Back to Authors

Singh, Mandeep

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2538-910X

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Abstract P326: Health Status and Frailty in Assisted Living and Nursing Home Residents
Kanwar, Amrit , Lennon, Ryan J. , Ghanta, Kalyan, Singh, Mandeep , Roger, Véronique L.

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 4 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circoutcomes.4.suppl_1.ap326 Get It

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and relationship of frailty and health status measures among residents of long-term care [nursing homes (NH) and assisted living (AL)] facilities. Resident and methods: Residents ≥ 65 years who are residents of NH and AL facilities at La Crosse county, Wisconsin, were assessed for frailty (gait speed, unintended weight loss, and grip strength), comorbidity (Charlson index), and quality of life (QOL) [Short Form (SF)-36]. Results: Among 96 participants (57 from NH and 39 from AL), 78% were frail. The prevalence of frailty (77% vs. 79%), comorbidity (2.0 vs. 2.0), and poor health status did not differ between residents of NH and AL living facilities. Frail residents were older and had higher comorbidity index (2.0 vs. 0, p=0.02), including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and heart failure. Frailty had the strongest correlation with the SF-36 Physical Component Score (r=-0.45), Figure. It exhibited weaker associations with comorbidity and the SF-36 Mental Component Score. Overall, SF-36 for physical component was lower among frail residents (33 vs. 48, p<0.001). Following adjustments by linear regression, compared to those without frailty, frail residents had lower adjusted quality of life scores. Conclusion: Frailty was highly prevalent among residents of long-term care facilities and did not differ between NH and AL facilities. We noted significant correlations between frailty, comorbid conditions, and poor quality of life.
Occupational musculoskeletal pain in cardiac sonographers compared to peer employees: a multisite cross‐sectional study
Orme, Nicholas M., Geske, Jeffrey B. , Pislaru, Sorin V. , Askew, J. Wells , Lennon, Ryan J. , Lewis, Bradley R., Rihal, Charanjit S. , Pellikka, Patricia A. , Singh, Mandeep , Askew, John Wells, Lennon, Ryan J. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Sabbah, Michael S. , Pellikka, Patricia A , Geske, Jeffrey B

Echocardiography | August 20, 2016 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1642-1647

10.1111/echo.13344 Get It

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence and impact of work‐related musculoskeletal pain in cardiac sonographers to a large control group of peer employees with similar demographics.BackgroundCardiac sonographers are known to have high levels of occupational musculoskeletal pain. Comparative studies with other employees within cardiology/radiology departments have never been performed.MethodsAn electronic survey was administered to Mayo Clinic employees at six major patient care facilities in four different states.ResultsThere were 2682 employees within the departments of cardiology and radiology who were contacted, and 1532 (57%) completed the survey. After excluding those who wore protective lead aprons, 517 employees comprised the control group and 66 cardiac sonographers made up the study group. Cardiac sonographers reported work‐related musculoskeletal pain more frequently than the control group (88% vs 40%; P<.001). This association persisted after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, length of current employment, and history of preexisting musculoskeletal pain (OR 11.6; [95% CI 5.32, 25.5]; P<.001). Cardiac sonographers sought medical care for their work‐related pain more often (55% vs 21%; P<.001) and missed more work due to pain (35% vs 12%, P<.001). In a secondary analysis, cardiac sonographers also experienced more work‐related musculoskeletal pain than nurses, technicians, and physicians working in the interventional laboratory who regularly wear a protective lead apron (P<.001).ConclusionsIn this multisite cross‐sectional study, cardiac sonographers experienced significantly more work‐related pain and missed more work due to pain than peer employees within cardiology/radiology departments.