Back to Authors

Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy

0000-0002-7332-8387

Mayo Clinic

National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS.

Citations 8

Clarifying risk-factor associations with quantitative breast tumor features: a pooled analysis of 24 studies
Adams, Daniel , Hurson, Amber N. , Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Antoniou, Antonis C, Auvinen, Päivi, Bane, Anita, González, Amy Berrington de , Bodelon, Clara, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Borrero, Maria , Brenner, Hermann, Brock, Ian W., Camp, Nicola J. , Cessna, Melissa H., Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, G, Copson, ER, Fh, Couch, Devilee, P, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana, Figueroa, Jonine D, Glendon, Gord, Hamann, U, Hartman, Mikael, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette A M, Hodge, James M, Holleczek, Bernd, Hollestelle, A M, Mj, Hooning, Investigators, kConFab, Amor, David, Andrews, Lesley , Antill, Y , Rl, Balleine, Beesley, Jonathan, Bennett, Ian, Bogwitz, Michael, Bodek, Simon, Botes, Leon, Brennan, Meagan, Brown, Melissa, Buckley, Michael, Caldon, Liz, Campbell, Ian, Chakrabarti, Anannya , Chauhan, Deepa, Chauhan, Manisha, Christian, Alice, Cohen, Paul, Colley, Alison, Cui, James, Courtney, Eliza, Cummings, Margaret, Delatycki, Martin, Dickson, Rebecca, Dixon, Joanne, Duijf, Pascal, Edwards, Stacey, Farshid, Gelareh , Fellows, AM, Fenton, Georgina, Field, Michael, Flanagan, James, Fong, Peter, Forrest, Laura, Fox, Stephen, French, Juliet , Friedlander, Michael, Gattas, Mike, George, Peter, Greening, Sian, Harris, Marion, Harraka, Philip, Hayward, Nick, Hoskins, Cass , Hunt, Clare, James, Paul, Jenkins, Mark, Kidd, Alexa, Koehler, Jessica, Kollias, J, Lakhani, Sunil, Lawrence, Mitchell, Lee, Jason , Li, Shuai, Lindeman, Geoff, Lippey, Jocelyn, Lipton, Lara, Loi, Sherene, Mann, Graham, Marsh, Deborah, McLachlan, Sue Anne, Reed, Amy McCart, Milne, Roger, Nightingale, Sophie , O’Connell, Shona, O’Sullivan, Sarah, Reilly, Robert O', Ortega, David Gallego, Pachter, Nick, Pang, Jia-Min, Pathak, Gargi, Patterson, Briony, Phillips, Kelly, Pieper, Ellen, Ramus, Susan, Rickard, Edwina, Ragunathan, Abi, Robinson, Bridget, Skandarajah, Anita, Salisbury, Elizabeth, Saunders, Christobel, Saunus, Jodi, Scott, Rodney, Scott, Clare, Sexton, Adrienne, Shaw, Joanne, Shelling, Andrew, Srinivasa, Shweta , Simpson, Peter, Mc, Southey, Spurdle, Amanda, Taylor, Jessica, Taylor, Renea, Thorne, Heather, Trainer, A H, Tucker, Kathy , Visvader, Jane, Walker, Logan, Williams, Rachael, Winship, I, Young, Mary Ann, Zaheed, Milita , Investigators, S On Behalf Of The Chlovis Study, Tan, Veronique Kiak Mien , Lim, Geok Hoon, Tan, Ern Yu , Tan, Su-Ming, Iau, Philip Tsau Choong , Jakubowska, A, Jones, Michael E. , Jones, Louise , Jones, Brandt, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske , Lawrence, Scott, Li, J M, Lubiński, J, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Martens, John W M, Mesker, Wilma E, Muhammad, Noor , Obi, Nadia, Olson, Janet E, Patel, Alpa V, Prajzendanc, Karolina , Ruddy, Kathryn J, Safizadeh, Fatemeh , Schöttker, Ben, Tengström, Maria , Le, Teras, Timmermans, M, Tollenaar, RA, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Q, Yang, Xiaohong R, Zamora, M Pilar, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Schmidt, M K, Pharoah, Paul D P, Abubakar, Mustapha, Eccles, Diana , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Eccles, Diana , Jones, Michael E , Jones, J. Louise , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Bane, Anita, Behrens, Sabine , Białkowska, Katarzyna , Bodelón, Clara , Brenner, Hermann , Broeks, Annegien , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Copson, Ellen , Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Devilee, Peter , Dunning, Alison M. , Easton, Douglas F. , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Glendon, Gord, González‐Neira, Anna , Hartikainen, Jaana M. , Hartman, Mikael , Heemskerk‐Gerritsen, Bernadette A. M. , Ho, Peh Joo , Hodge, James M. , Holleczek, Bernd , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Hooning, Maartje J. , Investigators, kConFab, Balleine, Rosemary L. , Bennett, Ian, Bogwitz, Michael R. , Bodek, Simon , Botes, Leon P., Buckley, Michael , Cohen, Paul A. , Crook, Ashley , Courtney, Eliza , Dawson, Sarah‐Jane , DeFazio, Anna , Delatycki, Martin B. , Duijf, Pascal H. G. , Fellows, Andrew, Fenton, Georgina L. , Flanagan, James M. , Forrest, Laura Elenor , Friedländer, Michael , Harraka, Philip A. , Kidd, Alexa, Kollias, James, Lakhani, Sunil R. , Lawrence, Mitchell, Lindeman, Geoffrey J. , Lippey, Jocelyn , Loi, Sherene , Reed, Amy E. McCart , Milne, Roger L , Gallego‐Ortega, David , Pathak, Gargi, Pearn, Amy , Robinson, Bridget A. , Skandarajah, Anita Rohini , Salisbury, Elizabeth, Saunders, Christobel , Saunus, Jodi M. , Savas, Peter Stephen , Sexton, Adrienne , Shelling, Andrew Neil , Simpson, Peter, Spurdle, Amanda B. , Visvader, Jane E. , Williams, Rachael, Tan, Bien‐Keem , Lim, Geok Hoon , Kaaks, Rudolf , Lawrence, Scott M. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Mannermaa, Arto , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Mesker, Wilma E. , Mulligan, Anna Marie , Obi, Nadia , Olson, Janet E. , Osório, Ana , Ottewell, Penelope Dawn , Patel, Alpa V , Pita, Guillermo , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Schöttker, Ben , Seibold, Petra , Tapper, William , Teras, Lauren R , Timmermans, Mieke, Vachon, Celine M. , Wesseling, Jelle , Yadav, Siddhartha , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Abubakar, Mustapha , García‐Closas, Montserrat

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jnci/djag244 Get It

Abstract Background Breast cancer is etiologically heterogeneous, but which risk factors differ in their associations across tumor subtypes remains unclear. We conducted a large, pooled analysis to evaluate independent, dose-response associations between breast cancer risk factors and quantitative tumor features. Methods Analyses of 15,731 invasive breast cancers from 24 studies evaluated associations (p-trend) between reproductive and hormonal factors, body mass index (BMI), alcohol, smoking, and family history in relation to quantitative immunohistochemistry measures on tissue microarrays (ER, PR, HER2, KI67, TP53) and tumor grade. Analyses in a subset of 10 population-based studies estimated subtype-specific odds ratios (ORs) comparing cases to controls. A Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP) <0.2 was used to identify associations with strong statistical evidence. Results Nulliparity and later age at menopause were associated with higher ER-positivity (p-trend=0.021 and 0.001, respectively), with corresponding OR[ER+] (95% CI) = 1.49 (1.16-1.90) for nulliparous vs. parous and 1.07 (1.03-1.11) per 5 years. Current combined menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use was associated with lower grade (p-trend<0.001), with OR [grade1] = 3.37 (2.69-4.21) for current vs. never users. Higher BMI was associated with lower ER-positivity and higher grade in premenopausal women (p-trend<0.001 and <0.001), with OR[ER+] = 0.80 (0.74-0.87) and OR[grade1] = 0.75 (0.63-0.88) per 5 units, and with higher PR-positivity and higher grade in postmenopausal women (p-trend<0.001 and <0.001), with OR[PR+] = 1.08 (1.03-1.14) and OR[grade 3] = 1.10 (1.04-1.17) per 5 units. Conclusion This pooled analysis of 15,731 cases showed that nulliparity, age at menopause, MHT, and BMI have independent, dose-response associations with ER, PR, and grade, clarifying patterns of etiologic heterogeneity. Associations with HER2, KI67 and TP53, or other risk factors did not meet our threshold for strong evidence.
Beyond BRCA deficiency: Clinical and molecular predictors of survival in patients with BRCA-deficient tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma
Garsed, Dale W. , Pandey, Ahwan , Ariyaratne, Dinuka , Laumont, Céline M. , Hamilton, Phineas T. , Alsop, Jennifer , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Au‐Yeung, George , Beckmann, Matthias W. , González, Amy Berrington de , Bisinotto, Christiani, Blome, Freya , Bodelón, Clara , Boros, Jessica , Brand, Alison H. , Carney, Michael E., Coulson, Penny , Cushing‐Haugen, Kara L. , Cybulski, Cezary, Darcy, Kathleen M. , David, C. W. Mabey, Davidson, Trent , Emons, Julius , Farrell, Rhonda , Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Harter, Philipp, Hartmann, Arndt, Heikaus, Sebastian, Hettiaratchi, Anusha , Heublein, Sabine , Huntsman, David G. , Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes , Jones, Michael E. , Kang, Eunyoung , Konecny, Gottfried E. , Kruitwagen, Rutgerus, Kwon, Jessica, Lambrechts, Diether , Lester, Jenny, Leung, Samuel , Leung, Yee , Loverix, Liselore , Mateoiu, Constantina , McNeish, Iain A. , Nevins, Nikilyn, Olawaiye, Alexander , Oršulić, Sandra , Osório, Ana , Quinn, Carmel M. , Mohan, Ganendra Raj , Ruebner, Matthias , Salfinger, Stuart , Samra, Spinder , Stewart, Colin J.R. , Talhouk, Aline , Tan, Adeline , Tarney, Christopher M., Aa, Maaike AVan Der, Gorp, Toon Van , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van, Wagensveld, Lilian van , Wahner-Hendrickson, Andrea E., Walter, Christina B., Welz, Julia , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Winterhoff, Boris , Berchuck, Andrew, Fasching, Peter A. , Gayther, Simon A. , Kelemen, Linda E. , Maxwell, G. Larry , Menon, Usha , Modugno, Francesmary, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Staebler, Annette , Swedlow, Anthony, Vergote, Ignace , Wu, Anna H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, M. C., Goode, Ellen L. , Bowtell, David D.L. , Lambrechts, Diether , Garsed, Dale W , Fereday, Sian , Pandey, Ahwan , Ariyaratne, Dinuka , Kennedy, Catherine J , Milne, Katy , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Blome, Freya , Bodelon, Clara , Christie, Elizabeth L , Ekici, Arif B , Ghatage, Prafull , Hettiaratchi, Anusha , Jones, Michael E , Kommoss, Felix , Lambrechts, Diether , Lee, Cheng-Han , Leung, Yee , Linder, Anna , McNeish, Iain A , Nelson, Gregg S , Nevins, Nikilyn , Ray-Coquard, Isabelle L. , Roxburgh, Patricia , Van de Vijver, Koen , Wahner-Hendrickson, Andrea, Wang, Chen , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Winham, Stacey J , Anglesio, Michael S , Cohen, Paul , Conrads, Thomas , Fasching, Peter A , Horlings, Hugo , Karlan, Beth Y , Menon, Usha , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Brenton, James D , Pharoah, Paul D P , Goode, Ellen L , Ramus, Susan J , Köbel, Martin , Nelson, Brad H , Fazio, Anna de , Friedlander, Michael , Lambrechts, Diether , Brand, Alison H , Bowtell, David D , Goodman, Marc T , Zwimpfer, Tibor A. , Fereday, Sián , Jayawardana, Madawa , Twomey, Laura , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Bolithon, Adelyn , Meagher, Nicola S. , Milne, Katy , Cazorla, Alicia , Chiu, Derek S , Christie, Elizabeth L. , Chudecka-Glaz, Anita Monika , Ekici, Arif B. , Elishaev, Esther , Engler, Tobias , Fischer, Anna, García‐Closas, Montserrat , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Glasspool, Rosalind , Hartkopf, Andreas D , Hernandez, Brenda Y. , Kaznowska, Ewa B. , Kluz, Tomasz , Kruitwagen, Roy F.P.M. , Kwon, Jessica, Lee, Cheng‐Han , Lester, Jenny, Leung, Samuel, Linder, Anna , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lubiński, Jan , Moubarak, Malak , Nelson, Gregg , Olbrecht, Siel , Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Sinn, Hans‐Peter , Sonke, Gabe S. , Steele, Linda, Taylor, Sarah E , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Wang, Chen , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Winham, Stacey J. , Anglesio, Michael S. , Reis, Francisco José Cândido dos , Cohen, Paul A. , Crowe, Philip John , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Fortner, Renée T. , García, María J. , Goodman, Marc T. , Gronwald, Jacek , Harris, Holly R. , Heitz, Florian , Karlan, Beth Y. , Sundfeldt, Karin , Brenton, James D. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ramus, Susan J. , Köbel, Martin , Nelson, Brad H. , DeFazio, Anna , Friedländer, Michael

No container title available | October 3, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-7572112/v1 Get It

Abstract BRCA-associated homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is present in ~ 50% of high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) and predicts sensitivity to platinum-based therapy. However, there is little understanding of why some patients with BRCA-deficient tumors experience unexpectedly poor outcomes. We profiled 154 tumors, enriched for patients with BRCA-deficient tumors that experienced short overall survival (≤ 3 years, n = 42), using whole-genome, transcriptome, and methylation analyses. All but one BRCA-deficient tumor exceeded an accepted HRD genomic scarring threshold. However, patients with BRCA1-deficient HGSC with a more elevated HRD score survived significantly longer. Patients with BRCA2-deficient HGSC and loss of NF1 survived twice as long as those without NF1 loss, whereas PIK3CA or RAD21 amplification defined BRCA2-deficient HGSC with exceptionally short survival. BRCA1-deficient tumors in short survivors had evidence of immunosuppressive c-kit signaling and EMT. In a large HGSC cohort (n = 1,389) including 282 individuals with pathogenic germline BRCA variants (gBRCApv), the location of the mutation within functional domains stratified clinical outcomes. Notably, residual disease after primary surgery had limited prognostic effect in gBRCApv-carriers compared to non-carriers. Our findings indicate that tumor HR proficiency in the context of therapy response and survival is not a binary property, and highlight genomic and immune modifiers of outcomes in BRCA-deficient HGSC.
Space Oncology: A Comprehensive Scoping Review
Niknam, Nafise , Akbarialiabad, Hossein , Kouhanjani, Mohsen Farjoud , Varghese, Lydia Johnson Kolaparambil , González, Amy Berrington de , Melin, M. Mark , Shafie’ei, Mohammad , Mousavi, Seyedeh Maryam , Hosseini, Seyed Ali , Taha, Seyed Reza , Grada, Ayman , Akbari, Zahra , Jokar-Derisi, Armita , Jurga, Marta , Das, Saswati , D’Urbano, Jessica , Hakim, Gabriella, Sadeghian, Najmeh , Tarbox, Michelle , West, Cameron , Hosseini, Seyed Hossein , Squire, Timothy , Christiansen, Rowena , Melin, Matthew M , Farjoud Kouhanjani, Mohsen , Kolaparambil Varghese, Lydia Johnson , Russomano, Thais , Murrell, D F , Leachman, Sancy A , Akbari, Zahra , Derisi, Armita Jokar , Das, Saswati , D'Urbano, Jessica , Hakim, Gabriella , Sadeghian, Najmeh , Paydar, Shahram , Tarbox, Michelle , West, Cameron , Ghorashi, Seyyed Mojtaba , Hosseini, Seyed Hossein , Squire, Timothy , Christiansen, Rowena , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Leachman, Sancy A. , Kumar, Ajay , Bunick, Christopher G.

Wilderness & Environmental Medicine | July 14, 2025 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1177/10806032251349442 Get It

Space exploration exposes astronauts to unique conditions such as microgravity and space radiation, potentially influencing gene expression and triggering carcinogenesis. Paradoxically, these extreme environments could uncover other pro-treatment aspects of cancer biology. Despite numerous reviews addressing these aspects in isolation, a comprehensive synthesis of the effects of space stressors on cancer development is incomplete. This scoping review aims to provide a holistic perspective on the influence of spaceflight and associated stressors—including gravitation (hyper- and microgravity), radiation, and vibration—on the potential for cancer development and altered cellular mechanisms. We adhered to the PRISMA-ScR checklist for our review. A multitiered search strategy was employed in English, starting with a preliminary keyword identification in Google Scholar and PubMed. Subsequently, the main search was conducted across five databases—Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science—until 22 February 2024. All included studies were thoroughly assessed by two independent reviewers. Of the 15,553 identified articles, 158 were deemed eligible. The majority (92%) were experimental studies, predominantly cell-based (74.17%). Breast (15.19%), thyroid (13.92%), and hematopoietic (11.40%) cancers were the most frequently examined. Spaceflight stressors could affect different biological systems variably, with microgravity impacting spatial growth and metastasis, and cosmic radiation exerting both tumor-suppressive and mutagenic effects. Our findings highlight the need for large-scale, prolonged analog studies mimicking space conditions to enhance mission safety and shed light on the nuanced effects of space stressors on cancer. Additionally, further extensive studies need to be performed in the true weightlessness of spaceflight, both animal-based and on human tissue (cell cultures and potentially whole perfusion organ models), in addition to crew pre/intra/post-flight long-duration evaluations. Furthermore, this unique research avenue may reveal cancer cell sensitivities to these stressors, opening new pathways for innovative therapeutic strategies in cancer treatment.
Interactions between genetic and epidemiological factors influencing mammographic density
Suger, Austin Hammermeister , Chen, Hongjie , Fan, Shaoqi , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Wang, Qin , Fasching, Peter A. , Haeberle, Lothar, Aronson, Kristan J. , Eccles, Diana M, Evans, D. Gareth , Astley, Susan , Hall, Per, Pharoah, Paul D P, Antoniou, Antonis C, García‐Closas, Montserrat , González, Amy Berrington de , Easton, Douglas F. , Vachon, Celine M. , Lindström, Sara, Eccles, Diana , Fan, Shaoqi , Bolla, Manjeet K , Dennis, Joe , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Wang, Qin , Stone, Jennifer , Yadav, Siddhartha , Milne, Roger L , Norman, Aaron, Hall, Per N , Czene, Kamila , Pharoah, Paul D P , García-Closas, Montserrat , Easton, Doug , Eccles, Diana , Evans, D Gareth , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Haas, Cameron B. , Scott, Christopher G. , Dunning, Alison M. , Stone, Jennifer , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Castelao, Jose E. , Murphy, Rachel A. , Couch, Fergus J. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Milne, Roger L. , Hopper, John L. , Norman, Aaron D. , Eliassen, A. Heather , Tapper, William , Czene, Kamila , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Gierach, Gretchen L. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Vachon, Celine M. , Harrison, Tabitha A.

American Journal of Epidemiology | March 30, 2025 | Volume: 195 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1231-1241

10.1093/aje/kwaf067 Get It

Abstract Studies have identified genetic and epidemiologic factors associated with mammographic density (MD) phenotypes. However, MD-associated genetic variants only account for a small proportion of the total estimated heritability. Interrogating interactions between genetic and epidemiologic factors could potentially identify additional MD-associated loci, expand our understanding of the genetic basis of MD phenotypes, and clarify how epidemiologic factors modulate relationships between genetic variants and MD. We conducted six separate genome-wide, gene–environment (GxE) interaction analyses, applying 2 degrees of freedom (df) and 1df interaction tests, for each of three MD phenotypes (percent density, dense area (DA), and nondense area (NDA)). The six epidemiologic factors considered were height, ever parous, parity, ever menopausal hormone therapy, ever breastfeeding, and months of breastfeeding. We included European ancestry participants from multiple studies within the Markers of Density consortium and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (n = 4895-16 218 depending on specific analyses). We identified 11 loci with genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10−8) interaction tests including two novel common genetic signals interacting with parity (8p21.2) and ever breastfeeding (19p13.2) for NDA. Our results suggest that epidemiologic risk factors might influence relationships between common genetic variants and MD phenotypes at particular genomic loci.
Mammographic Density Decline, Tamoxifen Response, and Prognosis by Molecular Characteristics of Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
Abubakar, Mustapha , Mullooly, Maeve , Nyante, Sarah J. , Pfeiffer, Ruth M. , Bowles, Erin J. Aiello , Cora, Renata , Bodelón, Clara , Butler, Eboneé N. , Butcher, Donna , Sternberg, Lawrence, Weinmann, Sheila , Glass, Andrew G., González, Amy Berrington de , Gierach, Gretchen L. , Nyante, Sarah , Aiello Bowles, Erin J , Butler, Eboneé , Sherman, Mark , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Gierach, Gretchen L , Pfeiffer, Ruth M , Troester, Melissa A. , Sherman, Mark E.

JNCI Cancer Spectrum | March 29, 2022 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jncics/pkac028 Get It

Abstract Background Mammographic breast density (MBD) decline post-tamoxifen initiation is a favorable prognostic factor in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer (BC) and has potential utility as a biomarker of tamoxifen response. However, the prognostic value of MBD decline may vary by molecular characteristics among ER–positive patients. Methods We investigated associations between MBD decline (≥10% vs <10%) and breast cancer–specific mortality (BCSM) among ER–positive breast cancer patients aged 36-87 years at diagnosis treated with tamoxifen at Kaiser Permanente Northwest (1990-2008). Patients who died of BC (case patients; n = 62) were compared with those who did not (control patients; n = 215) overall and by tumor molecular characteristics (immunohistochemistry [IHC]–based subtype [luminal A–like: ER–positive/progesterone receptor [PR]–positive/HER2–negative/low Ki67; luminal B–like: ER–positive and 1 or more of PR–negative, HER2–positive, high Ki67] and modified IHC [mIHC]–based recurrence score of ER/PR/Ki67). Percent MBD was measured in the unaffected breast at baseline mammogram (mean = 6 months before tamoxifen initiation) and follow-up (mean = 12 months post-tamoxifen initiation). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed from logistic regression models. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results MBD decline was statistically significantly associated with reduced risk of BCSM overall (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.92). This association was, however, stronger among women with aggressive tumor characteristics including luminal B–like (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.73) vs A–like (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.19 to 2.92); large (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.78) vs small (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.04 to 3.79) tumors; PR–negative (OR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.37) vs PR–positive (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.18 to 1.40) disease; and high (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.93) vs low (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.10 to 2.09) mIHC3 score. Conclusion The findings support MBD decline as a prognostic marker of tamoxifen response among patients with aggressive ER–positive BC phenotypes, for whom understanding treatment effectiveness is critical.
Involution of Breast Lobules, Mammographic Breast Density and Prognosis Among Tamoxifen-Treated Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients
Nyante, Sarah J. , Pfeiffer, Ruth M. , Cora, Renata , Butcher, Donna , Sternberg, Lawrence, Bowles, Erin J. Aiello , Fan, Shaoqi , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Weinmann, Sheila , Hoover, Robert N. , Brinton, Louise A. , González, Amy Berrington de , Glass, Andrew G., Sherman, Mark E. , Gierach, Gretchen L. , Pfeiffer, Ruth M , Cora, Renata , Fan, Shaoqi , Gierach, Gretchen L , Figueroa, Jonine D , Nyante, Sarah , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Mullooly, Maeve

Journal of Clinical Medicine | November 4, 2019 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1868

10.3390/jcm8111868 Get It

Mammographic breast density (MD) reflects breast fibroglandular content. Its decline following adjuvant tamoxifen treated, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer has been associated with improved outcomes. Breast cancers arise from structures termed lobules, and lower MD is associated with increased age-related lobule involution. We assessed whether pre-treatment involution influenced associations between MD decline and risk of breast cancer-specific death. ER-positive tamoxifen treated patients diagnosed at Kaiser Permanente Northwest (1990–2008) were defined as cases who died of breast cancer (n = 54) and matched controls (remained alive over similar follow-up; n = 180). Lobule involution was assessed by examining terminal duct lobular units (TDLUs) in benign tissues surrounding cancers as TDLU count/mm2, median span and acini count/TDLU. MD (%) was measured in the unaffected breast at baseline (median 6-months before) and follow-up (median 12-months after tamoxifen initiation). TDLU measures and baseline MD were positively associated among controls (p < 0.05). In multivariable regression models, MD decline (≥10%) was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer-specific death before (odds ratio (OR): 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18–0.92) and after (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18–0.94) adjustment for TDLU count/mm2, TDLU span (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14–0.84), and acini count/TDLU (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13–0.81). MD decline following adjuvant tamoxifen is associated with reduced risk of breast cancer-specific death, irrespective of pre-treatment lobule involution.
An open invitation to join the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry to standardize data collection in pediatric radiation oncology
Lawell, Miranda P. , Indelicato, Daniel J. , Hartsell, William F. , Perentesis, John P. , Vatner, Ralph E. , Perkins, Stephanie M., Mangona, V.S. , Hill‐Kayser, Christine E. , Kwok, Young , Chang, John, Wilkinson, J. Ben, MacEwan, Iain, Eaton, Bree R. , Gallotto, Sara L. , Weyman, Elizabeth A. , Bajaj, B., Baliga, Sujith , Yeap, Beow Y., González, Amy Berrington de , Yock, Torunn I. , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Paulino, Arnold C. , Laack, Nadia N. , Ermoian, Ralph P. , Wolden, Suzanne L. , Chang, Andrew L., Ladra, Matthew M. , Indelicato, Daniel J , Yeap, Beow Y

The British Journal of Radiology | October 10, 2019 | Volume: 93 | Issue: 1107 | Pages: No page available

10.1259/bjr.20190673 Get It

Objective: The Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) is a comprehensive data registry composed of pediatric patients treated with radiation. It was established to expedite outcomes-based research. The attributes which allow the PPCR to be a successful collaboration are reviewed. Methods and materials: Current eligibility criteria are radiotherapy patients &lt; 22 years treated at one of the 15 US participating institutions. Detailed health and treatment data are collected about the disease presentation and treatment exposures, and annually thereafter, in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) imaging and radiation plans are collected through MIM/MIMcloud. An optional patient-reported quality-of-life (PedsQL) study is administered at 10 sites. Results: Accrual started October 2012 with 2,775 participants enrolled as of 25 July 2019. Most patients, 62.0%, were treated for central nervous system (CNS) tumors, the most common of which are medulloblastoma (n = 349), ependymoma (n = 309), and glial/astrocytoma tumors (n = 279). The most common non-CNS diagnoses are rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 284), Ewing’s sarcoma (n = 153), and neuroblastoma (n = 130). While the majority of participants are US residents, 18.7% come from 36 other countries. Over 685 patients participate in the PedsQL study. Conclusions: The PPCR is a valuable research platform capable of answering countless research questions that will ultimately improve patient care. Centers outside of the USA are invited to participate directly or may engage with the PPCR to align data collection strategies to facilitate large-scale international research. Advances in knowledge: For investigators looking to carry out research in a large pediatric oncology cohort or interested in registry work, this paper provides an updated overview of the PPCR.
Pooling Prospective Studies to Investigate the Etiology of Second Cancers
Black, Amanda , Gibson, Todd M. , Park, Yikyung , Weinstein, Stephanie J. , Andreotti, Gabriella , Purdue, Mark P. , Fraumeni, Joseph F., Hartge, Patricia, Tucker, Margaret A. , Hoover, Robert N. , Cerhan, James R. , Zeleniuch‐Jacquotte, Anne , Curtis, Rochelle E. , Elena, Joanne W. , González, Amy Berrington de , Morton, Lindsay M. , Shiels, Meredith S. , Robien, Kim , Albanes, Demetrius , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Sampson, Joshua N. , Cerhan, James R , Morton, Lindsay M , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Gibson, Todd , Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 15, 2014 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1598-1608

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0191 Get It

Abstract Background: With over 13 million cancer survivors in the United States today, second cancers are of rapidly growing importance. However, data on nontreatment risk factors for second cancers are sparse. We explored the feasibility of pooling data from cohort studies of cancer incidence to investigate second cancer etiology. Methods: We combined data from five prospective studies including more than 800,000 individuals. We compared study designs and populations; evaluated availability of and ability to harmonize risk factor data; compared incidence and survival for common first primary malignancies and incidence of second primary malignancies; and estimated sample size requirements. Results: Overall, 96,513 incident, first primary malignancies were diagnosed during 1985 to 2009. Incidence rates and survival following the first primary varied among the cohorts, but most of the heterogeneity could be explained by characteristics of the study populations (age, sex, smoking, and screening rates). A total of 7,890 second primary cancers (excluding original primary site) were identified, yielding sufficient statistical power (≥80%) for detecting modest associations with risk of all second cancers among survivors of common first primary malignancies (e.g., colorectal cancer); however, there were insufficient events for studying survivors of rarer cancers or identifying risk factors for specific second cancers. Conclusions: Pooling data from cohort studies to investigate nontreatment risk factors for second primary cancers seems feasible but there are important methodologic issues—some of which are barriers to specific research questions—that require special attention. Impact: Increased understanding of nontreatment risk factors for second cancers will provide valuable prevention and surveillance information. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(8); 1598–608. ©2014 AACR.