Rihal, Charanjit S.

Background Low body mass index ( BMI ) and serum creatinine are surrogate markers of frailty and sarcopenia. Their relationship with cause‐specific mortality in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is not well studied. Methods and Results We determined long‐term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in 9394 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from 2000 to 2011. BMI and serum creatinine were divided into 4 categories. During a median follow‐up of 4.2 years (interquartile range 1.8–7.3 years), 3243 patients (33.4%) died. In the multivariable model, compared with patients with normal BMI , patients with low BMI had significantly increased all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [ HR ] 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.7), which was related to both cardiovascular causes (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–1.8) and noncardiovascular causes (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.06–1.9). Compared with normal BMI , significant reduction was noted in patients who were overweight and obese in terms of cardiovascular mortality (overweight: HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67–0.88; obese: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.93) and noncardiovascular mortality (overweight: HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.97; obese: HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.95). In a multivariable model, in patients with normal BMI , low creatinine (≤0.70 mg/dL) was significantly associated with increased all‐cause mortality (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.5) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4–3.8) compared with patients with normal creatinine (0.71–1.0 mg/dL); however, this was not observed in other BMI categories. Conclusions We identified a new subgroup of patients with low serum creatinine and normal BMI that was associated with increased all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Low BMI was associated with increased cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. Nutritional support, resistance training, and weight‐gain strategies may have potential roles for these patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence and impact of work‐related musculoskeletal pain in cardiac sonographers to a large control group of peer employees with similar demographics.BackgroundCardiac sonographers are known to have high levels of occupational musculoskeletal pain. Comparative studies with other employees within cardiology/radiology departments have never been performed.MethodsAn electronic survey was administered to Mayo Clinic employees at six major patient care facilities in four different states.ResultsThere were 2682 employees within the departments of cardiology and radiology who were contacted, and 1532 (57%) completed the survey. After excluding those who wore protective lead aprons, 517 employees comprised the control group and 66 cardiac sonographers made up the study group. Cardiac sonographers reported work‐related musculoskeletal pain more frequently than the control group (88% vs 40%; P<.001). This association persisted after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, length of current employment, and history of preexisting musculoskeletal pain (OR 11.6; [95% CI 5.32, 25.5]; P<.001). Cardiac sonographers sought medical care for their work‐related pain more often (55% vs 21%; P<.001) and missed more work due to pain (35% vs 12%, P<.001). In a secondary analysis, cardiac sonographers also experienced more work‐related musculoskeletal pain than nurses, technicians, and physicians working in the interventional laboratory who regularly wear a protective lead apron (P<.001).ConclusionsIn this multisite cross‐sectional study, cardiac sonographers experienced significantly more work‐related pain and missed more work due to pain than peer employees within cardiology/radiology departments.

Objectives Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes frequently fails to restore myocardial perfusion despite establishing epicardial vessel patency. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor, and its expression is increased in atherosclerosis and after PCI. In this study, we aim to define the role of endothelin in regulating coronary microvascular blood flow and myocardial perfusion following PCI in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTACS), by assessing whether adjunctive therapy with a selective endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonist acutely improves postprocedural coronary microvascular blood flow. Methods In a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 23 NSTACS patients were enrolled to receive an intracoronary infusion of placebo (n=11) or BQ-123 (n=12) immediately before PCI. Post-PCI coronary microvascular blood flow and myocardial perfusion were assessed by measuring Doppler-derived average peak velocity (APV), and cardiac biomarker levels were quantified. Results Compared with the placebo group, APV was significantly higher in the drug group immediately after PCI (30 (20, 37) vs 19 (9, 26) cm/s; p=0.03). Hyperaemic APV, measured post-adenosine administration, was higher in the BQ-123 group, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (56 (48, 72) vs 46 (34, 64) cm/s; p=0.090). Maximum coronary flow reserve postprocedure was not different between the two groups (2.1 (1.6, 2.3) vs 2.5 (1.8, 3.0)). Per cent change in creatine kinase isoenzyme MB from the time of PCI to 8 and 16 hours post-PCI was significantly lower in the drug group compared with the placebo group (−17 (−26, −10) vs 26 (−15, 134); p=0.02 and −17 (−38, 14) vs 107 (2, 446); p=0.007, respectively). Conclusions Endothelin is a mediator of microvascular dysfunction during PCI in NSTACS, and adjunctive selective ETA antagonist may augment myocardial perfusion during PCI. Trial registration number NCT00586820; Results.

ObjectivesThis study sought to assess the learning curve for TMVR for treatment of primary mitral regurgitation (MR).BackgroundData are lacking regarding the technical experience required to achieve optimal clinical outcomes with transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) using the edge‐to‐edge MitraClip technique.MethodsWe examined the sequential experience of the first 75 patients (age 80 ± 9 years; 77% male) who underwent TMVR at our institution. A sequence number of each patient was assigned as a continuous variable and in tertiles for analysis.ResultsTMVR with MitraClip was successful in 97% with an average procedural time of 106 ± 39 minutes. The 30‐day rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was 7%. With increased case experience, there were decreases in procedural time, fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, and major adverse cardiovascular events. Procedural success, residual mitral regurgitation and NYHA functional classification at 30‐day follow‐up remained unchanged throughout the experience.ConclusionsThe learning curve for TMVR with MitraClip for treatment of primary MR is characterized by a sequential reduction in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, procedural complications, and hospital length of stay at a tertiary academic medical center. Thirty‐day procedural results are favorable and similar during the initial learning period.

BackgroundObjective measures of frailty have not been well defined as risk factors for a poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve insertion. We hypothesized that assisted care as a baseline patient characteristic was a simple objective measure of frailty. We reviewed our experience to assess for an association between assisted care and outcome of operation.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 597 patients operated with transcatheter aortic valve insertion from November 2008 through July 2015. The study cohort included patients with a dichotomous baseline characteristic of receiving assisted care (AC group, n = 60, 10.1%) or not receiving assisted care (NC group, n = 537, 89.9%). The endpoints of the study were operative stroke/death and 1‐year survival.ResultsThe age of the patients was 80.6 ± 9.0 years, male sex was present in 349 (58.5%), and STS predicted risk of mortality was 9.2 ± 6.2%. Alternate access was used in 26 (43.3%) patients in the AC care group and in 220 (41.0%) in the NC group (P = 0.724). Operative stroke/death occurred in 4 (6.7%) patients in the AC group and in 25 (4.7%) in the NC group (P = 0.492). Mortality at 1 year in the AC group was 14.8 ± 5.2% and in the NC group was 12.9 ± 1.7%; (P = 0. 250).ConclusionsAssisted care as a baseline patient characteristic does not result in increased operative stroke/death or 1‐year mortality in patients following transcatheter aortic valve insertion. Assisted care should not by itself preclude operation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background— Off-label use of transcatheter aortic and pulmonary valve prostheses for tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation (TVIV) within dysfunctional surgical tricuspid valve (TV) bioprostheses has been described in small reports. Methods and Results— An international, multicenter registry was developed to collect data on TVIV cases. Patient-related factors, procedural details and outcomes, and follow-up data were analyzed. Valve-in-ring or heterotopic TV implantation procedures were not included. Data were collected on 156 patients with bioprosthetic TV dysfunction who underwent catheterization with planned TVIV. The median age was 40 years, and 71% of patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. Among 152 patients in whom TVIV was attempted with a Melody (n=94) or Sapien (n=58) valve, implantation was successful in 150, with few serious complications. After TVIV, both the TV inflow gradient and tricuspid regurgitation grade improved significantly. During follow-up (median, 13.3 months), 22 patients died, 5 within 30 days; all 22 patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and 9 were hospitalized before TVIV. There were 10 TV reinterventions, and 3 other patients had significant recurrent TV dysfunction. At follow-up, 77% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II ( P <0.001 versus before TVIV). Outcomes did not differ according to surgical valve size or TVIV valve type. Conclusions— TVIV with commercially available transcatheter prostheses is technically and clinically successful in patients of various ages across a wide range of valve size. Although preimplantation clinical status was associated with outcome, many patients in New York Heart Association class III or IV at baseline improved. TVIV should be considered a viable option for treatment of failing TV bioprostheses.