Citations

Abstract Background Breast cancer is etiologically heterogeneous, but which risk factors differ in their associations across tumor subtypes remains unclear. We conducted a large, pooled analysis to evaluate independent, dose-response associations between breast cancer risk factors and quantitative tumor features. Methods Analyses of 15,731 invasive breast cancers from 24 studies evaluated associations (p-trend) between reproductive and hormonal factors, body mass index (BMI), alcohol, smoking, and family history in relation to quantitative immunohistochemistry measures on tissue microarrays (ER, PR, HER2, KI67, TP53) and tumor grade. Analyses in a subset of 10 population-based studies estimated subtype-specific odds ratios (ORs) comparing cases to controls. A Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP) <0.2 was used to identify associations with strong statistical evidence. Results Nulliparity and later age at menopause were associated with higher ER-positivity (p-trend=0.021 and 0.001, respectively), with corresponding OR[ER+] (95% CI) = 1.49 (1.16-1.90) for nulliparous vs. parous and 1.07 (1.03-1.11) per 5 years. Current combined menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use was associated with lower grade (p-trend<0.001), with OR [grade1] = 3.37 (2.69-4.21) for current vs. never users. Higher BMI was associated with lower ER-positivity and higher grade in premenopausal women (p-trend<0.001 and <0.001), with OR[ER+] = 0.80 (0.74-0.87) and OR[grade1] = 0.75 (0.63-0.88) per 5 units, and with higher PR-positivity and higher grade in postmenopausal women (p-trend<0.001 and <0.001), with OR[PR+] = 1.08 (1.03-1.14) and OR[grade 3] = 1.10 (1.04-1.17) per 5 units. Conclusion This pooled analysis of 15,731 cases showed that nulliparity, age at menopause, MHT, and BMI have independent, dose-response associations with ER, PR, and grade, clarifying patterns of etiologic heterogeneity. Associations with HER2, KI67 and TP53, or other risk factors did not meet our threshold for strong evidence.

Abstract Polygenic risk scores (PRSs), which quantify inherited susceptibility to complex traits and diseases, have emerged as valuable tools for risk stratification and precision medicine. Despite their promise, PRS developed on European cohorts often demonstrate substantially reduced predictive accuracy in non-European populations, due to differences in genetic architecture. The disproportionate representation of European ancestry cohorts in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) leads to inequitable deployment of PRS technologies across diverse populations. Here, we introduce PRANA (Polygenic Risk Adaptation via Neural-network Architecture), a deep learning framework that adapts an existing PRS developed on one population to other ancestries. Unlike methods that require large-scale GWAS in the target population, PRANA leverages pre-trained PRS models derived from European cohorts and adapts them using modestly sized cohorts from the target population. We evaluated PRANA on seven complex traits in South Asian, East Asian and Ashkenazi Jewish populations, as well as in selected smaller East Asian subpopulations where the scarcity of training data poses a particular challenge. PRANA mostly improved predictive performance of the baseline PRS models by 5%-20% in terms of effect size (β) and Nagelkerke’s R², and, in most cases, outperformed existing cross-ancestry multi-PRS approaches. These results highlight PRANA as a scalable and practical strategy to reduce disparities in genomic risk prediction and advance the equitable application of PRS in diverse populations.

TPS1679 Background: Cancer care in the United States remains highly centralized, imposing substantial time, caregiver, and financial burdens on patients, particularly those residing in rural and medically underserved regions. While international experience supports the feasibility of home-based cancer therapy delivery, prospective U.S. clinical trial data are limited. The Cancer CARE Beyond Walls (CCBW) program was developed to address these gaps through a decentralized cancer care model integrating virtual oversight, remote monitoring, mobile clinical services, and community-based nursing partners. The study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and patient-centered impact of delivering cancer-directed therapy in patients’ homes or near-home mobile units in the Florida Panhandle, a region characterized by long travel distances to tertiary centers and limited oncology infrastructure. Methods: This is a phase 2, single-arm clinical trial evaluating the delivery of standard-of-care cancer-directed therapy outside of traditional infusion centers. Eligible adult patients (ECOG 0–3) with histologically confirmed malignancies receiving guideline-supported or FDA-approved systemic cancer therapy must demonstrate tolerability of at least one prior in-clinic treatment cycle. Following registration, patients transition to home-based or near-home mobile unit administration for a minimum of 12 weeks, with an option to continue up to 24 weeks. Care delivery is coordinated through a virtual command center providing real-time virtual oversight, remote monitoring, and escalation pathways. Treatment administration is performed by trained local home health nurses, medication shipping, and digital interaction with the electronic health record. A fully equipped mobile unit extends access to rural areas not covered by home health agencies. The primary endpoint is patient preference for treatment location at week 12. Secondary endpoints include safety, avoidable acute care utilization, patient-reported function and global health/quality of life, patient-reported symptoms, and satisfaction with care. Exploratory endpoints assess travel burden, patient perceptions of caregiver experience, and patient perceptions of home versus mobile unit care. Enrollment of 27 patients will provide 80% power to reject a 50% null rate (2-sided exact test, α=0.10), assuming 75% prefer decentralized care or express no preference. This investigator-initiated trial is open to accrual and is supported by a grant from the Florida Cancer Innovation Fund. Clinical trial information: NCT07285044 .

Abstract Introduction/Rationale Hepatic sarcoidosis (HS) is a rare manifestation of sarcoidosis occurring in 6 to 11% of patients with sarcoidosis. Little is known about the clinical characteristics and overall outcome of patients who present with HS. Two recent single center studies from Europe and the U.S. outlined the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and therapeutic interventions in these patients. Our study aims to add to this body of knowledge; in particular, highlighting the clinical presentation, therapeutic interventions, comorbid disease burden, and overall outcomes in patients with HS presenting to a large tertiary care sarcoidosis center of excellence in the U.S. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients with hepatic sarcoidosis (HS) seen at the Sarcoidosis Center of Excellence at East Carolina University (ECU) between 2000 and 2025. Data including demographics, clinical manifestations, diagnostic tests, treatments and outcomes, were extracted. Results A total of 794 patients with sarcoidosis were identified. Twenty-one (21) patients had over 50% of missing data and were excluded. Of the 773 patients included in the study, 62 patients (8%) had hepatic sarcoidosis. Of these, 73% were female and 79% were African American. The mean age at diagnosis was 40 years. Thirty-nine percent (39%) of patients underwent a liver biopsy and majority (64%) had a Scadding CXR I or II at diagnosis. There was no significant difference in the age (at diagnosis), race, gender, BMI, smoking status, or pulmonary function when patients with HS were compared to the rest of the cohort (n = 711) (Table 1). CXR Scadding stage at presentation was also similar except that 5% of non-HS patients had a stage IV CXR at presentation compared to 0 patients with HS (Table 1). Evaluation for other organ involvement revealed that patients with HS were more likely to have splenic, Calcium-Vit D dysregulation, extra-thoracic lymphadenopathy, and bone/bone marrow involvement than non-HS patients (Table 2/Figure 1). Treatment patterns including use of methotrexate and infliximab were identical except that only 5% of patients were treated with ursodiol. This was unexpectedly low (Table 3). Outcomes including fatigue at any point during the follow-up and mortality are presented in Table 4. 10.4% of non-HS patients died versus 4.9% of HS patients. No patients in our cohort underwent a liver transplant. Conclusion Hepatic sarcoidosis was found in 8% of patients and was associated with multi-organ disease. Patients received similar medications, including methotrexate, as patients without hepatic sarcoidosis. This abstract is funded by: None

Abstract Purpose: Standard care for high-grade gliomas (HGG) involves maximal surgical resection followed by radiation and temozolomide. Postoperative adjuvant therapy frequently causes lymphopenia, which is associated with poor prognosis. Interleukin 7 (IL7) is essential for lymphocyte development, homeostasis, and survival. NT-I7 (efineptakin alfa), a long-acting recombinant IL7, reverses lymphopenia and improves survival in murine glioma models. However, the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and impact of NT-I7 on immune cells in patients with HGG remain unknown. Patients and Methods: We conducted a phase I trial (NCT03687957) examining the MTD and effect of NT-I7 on lymphocytes in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity; secondary endpoints included absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) changes over time, overall response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints included immune profiling at different time points using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in a subset of patients. Results: NT-I7 was well tolerated with a MTD of 720 µg/kg. Moreover, NT-I7 significantly increased ALCs for more than 12 weeks in duration. Early elevations in CD4+, CD8+ T cells and NK cells further coincided with increased TNF and CXCL9 cytokine levels. Comprehensive immune profiling of peripheral blood T cells revealed selective clonotype expansion within CD8+, but not CD4+, T cells following NT-I7 administration. Finally, a subset of our patients with MGMT promoter–unmethylated glioblastoma, which are typically associated with a poorer prognosis, demonstrated promising clinical responses. Conclusions: NT-I7 has the potential to maintain and increase lymphocyte counts in patients with HGG and warrants further investigation, particularly in combination with immune-based therapies.

Abstract Background: Intravenous (IV) isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd) is approved for treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on the ICARIA-MM study. Subcutaneous (SC) administration of Isa offers potential advantages such as shorter administration duration and greater patient comfort compared with IV routes. Isa SC via an on-body injector (OBI), an investigational wearable bolus injector, demonstrated safety and efficacy in a Phase 1b study in patients with RRMM. The IRAKLIA trial (NCT05405166) was the first Phase 3 trial evaluating the non-inferiority of Isa-Pd SC via an OBI vs Isa-Pd IV in patients with RRMM. Here, we report the findings of the IRAKLIA trial in the East Asian subgroup with RRMM. Methods: This global, multicenter, open-label study enrolledpatients aged ≥18 years with RRMM who had received ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). Patients were randomized 1:1 to Isa SC (1400 mg) or Isa IV (10 mg/kg) weekly in Cycle (C)1, then every 2 weeks in addition to P (4 mg orally daily, Day [D]1-21) and d (40 mg orally [20 mg if age ≥75 years] weekly). Treatment was administered in 4-week cycles and continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Co-primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and observed Isa concentration before dosing (Ctrough) at steady state (predose at C6D1). Key secondary endpoints included rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), Ctroughlevel Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), infusion reaction incidence, and patient satisfaction rate based on the patient experience and satisfaction questionnaire (PESQ) at C5D15. Results: The East Asian subgroup consisted of 105 patients from China (Mainland, n=82 and Taiwan, n=1) and Japan(n=22) (SC, n=50; IV, n=55). Baseline characteristics of the East Asian subgroup were generally balanced between the two arms and generally comparable to the overall global population (median age 62 years; median 2 prior LOT; 29.5% high-risk cytogenetics; 82.9% refractory to lenalidomide; 7.6% prior exposure to daratumumab). After a median of 13.0 months follow-up, ORR in the SC and IV arm was 74.0% and 70.9%, respectively (relative risk [95% CI] = 1.044 [0.815 – 1.335]). The mean (SD) of Ctroughat C6D1 was 502 (232) µg/mL for SC arm and 282 (123) µg/mL for IV arm. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) comparing SC to IV for Ctrough at steady state was 1.756 (1.346 – 2.290). The ≥VGPR rates were 58.0% for SC and 50.9% for IV (relative risk [95% CI] = 1.139 [0.798 – 1.631]). The mean(SD) of C2D1 Ctroughlevel was 420 (161) µg/mL for the SC arm and 262 (111) µg/mL for IV arm. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) comparing SC to IV for Ctrough at C2D1 was 1.673 (1.321 to 2.120). The infusion reaction incidence was 0% and 21.8% for SC and IV, respectively. Grade ≥3treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 82.0% and 87.3% of patients in the SC and IV arms, respectively. Treatment discontinuation rates were 6% for the SC arm and 12.7% for the IV arm. Injection site reactions (ISRs) occurred in 4% (2/50) of patients in the SC arm and in 0.21% (2/964) of SC injections (all Grade 1), with 99.3% of SC injections completed successfully. Isa SC patients expressed higher satisfaction with their injection method, with 64.0% of patients reporting “satisfied” or “very satisfied” vs 52.7% of Isa IV patients (odds ratio [95% CI] = 1.594 [0.728 – 3.489]). Conclusions: The efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic results between Isa SC vs IV + Pd in the East Asian population from the IRAKLIA study were consistent with the results of the overall global population, in which non-inferiority of ORR, Ctrough at C6D1, ≥VGPR and Ctrough at C2D1 was demonstrated and statistically significantly fewer infusion reactions and higher patient satisfaction were also noted for SC vs IV. These results support the potential use of Isa SC delivered via OBI in East Asian patients and demonstrate the potential of this delivery method to improve patient experience and practice efficiency.

Background: Breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) and traditional risk models (e.g., the Gail model [Gail]) are known to contribute largely independent information, but it is unclear how the overlap varies by ancestry, age, disease type (invasive breast cancer, DCIS), and risk threshold. Methods: In a retrospective case–control study, we evaluated risk prediction performance in 180,398 women (161,849 of European ancestry; 18,549 of Asian ancestry). Odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regression models and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were estimated. Results: PRS for invasive disease showed a stronger association in younger (<50 years) women (OR = 2.51, AUC = 0.622) than in women ≥ 50 years (OR = 2.06, AUC = 0.653) of European ancestry. PRS performance in Asians was lower (OR range = 1.62–1.64, AUC = 0.551–0.600). Gail performance was modest across groups and poor in younger Asian women (OR = 0.94–0.99, AUC = 0.523–0.533). Age interactions were observed for both PRS (p < 0.001) and Gail (p < 0.001) in Europeans, whereas in Asians, age interaction was observed only for Gail (invasive: p < 0.001; DCIS: p = 0.002). PRS identified more high-risk individuals than Gail in Asian populations, especially ≥50 years, while Gail identified more in Europeans. Overlap between PRS, Gail, and family history was limited at higher thresholds. Calibration analysis, comparing empirical and model-based ROC curves, showed divergence for both PRS and Gail (p < 0.001), which indicates miscalibration. In Europeans, family history and prior biopsies drove Gail discrimination. In younger Asians, age at first live birth was influential. Conclusions: PRS adds value to risk stratification beyond traditional tools, especially in younger women and Asian ancestry populations.