39, P < .001) and faster decline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (Spearman ρ = 0.27; P < .001) correlated with a lower CLix score in FLAME-AD series. Cases with a nonamnestic syndrome had lower CLix scores (median [IQR], 13 [9-18]) vs not (median [IQR], 21 [15-27]; P < .001). Hippocampal MRI volume (Spearman ρ = −0.45; P < .001) and flortaucipir tau-PET uptake in posterior cingulate and precuneus cortex (Spearman ρ = −0.74; P < .001) inversely correlated with CLix score. Although AD cases with a CLix score less than 10 had higher cortical tangle count, we found lower percentage of CD68-activated microglia/macrophage burden (median [IQR], 0.46% [0.32%-0.75%]) compared with cases with a CLix score of 10 to 30 (median [IQR], 0.75% [0.51%-0.98%]) and on par with a CLix score of 30 or greater (median [IQR], 0.40% [0.32%-0.57%]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Findings show that AD heterogeneity exists along a continuum of corticolimbic tangle distribution. Reduced CD68 burden may signify an underappreciated association between tau accumulation and microglia/macrophages activation that should be considered in personalized therapy for immune dysregulation.

AbstractBackgroundPerturbations in immune pathways are strongly associated with Alzheimer’s disease. A positive association between autoimmune diseases and frontotemporal dementia has been reported. We explored whether early onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) would associate with autoimmune diseases.MethodWe compared 313 patients with EOAD from the Mayo Clinic Florida, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) Registry with matched cognitively normal controls (NC) based on age (+/‐ 2 years) and gender at 1:2 ratio. NC were derived from Mayo Clinic Biobank Project, Rochester (N = 313) and the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (N = 313). Data abstraction was performed by trained statisticians using ICD 9&10 codes corresponding to 40 specified autoimmune diseases and/or documentation of specified immunomodulatory treatment. Data was also abstracted via retrospective record review. We further reviewed clinical records from EOAD patients with neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer’s disease patients enrolled in the ADRC (n = 10). Each autoimmune disease type was compared between cases and controls using Fisher’s exact test. All tests were two‐sided with alpha level set at 0.05 for statistical significance. Continuous variables were summarized as median (range) while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). The prevalence of autoimmune disease in the general population was based off Hayter & Cook, 2012 and Roberts & Erdei, 2020. All data abstraction was done blinded to the clinical diagnosis and baseline demographics.ResultAutoimmune disease history was abstracted from 949 patient records (313 EOAD, 10 pathologically‐confirmed EOAD, 626 NCI). The median age was 57 years‐old. (EOAD range 28,65 yrs.; NC 30,66 yrs.). Autoimmune thyroiditis (p = 0.0008), ulcerative colitis (p = 0.011, psoriasis (<0.0001), rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.0005), and Raynaud’s syndrome (p = 0.0021) were less prevalent in patients with EOAD compared to NC. Furthermore, patients with EOAD had a lower prevalence of immune mediated hematologic disorders.ConclusionPatients with EOAD have a lower prevalence of autoimmune diseases than NC. Immune activation identified in early onset AD patients may be unrelated to autoimmunity. Findings should be explored in late onset AD patients.

AbstractBackgroundPSEN1 mutations are the most common genetic cause for autosomal dominant forms of Alzheimer’s disease patients with an age at onset below 65 years (ADAD). Even though all PSEN1 mutations lead to an increased Aβ processing and production, there is a large variability in phenotypic presentation even in individuals with the same mutation. Splicing isoforms in AD genes are reported to be associated with the disease, however little is known about correlation between splicing pattern and phenotypic presentation (e.g. variable age onset). We hypothesized that cellular and transcriptomic alterations differ amongst patients with different phenotypic presentation. In a group of 8 ADAD with the same PSEN1 p.G206A mutation, we investigate the association between brain cell type proportion, gene expression, and splicing isoforms with age at onset, Aβ plaque type and severity of AD neuropathologic change.MethodsEight Hispanic ADAD cases with PSEN1 p.G206A mutation were identified in the Mayo Clinic brain bank housed in Jacksonville, FL. Standard (immuno)histochemical stains, including H&E and thioflavin S, were performed to evaluate AD neuropathologic change. We focused on distinct Aβ plaque types in an association cortex (inferior parietal gyrus) and primary cortex (motor). We carried‐out single‐nuclei short and long read RNA sequencing on both brain regions. We will stratify our transcriptomic analyses based on neuropathology and phenotypic presentation.ResultsWe observed large variability in age at onset (median = 53 years; range: 42‐59 years). Furthermore, disease duration was reportedly variable (median = 10 years; range: 8‐17). All cases had a Braak tangle stage VI and Thal amyloid phase 5. Only 3 patients carried at least one APOE*ε4 risk allele, suggesting that its effect was minimal on ages at onset and death. Different plaque types were observed for short versus long survivors. In short survivors, plaques were predominantly fibrillar with an eosinophilic radial component, whereas in longer survivors predominantly cored plaques were observed.ConclusionLarge phenotypic variability within patients with the same mutation is observed suggesting the involvement of yet to be discovered genetic modifiers. Understanding cellular transcriptomic events in ADAD is essential to future development of therapeutic approaches and development of biomarkers.

We previously demonstrated that increased expression of the SERPINA5 gene is associated with hippocampal vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brains. SERPINA5 was further demonstrated to be a novel tau-binding partner that colocalizes within neurofibrillary tangles. Our goal was to determine whether genetic variants in the SERPINA5 gene contributed to clinicopathologic phenotypes in AD. To screen for SERPINA5 variants, we sequenced 103 autopsy-confirmed young-onset AD cases with a positive family history of cognitive decline. To further assess the frequency of a rare missense variant, SERPINA5 p.E228Q, we screened an additional 1114 neuropathologically diagnosed AD cases. To provide neuropathologic context in AD, we immunohistochemically evaluated SERPINA5 and tau in a SERPINA5 p.E228Q variant carrier and a matched noncarrier. In the initial SERPINA5 screen, we observed 1 individual with a rare missense variant (rs140138746) that resulted in an amino acid change (p.E228Q). In our AD validation cohort, we identified an additional 5 carriers of this variant, resulting in an allelic frequency of 0.0021. There was no significant difference between SERPINA5 p.E228Q carriers and noncarriers in terms of demographic or clinicopathologic characteristics. Although not significant, on average SERPINA5 p.E228Q carriers were 5 years younger at age of disease onset than noncarriers (median: 66 [60–73] vs 71 [63–77] years, P = .351). In addition, SERPINA5 p.E228Q carriers exhibited a longer disease duration than noncarriers that approached significance (median: 12 [10–15]) vs 9 [6–12] years, P = .079). More severe neuronal loss was observed in the locus coeruleus, hippocampus, and amygdala of the SERPINA5 p.E228Q carrier compared to noncarrier, although no significant difference in SERPINA5-immunopositive lesions was observed. Throughout the AD brain in either carrier or noncarrier, areas with early pretangle pathology or burnt-out ghost tangle accumulation did not reveal SERPINA5-immunopositive neurons. Mature tangles and newly formed ghost tangles appeared to correspond well with SERPINA5-immunopositive tangle-bearing neurons. SERPINA5 gene expression was previously associated with disease phenotype; however, our findings suggest that SERPINA5 genetic variants may not be a contributing factor to clinicopathologic differences in AD. SERPINA5-immunopositive neurons appear to undergo a pathologic process that corresponded with specific levels of tangle maturity.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative conditions, affecting the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Ongoing research has provided insight into developing clinical trials for FTLD and key clinical measures such as structural MRI. To inform clinical trial design and optimize participation, it is imperative to explore facilitators and barriers for potential candidates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to participating in future clinical trials for FTLD.MethodsAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) are observational studies focused on characterizing FTLD syndromes in preparation for clinical trials. The 584 participants enrolled across 18 research sites in the United States and Canada completed a survey assessing interest in clinical trial participation.Results29% of respondents self‐reported as patients (63±10 years), 26% self‐reported as caregivers answering on behalf of patients (65±10 years), and 45% self‐reported as healthy but at risk for FTLD (48±14 years). Travel reimbursement was the most common factor reported to positively influence participation (≧66%), with the healthy but at risk group showing the strongest endorsement (83%). Cost and time involved in travel were possible barriers for about half of the patients (48%) and healthy but at risk respondents (53%). The respondents value receiving feedback on the study findings (≧80%) and being informed of their individual disease progression (≧75%). Particularly, keeping participation confidential was very important for the healthy but at risk group (62%). In regard to research assessments, most participants demonstrated a high interest in physical and neurological exams at a research center (≧87%) whereas only half were interested in doing more invasive procedures such as the lumbar puncture (≧52%). Overall, respondents showed a positive attitude and support for research participation (≧77%) and trusted that their health information would remain confidential in a clinical trial (≧53%).ConclusionsFavorable attitudes and interest towards medical research exist among participants. To optimize participation, clinical trials should allocate funding for travel and involve participants in feedback about study results and their disease progression. Alternatives to invasive assessments may increase participation.

Abstract Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP) is a complex heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder for which mechanisms are poorly understood. To explore transcriptional changes underlying FTLD-TDP, we performed RNA-sequencing on 66 genetically unexplained FTLD-TDP patients, 24 FTLD-TDP patients with GRN mutations and 24 control participants. Using principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering, differential expression and coexpression network analyses, we showed that GRN mutation carriers and FTLD-TDP-A patients without a known mutation shared a common transcriptional signature that is independent of GRN loss-of-function. After combining both groups, differential expression as compared to the control group and coexpression analyses revealed alteration of processes related to immune response, synaptic transmission, RNA metabolism, angiogenesis and vesicle-mediated transport. Deconvolution of the data highlighted strong cellular alterations that were similar in FTLD-TDP-A and GRN mutation carriers with NSF as a potentially important player in both groups. We propose several potentially druggable pathways such as the GABAergic, GDNF and sphingolipid pathways. Our findings underline new disease mechanisms and strongly suggest that affected pathways in GRN mutation carriers extend beyond GRN and contribute to genetically unexplained forms of FTLD-TDP-A.

Abstract Background: Genetic studies have shifted to sequencing-based rare variants discovery after decades of success in identifying common disease variants by Genome-Wide Association Studies using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism chips. Sequencing-based studies require large sample sizes for statistical power but often inadvertently introduce batch effects because samples are typically collected, processed, and sequenced at multiple centers. Conventionally, batch effects are first detected and visualized using Principal Components Analysis and then controlled by including batch covariates in the disease association models. For sequencing-based genetic studies, because all variants included in the association analyses have passed quality control measures, this conventional approach treats every variant as equal and ignores the substantial differences still remaining in variant qualities and characteristics such as genotype quality scores, alternative allele fractions (fraction of reads supporting alternative allele at a variant position) and sequencing depths. Results: In the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) exome dataset of 9,904 cases and controls, we discovered hidden variant-level differences between sample batches of three sequencing centers and two exome capture kits. Although sequencing centers were included as a covariate in our association models, we observed differences at the variant level in genotype quality and alternative allele fraction between samples processed by different exome capture kits that significantly impacted both the confidence of variant detection and the identification of disease-associated variants. Furthermore, we found that the association signals of a subset of top disease risk variants came exclusively from samples processed by one exome capture kit that was more effective at capturing the alternative alleles compared to the other kit. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of additional variant-level quality control for large sequencing-based genetic studies. More importantly, we demonstrate that automatically filtering out variants with batch differences may lead to false negatives if the batch discordance came largely from quality differences and if the variants from one batch had better quality scores.