Perkins, Stephanie M.

ABSTRACTIntroductionProton beam therapy (PT) offers a targeted approach to treating pediatric tumors by minimizing radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissue. However, the specific toxicity profile associated with it remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the incidence and risk factors of acute and late treatment‐related toxicities following PT in pediatric patients with pelvic tumors.MethodsUsing data from the Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR), we analyzed 126 pediatric patients who underwent PT for pelvic tumors. We assessed the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and musculoskeletal (MSK) toxicities at baseline, during treatment, and across follow‐up intervals.ResultsAcute toxicities were observed in 61.9% of patients posttreatment, with new GI, GU, and MSK toxicities occurring in 54.3%, 9.7%, and 7.0% of baseline toxicity‐free patients, respectively. Follow‐up indicated that 20.6%, 22.2%, and 13.5% of patients developed late GI, GU, and MSK toxicities, respectively. Use of passive scattering proton therapy and radiation to the abdomen were significant predictors of GI toxicity development, while higher radiation dose was associated with MSK toxicity development.ConclusionOur findings demonstrate the safety profile of PT among pediatric patients while identifying specific risk factors, such as passive scattering proton therapy and abdominal irradiation, that contribute to increased GI toxicity. While proton therapy appears to be a well‐tolerated treatment option, the observed toxicity rates highlight the need for continued monitoring and long‐term follow‐up.

Abstract Purpose: Embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) is a rare pediatric CNS embryonal tumor with poor survival. The Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) was queried for outcomes data from prospectively consenting pediatric patients with ETMR treated with proton radiation therapy (RT). Methods: 20 patients (2013-2021) at 9 institutions had ETMR; 2 with prior RT were excluded from statistical analyses (PPCR ETMR, N=18). Overall Survival (OS) and Event Free Survival (EFS) analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank values. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median age at RT was 3.0 years (1.7-12.2); median follow-up was 55.5 months (2.6-119.4). 8 patients (44%) expired and 6 patients (33%) are surviving ≥55 months. 11 (61%) patients received systemic therapy with stem cell support. The majority (89%) had focal RT, while 2 patients received craniospinal irradiation (CSI). 4-year OS and EFS were 59.6% and 54.2%, respectively. Local control (LC) at 4 years was 81%. No differences in OS or EFS were observed for receipt of systemic therapy with stem cell support (p=0.361, p=0.57), progression prior to RT (p=0.127, p=0.18), or surgery to RT ≥200 days (p=0.35, p=0.254). Symptomatic radionecrosis was not reported. Conclusion: Focal proton RT provided effective local control as part of multimodality therapy for ETMR, with encouraging survival for this rare and often infant age tumor. Outcomes for CSI were limited to 2 patients treated upfront, and 1 patient receiving salvage CSI for disseminated relapse after focal RT who is surviving >1 year. Trial: DFCI protocol 12-103, clinicaltrials.gov NCT01696721, date of registration 9/27/2012

Abstract BACKGROUND Primary intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare heterogeneous tumors; germinoma accounts for two-thirds of cases. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by response-based reduced radiotherapy dose and field is the established approach for managing localized CNS germinomas, controversy persists regarding the treatment of primary metastatic disease. Additionally, limited research exists on the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary metastatic germinoma. METHODS A retrospective multi-institutional analysis was conducted to assess overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) among patients diagnosed with metastatic germinoma who were treated with various modalities. RESULTS We identified 88 patients, including 63 males and 25 females. The median age at presentation was 13.5 years. All patients, who had undergone both brain and spine MRIs, had their diagnoses confirmed through a biopsy, positive CSF cytology, and/or positive CSF tumor markers at presentation. Primary Tumor location was pineal (n=37), suprasellar (n=27), bifocal (n=14) and others (n=9). Eight patients underwent subtotal resection. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI; 21-24 Gy) was administered to 71 patients (81%), while eight patients (9%) received whole ventricular irradiation (WVI; 23.4-30 Gy). Whole brain radiation was given to four patients (5%; 24 Gy), and two patients (2%) had unknown fields. Boosts to primary and/or metastatic sites were administered in all but seven patients. Notably, thirty patients (34%) received CSI without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At the end of therapy, 69 patients had complete response, 10 partial response and the response was unknown in six. Three patients did not receive irradiation, all died of disease progression. The median follow-up was 64 months (range 6-159 months), yielding an OS of 96.6%. Ongoing multi-institutional data collection and analysis will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION Our study is one of the largest studies to date in metastatic germinoma and may provide insight into the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with lower CSI doses.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Primary intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are rare heterogeneous tumors, with germinoma accounting for two-thirds of cases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with response-based reduced radiotherapy dose and field has become the standard management of localized CNS germinomas, however, treatment of primary metastatic disease has remained controversial. Furthermore, there is limited published research on the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary metastatic germinoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multi-institutional data collection and analysis of patients diagnosed with metastatic germinoma since 2000 to assess the overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) of the different treatment modalities administered. RESULTS: We identified 78 patients with germinoma, in two tertiary care centers, of which nine patients (11.5%; eight males) had metastatic disease. The median age at presentation was 13.3 years. All patients had a biopsy at presentation confirming the diagnosis. Three patients had positive CSF cytology (M1). Six patients received craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with boost to primary and metastatic sites, of which five patients received total CSI dose of 24 Gy, while the dose was unknown for one patient. One patient required one cycle of chemotherapy prior to CSI due to worsening visual changes, which subsequently resolved. One patient received two cycles followed by whole ventricular irradiation (WVI) of 23.4 Gy with a boost to the primary bed. One patient received WVI without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. One patient developed anoxic brain injury and only received chemotherapy. He died of recurrent progressive disease 15 months post-diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 77.5 months (range 15-130.5 months), with an OS of 88.9%. Further multi-institutional data collection and analysis is underway and will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION: We anticipate our results may elucidate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic germinoma, and whether when combined with lower CSI doses did not compromise EFS/OS.

AbstractThe clinical outcomes for infants with malignant tumors are often worse than older children due to a combination of more biologically aggressive disease in some cases, and increased toxicity—or deintensification of therapies due to concern for toxicity—in others. Especially in infants and very young children, finding the appropriate balance between maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity—in particular late side effects—is crucial. We review here the management of malignant tumors in infants and very young children, focusing on central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and rhabdomyosarcoma.

OBJECTIVE The internal high-dose volume varies widely for a given prescribed dose during stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to treat brain metastases (BMs). This may be altered during treatment planning, and the authors have previously shown that this improves local control (LC) for non–small cell lung cancer BMs without increasing toxicity. Here, they seek to identify potentially actionable dosimetric predictors of LC after SRS for melanoma BM. METHODS The records of patients with unresected melanoma BM treated with single-fraction Gamma Knife RS between 2006 and 2017 were reviewed. LC was assessed on a per-lesion basis, defined as stability or a decrease in lesion size. Outcome-oriented approaches were utilized to determine optimal dichotomization for dosimetric variables relative to LC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis was implemented to evaluate the impact of collected parameters on LC. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven melanoma BMs in 79 patients were identified. The median age was 56 years (range 31–86 years). The median follow-up was 7.6 months (range 0.5–81.6 months), and the median survival was 9.3 months (range 1.3–81.6 months). Lesions were optimally stratified by volume receiving at least 30 Gy (V30) greater than or equal to versus less than 25%. V30 was ≥ and < 25% in 147 and 140 lesions, respectively. For all patients, 1-year LC was 83% versus 66% for V30 ≥ and < 25%, respectively (p = 0.001). Stratifying by volume, lesions 2 cm or less (n = 215) had 1-year LC of 82% versus 70% (p = 0.013) for V30 ≥ and < 25%, respectively. Lesions > 2 to 3 cm (n = 32) had 1-year LC of 100% versus 43% (p = 0.214) for V30 ≥ and < 25%, respectively. V30 was still predictive of LC even after controlling for the use of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Radionecrosis occurred in 2.8% of lesions and was not significantly associated with V30. CONCLUSIONS For a given prescription dose, an increased internal high-dose volume, as indicated by measures such as V30 ≥ 25%, is associated with improved LC but not increased toxicity in single-fraction SRS for melanoma BM. Internal dose escalation is an independent predictor of improved LC even in patients receiving immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy. This represents a dosimetric parameter that is actionable at the time of treatment planning and warrants further evaluation.

Objective: The Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) is a comprehensive data registry composed of pediatric patients treated with radiation. It was established to expedite outcomes-based research. The attributes which allow the PPCR to be a successful collaboration are reviewed. Methods and materials: Current eligibility criteria are radiotherapy patients &lt; 22 years treated at one of the 15 US participating institutions. Detailed health and treatment data are collected about the disease presentation and treatment exposures, and annually thereafter, in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) imaging and radiation plans are collected through MIM/MIMcloud. An optional patient-reported quality-of-life (PedsQL) study is administered at 10 sites. Results: Accrual started October 2012 with 2,775 participants enrolled as of 25 July 2019. Most patients, 62.0%, were treated for central nervous system (CNS) tumors, the most common of which are medulloblastoma (n = 349), ependymoma (n = 309), and glial/astrocytoma tumors (n = 279). The most common non-CNS diagnoses are rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 284), Ewing’s sarcoma (n = 153), and neuroblastoma (n = 130). While the majority of participants are US residents, 18.7% come from 36 other countries. Over 685 patients participate in the PedsQL study. Conclusions: The PPCR is a valuable research platform capable of answering countless research questions that will ultimately improve patient care. Centers outside of the USA are invited to participate directly or may engage with the PPCR to align data collection strategies to facilitate large-scale international research. Advances in knowledge: For investigators looking to carry out research in a large pediatric oncology cohort or interested in registry work, this paper provides an updated overview of the PPCR.